im surprised the 1m is faster on the straights, thought the m3 might have the advantage
BMW M3 vs BMW 1 Series M Coupe
| Category | BMW M3 (E92) | BMW 1 Series M Coupe |
|---|---|---|
| Max power (ps / bhp) | 420 / 414 | 340 / 335 |
| Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 400 / 295 | 500 / 369 |
| Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1628 / 3589 | 1514 / 3338 |
| Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 258 / 255 | 225 / 221 |
| Average price | €79,000 | €54,000 |
Lap Times
Acceleration (mph)
| Speed & distance | BMW M3 (E92) | BMW 1 Series M Coupe |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.7 s | 1.7 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 3.3 s | 3.5 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 8.6 s | 8.9 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 9.4 s | 9.8 s |
| 0 - 110 mph | 12.7 s | 13.4 s |
| 0 - 120 mph | 15.1 s | 16.5 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 9.0 s @ 95.1 mph | 9.0 s @ 94.4 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 12.4 s @ 114.3 mph | 12.8 s @ 111.2 mph |
Acceleration (kph)
| Speed & distance | BMW M3 (E92) | BMW 1 Series M Coupe |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.8 s | 1.6 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 1.9 s | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 60 kph | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 3.8 s | 3.4 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.3 s | 4.5 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 9.9 s | 10.3 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
| 1000 m | 23.5 s @ 230.0 kph | 23.9 s |
Rolling acceleration
| Speed | BMW M3 (E92) | BMW 1 Series M Coupe |
|---|---|---|
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 4.3 s | 4.0 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 4.4 s | 4.0 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 5.4 s | 4.6 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (4) | 8.9 s | 8.6 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (5) | 11.0 s | 10.6 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (6) | 12.8 s | 13.6 s |
| Est. 100 - 140 kph | 3.7 s | 3.9 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 10.9 s | 12.1 s |
General performance
| Category | BMW M3 (E92) | BMW 1 Series M Coupe |
|---|---|---|
| Top speed | 280 kph (174 mph) | 250 kph (155 mph) |
| Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 16.7 s @ 1398 ft | 17.4 s @ 1483 ft |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.65 g (6 m/s²) | 0.66 g (6 m/s²) |
| 18m slalom | 70.1 kph (43.6 mph) | 69.7 kph (43.3 mph) |
| Fuel economy | 9.2 l/100 km (26 mpg US / 31 UK) | 10.4 l/100 km (23 mpg US / 27 UK) |
| Lateral acceleration | 0.97 g (10 m/s²) | 0.95 g (9 m/s²) |
| Downforce @ 200 kph | -33 kg (-73 lbs) | -32 kg (-71 lbs) |
| 100 kph - 0 | 34 m (111 ft) | 35 m (114 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 136 m (445 ft) | 133 m (436 ft) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 33 m (109 ft) | 36 m (117 ft) |
Summary
| Category | BMW M3 (E92) | BMW 1 Series M Coupe |
|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 1678 | 1660 |
| Straight line speed | 4278 | 4400 |
| Total | 5955 | 6060 |
Verdict
There is no clear winner in this comparison.
This comparison has been viewed 6.1k times.
Acceleration graph
G 12y ago
The problem with the rating system is that it doesn't appear to be properly weighted. For example, if two cars achieve a time of 8:04 and 8:05 respectively, then relatively speaking they are much closer in performance than another two cars which achieve 1:00 and 1:01. Both times may only be 1s apart, but expressed as a percentage, we have a 0.2% difference in the first example but 1% in the second, which explains why Nurburgring lap times seem to skew the results in a two car comparison.
Julle85 13y ago
@Derb
No, i dont take serious this stuff :D
In here this pointslist is "amazing". Where i can see that pointslist?
Fastestlaps can forget pointslist in here, and it will be better system in here, if the car will win both categorys, and dont giving points to cars.
For example.
Track Performance: If BMW 1 M Coupe is faster on track, then it will faster on track, and win M3.
Staight line speed: If BMW M3 is faster on straigt line speed, then M3 win.
And if the car wins both categorys, then the car is noticeably faster then other.
Please Fastestlaps, forget the pointslist!
Julle85 13y ago
@Georg
How can you explain this?
Audi RS5 is faster than BMW M3 E92 is. And BMW M3 E92 is faster than 1 M Coupe is. And 1 M Coupe is faster than Audi RS5 is. WTF?
....
https://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/eb5g9r594rff
...
https://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/99la2sj3tvav
Here is more.
https://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/2eijj1lfzvj1
...
https://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/audi_rs6_avant_c6-vs-bmw_1er_m_coupe.html
...
https://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/audi_rs6_avant_c6-vs-audi_rs6_c6.html
?????
Why Audi RS5 topspeed is +280km/h? So Audi RS6 topspeed is also 280km/h.
Georg 13y ago
the way the point system works here... the M3 has two tracks with a huge lead over the 1M ...all other tracks are extremly closed match which adds next to no points even f won more tracks overall...
the 10s at the northloop and the 6s at the wet handling test which won the M3 made the different
The point system here is based on time different not numbers of track won...the bigger the different the more points the faster car gets...
