2002 Lamborghini Murcielago

the lamborghini murcielago is smooth and looks good and is expensive but when you think about its only quick on striaght lines mon the acceleration is not all that great ether you know and it wieghs 3960lbs!!!!! that is wiegh to heavy it recrded 3.8secs to 60mph at nardo and it only ran up to 203mph at nardo theres another problem with it just wont corner very well i mean at the nurburgring it recorded 7.50sec disapointing hey ford gt and corvette z06 both went round the nurburgring in 7.42 the porsche 911 turbo went round the nurburgring in 7.40 from what i heard the lambo murcielago has 580hp but its still abit slow compared to them porschs the lambo would nt stand a chance against the zonda f and i love the zonda f she has 602 hp and would whup the lambo the zonda f clubsport did 7.24 round the nurburgring and another car i love that would kik dust in the face of this car blew me away the corvette zr1 with 638 bhp the corvette zr1 went round the nurburgring in 7.26

sorry the sportauto wet handling time was for the LP640 please delet this

also in the Roadster version press release they have a 0-200 @ 11.4 sec. and 0-300 @ 34.2 and considering the coupe is listed faster than the vert's 3.8 sec. I'd say it's fair to use the vert's times on this page to save space on creating a page just for the vert which likely won't get much track time from mags/owners... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamborghini_Murci%C3%A9lago#_note-3

Quarter Mile: 11.7 sec. http://www.motortrend.com/features/scenes/112_0306_spdtest/photo _03.html

You are right. Entry changed.

the acceleration to 60mph is 3.6 seconds look it up