VW Passat CC V6 4motion specs

This car is pretty slow by todays standards.

This car does 0-100kph in 5.5s every time. Please update your page.

It has the best of both worlds, it's very powerful and gets good gas mileage.

I don't think the fuel consumption is bad,considering its 3.6 v6 with 4mo ,on my daily/weekly commute I'm averaging 28mpg and that's inner city urban terrain.
Handles pretty well too, especially in 's' with the suspension/steering in sport.
Wolf in sheeps clothing

Fuel consumption can it be a poblem with the 2006 4motion passat

Is this the newiest version of CC 3.6? Because the uncertainty, I can't add performance figure and laptime of from Autobild.

Sorry guys, I own one and it wont do more than 5 secs 0-100. Maybe if I completely stripped the interior and removed the spare tyre. The M3 comfortably wins on the track.

Noutri, hoyi, Rossiz please stop adding pointless comments, all your postings come from the same IP Adress...

I seen this car on the road and it look very stunning!

Its not as beautiful as the CLS, but as close as it can come.

Nice body and a fast 3,6 l engine.

Can this car come with 4x2 and manuel gearbox?

This car have 300 hp in Europe, but only 280 in the US.
hp
The 3,6 liter have a very good sound, but sadly it has been built so good that the wonderful enginesound is just hearable in S-MODE. Than the enignesound is really good.

..Or as it should be...

It doesn`t need more power. It is as fast as hell when you first get it one the free-way.

155 mph in just 35 seconds!

This car plus twin turbo with maybe 450-550hp would be sweet. It can be fast yet controllable.

Not too heavy either for a mid size 4 seat AWD sedan.

The car actually accelerates from 0-60 mp/h in 5,3 seconds.

It´s quite fast and sounds as a V8!!

Love the design! The brand new CLS 500 can not be as good as this V6! The CC V6 will smoke it because it has DSG and 4x4.

It´s a wonderful car!

I love the look of it!

How can this be slower than the R36 when it weighs less?
With launch control, and DSG, I would expect a 5.0 flat or less 0-60(R36 has a 5.4 0-60).
I would also expect this CC to do about a 13.3 1/4 at just a few ticks over 100mph as the R36 does it in 13.6 at a hair over 100mph.

whats the difference between the passat r36 and passat cc v6?

They have the same engine and interior?

The same spec and the same price?

Hello again.

I ment of course e36.

I have a yellow 92 model m3 with 300 hp. A guy at work ownes a 09 mod Passat Comfort Coupè with 3,6 liter engine an 4-motion.

We switched cars for a day and i found it more comfortable and more \"sexy\". I just loved the DSG gearbox and the engine felt snap in any situation.

I ment e36, I do not know how I could wrote e39.

Sorry guys!

Yes the E46 would beat this PASSAT.I think the E36 beats it too.E39 M5 would kill it.

E46 M3 would smoke this. I don't know what M3 you're reffering to, possibly your imaginary M3.

M-car owners are usually very knowledgeable about their cars and cars in general and wouldn't come up with something stupid like "E39 M3"

e39 NO 3-series.E39 is 5-series BMW

E39 M3?

Im from Germany.

I have tried this car many times, and i must say that i think it beats my M3 (e39) when we are talking about feeling and comfort.

I got this car in 0-100 km/h in just 5,6 seconds using launch control.

You put the DSG in Sport-Mode, turn off ESP, set the supension on SPORT, hold the brake, push in the trottle and than release tha brake.
Then the car will set off in a few seconds.

the car does 0-100 in 4.7 seconds using luanch controll

...

This car has a Porsche-engine and has an unbeliveable acceleration.

Do you 2 guys know each other?

This car has a Porsche-engine and has an unbeliveable acceleration.

And it looks very beautiful! Its stunning really!

I bet this will beat Audi a4 3,0 tdi quattro inn a steep long hill.

\"the car does 0-100 in 4.7 seconds using luanch controll\"

Sorry it can\'t , it has to be modded , but it will do around 5 sec when it\'s modded.

the car does 0-100 in 4.7 seconds using luanch controll

yes that was a typo... correct time was 6.0

http://www.fastestlaps.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=907#907

test datasheet in the fastest laps forum

I think the 0-100 is 6.4s, not 4.6s.