Power 527 kw (707 bhp / 717 ps) @ 6200 rpm
Torque -
Displacement 6.4 liters (392 ci)
Bore and stroke 103.9 mm (4.1 in) x 94.5 mm (3.7 in)
Compression 10.9 to 1
Engine type Chrysler 392 HEMI V-8 Supercharged
Engine location front

General data

Gearbox Tremec TR6060 6 Speed Manual and Chrysler 8 Speed Automatic
Drive rear wheel drive
Fuel capacity 72 l
Year of introduction 2014
Home country USA


Curb weight 1892 kg (4162 lbs) +
Size 5.02 m (198 in) long, 1.92 m (76 in) wide and 1.45 m (57 in) high
Wheelbase 2.95 m (116 in)
Track width 1.6 m (63.1 in) front, 1.6 m (63.1 in) rear


Power to Weight ratio 374 bhp/tonne
Power per liter 110 bhp/liter

Fastestlaps.com stats

FL Rank Position - 1770/1769, 0 points
Page views 28095
Car submitted by Super8

More Challenger SRT-8 Hellcat photos

Photo of Dodge Challenger SRT-8 HellcatPhoto of Dodge Challenger SRT-8 HellcatPhoto of Dodge Challenger SRT-8 HellcatPhoto of Dodge Challenger SRT-8 Hellcat

2014 Dodge Challenger SRT-8 Hellcat

Photo of Dodge Challenger SRT-8 Hellcat
Add laptime    Add performance    Add photo

Lap Times (1)

Track Time Position Faster than Slower than
GingerMan Raceway 1:45.80 19/19 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500

Dodge Challenger SRT-8 Hellcat racing rivals

Ferrari F40, McLaren Mercedes SLR, Ascari KZ1, TVR Sagaris, Noble M15

Other cars by Dodge (87)

Viper SRT-10, Charger SRT-8, Viper GTS, Viper SRT-10, Viper RT/10, Viper SRT-10 ACR, Caliber SRT4, Challenger SRT-8, Viper ACR, Viper SRT-10 Roadster, Viper GT2, Challenger SXT Coupe, Viper SRT-10 Roadster, Ram SRT-10, Charger V6, Charger R/T, Viper RT/10, Charger Daytona, Neon SRT-4, Challenger R/T, Challenger SRT-8 392, Charger SRT-8 facelift, Charger R/T 1969, ... show more

Community comments (255)

  16 hours ago
IMO, You should put a pic of the car standing still, That way you can see the rims, The brakes and the tyres, Rolling pics of the main pic makes everything a bit blurred. Id put a pic, But i cannot see images at the moment.
  1 day ago
Can you find me a picture you want that is not from the ones on the sidebar? Because if i put one from sidebar as main picture, I would have to delete it from sidebar, which is a hassle and deleting is never good, itš better to have more pics :)

P.S. When you search for a picture, make sure its pretty big and doesn't contain any annoying watermarks.
  1 day ago
@fastestlaps, any chance we can change that photo for the challenger hellcat, I was thinking maybe the one at the bottom under "More Challenger SRT-8 Hellcat photos"
  2 weeks ago
Your story basically confirms that it's Soviet Unions fault... The whole system was flawed and could not harbor decent automotive manufacturing. Because there was no competition and no incentive to make great products.

When SU broke down, in early 90s, obviously, everything couldn't change overnight. And the first attempts at making cars, much like everything else, were flawed.
  2 weeks ago
perticulary any good or cheap. And that's because these cars were not made by engineers who wanted to make a good car for the people, they were made by accountants who wanted to make money instant, without "wasting" time for making them suitable for new markets. And that's the difference. There was really no reason to buy them. In Octavia or Logan you get the sense that engineers have worked really hard to build the best car from what was available. In cars like Lanos or Nubira you don't get that feel, in fact - you don't get any feel at all.
Another problem is that in Poland we think that "domestic" means "rubbish" and "foreign" means "tough". That's of course legacy of communism. We simply wouldn't buy polish car, no matter what enthusiasts say. There's domestic energy drink company that was selling their product with polish sounding name. It wasn't selling very well. Then they've changed the name and the package design so now it doesn't even have ANY polish word on it and guess what? It's the best selling energy drink in the country!
So guys in US - respect your domestic cars if you don't want to be driving in bland and boring Toyotas and Nissans only. If I were you I would be running to the dealership for a new Challenger even for $26,995 base 305 HP V6 because it's a bargain! Over here for the same money you could buy low spec diesel Mondeo with manual rear windows. Shame.
  2 weeks ago
Guys, in Poland it's not just about communism past.
Look at Czech Republic and their Skoda. In the late 80s/early 90s they had rubbish 105/120/125, which was even worse than our Polonez. Then they launched Favorit. Everybody laughed. But they kept evolving (with help from VW of course). Then there was Octavia - car with VW underpins, much bigger than Golf, but with lower pricetag. It was an instant hit. Now they are making SuperB - available with 260 HP 3.6 V6, AWD and DSG.
Same goes with Romania and their Dacia. After the fall of communism they got 1310 - car designed in late 60s, and made until 2004. Pickup version even lasted 2 years more. But they kept evolving. Early efforts were pathetic but in 2004 they came up with Logan. People laughed at it: "How can sub €6,000 car be any good?" But it was. It was (and still is) bigger, more comfortable, more reliable, cheaper and easier to fix than all entry level cars like Fiat Panda, Hyundai Getz and so on. Logan real competitors - cars like Fiat Albea or Hyundai Accent were more expensive, but weren't really any better. Logan was a huge success and it's assembled and sold all over the world under different brands, including Renault, Nissan, Mahindra and even Lada. Now you can get one with leather seats, touchscreen satnav and turbocharged petrol engine and it still will be cheaper than basic Fiesta. Amazing.
In Poland on the other hand after the fall of communism we merged with Daewoo. And products of that weren't
  3 weeks ago
Id love to see a Polish SuperCar. Or just a good Polish brand, Same with the Chinese....If they stopped stealing everybodys design..
  3 weeks ago
pl80, I agree. And same goes for all countries occupied by soviet union.
  3 weeks ago
Lukasz, if it wasn't for f. communists, Poland could make cars like that too.
  1 month ago
Guys, let's not forget that Challenger Hellcat is actually not 4, but 5-Seater car!
That makes it even more amazing: Under $60,000, 707 HP, ten second car with a beautiful retro-style body, with a huge trunk and 5 seats! It will even hit over 20 MPG on the highway!
It makes me wonder: What next gen Challenger will bring us? Imagine 100 HP more with lightweight aluminum structure (like new Ford F-150), several carbon-fibre body panels, AWD and sub-3-second 0-60 time. Now it might sound ridiculous, but so did Dodge one year ago announcing current Hellcat.
I'm from Poland but I have to say: God Bless America!
  4 months ago
wrong photo
  5 months ago
Hellcat drives the "Snake." Good review. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYa3dDjkFis
  5 months ago, last edited 5 months ago
Lol br2, you just don't get it. I judge a "car" on how well it is as being a car. I judge a sportscar as being a sportscar, a supercar being a supercar just like how normal people do. The M3 is the better "car" because you can have friends, (woah) and I can fit my full sized keyboard, and have a lot of fun, yet not need another car.

Corvette is the better sportscar, obviously cuz it was purposely built for performance and 2 seats. But you'd have to buy another car too, maybe not you, but I have equipment and friends, so yeah I would need to.

And where I live, a parking space costs around 150k USD, I think a second car would be quite costly.

  5 months ago
How about you Google that article instead? Actually, don't bother, I'll quote the relevant part here:

"Based on these expectations, the dyno printouts suggest our Z06 was producing more like 530 horses. But Chevy isn't alone underestimating the output of its hero motor: These figures show the Viper's V-10 also was good for 530 horses, and the GT's supercharged V-8 was pumping out at least 600 ponies."

Thank you for proving my point, good sir.
  5 months ago
Google "2006 Ford GT vs. Z06 vs. Viper". Click on the MT site. You'll see the picture that shows drivetrain losses for all 3 cars.
  5 months ago
It is big, But hey, You know what they say about a big boot.......Wait..
  5 months ago
@hemisrt: Remember about a week ago when you said you don't believe manufacturers underrate their HP numbers. Well this Challenger Hellcat is listed at 707HP, and dynos a whopping 671HP to the ground. This car is definitely underrated. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BZOcxQQC2M&feature=em-uploademail
  5 months ago
@Coolshirt. Correct. The Vette (and muscle cars) work for average American's because they are practical. Once you get past HIGH purchase prices of Exotics, you also have HUGE insurance rates, MEGA maintenance/service costs. Replacement parts....forget it. The Vette can be repaired at most any good mech shop. Parts are reasonable. Insurance is low if you have a good record.
  5 months ago
@BR2+: That's a big trunk.
  5 months ago, last edited 5 months ago
As sports cars go, Corvettes have pretty much always been the most practical and easiest to live with. If anyone ever wonders why it's hard to get a rear weight bias in a 'Vette, look no further than that trunk; a bunch of empty space back there. Not complaining, I quite like it. I held off on putting a four-point roll bar in my C6Z for a long time, because it would effectively cut cargo room by over 1/3. The only drawbacks are the lack of a divider back there(that tiny lip ain't no divider), the lack of vertical space, and the heat(there's a reason they call the back a greenhouse). I won't deny that an M3 is a more practical car by nature, but a Corvette isn't an Exige or something; they're far from useless.
  5 months ago
Oh baby hes got some sass on him! Girlfriennnnnnd!!!

Anywhoo, You judge which car is better by how big the boot is? lol

There are very few family here with less then 2 cars here, EVen if you didnt have a 2 seater you would still have a 2nd car regardless of the type, Its all in how one makes it. And a C7 has quite the sizeable boot.
  5 months ago, last edited 5 months ago
Don't know why I'm replying to a obvious troll, but whatever.

2.7% drivetrain loss is impossible. Like, physically impossible with today's technology. There's not a transmission on this planet that's that efficient. And if there is, it damn sure wasn't in a $150k supercar from 2004, and it damn sure isn't in a $70k musclecar from Dodge. The Ford GT might be the most famously underrated cars of the modern age. Nearly every owner who dyno'd one came back with numbers suggesting over 600hp at the crank. They weren't isolated incidents; we're talking dozens of cars on dynos across the US. May not sound like much considering there are a few thousand FGTs out there, but consider how many owners ever bothered to put them on dynos. Not a whole lot, and *most* of the ones who did got numbers clearly indicating the car was significantly underrated from the factory. Of course Ford never admitted it, but everyone knows.
Pages:    1234567891011Next
7621 fastest lap times for 4559 cars from 299 manufacturers.
© Fastestlaps.com 2006-2015