Image of Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat

Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat specs

Car type 4-door saloon
Curb weight 2082-2106 kg (4590-4643 lbs)
Dimensions 5.09 m (200 in) long, 1.89 m (74 in) wide, 1.47 m (58 in) high
Wheelbase 3.05 m (120 in)
Power / weight 342 ps (338 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 421 Nm (310 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2015
Origin country United States
Average fuel consumption 18.0 l/100 km (13 mpg US / 16 mpg UK)
Price in Europe €105,900
Views 25.1k
Submitted by BR2+

Performance

Top speed 332 kph (206 mph)
0 - 50 kph 1.9 s
0 - 100 kph 3.9 s
0 - 130 kph 5.5 s
0 - 160 kph 7.4 s
0 - 200 kph 10.9 s
0 - 280 kph 25.5 s
0 - 60 mph 3.4 s
0 - 100 mph 7.2 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.7 s @ 103.8 mph
1/4 mile 11.4 s @ 128.0 mph
Est. 1/2 mile 18.2 s @ 148.5 mph
Est. 1 mile 29.7 s @ 167.8 mph
Est. 1000 m 21.0 s @ 249.0 kph
60 - 100 kph (4) 3.1 s
60 - 100 kph (5) 4.6 s
80 - 120 kph (5) 4.2 s
80 - 120 kph (6) 6.2 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 7.0 s
100 kph - 0 33 m (109 ft)
200 kph - 0 135 m (444 ft)
60 mph - 0 32 m (104 ft)
Lateral acceleration 0.94 g (9 m/s²)

More acceleration times

Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type SuperCharged Hemi HellCat V8
Displacement 6.2 l (378 ci)
Power 717 ps (707 bhp / 527 kw)
Torque 881 Nm (650 lb-ft) @ 4800 rpm
Power / liter 116 ps (114 hp)
Efficiency 40 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 34 ps
Transmission TorqueFlite 8HP90 8-Speed AutoMatic
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

Laptimes 5

Charger SRT Hellcat rivals

User avatar

User avatar

hostboy  1m ago

[2018 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat] Motor Trend 6/2018 test results (to be published on "Sporty Big Rigs" page in 7/2018 issue):
0-30 mph = 1.6 s
0-40 mph = 2.1 s
0-50 mph = 2.6 s
0-60 mph = 3.2 s
0-70 mph = 3.9 s
0-80 mph = 4.6 s
0-90 mph = 5.3 s
0-100 mph = 6.5 s
1/4-mile = 11.0 s / 131.0 mph
Figure-8 = 25.1 s / 0.81 g
Willow Springs = 86.00 s
Braking, 60-0 mph = 104 ft
Lateral acceleration = 0.92 g


User avatar

hostboy  1m ago

[2018 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat] Autopista 6/2018 results:
0-60 km/h = 1.9 s
0-80 km/h = 3.0 s
0-100 km/h = 3.6 s
0-120 km/h = 4.3 s
0-160 km/h = 6.6 s
0-200 km/h = 9.9 s (400m: 11.2/218)
0-250 km/h = 18.3 s (1000m: 20.0/262)
0-300 km/h = 30.4 s (1600m: 28.1/289)


User avatar

hostboy  1m ago

[2018 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat] Evo 6/2018 results:
0-30 mph = 2.8 s
0-40 mph = 3.4 s
0-50 mph = 4.0 s
0-60 mph = 4.7 s
0-70 mph = 5.3 s
0-80 mph = 6.2 s
0-90 mph = 7.1 s
0-100 mph = 7.8 s
0-110 mph = 8.9 s
0-120 mph = 10.2 s (1/4-mile: 12.1/129)
0-130 mph = 12.2 s
0-140 mph = 13.6 s
0-150 mph = 15.9 s
0-160 mph = 18.2 s (1000m: 21.0/175)
0-170 mph = 20.6 s
0-180 mph = 26.2 s
0-190 mph = 39.9 s
0-200 mph = 65.8 s

 

User avatar

BR2+  1m ago

...So 10mph more, 180-190 is supposed to take 14s for a 700bhp car? Lol

So where is your article?......


User avatar

hostboy  1m ago @BR2+

The Hellcat had a bad driver. It is even mentioned the Hellcat is a heavy piece of pork and that the driver forgot to turn off traction control. The article isn't online yet, I have just seen it in the stores. But it will be.

It is a little slower than the CTS-V after 186 mph because it is heavier, bigger, and less stable. Not to mention the Hellcat Charger and Challenger wear 275/40YR20 tires while the CTS-V wears 295/35ZR19, so the CTS-V is superior in acceleration AND (also) on the track.


User avatar

BR2+  1m ago @hostboy

So then where is the story?


User avatar

hostboy  2m ago

204mph is a governed if not a very conservative top speed. It can actually do better. And yes the Challenger Hellcat (which is supposed to go 199mph) is also actually a 200mph car. The Challenger Hellcat can hit 205+ unrestricted like the Audi R8 V10+ and the Charger Hellcat can hit 217+ unrestricted like the Lamborghini Aventador.


User avatar

hostboy  6m ago

707 hp bone stock on 93 octane, approximately 1050 hp on E85! ;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ScEuVUh2aw

70-100 mph: 2.18 s
70-130 mph: 5.15 s
70-150 mph: 8.29 s
100-150 mph: 6.08 s


User avatar

hostboy  6m ago

This is perhaps acceleration on 500 hp mode:::
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5F5kAqNp-I

0-100 km/h: 5.4 s (0-60 mph: 5.2 s)
0-200 km/h: 14.2 s (0-100 mph: 9.9 s)


User avatar

hostboy  6m ago

Test figures (AUTO BILD sportscars)
0-50 km/h: 1.9 s
0-100 km/h: 4.1 s
0-130 km/h: 5.6 s
0-160 km/h: 7.5 s
0-200 km/h: 9.8 s
0-300 km/h: 23.3 s
0-402.34 m: 11.60 s @ 221.0 km/h
https://imgur.com/a/gdNmb

 

User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago

Well they got 10.2 and 11 0-200 for ZO6. These numbers are much faster than those above. Hard to believe ZR1 is barely quicker than this powerful land yacht even with aero.


User avatar

hostboy  7m ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAeo-GDXEDE

100-150 mph: 6.0 secs
150-170 mph: 4.2 secs
170-200 mph: 10.8 secs
200-240 km/h: 3.6 secs
200-300 km/h: 12.5 secs

It's stock, I'm not kidding. It topped 204 mph on a Mexican highway.


User avatar

Ahmed Saleh  1y ago

The Sachsenring track time seems wrong and way too high. The similar performance Challenger hellcat makes it in 1:38.92


User avatar

hostboy  2y ago

0-1000m: 23.0sec @ 253kph
Source: Le Moniteur Automobile (July 20, 2016)


User avatar

MOPAR  3y ago

I saw the magazine, and time is real. Page 68

a2s3xz

magazine autobild. Tesla Model S 1:40...


User avatar

MOPAR  3y ago

please reference contidrom


User avatar

uptownfunker  3y ago

Does anyone have any knowledge whether someone working for Mopar posted a comment below 😂


User avatar

Mopar  3y ago

1:32,00 :O
Does anyone have a source that time?



User avatar

SolidSnake  3y ago

caranddriver.com/dodge/charger-srt-srt-hellcat

Zero to 100 mph: 7.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 11.7 sec
Zero to 170 mph: 23.1 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 3.7 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 1.7 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 2.3 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 11.4 sec @ 128 mph
Top speed (drag ltd, mfr's claim): 204 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 153 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.94 g


User avatar

uptownfunker  3y ago

0-100 km/h = 0-62 mph: 3.839 s
0-200 km/h = 0-124 mph: 12.667 s

Source: New Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat (707 hp) Sound & Acceleration 0-144 Mph https://youtu.be/d14y4G4lNNw


User avatar

uptownfunker  3y ago

0-200 km/h = half 0-120 mph (9.9 s) and half 0-130 mph (11.7 s) = 0-125 mph: 10.8 s

PDF: http://media.caranddriver.com/files/2015-dodge-charger-srt-hellcat.pdf


User avatar

uptownfunker  3y ago

Ok, since the 3.4 (C&D) 0-60 won't go through, I'll use the 3.7 claim by SRT, which is also mentioned by M/T.


User avatar

uptownfunker  3y ago

Would you guys choose this, the Cadillac CTS-V, or the Mercury Marauder Kenny Brown S?

Write 😠for FCA, 😉 for GM, and 😊 for FMC.


User avatar

Shaggy  3y ago

My favorite sedan.


User avatar

uptownfunker  3y ago

I think the 0-60 time got deleted; no?


User avatar

NIN  3y ago

@BR2+

The reason is that if they don't do it for other cars, they shouldn't do it for cars just to help that particular car get a better result.

Every legit magazine that I know of has standard testing procedures for 1/4 mile and they all test at recommended tire pressure. Owners will obviously fiddle with tire pressures which is 1 reason why owners can beat magazine times in the 1/4 mile.

Lap-times are different since changing tire pressures happens when magazines test cars at the track.


User avatar

BR2+  3y ago

It wasn't in a comparison, So what's the difference?


User avatar

NIN  3y ago

There's a better stock 1/4 mile time using standard tire pressure...

Using the factory-recommended pressures, the Charger Hellcat was no still slouch with an 11.27-second time recorded,

...here's the link.

http://www.autoblog.com/2015/06/01/dodge-charger-hellcat-11-second-quarter-mile/

I don't count times when pressures are changed for some cars and not for others.


User avatar

uptownfunker  3y ago

As a muscle car fan, I think (not trying to be biased, but) the Hellcat is dope, beautiful and fast, and powerful! Both this Charger and the Challenger. I mean 204 mph and 707 hp, that means screw you, Cadillac with the CTS-V!

Either way, driving a Hellcat or CTS-V or the upcomingish Ford Taurus RS (look it up on Google) is like dating a hot cheerleader from school!


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

Yeah,
1: Raw Power
2: Who gives a shite how much power you can squeeze out of the tiniest engine
3: That awesome factor
4: Affordable
5; Tyre melting asphalt tearing fun

So what if they dont handle like a precision 911, What are you more likely to encounter, A race track or a stop light?

NOBODY buys a car like this, Or cars like these for those reasons, And that is why i Love American performance cars.


User avatar

Shaggy  4y ago

I don't think many of the people on here know what American muscle cars are about. I can put it in 2 words: RAW POWER.


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

No your not, This cars not bout putting power down like a 911 Turbo, It's about 700bhp smokin the tyres putting a smile on your face with the kids in the back seat and a boot full of groceries while not costing 6 figures, this car above all else is about the awesome factor, Muscle car awesomeness, Not how it can take n apex like a GTR


User avatar

JLeno  4y ago

Seriously, what a waste of power and in a car with an AWD platform. Better off in an AWD Charger!

Photo of Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat

Photo of Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat

Photo of Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat

Timeline

User avatar
cxasuka 59m 

1:48、9?

User avatar
fakekillerfour 2h 

added data for Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo Turbo S E-Hybrid

Latest topics

5:19 - Porsche 919 sets new absolute Nürburgring lap record 28
45 minutes ago by manone

Unrestricted Porsche 919 Hybrid sets lap record on Spa 51
5 hours ago by Sonatine

VW beat the Pikes Peak record 15
3 days ago by saxy

First official look at a near-production ready Aston Martin Valkyrie 39
1 week ago by hostboy

Fastest lap time of all time from Sport Auto magazine 27
2 weeks ago by Fastedee

Alfa Romeo to produce 700+ hp 8C supercar? 7
2 weeks ago by Jerem

Active users

fakekillerfour, tyler, saxy, BR2+, manone, Fastedee, Monolith29, 777Balt, sroser, Sonatine, hostboy, honzakoubek, Inline 6 rules