| Price in Europe | €86,200 - €111,647 |
| Price in US | $84,895 - $97,590 |
| Car type | 4-door saloon |
| Curb weight | 1835-1959 kg (4045-4319 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.86 m (191 in) long, 1.85 m (73 in) wide, 1.47 m (58 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.89 m (114 in) |
| Introduced | 2005 |
| Origin country | Germany |
| Gas mileage | 27.5-11.1 l/100 km (9-21 mpg US / 10-25 mpg UK) |
| CO2 emissions | 390 g/km |
| Views | 355.1k |
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.5 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 2.0 s |
| 0 - 60 kph | 2.3 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 3.5 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.4 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 5.9 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 6.8 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 7.4 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 9.2 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 11.6 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 13.5 s |
| 1000 m | 22.2 s |
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.7 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 2.3 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 3.2 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 4.1 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 5.1 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 6.6 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 8.0 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 9.2 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 20.7 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.7 s @ 98.8 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 12.3 s |
| Top speed | 305 kph (190 mph) |
| 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 15.2 s |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.67 g (7 m/s²) |
| 18m slalom | 66.1 kph (41.1 mph) |
| 600ft slalom | 109.0 kph (67.7 mph) |
| Lateral acceleration | 0.90 g (9 m/s²) |
| Downforce @ 200 kph | -32 kg (-71 lbs) |
| Engine type | V10, 40v |
| Displacement | 5.0 l (305 ci) |
| Power | 507 ps (500 bhp / 373 kw) @ 7750 rpm |
| Torque | 520 Nm (384 lb-ft) @ 6100 rpm |
| Power / liter | 101 ps (100 hp) |
| Power / weight | 271 ps (268 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 278 Nm (205 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 28 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 27 ps |
| Transmission | 7 speed |
| Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
| 100 kph - 0 | 35 m (115 ft) |
| 190 kph - 0 | 128 m (420 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 146 m (479 ft) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 33 m (109 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 48 m (158 ft) |
| 100 mph - 0 | 99 m (326 ft) |
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 4.3 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 5.8 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 6.9 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (7) | 9.3 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (4) | 8.6 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (5) | 11.5 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (6) | 13.5 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (7) | 18.7 s |
| 80 - 120 kph | 3.0 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 9.0 s |
| 5 - 60 mph | 4.6 s |
| 45 - 65 mph | 1.8 s |
wallenieswiftie 3m ago
If BMW launched the production version a year early, around the same time as they did with the concept version, it would be an even more analogue competitor with the E55 AMG W211 and the RS6 C5.
It had such a long production span that you can compare it with E63 W211, E63 W212 pre-update, and RS6 C6!
https://www.classicdriver.com/en/article/bmw-shows-m5-concept
wallenieswiftie 3m ago
The true Nurburgring time was 8:13. Even if it had the limiter detached there would not be a 21-second gap between these two lap times. 7:52 would be possible on contemporary semi-slick tires. Very few cars ran that time, and it was mostly supercars like F430, Gallardo, Ford GT, C6 Z06, and certain 996/997 versions. Even the 360 Challenge Stradale and the 400hp Corvette twins were slower.
Volodymyr 2y ago
How Wiesmann GT MF5 can be slower on Nordschleife with same engine and much less weight? 7:52 by Auto Bild versus 7:52 by anonymous. Official lap time by Sport Auto is 8 min. 13 sec. I’m talking about stroked “1 of” M5 CSL with 570 hp. But stock M5 E60 will not be able to achieve such a result. 7:52 is faster than M5 F10 Competition. How????? Tell me, how???
TypeF173 4y ago
Quote>"Dinan will take the 5.0L V10 that powers the "standard" M5/M6 and bore and stroke it to 5.7 liters. The end result is a legitimate road beast that cranks out 628 hp and 482 lb-ft. The additional hp under the bonnet of the Dinan M's still revs freely to 8100 RPM, and much of the torque is available as low as 3000 RPM."
5.7 LITRES!!! Just over the McLaren F1 power but slighlty less torque.
I can't quite remember but I'm sure this pushed the M5 over 200MPH!
They were simpler times...
Stevelvaw 10y ago
Read mostly positive feedback about our web store that by its turn can’t prevent you from buying our product. Buying Levitra Brand couldn't make any difficulty to satisfy your needs because our website immediately for the finish is wonderful for you. Help make your choice and that means you won’t regret. We're thinking about good service additionally getting a customer has an interest in good product.levitra professional samples,levitra pills for sale
cheapest price for levitra,levitra australia online
777Balt 11y ago
ok not 220hp more but 200. Still being 14 seconds faster with 200hp less and narrower tires is amazing
Lumi 11y ago
Here is the link and the link to the BMW article whichs confirms the M5's 7:52 delimited time around the ring with Hans-Joachim Stuck behind the wheel... http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/e60-m5-e61-m5-touring-discussion/323410-e60-m5-laps-ring-7-52-a.html
BR2+ 12y ago
That 2007 M6 reaching 332Kph was also a Kelleners Racing M6 which did do a GPS Verified top speed of that, But that wasn't stock, No stock M5/M6 goes past 200Mph, The fastest TRUE GPS VERIFIED top speed of a M5/M6 is 194Mph, 315ph, Theres a SHITE LOAD of speedo videos, And everyone thinks there doing that, even some saying they did 211Mph and 215Mph lol Its true, Bmws are slippery.
But not slippery enuff to do 330Kph plus, Not with 500Bhp. However though, as far as the 194Mph time is concerned, I do not know if its its FULL top speed, or if there was room for more. But a lot of this 200Mph+ stuff is only based on a speedo video on Youtube, And those can be anywhere between 15-30kph off. Like these videos...ALL speedos without a single spec of proof.
http://www.bmwm5powerv10.com/e60-m5-top-speed.html
As far as the CC V8S is concerned, 240Mph is only a "Claimed" top speed, No Koenigsegg has registered its claimed aerodynamic value tested, So I Highly doubt it would even go past 225Mph let alone 240Mph. Correct me if im wrong people.
