Performance

Max speed 320 kph (198.4 mph)
0 - 60 mph 3.6 s
0 - 100 mph 7.6 s
0 - 150 mph 17.0 s
1/4 mile 11.7 s @ 126 mph

Engine

Power 527 kw (707 bhp / 717 ps) @ 6200 rpm
Torque -
Displacement 6.4 liters (392 ci)
Bore and stroke 103.9 mm (4.1 in) x 94.5 mm (3.7 in)
Compression 10.9 to 1
Engine type Chrysler 392 HEMI V-8 Supercharged
Engine location front

General data

Gearbox Tremec TR6060 6 Speed Manual and Chrysler 8 Speed Automatic
Drive rear wheel drive
Fuel capacity 72 l
Year of introduction 2014
Home country USA

Dimensions

Curb weight 1892 kg (4162 lbs) +
Size 5.02 m (198 in) long, 1.92 m (76 in) wide and 1.45 m (57 in) high
Wheelbase 2.95 m (116 in)
Track width 1.6 m (63.1 in) front, 1.6 m (63.1 in) rear

Calculations

Power to Weight ratio 374 bhp/tonne
Power per liter 110 bhp/liter

Fastestlaps.com stats

FL Rank Position - 1599/1598, 0 points
Page views 34798
Car submitted by Super8

More Challenger SRT-8 Hellcat photos

Photo of Dodge Challenger SRT-8 HellcatPhoto of Dodge Challenger SRT-8 HellcatPhoto of Dodge Challenger SRT-8 HellcatPhoto of Dodge Challenger SRT-8 Hellcat

2014 Dodge Challenger SRT-8 Hellcat

Photo of Dodge Challenger SRT-8 Hellcat

Dodge Challenger SRT-8 Hellcat racing rivals

Ferrari F40, McLaren Mercedes SLR, Ascari KZ1, TVR Sagaris, Noble M15

Other cars by Dodge (91)

Viper SRT-10, Charger SRT-8, Viper GTS, Viper SRT-10, Viper RT/10, Viper SRT-10 ACR, Caliber SRT4, Challenger SRT-8, Viper ACR, Viper SRT-10 Roadster, Viper GT2, Challenger SXT Coupe, Viper SRT-10 Roadster, Ram SRT-10, Charger V6, Charger R/T, Viper RT/10, Charger Daytona, Neon SRT-4, Challenger R/T, Challenger SRT-8 392, Charger SRT-8 facelift, Charger R/T 1969, ... show more

Community comments (273)

  3 weeks ago
NICE! I see someone managed to add the laps before me, btw that new photo looks great, looks like my nagging worked lol :P
  3 weeks ago
Yes, sir! Track added.

When you add laptimes, copy & paste this as reference:

Road & Track http://www.roadandtrack.com/pcoty-2015-collection/

And this as "Organisation":

Road & Track
  3 weeks ago
@Fastestlaps, now that you updated the performance can you pleeeaseee change the main photo for this car? also when you get the chance can you please add the track motown mile so I can finally add the laptimes for this car as well as the rest of the cars tested there? http://www.porscheboost.com/content.php?5420-Road-and-Track-2015-Performance-Car-of-the-Year-test-figures-Lap-Times-1-4-mile-curb-weight-etc
  3 weeks ago
Updated!
  3 weeks ago
Yo, y'all need to update the Hellcat!

0-60: 3.6
0-100: 7.6
1/4: 11.7@126

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2015-dodge-challenger-srt-hellcat-test-review
  1 month ago
Yo, there's 44 freaking laptimes at motown mile! how come no one has added it yet? (along with ahem a new challenger hellcat photo)
http://www.porscheboost.com/content.php?5420-Road-and-Track-2015-Performance-Car-of-the-Year-test-figures-Lap-Times-1-4-mile-curb-weight-etc
  3 months ago
There was no Hellcat in 2014. That's a 470 (not 475) HP Challenger SRT.
  4 months ago
...Wouldnt say that...
  4 months ago
You can give another 500 bhp to it and it will never ever get a second faster to 60mph or on the track. they should have kept the SRT8 engine and reduce the weight by 400p, better chassis/gear, that would have make a difference. or a 4-wheel-drive...
  4 months ago
Alot of things contribute to that.
  4 months ago
Don't forget torque.
  4 months ago
Smh...Its not all about Bhp...Smh
  4 months ago
So disappointed in this vehicle 0-60 times as I punched in on YouTube ( Hellcat 0-60 times) and watched a few vids with even a guy from dodge doing a best 4.3 0-60 but claiming he seen 3.5 0-60? They did like 20 runs in two different vids. 700HP ?? Maybe this car just weighs too much? Confused.
  5 months ago
As long as you can see the car from a good angle, And everything is showing, Ive no complaints. But updated everything imminently would be nice,
  5 months ago, last edited 5 months ago
@BR2+ "IMO, You should put a pic of the car standing still, That way you can see the rims, The brakes and the tyres, Rolling pics of the main pic makes everything a bit blurred. Id put a pic, But i cannot see images at the moment."

Two of the three photos I suggested are of the car standing still, strange that you cannot see them. at this point I really don't care, I just want any photo of the challenger hellcat, just not this srt8 392 that we've had for so long.

p.s. this is why I hate when people add cars before they reach production.
  5 months ago
Cool video. .I call that a draw.

Hellcat is made of 100% authentic American awesome. No techie nonsense, just POWEEEER!
  5 months ago
  5 months ago, last edited 5 months ago
At last in poland there are some chances (that I not belive that are high) to have The Arrinera mid engined super sport car based on 7.2 V8. (look like a mix of cayman, corvette, ferrari and lambo so it have a litte from the bests) There are some typical post soviet union problems and tones of bullshit, but who knows.

About Hellcat is very bad ass car - and this thing only matter. Which is the baddest stock car on market. I belive that new Mustang GT 500 will be even badder and it end Hellcat nr1 spot in this category. Its just too old and too heavy, power is not enough, even 700.
  6 months ago
IMO, You should put a pic of the car standing still, That way you can see the rims, The brakes and the tyres, Rolling pics of the main pic makes everything a bit blurred. Id put a pic, But i cannot see images at the moment.
  6 months ago
Can you find me a picture you want that is not from the ones on the sidebar? Because if i put one from sidebar as main picture, I would have to delete it from sidebar, which is a hassle and deleting is never good, itš better to have more pics :)

P.S. When you search for a picture, make sure its pretty big and doesn't contain any annoying watermarks.
  6 months ago
@fastestlaps, any chance we can change that photo for the challenger hellcat, I was thinking maybe the one at the bottom under "More Challenger SRT-8 Hellcat photos"
  6 months ago
Your story basically confirms that it's Soviet Unions fault... The whole system was flawed and could not harbor decent automotive manufacturing. Because there was no competition and no incentive to make great products.

When SU broke down, in early 90s, obviously, everything couldn't change overnight. And the first attempts at making cars, much like everything else, were flawed.
  6 months ago
perticulary any good or cheap. And that's because these cars were not made by engineers who wanted to make a good car for the people, they were made by accountants who wanted to make money instant, without "wasting" time for making them suitable for new markets. And that's the difference. There was really no reason to buy them. In Octavia or Logan you get the sense that engineers have worked really hard to build the best car from what was available. In cars like Lanos or Nubira you don't get that feel, in fact - you don't get any feel at all.
Another problem is that in Poland we think that "domestic" means "rubbish" and "foreign" means "tough". That's of course legacy of communism. We simply wouldn't buy polish car, no matter what enthusiasts say. There's domestic energy drink company that was selling their product with polish sounding name. It wasn't selling very well. Then they've changed the name and the package design so now it doesn't even have ANY polish word on it and guess what? It's the best selling energy drink in the country!
So guys in US - respect your domestic cars if you don't want to be driving in bland and boring Toyotas and Nissans only. If I were you I would be running to the dealership for a new Challenger even for $26,995 base 305 HP V6 because it's a bargain! Over here for the same money you could buy low spec diesel Mondeo with manual rear windows. Shame.
Pages:    123456789101112Next
7621 fastest lap times for 4559 cars from 299 manufacturers.
© Fastestlaps.com 2006-2015