2005 Lotus Exige S

Did you just make these 0-100kph and 0-160kph times up?

The VIR time has a comma in it, which is throwing off that track's times

Yeah theres no way this thing doe the ring in 7:50, that claim was total bullshit yo!!!

http://www.fastestlaps.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=850#850
the Oschersleben laptime source

0-160 - 9.98 seconds http://www.grouplotus.com/car/car_tech_specs.php?id=2#top

the gallardo spder was not on a wet track - thats what the guy said

Anonymous sportauto tested the 192PS Exige Mk II with 8:32min and the 179PS MkI Exige with 8:42min. The Lotus Exige lacks in topspeed and high speed acceleration to make good times at the Ring...
The simlar 200hp/250Nm Opel Speedster Turbo reach 8:34min
To get that Exige under 8:30min on a full lpa needs a highly skilled race driver!
perhaps this 7:50min guy was reffering to a bridge to bridge lap (touris lap) without the Doettingerhöhe straight

A stock Exige hasn't got the top end power to achieve those laps on the ring.

PLus the Gallardo on the top gear track was a wet lap.

No matter whether it can or can't achieve 7:50, this lap time had to be deleted because of no reference information. And lap time you submitted for 2-11 at TopGear track was laughingly slow. Slower than Lacetti 1.8 as far as I remember.

you utter knobend - how can it not achieve it - were you there? - No - it can go as quick as lambo gallardo sypder round the top gear track so y can't it do that time - it's my exige he did it in and another chap i know has modified the tyres i've got on it - and my m8 that did the lap had spend 3 weeks camping near the nurburgring and i drove out and stayed with him the last week he was there and we took both cars (my exige, his new 2-11) and i timed them

No stock Exige can achieve that kind of time, so i deleted it.

Lap time 7:50 at Nordschleife is most likely to be deleted. "My friend did it" is not a reference. If your friend really did it I hope he has filmed it otherwise there is no way to prove it.

I changed it already, now it should appear in the list as it should.

What do you mean by saying "out of order?" What's wrong with this lap time?

time placed on list out of order on top gear track

sorry - i got that wrong 0-200 is about 12.9 seconds i think - sorry - i didnt check what i'd written b4 posting - SRRY