Image of Renault 5 Turbo Phase I

Renault 5 Turbo Phase I specs

Car type Compact
Curb weight 975-980 kg (2150-2161 lbs)
Years built 1980 - 1982
Origin country France
Gas mileage 16.3-13.2 l/100 km (14-18 mpg US / 17-21 mpg UK)
Views 9.4k

Lap times

Performance

0 - 40 kph1.8 s
0 - 60 kph3.3 s
0 - 80 kph4.8 s
0 - 100 kph6.9 s
0 - 120 kph9.7 s
0 - 140 kph13.6 s
0 - 160 kph18.5 s
0 - 180 kph28.4 s
0 - 200 kph60.0 s
1000 m27.9 s
Top speed203 kph (126 mph)
Renault 5 Turbo Phase I acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type 4 cylinders, 8 valves, turbo garrett t3
Displacement 1.4 l (85 ci / 1397 cc)
Power 160 ps (158 bhp / 118 kw) @ 6000 rpm
Torque 210 Nm (155 lb-ft) @ 3250 rpm
Power / liter 115 ps (113 hp)
Power / weight 164 ps (161 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 215 Nm (158 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 11 PS per l/100 km
Transmission 5 manual
Layout rear engine, rear wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

Rolling acceleration

40 - 60 kph (3)4.5 s
40 - 60 kph (4)7.7 s
40 - 60 kph (5)11.2 s
40 - 80 kph (3)6.8 s
40 - 80 kph (4)12.7 s
40 - 80 kph (5)20.2 s
40 - 100 kph (3)9.0 s
40 - 100 kph (4)15.6 s
40 - 100 kph (5)25.0 s
40 - 120 kph (3)11.4 s
40 - 120 kph (4)18.7 s
40 - 120 kph (5)29.0 s
40 - 140 kph (4)22.5 s
40 - 140 kph (5)34.0 s
40 - 160 kph (4)27.2 s
40 - 180 kph (5)48.5 s
User avatar
User avatar

Hoppelmoppel123  2m ago

@FastestLaps please change:
160 PS @ 6000
210 Nm @ 3250
1397 ccm
1980-1982

 

User avatar

humana  2m ago

@FastestLaps


User avatar

Anonymous  18y ago

JAVI! You mixed HP and PS!
It has 160 PS not HP


User avatar

Anonymous  18y ago

Why is JAVA JOE or anybody even talking about this piece of shit!


User avatar

javi ( spain)  18y ago

R5 Turbo fse I:
Only 200 unid. in every world.

Turbo fase II: More units than fase I.


Photo of Renault 5 Turbo Phase I

Photo of Renault 5 Turbo Phase I

Timeline

User avatar
anonymoused 3h 

So far only one car was ever made.

Arthur is right, the bore is 93 mm and the stroke ...

Naturally aspirated V8 grand tourers and/or muscle cars... the RC F ...

Honestly I was never really even a fan of either the ...

I'll NEVER forget that this car pulled 1.16 g on the ...

Only the facelift (2016 to 2019), I like.

This one came out in 2008. By then the E60 M5 ...

I still do not like this generation pre-facelift Lexus IS (2014-2020). ...

Another very bad lap time for a 400hp sports car. ...

That's a very bad lap time for a 400hp sports sedan. ...

The V2 was fast and cool for its time but V1 ...

This car was honestly PEAK Cadillac.

Most overrated midsize Cadillac V-series generation ever. Sedan only, automatic only, ...

2.8 and 8.8 translate to more like a 10.4 1/4 mile ...

Ok but why would Bentley claim two different top speeds for ...

Follow-up self-response: the Mulliner is the Maybach competitor. The Speed version ...

ANY car can do an 11.8 1/4 mile if tuned. ...

the lap time comparison is pretty weird, it's a supercar and ...

At least the new RS3 made up for Audi's lackluster RS4 ...

That is so unusual for this car to be only 0.3 ...

The only car that is actually a competitor to this is ...

You’re comparing the wrong car. The Taurus/MKS is a 5-series competitor, ...

I’m sure the original comparison starter meant to compare this with ...

These three are the single most underrated luxury sedans ever made. ...

Possibly the most overrated sedan ever made. There was nothing particularly ...

Again this is just an appearance package. It is really not ...

This is really just a marketing/appearance package for the R/T. Even ...

Dodge is the most inconsistent with naming their vehicles.

The only real competitors for this one are the Maserati Ghibli ...

I’d say this is a better competitor to the E53 AMG ...

I’ve seen people try to compare this with the M5. It ...

That’s not a D4. The 6.3 W12 is not in any ...

Honestly, this car is in a league of its own. The ...

Will Audi change their top speed claim now that this reached ...

And yet the official top speed is 290