Image of Lamborghini Aventador SVJ

Lamborghini Aventador SVJ specs

Car type Coupe
Introduced 2018
Origin country Italy
Views 8.4k
Submitted by fakekillerfour

Performance

Top speed 351 kph (218 mph)
0 - 100 kph 2.8 s
0 - 200 kph 8.6 s
100 kph - 0 30 m (98 ft)

Powertrain

Engine type V12 DOHC 48 valve
Displacement 6.5 l (397 ci)
Power 770 ps (759 bhp / 566 kw) @ 8500 rpm
Torque 720 Nm (531 lb-ft) @ 6750 rpm
Power / liter 118 ps (117 hp)
Transmission 7 speed single-clutch
Layout middle engine, all wheel drive

Laptimes 1

Track Time
Nürburgring Nordschleife 6:44.97

Aventador SVJ rivals

User avatar

User avatar

Tyrone1  2d ago

The cross bars not lining up with the engine is triggering my OCD like crazy. Lambo! the engine is... THERE, make the bars cross THERE please xD Please tell me someone else finds this unacceptable on a 500k car?


User avatar

fakekillerfour  2d ago

Top Gear first drive review of the Lamborghini Aventador LP770-4 SVJ
https://www.topgear.com/car-reviews/lamborghini/lp-770-4-superveloce-jota-2dr-isr/first-drive


User avatar

MacTavish   1w ago

Let's see its performance in other circuits, I hope it to perform better than performante

 

User avatar

BR2+  1w ago

Not many people will be taking this to any tracks, Its going to be used for 1 reason, Status, Like all newer Lambos, Which is a shame


User avatar

saxy  1w ago @BR2+

On the other hand we see gt3s, gt2rs, 720s on tracks all the time.


User avatar

MacTavish   4d ago

Well it's true though. But I want it to keep itself worthy and do better in other tracks as it is the flagship model. I don't want this to repeat sv's legacy, it was fast occasionally in most tracks.


User avatar

Ionica   3w ago

Aventador SVJ...perfect definition of Hypercar. Many of you will say: another Lamborghini huge fan. It's not like that. I was a Ferrari ( until the 612 scaglietti) and McLaren (until the 650 but i liked the 570s) fan....but Lamborghini is different. They just make the cars better and better in a simplistic way. They are trying to keep the tradition...to keep the agressive look, the sound, the crankles of the engine, the aerodinamic ....they are not : ok let's try something else something new. Love the single cluch gearbox....just because it kick's you when shifting....to feel that brutallity of the engine....it's just pure adrenalline. This is the pure hypercar. No turbo, no supercharged engine or elecric....no huge wing on the back, no lots of things....and it's 500000 $ that's low price for a car like this not 1 million .

 

User avatar

saxy  3w ago

$500000 for a run of the mill Aventador with a body kit. I’m sorry, but real hypercars are insanely into details, made of exquisite materials and pushing the limits of engineering.
A Laferrari, an Apollo IE, a Project one, a Koenigsegg is a hypercar.


User avatar

BR2+  2w ago

They arent different, But i can highly respect them trying to keep there tradition, Often today many company lose that for either bullshit faster performance or effed up fuel economy gains, But Lambo is owned by germans And pretty soon they will fall into this bullshite like the rest of the german companys, Bmw fkn up the Ms with Forced induction n Awd, Heavy, Porsche turboing a normal Carrera, N not offereing manuals on certain cars, Mb is the same as BMW, Lambo is next..

Also, not a damn thing is simplistic about n SVJ let alone ant Lambo today


User avatar

Ionica  2w ago @saxy

Do you think that this Aventador is like a tuned Renault Megane? The performance of it show that is not an Aventador with just a body kit. It doesn't have electric engine or turbocharged one to have 1000 HP....it has a V12 that gives everything it takes for this car....to make it fast...and it does an excellent job....this is for me a perfect hypercar. I don't want a car that sounds like vacuum cleaner and looks like something else. I want to feel the power, the brutality the rage....to feel like i'm going fast...not just go fast....i want to hear it also, to sense it.


User avatar

saxy  2w ago @Ionica

The Aventador is good at being a supercar but $500,000... if this SVJ isn’t just an Aventador with a body kit then please tell me what are the changes from it and a Aventador S? Engine-wise, it’s just a slightly more, more aero and stickier tires. It weighs no less. On the other hand a 600lt and 675lt are some 100kg lighter than the cars it’s based off of. Now that’s how you make a special version. Do you know how many things you have to change to save 100kg of weight?

On the other hand, a Huracan performante has a price of $275k for reference and a 720s $288k, both capable of beating P1 and 918s on track.


User avatar

BR2+  2w ago @saxy

Ive always thought the Aventadors price was way too high since it came out, $400,000 Usd, £260,000, Although its mich bigger in the Us, The Murcielago was 290k-170k, And thats a huge difgerence in generational gap prices, Not too mention its smaller sibling price, The Huracan n Gallardo, Plys every higher performance version of said car is the same car with a bodykit+ , Doesnt matter which car, The top model of Huracan wont even come within 30k of a base Aventadors price, Also the SV shaved off 218lbs from the 700, And J shaved another 40lbs or so, So overall it did save some, but 500k?....


User avatar

Ionica  2w ago @saxy

It is 50 kg less that the S model....but you are missing something else. It's not all about the weight of the car....it's all about the air pressure at high speed. Do you know how much weight puts the air on the car at high speed? Lamborghini managed to control that air flow perfectly to increase or decrease downforce...when the car needs it. The Laferrari has 300 kg less, more power, electric engine, lots of active aerodynamics, better brake system....but it wasn't capable of beating even a Huracan Performante on a race track. Not to mention that on the Red Bull race track was 0.00.15 faster than the SV. Why would I want to pay 1 mill for a car like that....just because is faster on straight line. And the McLaren is the same story. But Lamborghini with that massive weight proves that they can be better and they are.


User avatar

Tyrone1  2w ago @Ionica

I cant think of a single hyper car which sounds like a vacuum cleaner to be honest ^^ They all pretty much sound awesome.
For some reason i cant take big aventadors seriously when it comes to track performance. Remember the SV? It posts a LUDICROUS record on the nurburgring but falls short in every comparison against other special edition supercars (Gt3rs, 675LT) and it was nowhere NEAR the performance of the holy trinity.
I cant help but feel this SVJ will dissapoint in a similar manner as soon as the track isnt call the Nordschleife. Prove me wrong lambo...


User avatar

BR2+  2w ago @Tyrone1

You should never use Ring times as a track comparison, Specially from a manufacture, There practically just advertisements, And the Aventador SV time is a good example. Aventadors have great track performance in every category, But just because it looses to certain cars doesnt mean it has bad performance, And im pretty sure the SVjs performance wont mimic the times on the Ring, Could be wrong since the Performante performs so well, But the people who will buy that car, Will not use it for its intended purposes..

And pretty much all McLarens knowdays sound like Vacuums....Compare a 720S sound, Then compare it to other 700bhp supercars...


User avatar

BR2+  2w ago @Ionica

...Better, And faster are 2 very different things..


User avatar

Tyrone1  2w ago @BR2+

Well i was referring to hyper cars. The mclaren P1 sounds like nothing else on four wheels. A real spaceship sound.


User avatar

Ionica  2w ago @Tyrone1

Really? Ok. Take these results: Motortrend figure-8: 0.00.90 s SV slower than 918; Balocco: 0.00.96 s SV slower than 918; Red Bull race track: 0.00.15 s SV slower than LaFerrari; Willow Springs: 0.01.88 s SV slower than 918 ; Hockenheim Short: 0.01.50 s SV slower than 918. Tell me how is that dissapoiment... for a heavy car with a normal N.A. V12 engine....without no electric engine, no active aerodynamics, no dual cluch gearbox? The SV did it's job perfectly....didn't failed at all. And to give an exemple: I can drive a koegniggseg regera slower than a BMW M4 GTS. It's not the car...it's the driver.


User avatar

Ionica  2w ago @BR2+

True...but I can find these 2 words in Lamborghini.


User avatar

Tyrone1  2w ago @Ionica

OK lets forget the 918 because the laptimes youve noted .dont help your point one bit. Lets consider the 675LT which is SLOWER than a 918 (and quite considerably on some circuits)
The LT hammers the SV on any track it has been tested on without fault. It also blows it apart in a straightline. The LT didnt have an electric engine. Only very marginal active rear wing aero. The SV is a special car by its appearance and the lamborghini X factor which makes them appealing. At no point other than the Nurburgring lap was it even CLOSE to performing on the level of other top cars.

Which brings me back to my original point. I hope the SVJ will not only be a one hit wonder at the 'ring like its predecessor.


User avatar

BR2+  2w ago @Tyrone1

I personally dont use that HyperCar moniker, There simply SuperCars, I mean what happens if your faster then a HyperCar?...UltraCar? Then MegaCar lol Eitherway, I think SuperCar is sufficient.

Anyhoo, Im not saying the P1 sounds bad, But a GT350 and 458 Speciale and C6 ZR1 sound are in way different leagues in terms of sound, Its just meh to me, And for having 900Bhp, Thats weak as hell, However, I understand that sound is as subjective as favorite color.


User avatar

BR2+  2w ago @Ionica

Its a great car, One of my all time favs, That is not a disappointment in anyway....Then you realize it gets man handles by a ZO6.......


User avatar

BR2+  2w ago @Ionica

...Where?..


User avatar

Ionica  2w ago @Tyrone1

You didn't get my point. Ok... 918 vs SV. If on the nurburgring the SV was 0.02.57 s slower than 918, on other race tracks is the same story...the SV laptime is very close to 918 laptime...no better but close....that proves that the SV nurburgring lap time isn't fake. Second: SV vs 675lt. The SV is faster than 675lt under 130/140 km/h...after... 675lt takes the lead. Then the SV is 200 kg heavier than 675lt. The SV because it doesn't have active aerodynamics or active rear wing to decrease downforce, at high speed becomes much heavier and because it doesn't have a turbo or electric engine to give more torque to the engine it loses time on straight line but it recovers on corners because of better stability and 4WD transmission. Another thing: You can't compare the Nurburgring (because it has more than 25 corners and very dangerous some of them...wich is an advantage for the SV ...because with those corners the Lambo recovers the time while 675 lt loses because of RWD and it oversteers) with the others racing tracks wich have around 5 to 10 corners (is not enough for such a heavy car to be faster than 675lt).


User avatar

Tyrone1  2w ago @Ionica

But the fact is the aventador isnt CLOSE to the 918 on other tracks. There are HUGE margins which seperate them! You list them as achievements. I see them as condemning facts. -2 seconds slower around willow springs is BIG.
-5 seconds around the 1min42 track "circuit bugatti" is massive. (5% difference)
-A full second on the figure 8 is no small margin given how short the "track" is (4% difference)

And yet 3 seconds slower at the ring. a minute 0.7% difference. oddly incongruent dont you think?


User avatar

Tyrone1  2w ago @Ionica

Besides which your point is moot. The SV lap at the ring was nothing more than a publicity stunt. It is neither accurate nor representative of what a stock SV can do and that has been proven by its mediocre track performances at other venues.
We will never know if a 675LT is faster than the aventador around the ring because MCLAREN DOESNT DO TIME ATTACKS THERE!

There is no reason why a heavier AWD vehicle should have an inherent advantage on a lighter RWD vehicle at the ring if the cars are setup correctly. RWD means lighter which means it can carry more speed through the corner even if at the cost of initial traction at the exit phase. Just look at GT3 cars.


User avatar

Tyrone1  2w ago @Ionica

Besides which your point is moot. The SV lap at the ring was nothing more than a publicity stunt. It is neither accurate nor representative of what a stock SV can do and that has been proven by its mediocre track performances at other venues.
We will never know if a 675LT is faster than the aventador around the ring because MCLAREN DOESNT DO TIME ATTACKS THERE!

There is no reason why a heavier AWD vehicle should have an inherent advantage on a lighter RWD vehicle at the ring if the cars are setup correctly. RWD means lighter which means it can carry more speed through the corner even if at the cost of initial traction at the exit phase. Just look at GT3 cars.


User avatar

BR2+  2w ago @Ionica

...Again, Do not use ring times when comparing track times.


User avatar

saxy  2w ago @Ionica

The Aventador SV is 1575kg DRY. 1731kg with fluids.
The 675LT is 1230kg dry, 1328kg with fluids.

That makes it 400kg difference, not 200. You could take out the whole Lambo engine and it would still be heavier. Same with the SVJ.


User avatar

Ionica  2w ago @BR2+

Don't say that to me...say it to everybody....who are frustrate, because Lamborghini has better times on ring than others Supercars. I believe in all ring times (Porsche GT2 RS / GT3 RS laptime, ACR, ZR1 and so on).


User avatar

Ionica  2w ago @Tyrone1

It is HUGE? Really? Just saying "HUGE" takes you 2 seconds. You don't know what you're saying. Porsche 918 has everything that Lamborghini Aventador SV doesn't (4WS, more power, much more torque, active aerodynamics, dual cluch transmission and so on) ....how is that HUGE...comparing to a hypercar that beats a Bugatti Veyron on straight line. Do you realise what you're saying. And about Le Mans (Bugatti) circuit is driver fault not car's fault. Not everyone can drive a car in the same manner. And do not try to talk about publicity....because Ferrari and McLaren are experts.


User avatar

Tyrone1  2w ago @Ionica

Shame you believe in ring laptimes because they are by far the most corrupted.
If i have to explain to you why even two seconds a lap is a VERY big deal then i wont bother. Because two seconds is a very big difference on any normal track.
"You don't know what you're saying"


User avatar

Tyrone1  2w ago @Ionica

" Porsche 918 has everything that Lamborghini Aventador SV doesn't (4WS, more power, much more torque, active aerodynamics, dual cluch transmission and so on)"

And that is why the 918 will go down in history as one of the greatest cars of the 21st century unlike the SV which will go down as a jumped up aventador which set ONE fast lap on ONE circuit on cut slicks.

The aventadors do NOT have the performance to back up the claims. This has been proven time and time again by loads of different tests. I dont even know what im trying to prove anymore it just seems like common sense ^^


User avatar

saxy  2w ago @Tyrone1

IKR? The SV was slower than an entry level Mclaren 570s around the Bugatti circuit. It was slower than the Huracan and Z06 around the big willow, and it was slower than a Veyron SS around the thermal track. At Hockenheim it’s slower than pretty much everything. You can’t claim to be king and suddenly be revealed to be nothing once at other tracks.


User avatar

BR2+  2w ago @Ionica

You are MISSING THE point, Not too mention you are looking at a SINGLE track, I cannot stress that enough, A single track is meaningless when it has many other laptimes, It goes THAT fast ONLY on THAT track, NOWHERE else, An LP750-4 is ONLY as fast as a Corvette C7 GrandSport, Which has 460bhp and a manual with Rwd, And 60k... Again, Its ONLY as fast as a GrandSport round tracks, There isnt even 1 Full seconds difference between them on any track..

A single lap where its faster then most cars is MEANINGLESS, You said it has better times on the ring than other supercars, Yeah....And thats the ONLY place it has it, Fast as shite there...Yet gets trounced EVERYWHERE else?...

Not too mention you said you believe EVERY Ring time..I cant prove anyone cheated so im not gonna say that, But there is FAR too many variables with ring times, And the SV is one of THE most fishy to come out in the last 10 years..


User avatar

General Castilla  2w ago @BR2+

"And the SV is one of THE most fishy to come out in the last 10 years.."

same goes for the whole fleet of por-shee cars including their milf's favorite suv, hearse and the ugliest sedan in existance the panny pancake


User avatar

General Castilla  2w ago @General Castilla

this riced up version is basically a 2011 aventador with minor tweaks to the ecu, intake and exhaust, then the sv body kicks in with more refined suspension that helped them add the final letter to milk more cows and call it the svj

what you're looking at here is, an audi gaudy which makes murican customers shoot their crap in tight jeans before they unveiled it to the public, lol

only an imbecile that has issues and needs the worlds attention will do anything to get his hand on one, tons of pics will be all over social media parked or with gold digger posing right next to it....true story!

this car will not be remembered as a masterpeice from lambo, but more of a clown show with a time set to 6:44 cuckoo clock gift for the customer to hang on his kitchen wall.

only few models will be remembered as special lambos, while the aventador has been a cluster f*ck abomination that screams out loud i'm the new breed

diablo
- vt 6.0
- gt 6.0

murcielago
- lp640
- lp670-4 sv

gallardo
- pre-lp superleggera
- lp550-2 (stick shift)
- lp570-4 superleggera + sts

i did not bother with the kitted versions (reventon etc....) because it's a way to make easy money for the factory. same shit, different exterior with poo performance that's not worth the extra 300k.


User avatar

Ionica  1w ago @Tyrone1

No...it's not shame at all. Probable shame because i don't believe in the other race track laptimes. I don't want to give more explanations....about my opinios. You think i'm just a stupid Lamborghini fan...and I can't see the truth....about this brand. No is not like that....I was a Ferrari fan...but they disappointed me so hard...once Ferrari was something to me...was even my favorite team from F1 Grad Prix....but now...they don't even inspire me....and same with the McLaren ( F1 was my dream car). But Lamborghini made me...who i am now. I'm a car designer and they are my inspiration. I learned so much from Lamborghini...i never found the knowledge of the aerodynamic efficiency in Ferrari, McLaren, Koegnigsegg and other supercar brans...like i founded in Lamborghini. You can say everything you want...i don't care....The SV is one amazing and fast car....same for the SVJ...and rest of the models. Nothing against you...wish you good days. All my respect to you....but I'm all with Lamborghini.


User avatar

Ionica  1w ago @Ionica

And I have nothing against Porsche...I'm a fan of them. Love the GT2 RS.


User avatar

Tyrone1  1w ago @Ionica

Look i respect you for brand loyalty and sticking with your gut impressions. And the Lambos are amazing cars. But the company that makes them do have a tendancy to ... INFLATE their on track capabilities. That is not opinion, that is FACT.


User avatar

Ionica  1w ago @Tyrone1

And If you really want to know what makes me believe the SV laptime of the ring was the moment when the VW corporate said no more laps to the SV because they didn't want to embarrass the 1 million 918 Spyder. And another reason is Marco Mapelli...who knows the Nurburgring "with his eyes closed". I think the SV or any other supercar in the "right hands" can be more faster than you ever imagined.


User avatar

Tyrone1  1w ago @Ionica

I fairly certain that was just a rumour...


User avatar

Ionica  1w ago @Tyrone1

Anyway. But nice knowing you and nice to discuss with you. See you on future topics. Respect for you.


User avatar

BR2+  1w ago @Ionica

Wait, Hold up, You believe in there Ring time.....but you DONT on the OTHER tracks?.....WTF!?..

You cannot be serious, The OTHER track times ARENT set by manufactures, There set by NON company events, They are done by the magazines, And not company drivers under company conditions, And you really think the SV can beat the Trinity on any track? Because supposedly VW said no more laps? What are you smoking?

And i agree the SV can be more faster with the right hands...But that goes the same for EVERY car, Which puts the SV at the same spot it was, Now i dont have a problem with this, But you just SCREAM Lamborghini fanboy..


User avatar

Ionica  5d ago @BR2+

You are taking this in the wrong direction. I didn't said that the SV is better than 918...but it could had a better time than 6.59....but all of you have so much expectations from the SV ( a car that doesn't have turbo's , electric engine, dual cluch transmission, active aerodynamics..etc.)...and yes i trust the ring time and not magazines lap times because i saw fanboyism there....and don't even dare to say that i'm wrong...so let's be honest. I don't scream Lamborghini fanboy....but it is too much hate for Lamborghini brand.


User avatar

Tyrone1  5d ago @Ionica

I dunno if you noticed this but, the REASON we have high expectations of the SV is BECAUSE of the Ring laptime. Any other laptime on track is mediocre at best.
Rather ironic that you talk about fanboysim in magazine tests and yet refuse to believe any of the DOZEN tests because the SV underperforms. I agree certain magazines have a clear bias towards some manufacturers. But you cannot overlook consistent poor performances in EVERY track test the car does.
Please for the love of god, forget nurburgring lap times. They mean precisely dick when comparing car performance, as BR2+ has pointed out.


User avatar

BR2+  5d ago @Ionica

No you definetly scream fanboy.

I also never said you said better, And tyrbos or not, active aero or not, DCT or not etc, A ZO6 doesnt have those either and wastes it round track, Not having those doesnt make one worse or better.

But the fact you trust the ring time, And no other time, Where it performs literally soooo much better there then everywhere else, Just says fan×boy, You say theres fanboyism in magazine tests, But not on a COMPANY performed test? I can agree to magazines having a certain fanboy effect, Or maybe evwn cheating of some kind, But i cant prove it.

And nobody here is hating on the Lambo brand, Also thats another trait of a fanboy, Saying theres hate when theres not, Its the laptime that is fishy, NONE of its laptimes come even anywhere near as close, If that was the case this thing should be rught begind a 918, A few 10ths of on every track, abut its not its seconds behind, Hell on a track less then 2 miles its 2s behind. Take a 918 and its 657 for example, It was at the top when it came out, And on EVERY other track, It destroyed every car, Then take the SV for example, See what im getting at? Ring times should be taken as meh, Great times, But not something that should be used as a benchmark other then the same track. And if your doing a 644 there, Then those expectations are just as high everywhere else.


User avatar

DrDuke  5d ago @BR2+

the 918 ran out of e-juice during his nos lap. It was set to the hotlap mode in which it doesnt load the battery. On shorter tracks the battery is big enough for a few laps without charging. Therefore a car that is faster on the nos must not be faster on shorter tracks.
By the way the laferrari doesnt have a similar hotlap mode - it can run all day long the same times.


User avatar

Ionica  5d ago @Tyrone1

Why should i trust these magazines test who made a Dodge Viper ACR with manual transmission faster than 918 on any track but it wasn't posible to beat it on the ring. Magazines lies more than car manufactures...so why should i trust them. I saw the same car tested by different magazines and the results were different from magazine to magazine. And another question...if Lamborghini cheated with the ring time...why they gave the permission to magazines to test the SV if they knew that the SV wasn't capable....just to add some bad publicity for the Lamborghini. It doesn't make any sense. They could've done the same thing like Ferrari with F12 tdf ( never tested on a race track). And lets be honest Lamborghini has lot of haters...even in magazines.


User avatar

Ionica  4d ago @DrDuke

Or you don't think that magazines get paid by car manufactures....to do some good publicity....come on....it's television for crying out loud. Why should I believe in car magazines....and that's not fanboyism.


User avatar

BR2+  4d ago @DrDuke

What does that have to do with anything?

And why are u even mentioning a LaFerrari?..


User avatar

BR2+  4d ago @Ionica

Again, Your usung rung times without thinking, The ACR time there was in no way associated with Dodge or the company other then the car, A huge difference between 2 cars taken there by Viper fans, And factiry backed support, Thats why you shoyld no what your talking about beforehand. And why would you trust a company over n independant, People accuse both companys n mags of cheating or being biased all the time, But not a single person comes with any bit of proof other then mental strain.

Plus magazines dont need a company permission to test a car, They can get it of a showroom, Or no somebody who has one, No permission is needed by Lambo since its not there car, Sometimes the companys give them a car to test, Sometimes they just give them the keys n say have at it, Like Porsche or Chevy or Audi, Sometimes they come with an engineer, Like Bmw, Sometimes they come with a whole crew, Then sometimes they pull a Ferrari, Or maybe all, Depends on the car, event n place n time. Plus a less then stellar laptime from Lambo doesnt mean anything, They are gonna sell regardless, And why fo you think the TDF was never tested? Sure Lambo has alot of haters, Same with every company, But its meaningless.


User avatar

Ionica  21h ago @BR2+

Ok...that's enough...You said it right...was not the Dodge company for the ring time of the ACR...was just a racing driver Lance David Arnold. I can say the same for the rest of the SV laptimes...it wasn't the Lamborghini company who tested the car on the other race track...it was just some racing drivers. Logical thinking....I'm making a car...to promote it...i'm posting a fake laptime of car on the ring...knowing that the car will be tested anyway by many auto magazines and others....giving that a bad publicity to the car and destroying the reputation of my brand. Isn't that stupid? Why would i want to do that? And let's be honest...i saw so many auto magazines giving false information about so many cars....and if you realy wanted you can make a Regera slower than a M4 GTS. I trust more the brand information than the auto magazine information. And it's 3 years since the launch of the SV ...and no one could prove that the ring time of the SV was fake. Ohh come on...90 % of the magazines says that the McLaren 675lt or the 720 are the best cars of the world....and those cars have handling problems....usually oversteers. Why should I believe in car magazines.


User avatar

Ionica  21h ago @BR2+

And with this I'm done with this topic. I trust Lamborghini engineering...but i don't trust Television. You can say to me whatever you want....and don't even try to say..." you just scream Lamborghini Fanboy" because i can tell you the same : You just scream Lamborghini hater" . I'm over.


User avatar

saxy  17h ago @Ionica

Dude. You’re just a kid. You know nothing. And besides BR2 is a hater of Ring Times, not Lambo. You on the other hand are a hater of reason and logic. Enjoy.


User avatar

BR2+  14h ago @Ionica

Dude you got problems, And your way of thinking, Or better not trusting, Is twisted, And i think you need to understand what a hater and what a fanboy is, Or the definition..


User avatar

General Castilla  3w ago

somehow this aventador made me feel

https://www.lolacamisetas.com/2158-large_default/mickey-mouse-tshirt-mickey-puke.jpg


User avatar

saxy  1m ago

It looks nice but I can’t get over that it’s just a body kit added to it, as opposed to the 675lt which changed quite a lot and took out 100kg, which you basically have to fundamentally change so much to get that much weight out.

 

User avatar

BR2+  1m ago

Isnt every faster version of a car just an added body kit and performance upgrades?

Looks good, great infact, But i think i prefer the looks of the SV over this, And thos rims are huge! Love it!

But i also dont see the point, Still to this day ive yet to see any versions of the Aventador at my end of the month track days, The only thing i would see thats Lambo, Is a Gallardo, and its usually the base version, So..., I see this selling great, but not used for its intended purpose, The Track.


User avatar

fakekillerfour  1m ago

This car weighs the same as the Aventador LP750-4 SV: 1525kg dry
https://www.lamborghini.com/en-en/models/aventador/aventador-svj-coupe

 

User avatar

BR2+  1m ago

Which means its gonna be 200kg over whats stated...


User avatar

saxy  1m ago @BR2+

I really don’t know how they manage to make the car so heavy. Keep in mind a Pagani Huayra BC which also has a large V12, has a dry weight of 313kg less... sure the Aventador has less carbon fiber but did they make the floor out of lead or something?


User avatar

tofu  1m ago @saxy

less carbon fiber, all wheel drive, rear wheel steering....so the svj is much complex than BC, then the huayra is always developing and modified, so it has a changed weight.


User avatar

BR2+  1m ago @saxy

Yea, In real life its not even that big, Yet some tesrs put a normal aventadir at 4100lbs, And the lowets at 3794lbs, I dunno where they get a 200kg difference from. Lambos arent big cars, wide yes but thats it


User avatar

tyler  1m ago @BR2+

Aventador is actually a big car long and extremely wide. The low height makes it seem smaller than it is.


User avatar

BR2+  1m ago @tyler

Ive seen 7 in real life, Its not big, Just wide as i have previously stated


User avatar

saxy  1m ago @BR2+

Well it is over a whole foot longer than a corvette. Makes me wonder how did they get such a big car to be so impractical. Why didn’t they just make it smaller.


User avatar

tyler  1m ago @BR2+

The Aventador is as long as a mid sized sedan how is that not long.


User avatar

FastestLaps  1m ago @saxy

Lambo have been good at making big and impractical cars for a while. Diablo probably was just as big and definitely even less practical.


User avatar

BR2+  1m ago @tyler

If its mid size, it aint long, Its simply wide, But cleary we have different opinions on what is big, Thas like saying a Double D bra is big, or Chuck Norris is big lol


User avatar

saxy  1m ago @BR2+

On the contrary, the Aventador more narrow than a 720s, but It’s longer than any supercar on sale by quite some margin actually.

A mid sized sedan isn’t long for a car that is a SEDAN with a big boot and seating for 5. The Aventador is a long car for seating just 2 and having zero cargo room. The corvette has just as big of an engine, same power but still can carry a lot of stuff AND be a foot shorter


User avatar

fakekillerfour  1m ago @FastestLaps

Could you change the main photo to the following:

https://s3.caradvice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/lamborghini-aventador-svj-518305.jpg


User avatar

FastestLaps  1m ago @fakekillerfour

Done!


User avatar

BR2+  1m ago @saxy

If its not over 195inches, I dont consider it big, But it also depends on width and height, Its simply wide to me, Ssloon or coupe makes no difference, plys the size of the person makes n impact too.


User avatar

saxy  1m ago @BR2+

How many rows of seats, and the purpose of the Car factor in whether a car is too big or not. People say the M3 is too big now, as large as an old M5, yet the Aventador is a whole 1/2 foot longer, without the huge boot and spacious backseats.

If the Aventador is by far the longest supercar on sale, then that says something.


User avatar

BR2+  1m ago @saxy

Some people say the new Minis are too big, All depends on person, And both thr FF and HellCat are longer and taller and a smidge narrower, And there both supes, So its not quite the longest on sale, But again, Some people would argue a DD bra is too big, Some would say a mansion is too small.


User avatar

Alim  1m ago

I think this will weigh 1500 kgs

 

User avatar

General Castilla  3w ago

only if you're buying from karachi market


User avatar

Streetrace2  2m ago

Audi power.

 

User avatar

Alim  1m ago

Where do you see audi in its engineering?


User avatar

General Castilla  3w ago @Alim

when was the last time you had a masala breathalyser test ?


Photo of Lamborghini Aventador SVJ

Photo of Lamborghini Aventador SVJ

Photo of Lamborghini Aventador SVJ

Photo of Lamborghini Aventador SVJ

Photo of Lamborghini Aventador SVJ

Photo of Lamborghini Aventador SVJ

Photo of Lamborghini Aventador SVJ

Photo of Lamborghini Aventador SVJ

Photo of Lamborghini Aventador SVJ

Photo of Lamborghini Aventador SVJ

Timeline

Latest topics

Nissan GT-R vs Audi R8, 911 Carrera, EVO X & Co 2
3 days ago by GT3RS

Here's Your Best Look Yet at the Mid-Engine Corvette 29
2 weeks ago by tyler

Formula 1 takes revenge on LMP1 Porsche 919 37
2 weeks ago by Billet

Historic Montoya Monza record broken 2
3 weeks ago by BR2+

Which is faster - Le Mans LMP1 car or Formula 1 car? 95
3 weeks ago by John Doe

Unrestricted Porsche 919 Hybrid sets lap record on Spa 56
1 month ago by FastestLaps

Active users

Pinecone, latvietis96, fakekillerfour, saxy, tyler, BR2+, keningeradam, Tyrone1, DodgeHEMI426, FastestLaps, sroser, viktor1230, Hans, honzakoubek, 777Balt, manone, Inline 6 rules