Dodge Charger SRT 392 specs

I will be the one to admit that the SRT 392 is a little bit faster than the Daytona 392 and R/T Scat Pack but underadvertised at the same "level" as the Daytona and Scat Pack to avoid any disappointments. Some SRTs make less, but the best bone stock ones make around 540. This niche was created to fill the gap between a Daytona 392 and an SRT Hellcat.

Even though it isn't a Hellcat-full, it is a Hellcat-lite. It can even beat the BMW M5 and AMG E63 on the track; the Hellcat is on the level of M5 Competition Package and AMG E63 S-Model. Natural aspiration really helps the 392 stay fast and stable around the circuit, though. Scat Packs and Daytona Apaches can only hang with 550i and E550 at best due to lower BMEP and a softer suspension, and softer (or should I say, smaller?) brakes.

2015 Dodge Charger SRT 392
Claimed Power: 485 hp @ 6100 rpm
Claimed Torque: 475 lb-ft @ 4100 rpm
Bore x Stroke: 4.092" x 3.722"
Number of Cylinders: 8
Boost Pressure: naturally aspirated
BMEP d: 12.0 bar (vs. 11.0 bar in R/T & Daytona)
VE un-boost: 100.00%
VE boost: 100.00%
MPS @ Peak Power: 20 m/s
Actual Power: 546 hp @ 6350 rpm (vs. 501 hp in R/T & Daytona)
Actual Torque: 497 lb-ft @ 4760 rpm
Drivetrain: RWD; 8AT
Estimated Weight: 4303 lb
0-60 MPH: 4.5 sec
0-100 MPH: 9.0 sec (10.1 sec for R/T & Daytona)
0-150 MPH: 23.1 sec (25.9 sec for R/T & Daytona)
1/4-Mile (street): 12.6 sec @ 120 mph (12.9 sec @ 115 mph)
1/4-Mile (drag): 12.2 sec @ 116 mph (12.5 sec @ 112 mph)
Top Speed: 193 mph (187 mph)
Motor Trend Figure-8: 24.9 sec @ 0.93 G (vs. 25.6 sec @ 0.89 G in the weaker 392 twins)
Nürburgring Nordschleife: 7:53 (vs. 8:13)
Top Gear Test Track (Power Lap): 1:24 (vs. 1:27)

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11T6iUr6uQ_TkqqFB1nPvV0malo9X5HgXlK3JZ2du1RA/edit?usp=sharing

@FastestLaps, please rename this page to Dodge Charger 392 (facelift). The many versions include R/T Scat Pack, Daytona, and SRT. There are no real performance differences between these three versions.

Here's the TEST review: caranddriver.com/reviews/2015-dodge-charger-r-t-scat-pack-test-review

caranddriver.com/dodge/charger Scroll down to the top article

I put the wrong link. This is the actual article for the performance figures, etc. m.caranddriver.com/reviews/2015-dodge-charger-r-t-scat-pack-test-review

The Scat Pack and SRT are nearly the same car. The 4.3 time was for the 2013 model. The 2015 now does 4.1 (see the article in C/D). 0-100 is actually 9.3 (not 9.2) seconds. :)

When it comes to mid-price American Muscle, it's either the $41,000 Scat, the $46,000 Chevy SS, or the $55,000 Kenny Brown Marauder S. caranddriver.com/reviews/2015-dodge-charger-r-t-scat-pack-first-drive-review

This is a new muscle car by Dodge. A step above the 370hp R/T but below the 707hp F-bomb-dropping Hellcat.