Image of McLaren F1 LM

McLaren F1 LM specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1062 kg (2341 lbs)
Power / weight 629 ps (620 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 664 Nm (490 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 1995
Origin country United Kingdom
Views 39.6k
Submitted by Centlivre

Performance

Top speed 362 kph (225 mph)
0 - 100 kph 2.9 s
0 - 100 mph 5.9 s
0 - 100 mph - 0 11.5 s

More acceleration times

McLaren F1 LM acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type BMW S70/2 V12 60°, 48 valves
Displacement 6.0 l (366 ci)
Power 668 ps (659 bhp / 491 kw)
Torque 705 Nm (520 lb-ft)
Power / liter 111 ps (110 hp)
Transmission 6
Layout middle engine, rear wheel drive

F1 LM rivals

User avatar

User avatar

Dick Allmighty  2m ago

**** all of you


User avatar

Good Gamer  1y ago

No I am not,if you don't believe its fine.He's the person who believes F1 can beat MP4-12c,F1 can do 7;11 at ring(which is impossible) all are the things I don't believe.From the posts he has posted.
http://fastestlaps.com/models/mclaren-f1

But then again I do believe F1 is faster than Enzo from the comparison I posted.And same you can see in ferrarichat forum from the drivers who have driven both.If you think I have not driven one.
http://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/288gto-f40-f50-enzo-laferrari/5925-enzo-mclaren-f1-3.html

Anyway you have your opinion and I have mine we should both learn to respect each others opinion.I would be very busy by the end of this week.


User avatar

BR2+  1y ago

Dude you have to be abcdefghi.....


User avatar

Good Gamer  1y ago

I don't think F1 LM or GTR can beat P1 even with modern tyres

You can't say that because in saying that you are telling that P1 will beat a road legal F1 GTR with more power.As for lap times go F1 GTR was around 10s faster than P1 GTR at redbull ring.
F1 GTR 1:23.798
http://www.racingsportscars.com/results/laps/Zeltweg-1997-08-03.html
P1 GTR 1:33(which is 2s slower than a GT3 car)
http://www.topgear.com/car-news/speed-week-2015/speed-week-986bhp-mclaren-p1-gtr-thrashed-track

So if P1 GTR with more downforce,slick tires etc couldn't beat F1 GTR what makes you think P1 beats F1 GTR.


User avatar

BR2+  2y ago

Its easy to say you would when your not shelling out millions of pounds for a rare car...

You would drive it no doubt, But you wouldnt push it to the limits, Hell you would be on HIGH alert just driving it in traffic, Watching out for every bump, Every rock in the road, Every passenger getting too close, And thats just in normal traffic, You would be babying that clutch. And yet you say you would push it to its, Limits, Or hand it to someone who would? lol

Yes there are people would would drive there cars fast, But how many people do you see pushing there millions of pound cars to the limit? Hell anything anyone gets that is new they baby the shite out of it.

And we have gone over this many times, The Bedford F1 wasnt STOCK, So no point in bringing that up again. The LM, Now thats different monster, its better in every way for the track, Its a damned race car, Only problem is its not the easiest car to drive, Even for a pro, So to compare it to a car of today in terms of track performance, Ive no idea, But im sure it will hold its own against.


User avatar

abcdeghi  2y ago

yes ,if you are talkingabout f1 lm,then i wouldn't test it but if it isstandard f1 then i would not hesitate to do it.
it is only my wish i know that probability of it being tested is 0.0000000000000000000000000000001%

MCLAREN SAID IT CAN IMPROVE STANDARD F1 LAPTIMES BY 10% AND CAN PRODUCE AROUND 550KG DOWNFORCE @ 150MPH.

F1'S AUTODROME LAP OF 1:21.2 WAS A HAPPY NEWS FOR ME AND IT MADE ME SAFE TO THINK F1 LM WILL BE FASTER THAN CGT.

HOWEVER IF I OWN AN LM I WOULD TEST ITS TOPSPEED.

THIS IS MY FAVORATE CAR TILL TODAY.
PERSONALLY I WAS NOT THAT GOOD FAN OF STANDARD F1 COMPARED TO IT.

THE BEST LOOKING CAR EVER PRODUCED IN MY OPINION.YES,IT DESERVES PRESERVATION BECAUSE IT IS A WORK OF ART

and i know only 5 were made +1 prototype.

and i would take it to track(STD F1,BUT LM WITH LEWIS HAMILTON)because driving and racing fast is fun.but i would learn about this car before taking it to track.AND LOL THAT'S WHY I SENT REQUEST TO EVO.

NOT EVERY PEOPLE HAVE SAME PERSONALITY,LIKE FLEMKE WHO ALLOWED HIS F1 TO BE TESTED.

 

User avatar

Chad  2m ago

the McLaren f1 LM has a much lower top end than the norm F1, its 354kmh or 220mph vs P1's 217mph


User avatar

BR2+  2y ago

Its not about generosity, Its about preservation. They only made 5 LMs, 1-2-3-4-5. FIVE, In the world, Million pound cars, Why would you take it to the race track, And push it to its limits knowing how hard it is to get there, And knowing the Possible outcome?

This was never tested seriously for good reason, And it never will be, You can say YOU would do that, But we all know you wouldnt.


User avatar

abcdeghi  2y ago

Someone should be generous enough to test this car.Mclaren should really test XP1LM around TG track, Nurburgring,Monza,Silverstone,bedford,evo tracks, and many more. this was never tested seriously.

by the way 0-60mph was 3.9s due to wheelspin at start if it is not calculated then entered values are correct.


User avatar

Assad Regime  4y ago

no lap times for such beast ?


User avatar

Wallace Racing  4y ago

6.9 @ 112 in the 1/8 mile = 10.87 @ 138.88 in the 1/4


User avatar

Fangio Man  5y ago

0-200 should be under 9 seconds.

No doubt!


User avatar

Ferrari driver  5y ago

Sorry, did not know that.


User avatar

Georg  5y ago

wiki is no source..


User avatar

Ferrari driver  5y ago

1/4 mile time is 11 seconds.

Source:

de.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLaren_F1


User avatar

Shaggy  5y ago

What video game, Project Gotham Racing 3, I have that game and it has that car.


User avatar

Ace_Topspeed & Srshayan  5y ago

The entered numbers were from a video game which is not creditable & had errors, we apologise


User avatar

The Horn Moster  5y ago

Never considered that wheelspin in the start may be the cause of 3.9s of acceleration which seems to be wrong but the entered ones are the most correct ones, or maybe around them, more or less (should be less a bit on 0-160, about 5.7s)


User avatar

Ace_Topspeed & Srshayan  5y ago

If we do not calculate the wheelspin, the entered times (0-600)mph : 2.9s & (0-100) 5.9s : Seems to be correct or maybe we should wait maybe Hamilton may test that car...and other word I did not put NFS as the correct resource by the way, & thanks for your advice on Top Gear!


User avatar

Ace_Topspeed & Srshayan  5y ago

Your right just Guessed something from calculations, I did not mean anything about the real times & of course it is not faster than veyron...Just guessed not judging


User avatar

BR2'  5y ago

LOL Wait wait wait...you base your acceleration assumptions on... NFS: Most Wanted? lol Conversation Over!

But i digress, ill answer anywhoo.

@Ace_Topspeed & Srshayan

1: The McLaren F1 cannot win against a Veyron. wether its from a dig or a roll, the fact that u actually believed Top Gear is hilarious in itself.

The case of the LeMans, said tested didnt want to "Bully" the car, you know since they only made 5(I wouldnt either) so he had ALot of access wheelspin at the start, so he couldnt push the car(AS Told) as he wanted, so subpar numbers were met, but, this car IS faster then an F1, wether its round track or acceleration, but only till about 210Mph where the Much more superior aerodynamics takes place on the F1. But years ago, the person, or one of the persons mentioned that if he were allowed to really show it the beans, he estimated the 1/4 time to be 10.5@140, but unfortunetly he never go the chance to do much with it. sadly, and i believe him.

On another note, never use Top Gear drag races as a reference..


User avatar

Mental  5y ago

"It is really really obvious that a car with + more 70 horsepower. less weight, added aerodynamical drag and resulted less acceleration?"

How less acceleration? As I can see, that's pretty better than the "basic" F1. F1 LM would be quite much faster on the track. To orient on the data which comes from the video game makes no sense.


User avatar

Ace_Topspeed & Srshayan  5y ago

It is really really obvious that a car with + more 70 horsepower. less weight, added aerodynamical drag and resulted less acceleration? probably the driver was afraid to do a full throttle with that monster!why?

Mclaren F1 at its one and only real world test with bugatti veyron held the lead for the first seconds, that means LM, makes a Huge Start & makes the drivers head to hit the seat hard so maybe that's why the records are not accurate. Mclaren F1 LM's speed was never tested within the 4 sold cars & one waiting for Luis Hamilton to win the other championship, claimed at 362 km/h which the F1 GTR did 381 km/h easily in a track not in order to set a record, but a normal track which is nearly the same specs of LM & it can do a lot more than that!

Calculated Acceleration results within the newly released NFS MW 2012 was:
(kph)
0-100: 2.85
0-160: 5.2
0-200: 7.2

only estimated, the real results should be around them...


User avatar

Mike B  6y ago

lol, it's all right :P


User avatar

phavyarden  6y ago

lol, it was the same sorry :p


User avatar

phavyarden  6y ago

@Mike B
There's another test by Motor Trend.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/112_0004_2000_mclaren_f1_supercar/viewall.html
That edition was my first car magazine :)


User avatar

Mike B  6y ago

Those 0-60 and 0-100 are BS;

There was only one test ever made (by CAR) and they got 0-60 in 3.9 and 0-100 in 6.7


User avatar

S-Vettel  6y ago

overpriced english car with a non english engine ? lol

brakes are complete fail


User avatar

MondayBlues  6y ago

How come the nurb lap time is not here?


User avatar

Julle85  6y ago

I love this car.


User avatar

Mal-2-2  7y ago

It counts as a street legal car for sure, but only counts as a production car in places like Germany. The volume is too low and the car isn't... well, it isn't actually produced, it's a modified concoction of existing parts.

I'm sure if someone took a few Formula 1 cars and fettled with them to make them road legal and sold them, that wouldn't make them production cars.

Surely if you do the same with Group C cars, it's the same thing.

In Germany if 9FF twin-turbocharge a 911 GT3 up to 1200hp, that counts as a production car.

If you count the Dauer 962, then you have to count the Callaway Corvette - there were only 2 of those and it's clearly a modified 'vette.

'Production runs' of this kind wouldn't pass FIA GT1 homologation rules that demand a minimum of 25 cars. That's a fairly good basis for saying that they aren't production cars. The F1 was designed and built from the ground up as a production road car, which sets it apart from the above and made it the fastest production car and it still is the fastest normally aspirated production car, maybe even the fastest normally aspirated street-legal car.

Photo of McLaren F1 LM

Timeline

Latest topics

Formula 1 still slower than Le Mans LMP1 prototypes 52
5 days ago by phavyarden

Viper ACR returns to Nürburgring for one last chance at production car lap record 32
5 days ago by phavyarden

Latest Spy Pics of Mid-Engined 2019 C8 Corvette: Best View Yet of Cabin and Overall Proportions 7
6 days ago by BR2-

Which is faster - Le Mans LMP1 car or Formula 1 car? 74
1 week ago by Simon Larsson

Formula 1 and MotoGP season updates 9
3 weeks ago by Fastedee

Porsche are already tired of winning 18
3 weeks ago by cosimo

Active users

Fastedee, saxy, FastestLaps, BR2+, Murmur, fakekillerfour, DeDe, rhs1992, dddd, honzakoubek, tyler, Hans, Freakz