Image of Ferrari LaFerrari

Ferrari LaFerrari specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1583-1585 kg (3490-3494 lbs)
Dimensions 4.70 m (185 in) long, 1.99 m (78 in) wide, 1.12 m (44 in) high
Wheelbase 2.65 m (104 in)
Power / weight 608 ps (600 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 568 Nm (419 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2014
Origin country Italy
Views 131.8k
Submitted by Chiesi

Performance

Top speed 350 kph (217 mph)
Est. 0 - 40 kph 1.3 s
0 - 50 kph 1.1 s
Est. 0 - 60 kph 1.8 s
Est. 0 - 70 kph 2.1 s
0 - 80 kph 1.9 s
Est. 0 - 90 kph 2.8 s
0 - 100 kph 2.7 s
Est. 0 - 110 kph 3.4 s
Est. 0 - 120 kph 3.7 s
Est. 0 - 130 kph 4.1 s
Est. 0 - 140 kph 4.5 s
Est. 0 - 150 kph 4.8 s
Est. 0 - 160 kph 5.2 s
Est. 0 - 170 kph 5.6 s
Est. 0 - 180 kph 6.1 s
Est. 0 - 190 kph 6.5 s
0 - 200 kph 6.9 s
Est. 0 - 210 kph 7.7 s
Est. 0 - 220 kph 8.3 s
Est. 0 - 230 kph 9.0 s
Est. 0 - 240 kph 9.7 s
Est. 0 - 250 kph 10.5 s
Est. 0 - 260 kph 11.6 s
Est. 0 - 270 kph 12.6 s
Est. 0 - 280 kph 14.0 s
Est. 0 - 290 kph 15.1 s
0 - 300 kph 15.0 s
Est. 0 - 30 mph 1.5 s
0 - 40 mph 1.5 s
Est. 0 - 50 mph 2.5 s
0 - 60 mph 2.4 s
Est. 0 - 70 mph 3.5 s
Est. 0 - 80 mph 4.1 s
Est. 0 - 90 mph 4.6 s
0 - 100 mph 4.7 s
0 - 110 mph 5.5 s
0 - 120 mph 6.4 s
0 - 130 mph 7.4 s
0 - 140 mph 8.5 s
0 - 150 mph 9.8 s
Est. 0 - 160 mph 11.2 s
Est. 0 - 170 mph 13.3 s
Est. 0 - 180 mph 14.3 s
Est. 0 - 200 mph 19.8 s
Est. 1/8 mile 6.6 s @ 121.2 mph
1/4 mile 9.7 s @ 149.1 mph
Est. 1/2 mile 15.4 s @ 183.9 mph
Est. 100 m 4.8 s @ 93.2 mph
Est. 1000 m 18.2 s @ 312.0 kph
Est. 100 - 140 kph 1.7 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 4.0 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph 8.8 s
Est. 60 kph - 0 12 m (38 ft)
Est. 100 kph - 0 30 m (98 ft)
Est. 120 kph - 0 41 m (135 ft)
Est. 130 kph - 0 48 m (158 ft)
Est. 140 kph - 0 55 m (181 ft)
Est. 160 kph - 0 72 m (235 ft)
Est. 180 kph - 0 88 m (289 ft)
Est. 190 kph - 0 97 m (318 ft)
Est. 200 kph - 0 106 m (348 ft)
Est. 300 kph - 0 230 m (753 ft)
Est. 30 mph - 0 8 m (25 ft)
Est. 50 mph - 0 20 m (65 ft)
60 mph - 0 29 m (95 ft)
70 mph - 0 41 m (136 ft)
Lateral acceleration 1.16 g (11 m/s²)

More acceleration times

Ferrari LaFerrari acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type V12
Displacement 6.3 l (384 ci)
Power 963 ps (950 bhp / 708 kw) @ 9250 rpm
Torque 900 Nm (664 lb-ft) @ 6750 rpm
Power / liter 153 ps (151 hp)
Transmission 7-speed DCT
Layout middle engine, rear wheel drive

Laptimes 9

Track Time
Algarve International Circuit (Portimao) 1:54.25
Anglesey Coastal 1:12.10
Fiorano 1:19.70
Mugello 1:55.20 est
Red Bull Ring 1:38.95
Silverstone (National Circuit) 0:58.58
Spa Francorchamps 2:48.00
Thermal Club Raceway 1:18.46
Top Gear Track 1:14.20

LaFerrari rivals

User avatar

User avatar

QA51M  1m

how can anyone say the laferrari is faster than 918 and p1 when all performance tests say otherwise


User avatar

AlexLaFF  1m

still the Laferrari could beat the P1 and 918 anyday


User avatar

Inline 6 rules  2m

Torque is 900 Nm. 700 Nm is only the petrol engine's torque, the whole "system" has 900 Nm.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaFerrari#Specifications


User avatar

saxy  8m

A million dollar AWD car with no racing or building pedigree beats an expensive supercar at a drag race. That really means nothing. For 1, it's not like it was a 100k car beat a million dollar ferrari. For 2, it's a 2-ton heavy car with batteries. It's a one-trick pony. If all a supercar was to do is to win a drag races, well i'm sorry then should everybody go buy dragsters?

I honestly don't think the "electric supercar" market will ever thrive. You buy a supercar because you want to be unsensible. You don't want a economic, practical thing on 4 wheels that gets you from A to B. Now especially when practical Teslas are doing 0-60mph in 2.65s, the argument of getting an electric supercar because of fast acceleration isn't valid anymore.


User avatar

dddd  8m

Excuses or facts ? These are facts that Rimac is more powerfull and has AWD system so noONE should be hurt that it is a faster car than LF.


User avatar

BR2+  8m

.....If you didnt....Then ehy did you list those excuses in your previous comments?......

So Laferrari lost in short distance drag race against 1100 hp AWD- 1mln $ monster that has instant torque and who cares ?

Butthurt mode (Off) ([on])

lol Come on


User avatar

dddd  8m

No its not. Butthurt syndrome is possible when i see that Mp4-12c is faster than 488 but i totally dont care that Rimac is quicker than LF in drag race.


User avatar

BR2+  8m

....That almost sounds like butthurt syndrome...


User avatar

dddd  8m

And your point is ? So Laferrari lost in short distance drag race against 1100 hp AWD- 1mln $ monster that has instant torque and who cares ? Laferrari has extreme straight line acceleration level but also it sounds and handles absolutely incredible.


User avatar

BR2+  8m

That, Is why people shouldnt test cars like this.


User avatar

Freakz  8m

Rimac Concept One vs LaFerrari vs Tesla P90D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eT7KKxoAvvk


User avatar

saxy  9m

Not feeling it. The Speciale Aperta was jaw dropping. This one reminds me of the aventador roadster. The ratio of how big the open top area is vs the size of car just doesn't match up. Actually I take that back. The aventador roadster looks a lot better



User avatar

Freakz  10m

TUG OF WAR! O_O
LaFerrari vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYCcUUgfpjk


User avatar

fakekillerfour  11m

Car and Driver weighed the Laferrari at 3489 Ibs 1583 kg.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/ferrari-laferrari-hypercar-tested-review



User avatar

Freakz  1y

Have been thinking how this LaFerrari owned by Matt has very good acceleration (while on damp conditions and 2 people on board): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZROYOq8Y3w


User avatar

luckyluke  1y

@dddd: I didn't bring up that topic and I said every manufacturer has recalls and that it means nothing. The weight still doesn't add up. That would mean Ferrari have over 200 kg of fluids in their cars. And I agree, there are more manufactures like that, not only Ferrari.


User avatar

dddd  1y

@Luckyluke Talking about recalls and "catching fire" is not the best way of discussing about supercars. All cars makers have had some and it means nothing. Weight ? Ferrari claims dry and kerb weight with lightening options. That is what i read on their website. Weights of specific models depends on equipment.
Imo others do it in similiar way. For me its not the problem.

The problem is that in my opinion Ferrari exaggerate performance level to the point that i do NOT believe in numbers they claim.


User avatar

luckyluke  1y

@BR2: I agree, the correct power numbers should be stated, but i don't think that will happen soon. Also, there is a factor which makes HP numbers vary more than being conservative and that is that some manufactures give power figures at the crankshaft instead at the wheels.

For example, the charger hellcat claims 717 hp (=707 bhp) at the crank but at the whells it makes something like 670 hp, which would be a really small crankshaft-whells-difference of 47 hp or 6.6 %. The BMW M5 (F10) claims 560 hp but it's more like 580 hp. => 20 hp or 3.6 %. So the difference between these two isn't 157 hp, it is only 90 hp.

Especially tuners try to make their cars look better with this tactic. Hennessey claims 1217 hp for his venom at the crankshaft, but in an interview he said it makes "only" 1050 hp at the wheels. That is a difference of 13.7 %. Another tuner once claimed to increase the power of a 997 GT2 by 170 hp to 700 hp, but that was again at crankshaft. So the real power was something like 630 hp. So, compared to the stock power, which is claimed 530 hp but in real approximately 540 hp, the increase is only 90 hp.


User avatar

luckyluke  1y

@manone: You twist the meaning of what other people said! Saxy said, that he has no probem with cars producing more power than claimed and that he doesn't like that Ferraris weight more and have less (not matching!) performance than Ferrari has claimed. Then you said that the statement was producing cars in general that are reaching claimed performance is cheating, which would be of course a totally stupid statement. You could have argued that Ferraris actually match their claimed performance but instead you tried to make the previous comment look stupid by interpreting it false.

"The correct way is to produce turbocharged cars that are basically factory chip tuned." What the hell is that supposed to mean? And the diesel pollution affair has nothing to do with being conservative? Again you have no valid points, just talking nonsense.

Your last statement is also rubbish. First, Porsche GT3 being "slaughtered"? By whom? Ferrari 458 Speciale? Well, they doesn't compete, since the 458 is twice the price of the GT3. And although that, the performance difference isn't really big. Second, its power figure is conservative. Third, every manufacture has recalls sometimes. That doesn't mean anything. Also, only 2 GT3s catched fire and that won't happen anymore. Do you know how many Ferraris catching fire every year and how many recalls Ferrari had in the past? And last, Porsche is not done producing NA cars. They continue to produce them in the future.


User avatar

BR2+  1y

I dont think they exaggerate performance figures, Like alot of cars some require a huge amount of skill, in almost any car that isnt well an Audi. So i believe there attainable, But not everyone can reach them, But again, The weight i believe was a claimed dry weight. Although im not 100% sure, Also that figure could have been made when the car was still in development, I think the actual car was still being tested even before full stats were shown, Could be wrong.


User avatar

saxy  1y

Lol manone. And hasn't Ferrari done exactly the same? "Stick to turbo charge to stay competitive?" Reference: Mclaren > 458 in any drag race.

And so you haven't refuted the fact that Ferrari exaggerates performance, lies about their curb weight. But again you're a fanboy. Of course you're fine with it.


User avatar

BR2+  1y

Know, Im not saying they are, But Ferrari is a company known for dirty tactics, Maybe some will call it cheating, I dunno, im not gonna call it anything since i cant prove it, But lets be real, Ferrari is extremely shady when it comes to performance tests, And if one claims to make the best, Or one of the best, It shouldnt have to play games in order to be tried.

Also, Bhp is Bhp, If a car makes a certain amount, Then THAT is the amount it should be making, None of this "Only makes the littlest amount in the worst conditions" crap. A car should make its actual advertised power figures, No mattter the aspiration, If one makes 400bhp and 400lb ft, It shouldnt be consrvative, It should make that much, All the advancements in the world ans people cant make a correct bhp number?...

Not saying its a bad thing for a consumer, But, It is a douchebagg move in my opinion, Its practically making a 400bhp car compete with a 300bhp car and making that car out to be better/faster then claimed, Im not saying a certain company is doing it, But adressing all companys, Certainly in no way an honorable thing, But honor is something not as common these days., But all in all, People should just tell the truth, Simple as that.


User avatar

manone  1y

Lol Having more hp than stated, that's so bad. Oh gosh. What cheaters. They should be like Ferrari cuz Ferraris way is always the best. Claim more power less weight more performance and be ignorant about having people test their cars. Now that's the honorable thing.

i thought a bit if i have ever read a more stupid comment than this. so you are basically saying that, since ferraris meet claimed performance, the practice of producing cars whose performance is as predicted is wrong and cheating. The correct way is to produce turbocharged cars that are basically factory chip tuned. Unfortunately, various US pollution agencies do not like this german way tuning their cars (a.k.a. "being conservative"... lol) :
http://www.arb.ca.gov/newsrel/newsrelease.php?id=776
just to mention the last of an endless list of actions that has been called for.
Obviously, when Porsche tried to enter in competition with ferraris in the NA engine market, they no longer had the "conservative" option, ended up being slaughtered and recalled all the 991 gt3 delivered for faulty engines. They wisely realized it was better to stick on tuning turbocharged units to be competitive....


User avatar

luckyluke  1y

@saxy: I know, right? How can every other car maker be so stupid?


User avatar

saxy  1y

Lol Having more hp than stated, that's so bad. Oh gosh. What cheaters. They should be like Ferrari cuz Ferraris way is always the best. Claim more power less weight more performance and be ignorant about having people test their cars. Now that's the honorable thing.


User avatar

mrft  1y

@manone: several companies, including tesla, porsche, and even ferrari, will go to great ends to tell you that power in batteries is easy to increase in power. Software updates are the reason.


User avatar

manone  1y

But to be honest Ferrari could easily change this situtation...Ferrari 488 GTB is said to have 670 HP...Hope that its an example of downplaying of power rating. This car should have at least 720 hp for real.

exactly, i do hope they will start to merciless cheat like the others. you know what the scummy german and british magazines will do? roll ferraris on dynos to show they cheat, unlike turbocharged mclaren and porsches. or, more conveniently, just take 50% longer in accelerating them, like they started doing with laferrari...


User avatar

manone  1y

By the way, you say, that Ferrari can't provide a more powerful LaFerrari press car because NA engines are untunable, but then you accuse Porsche to provide tuned 918 although its engine is also NA. Where is the logic there? Furthermore, there were never engineers from Porsche presence when the 918 was testet or as far as I know any other car, while most of the time, there are dozens engineers from Ferrari presence at the tests.

porsche changed 918 power claims so many times when mclaren and ferrari were about declare their figures. always upping them by means of the electric motors/batteries which constitute a huge part of the 918's total output. its engine couldn't be touched as it delivers almost the reference among road cars' specific powers. as far as i can see, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aI-DUULV1tE
its 18 secs 0-300 are roughly consistent with power figures in this test.

of course porsche sent their team of engineers to e.g. portimao, maybe nurburgring..., sweetheart. mega LOL dozens of ferrari engineers? this is conservative! i would say thousands at the very least. they usually bring the whole town of maranello, fiorano circuit included...

i have already explained you why ferrari sends their engineers whenever they can. they have no national car magazines lobbies to pet their cars and sandbag others like mclarens and porsches. so ****ing sick of repeating countless times such trivialities as tomorrow sun will rise again...

Photo of Ferrari LaFerrari

Photo of Ferrari LaFerrari

Photo of Ferrari LaFerrari

Photo of Ferrari LaFerrari

Photo of Ferrari LaFerrari

Photo of Ferrari LaFerrari

Photo of Ferrari LaFerrari

Photo of Ferrari LaFerrari

Photo of Ferrari LaFerrari

Photo of Ferrari LaFerrari

Active users

FastestLaps, hmdqyg, saxy, tyler, fakekillerfour, BR2+, Flabernat, DeDe, lawrencefearon, Fastedee

Latest topics

2017 racing season starts tomorrow 40
13 hours ago by saxy

The new, "down-sized" Audi RS5 14
15 hours ago by BR2+

Data submission requests 148
1 day ago by fakekillerfour

Dodge Viper ACR goes "HAM" on 14 tracks, "spanks" Porsche 918 1
2 days ago by lawrencefearon

Shame on Ferrari, shame on McLaren 88
5 days ago by Fastedee

Aston Martin DB11 is much faster than S-Class coupe 20
5 days ago by Fastedee