This laptime was quoted by best motoring as the curret "production car
laprecord" as they went with the Nismo R34 GT-R Z-Tune on the track for a time
attack run. There was a video compare by best motoring were they show inbord
views of both cars in compare.
At youtube they always delet BM videos for copyright reasons :(
not many people comented this car the ferrari 360 challenge stradale is really
really good im very impressed in the corners this car could just zoom through
them caus shes only 2816lbs then again i like this car but shes not all that
quick on striaghts this verses the enzo the 360 could probaley corner way
quicker but then again the enzo would smoke this car on the striaghts overall
speaking the enzo is the winner but i still prefer the 360 cs because shes
lighter and she looks allot better and shes way cheaperthan the enzo the enzo
coasts 645 000 usd and the 360cs is only 240 000 usd (only when new)
wow that qauter mile time is amazing only 12.1secs she takes 4.0secs to get
60mph and how does she do it so quick with only 425hp im guessin its because
shes so light i mean she only wieghs 2816lbs thats like nothin man the aerio
dynamics must be good cause the 360cs is so smooth and she looks great to her
12.1 quatermile time is like only 1sec of the ferrari enzos qauter mile time of
11 secs
damn 7.56 round the nurburgring i would have guesed like the low 7.40s round the
nurburgring competing with the porsche 911 gt3 and the the porsche 911 turbo
thats what the ferrari 360cs should be gettin compettition from not the skyline
r33 and the viper i mean cmon the 360cs only wieghs 2816lbs why cant it get into
the low 7.40s like the 911 gt3 the 360cs got great lap times on the tsukuba of
only 1min2sec thats really good quicker than the current 997 gen code name
prsche 911 gt2 round the tsukuba the 911 gt2 gos round the nurburgring in 7.32
the reason for this is the 911 gt2 has 530hp and the 360cs is only 425hp the
360cs also went round the top gear track quicker than th last generation early
2000s porsche 911 996 gt3 rs the lap time was only 1.22.3 round the top gear
track
what!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 7.56 round the nurburgring that doesnt sound right
the stupid skyline r34 went round thenurburgring quicker than a ferrari 360cs
wow ferrari has out done them selves look i know evryones talking about its
succsecor the ferrari 430 scuderia lapping the ferrari test track quicker than
the enzo (fiorano circuit)but what about their presuccesors history is repeting
its self well the ferrari 360 challenge stradale is less than half the price of
a ferrari f50 and the ferrari 360cs laps the ferrari test track (fiorano
circuit) quicker than a ferrari f50
wow ferrari has out done them selves look i know evryones talking about its
succsecor the ferrari 430 scuderia lapping the ferrari test track quicker than
the enzo (fiorano circuit)but what about their presuccesors history is repeting
its self well the ferrari 360 challenge stradale is less than half the price of
a ferrari f50 and the ferrari 360cs laps the ferrari test track (fiorano
circuit) quicker than a ferrari f50
(sarcasm) nice names yo, anyhoo dude why do you keep changing your name?? i know
oyur the same person who's commenting this, i dont care im just saying.
SkyLines better than the 360 anyway. the cs just happens to have mo power and a
lighter weight, and costs $100,000 more. but what would happen if you put that
$100,000 in the M-Spec??? bye bye Ferrari...(not that i dont like thCS or
anything)..
Ferrari 360 CS 1'39"85 on Autozeitung track, tested together with
Porsche 996 GT3 RS 1'39"27, both on Pirelli PZero Corsa. AZ issue 23/2003.
Conditions must have been pretty bad...
AZ 5/2004 comparison lists
Gallardo 500ps 1'37"8 (Pirelli Rosso),
Ferrari 575M MAranello F1 1'38"8 (Pirelli Rosso),
Viper SRT-10 1'39"9 (Michelin Pilot Sport).
I think the Viper would be on Michelin Pilot ZP's. They didn't get Pilot Sports
until 2008. Also, seems kind of slow being behing a 575, but I guess it's
possible.
Is there any reference for the acceleration datas? The best I could find are:
0-100: 4,1 s
0-160: 9,7 s
0-200: 15,5 s
I know that this car can do better than my datas, but 4 s, 8,4 s and 13,6 s seem
a bit optimistic for me.
1/4mile 12.164s
Tsukuba 1:02.44 which Best Motoring was it?
