Whats up with the huuuge range in weight? I get that the SS is lighter than the GT, and that theres wet weights and dry weights reported, but 1k pound difference? Anyone know what the true weights are?
Bugatti EB110 SS specs
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 1420-1866 kg (3131-4114 lbs) |
Introduced | 1992 |
Origin country | Italy |
Gas mileage | 14.7 l/100 km (16 mpg US / 19 mpg UK) |
CO2 emissions | 352 g/km |
Views | 35k |
Lap times
Acceleration
0 - 100 kph | 3.3 s |
0 - 200 kph | 10.5 s |
1000 m | 19.8 s |
100 - 140 kph (5) | 4.1 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 7.2 s |
0 - 30 mph | 2.2 s |
0 - 40 mph | 2.7 s |
0 - 50 mph | 3.4 s |
0 - 60 mph | 4.4 s |
0 - 70 mph | 5.3 s |
0 - 80 mph | 6.8 s |
0 - 90 mph | 7.8 s |
0 - 100 mph | 9.1 s |
0 - 110 mph | 10.9 s |
0 - 120 mph | 12.6 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 7.7 s @ 107.5 mph |
1/4 mile | 11.0 s |
General performance
Top speed | 355 kph (221 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.92 g (9 m/s²) |
Lateral acceleration | 0.99 g (10 m/s²) |
60 mph - 0 | 34 m (112 ft) |
Noise @ idle | 67 dB |
Noise @ 50 mph | 74 dB |
Noise @ 70 mph | 77 dB |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | Quad-Turbo V12, 60v |
Displacement | 3.5 l (214 ci) |
Power | 612 ps (603 bhp / 450 kw) @ 8250 rpm |
Torque | 650 Nm (479 lb-ft) @ 4200 rpm |
Power / liter | 175 ps (172 hp) |
Power / weight | 385 ps (380 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 409 Nm (302 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 42 PS per l/100 km |
Transmission | 6-Speed Manual |
Layout | middle engine, rear wheel drive |
EB110 SS competition
wallenieswiftie 1y ago
My estimations for the Bugatti EB110 SS vs. the GT
0-60 mph: 3.15 sec vs. 3.20
0-100 mph: 8.23 sec vs. 8.57
60-100 mph: 5.08 sec vs. 5.37
1/4-mile: 11.34 sec @ 124.91 mph (-0.16 sec & +4.71 mph)
Top speed: 208 mph (theoretical maximum velocity: 221 mph)
- a GT is more aerodynamic so it is able to hit 210, but its theoretical maximum velocity is measured at a lower figure at 219 for some reason :(
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ERFzdIin1zS36ZjmkjahNwjwJAVxwoPCgNV2zJzn2Jo/edit?usp=sharing
Corvolet3 2y ago
Bugatti EB 110 SS at the Nürburgring Nordschleife (full btw):
The Bugatti EB 110 SS with 610 claimed PS (not hp) managed 300 kph at the Döttinger Höhe.
After a country wine to champagne comparison they claim a lap time of 8:01 on the 20.8km layout. Also a top speed of 351 kph and an acceleration of 0-100 in 3.4 seconds. Dry weight 1420kg, maximum loaded weight 1720 kg.
Issue: sport auto 10/1993
Whatever 2y ago
Probably a hidden lap time for this car.
According to this interview of Davide Circoni, it did lap Nurburgring in 7:44. Time when it is said is around 13:25.
https://youtu.be/MNQBDqUkb6o
hostboy 2y ago
Bugatti EB110 Sport Stradale (1992):
Claimed Power: 603 bhp / 612 PS / 450 kW
Actual Power: 698 bhp / 708 PS / 521 kW
Estimated Weight: 1729 kg with driver and fuel
Source of Estimations: TorqueStats *with several adjustments
Imperial acceleration figures (for U.S.):
▪ 0-30 mph: 1.362 s
▪ 0-60 mph: 3.112 s
▪ 0-100 mph: 6.612 s
▪ 0-150 mph: 14.877 s
▪ 0-200 mph: 31.997 s
▪ Top speed: 215.646 mph *average of both directions
▪ 1/4 mile: 11.113 s @ 129.643 mph
▪ 1 mile: 26.900 s @ 187.437 mph
▪ 1' rollout: 0.288 s
Metric acceleration figures (for rest of the world):
▪ 0-100 km/h: 3.551 s
▪ 0-200 km/h: 10.520 s
▪ 0-300 km/h: 26.816 s
▪ Top speed: 355.200 km/h
▪ 0-380 m: 11.077 s @ 205.226 km/h
▪ 0-400 m: 11.356 s @ 207.795 km/h
▪ 0-1000 m: 19.999 s @ 275.757 km/h
hostboy 3y ago
0-30: 2.2
0-40: 2.7
0-50: 3.4
0-60: 4.4 [if this were to hit 60 in first, it would do that sprint in 3.9-4.1]
0-70: 5.3
0-80: 6.8
0-90: 7.8
0-100: 9.1
0-110: 10.9
0-120: 12.6
1/4-mile: 12.5 @ 119.5
This was one of the very rare times when an American mag didn't use rollout, as from what I can see on here. With rollout this would have done 0-30-> 1.8-2.0, 0-60-> 4.0-4.2, 0-100-> 8.7-8.9, and the 1/4-mile in 12.0-12.2sec.
If the car had advanced launch control, expect to see this in the 11.5-11.7 range. If this was the Euro-spec car, it would even do 11.2-11.3, possibly 11.1 on the dragstrip.
uptownfunker 9y ago
Why is the estimated 1/2-mile trap speed 181mph, if the full-mile trap is just 169mph? Is there something wrong mixed with the 0-200kph time and the top speed? Looks like someone misshifted one of the gears after 185 and all the sudden revved above redline... lollll...maybe 151?
EDIT: Isn't the est. 1/2-mile trap supposed to be half 1/4 and half full? I mean: (1310.5)+(1690.5) = 150, so it definitely+obviously cannot have a halfmile trap faster than a fullmile one. The same mistake happened in the Ferrari 599 GTO page.
Phil92 13y ago
The established time for the standing mile sounds pretty good, in comparison to the quarter and the half mile a genious has been at work!
Mike B 13y ago
I'm here again, like I and Georg have pointed out, the picture here is of the Dauer EB110 and should be replaced by the picture of a real, yellow EB110 SS below. The car is AWD like the reviews from EVO and the specsheet claim, also, 3.35s rounds up to 3.4 not 3.3.
One last thing, There's no such thing as "US spec".
Mike B 14y ago
This car is AWD.
http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/cargrouptests/55063/bugatti_eb110_meets_edonis.html
And the picture of the yellow one looks better :P
wee+poo he he 15y ago
my bugatti veyron that i bought 1,000,000 is a lot better he he he !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!your car is pooooo