Image of Renault 5 GT Turbo 2

Renault 5 GT Turbo 2 specs

Car type Compact
Curb weight 822-851 kg (1812-1876 lbs)
Introduced 1986
Origin country France
Gas mileage 7.3 l/100 km (32 mpg US / 39 mpg UK)
CO2 emissions 175 g/km
Views 26.3k

Performance

0 - 50 kph3.3 s
0 - 80 kph6.3 s
0 - 100 kph8.2 s
0 - 130 kph16.0 s
60 - 100 kph (4)8.2 s
80 - 120 kph (4)11.4 s
Est. 0 - 60 mph8.2 s
0 - 100 mph24.6 s
Est. 1/8 mile11.5 s @ 73.9 mph
1/4 mile15.6 s
Top speed198 kph (123 mph)
100 kph - 058 m (191 ft)
Renault 5 GT Turbo 2 acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type Turbo, OHV, 4 cyl, 8 valves
Displacement 1.4 l (85 ci / 1397 cc)
Power 120 ps (118 bhp / 88 kw)
Torque 165 Nm (122 lb-ft)
Power / liter 86 ps (85 hp)
Power / weight 143 ps (141 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 197 Nm (145 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 16 PS per l/100 km
Transmission 5
Layout front engine, front wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

User avatar
User avatar

benedekpuskas  5y ago

worst 100-0 km/h. proof you don't need brakes...


User avatar

Andrea  14y ago

**This is not correct :

Super 5 GT Turbo 120cv

0-100Kph is 8.0 seconds !**


User avatar

Andrea  14y ago

**This is not correct :

Super 5 GT Turbo 120cv

0-100Kph is 8.0 seconds !**


User avatar

YTB24  16y ago

Hello guys . First ist the best internetside-WW. Where i can dispense some money. Ehmm i had a Peugeot 106 Gti with smal Tires 130hp and the Renault 5 GT2 was almost door by door until 160km/h. Now i think the Renalt does 0-160 between 21.5 -22. My fahter has also one in 88 and he destroy many many GOLF , UNO ( 109hp ) etc...
Thanks for this very goog chance to learn english. kind reagards from Switzerland


User avatar

javi ( spain)  18y ago

R5 GT turbo phase 1 115hp:

0-1000m in 28,7 s.

0-400m in 16,0 s.

test:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=MQOZHAX9

R5 GT turbo phase II 120hp:

0-400m in 15,6 s.

0-1000m in 28,7 s.

test:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=49W9K1MI

More test of cars:

http://www.forocoches.com/foro/showthread.php?t=654384&highlight=regalazo


User avatar

Ayrton4ever  18y ago

You can confirm the above from the Renault 5 GT Turbo Raider spec (which apart from cosmetic changes had same tech spec). The original Raider broghure page with tech spec is here: http://www.renault5gtturbo.com/Renault_Literature/raiderp3.jpg


User avatar

Ayrton4ever  18y ago

Not sure who edited things but there are many errors there. Top speed is 204 Km/h, 0-100 is 8.0, power is 120bhp not ps, year of intro is 1987


User avatar

Ayrton4ever  18y ago

The other one you have is the Renault 5 Turbo 2 (160bhp, mid-engined, rear-wheel drive, K-jetronic injection engine). As Georg says this one is the GT turbo (same engine capacity placed at the front, front wheel drive, carburettor). There was a phase 1 GT Turbo with 115 bhp and this one, Phase 2 with 120bhp. I wanted to correct this as wrongly entered 120ps and also factory 0-100Kph is 8.0 seconds, but cannot find how you can edit!


User avatar

Georg  18y ago

This car name was incorrect

It is the Renault R5 GT Turbo 2 ... not phase 2.. it is the second generation R5 Turbo... the 160PS version was midengine this was a normal front engine R5


User avatar

Wads  18y ago

We already have a Phase 2 car in the database but that one is listed with 160bhp..... which is correct?


User avatar

Anonymous  18y ago

OMG, did homer simpson create this car??????

Timeline

User avatar
anonymoused 3h 

So far only one car was ever made.

Arthur is right, the bore is 93 mm and the stroke ...

Naturally aspirated V8 grand tourers and/or muscle cars... the RC F ...

Honestly I was never really even a fan of either the ...

I'll NEVER forget that this car pulled 1.16 g on the ...

Only the facelift (2016 to 2019), I like.

This one came out in 2008. By then the E60 M5 ...

I still do not like this generation pre-facelift Lexus IS (2014-2020). ...

Another very bad lap time for a 400hp sports car. ...

That's a very bad lap time for a 400hp sports sedan. ...

The V2 was fast and cool for its time but V1 ...

This car was honestly PEAK Cadillac.

Most overrated midsize Cadillac V-series generation ever. Sedan only, automatic only, ...

2.8 and 8.8 translate to more like a 10.4 1/4 mile ...

Ok but why would Bentley claim two different top speeds for ...

Follow-up self-response: the Mulliner is the Maybach competitor. The Speed version ...

ANY car can do an 11.8 1/4 mile if tuned. ...

the lap time comparison is pretty weird, it's a supercar and ...

At least the new RS3 made up for Audi's lackluster RS4 ...

That is so unusual for this car to be only 0.3 ...

The only car that is actually a competitor to this is ...

You’re comparing the wrong car. The Taurus/MKS is a 5-series competitor, ...

I’m sure the original comparison starter meant to compare this with ...

These three are the single most underrated luxury sedans ever made. ...

Possibly the most overrated sedan ever made. There was nothing particularly ...

Again this is just an appearance package. It is really not ...

This is really just a marketing/appearance package for the R/T. Even ...

Dodge is the most inconsistent with naming their vehicles.

The only real competitors for this one are the Maserati Ghibli ...

I’d say this is a better competitor to the E53 AMG ...

I’ve seen people try to compare this with the M5. It ...

That’s not a D4. The 6.3 W12 is not in any ...

Honestly, this car is in a league of its own. The ...

Will Audi change their top speed claim now that this reached ...

And yet the official top speed is 290