Image of McLaren 720S

McLaren 720S specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1419-1436 kg (3128-3166 lbs)
Power / weight 504 ps (497 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 539 Nm (398 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2017
Origin country United Kingdom
Average fuel consumption 15.2 l/100 km (15 mpg US / 19 mpg UK)
Noise @ idle 57 dB
Noise @ 30 mph 68 dB
Noise @ 50 mph 71 dB
Noise @ 70 mph 75 dB
Views 72.3k
Submitted by fakekillerfour

Performance

Top speed 341 kph (212 mph)
0 - 50 kph 1.3 s
0 - 100 kph 2.6 s
0 - 130 kph 3.8 s
0 - 150 kph 4.7 s
0 - 160 kph 5.1 s
0 - 200 kph 7.1 s
0 - 250 kph 11.4 s
0 - 300 kph 19.2 s
0 - 30 mph 1.2 s
0 - 40 mph 1.7 s
0 - 50 mph 2.2 s
0 - 60 mph 2.5 s
0 - 70 mph 3.2 s
0 - 80 mph 3.8 s
0 - 90 mph 4.4 s
0 - 100 mph 5.1 s
0 - 110 mph 5.9 s
0 - 120 mph 6.8 s
0 - 130 mph 7.8 s
0 - 140 mph 8.9 s
0 - 150 mph 10.2 s
0 - 160 mph 11.7 s
0 - 170 mph 13.6 s
0 - 180 mph 17.5 s
Est. 1/8 mile 6.6 s @ 118.7 mph
1/4 mile 9.9 s @ 148.2 mph
Est. 1/2 mile 15.7 s @ 170.3 mph
1000 m 18.1 s @ 293.6 kph
Est. 100 - 200 kph 4.5 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph 12.3 s
50 kph - 0 8 m (25 ft)
100 kph - 0 29 m (95 ft)
200 kph - 0 109 m (359 ft)
300 kph - 0 237 m (779 ft)
30 mph - 0 8 m (26 ft)
50 mph - 0 21 m (68 ft)
60 mph - 0 28 m (93 ft)
70 mph - 0 40 m (131 ft)
18m slalom 73.4 kph (45.6 mph)
Lateral acceleration 1.10 g (11 m/s²)
McLaren 720S acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type twin-turbocharged V8
Displacement 4.0 l (244 ci)
Power 720 ps (710 bhp / 529 kw) @ 7500 rpm
Torque 770 Nm (568 lb-ft) @ 5500 rpm
Power / liter 180 ps (178 hp)
Efficiency 47 PS per l/100 km
Transmission 7 Speed SSG
Layout middle engine, rear wheel drive

Laptimes 12

720S rivals

User avatar

User avatar

dino  1w ago

in other news, the fat mermaid believes she has the firepower to defend herself and the rest of eu, only if you're going to show us that you've inherited some na_zi weapon from ww2 stacked under your bed which you never disclosed to anybody lol

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-10/merkel-says-europe-can-t-count-on-u-s-military-umbrella-anymore

soon enough, the german automakers will be priced close to a toyota corolla and honda civic when sales start to slump, if the fat mermaid doesn't obey

http://via.news/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/portugal-torres-vedras-Angela-Merkel-Germany-vianews-684x1024.jpg


 

User avatar

dino  1w ago

let me guess the usual excuse with por-shee fanboys, the germans didn't have access to a fire hydrant for a quick refill every time the water tank light would come on :)

like i said, it's an overhyped turbo s with awd disengaged and a fish tank that can't do much for more than couple of minutes. what an ingenious design lololol


User avatar

Fastedee  1w ago @dino

Porshee vs Porshuh hmmm so different.


User avatar

dino  1w ago @Fastedee

or poor-hush when cheating devices aren't doing their job :)

excellent job from mclaren in destroying this fugly beetle


User avatar

BR2+  1m ago

Wow, 90k in options, Thats more then a fully loaded M3 with every option available, Wonder what all the options were, Not like there worth more then an M3, I think that price JUST for options, Is just ridiculous, And im sure there were more too, Prolly mostly carbon fiber stuff.

But either way it looks good in blue, Still not sure how i feel on the looks, Seen better, But seen worse to.

But i have to admit, That mountain road looks Amazing! It looks straight out of a video game, Its astonishing.

 

User avatar

saxy  1m ago

Expensive options on a 488gtb can easily cost that much as well. I just saw one of these yesterday in orange + black. It sure is impressive, but unless I’m trying to go racing I can’t see why id need to get a 720s over a 570s. If it were for showing off, then I’d get something else.


User avatar

MikaCoulthard  1m ago

Yes!


User avatar

BR2+  1m ago @saxy

Still, The options alone are more then a fantastic car, Which is plain stupid, No amount of options is worth a fully done M3, And the 488 is even worse, starts at 270k, yet with all the options available, its around 425k, And that's insane a full GT3 for that money, And like the 720 it's mostly carbon stuff that won't even do anything but save a bit of weight, Pagani and Bugatti are prolly the worst of all year there expensive, but literally every option fitted fully done is more then your above average house..


User avatar

saxy  1m ago @BR2+

I agree but with some manufacturers like pagani and what not, things are so custom, everything has to be specially made, which MUST cost a lot more for the effort. Other options like a 50k Brietling clock is just for the stupidly rich for bragging rights. Where you’d think brand name expensive cars should come with more things, it actually could be the opposite. A cheap holiday inn comes with free breakfast but a luxury 5 star hotel charges $25 for it.


User avatar

fakekillerfour  1m ago

CarandDriver instrumented test of the McLaren 720s
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2018-mclaren-720s-instrumented-test-review


User avatar

Bappy  2m ago

0-200 kmh (0-124mph) is actually 7.8 seconds . And for the Ferrari pista 0-124 mph is 7.6 seconds .

 

User avatar

Freakz  2m ago

We take the quickest time it has achieved, validated by a test. 7.8 sec is McLaren's official statistic, but as you probably know real world results have been even better (since McLarens' actually produce more power than what is stated on their official website).

A German magazine got a 7.1 sec in 0-200 km/h (so we use this):
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/37474900112/in/album-72157689118575056/

We do this on pretty much any car (if valid results/figures are given)!


User avatar

hostboy  3m ago

Looks so sexy every Czech woman wishes to lay a finger on this! ;)))))


User avatar

QA51M  3m ago

Top gear and chris harris have lapped the 720s around Algarve International Circuit (Portimao) in 1.55.20


User avatar

SRT  3m ago

Algarve Circuit - 1:55.2


User avatar

Chanante  3m ago

One question of this car. Many people said that 720S does 800ps but Mclaren declares 720 ps and in homologation an engine can make 95% to 105% of the declared power but 800 ps is more than a 110%. For example 488 in Sport Auto test maked 700ps and it is a little bit less than a 105%. It is legal? Why Mclaren don´t said that 720S makes 750 ps?

 

User avatar

Tyrone1  3m ago

Sorry has there actually been a measured case of 800hp at the crank? Or is that just a guess based off of dyno results?
If not then that is the reason why they can get away with lying about the horsepower i guess.


User avatar

Fastedee  3m ago @Tyrone1

Guess based off 697 whp.


User avatar

Tyrone1  2m ago @Fastedee

Yeah thought so. Its probably more reasonable to assume that the 720s is highly efficient rather than grossly underrated. It probably makes around 750hp with minimal losses but it doesnt make 800.


User avatar

manone  2m ago @Tyrone1

no. you can't make a drivetrain 50hp more efficient than other
top cars.


User avatar

Tyrone1  2m ago @manone

Maybe not 50, but is it so far-fetched to believe they've made a highly efficient engine instead of automatically assuming they are lying by using the "15 percent" drivetrain loss rule of thumb?
Rule of thumb which (as the name suggests) varies from car to car quite considerably in fact.


User avatar

Dynomight  2m ago @Tyrone1

Absoluteely


User avatar

manone  2m ago @Tyrone1

what do you mean with "highly efficient engine"?
engine efficiency is roughly defined as the ratio between the power and the
heat absorbed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engine_efficiency
an engine being more efficient than another means that this
ratio is bigger.
from what we see, it is evident that, say compared to what
stated by mclaren, engine power is noticeably higher than
720+5%, but no information on heat absorbed. why are you so concerned about efficiency and engne heat absorbed,
anyways?


User avatar

Tyrone1  2m ago @manone

By efficient i meant drivetrain losses. Minimal losses between the crank and the wheels via maybe different materials, smaller tyres etc... I'm no car mechanic obviously, but Surely if Mclaren was doing something illegal by understating the power by that much, homologation laws would have caught them out no? Im just trying to think of an explanation other than "Mclaren lied".


User avatar

manone  2m ago @Tyrone1

i am not sure, but i think homologation laws have nothing to do with manufacturer's declared power and effective vehicle
power. Moreover, cars used for homologations are not
random samples taken from dealers' network.
I think maclaren, unlike ferrari, decided to
up their ethics to the german manufacturers' standards:
BMW, M-B, Porsche, VW have been producing
TURBOCHARGED engines cars with much higher power
than the official figures, making appear proper competitors
with correct power figures like being underpowered lemons. They have being doing this for at least 2 decades now, to the point milions of idiots around
the world started believing germans were employing
physics-defying technology in their cars, which is the same
thing happening with mclaren now.


User avatar

DrDuke  2m ago @manone

The simplest and most logic explanation to this topic is: the dyno runs are inacccurate.


User avatar

manone  2m ago @DrDuke

maybe, but then it remains totally unexplained how 720 S
accelerates exactly like an 800hp (700whp)-1430kg car, in spite of having just 720hp.


User avatar

BR2+  2m ago @DrDuke

So far all but a few dyno tests, have have over 700bhp, the lowest I no of is 689bhp n highest of 719hp, and those are all in different dynos, so this car is making around 832bhp real power, so they are lying out there asses, it's not bad for a consumer's stand point, but it's certainly not a good quality for a company to be honest in order to look better or faster then it really is IMO.


User avatar

DrDuke  2m ago @manone

up to 120-140km/h its all about traction, power/weight and weight after that drag and power gets significant.


User avatar

DrDuke  2m ago @BR2+

The best dynos have an inaccuracy of 2%. I don't know how much worse the worst are but I think somewhere between 5-10%. If you ask around in the scene then you will learn there are some dynos that always provide too high numbers.

And this tuning would be a total lie:
http://www.evo.co.uk/news/21011/tuner-upgrade-takes-mclaren-720s-close-to-800bhp


User avatar

manone  2m ago @DrDuke

i meant roll acceleration races. as it seems, from the videos posted, from 100kmh onwards the acceleration is clearly not
explainable with "only" 720hp, nor its drag is any different from its peers given its max speed.


User avatar

Monolith29  2m ago @DrDuke

with dyno's all we can do is gather all the different dyno results of a stock car, this case 720s and average them out to get the closest to its real power. i say this due to all the variables between dyno's - even air temp, humidity, elevation, the fuel used ect ect. my best guess is about 735-755hp, ive no proof its just a guesstimate based on others info and different dyno results


User avatar

SRT  3m ago

720S vs P1 by Chris Harris test on Algarve soon

mcl-198.jpg?itok=wOkymCmw

 

User avatar

Tyrone1  3m ago

720s wont win. It may be faster on smaller, more handling based tracks but come on. It wont beat the P1 on a proper fast race track. Expectations for this car are just through the roof. People are expecting it to beat everything.


User avatar

TheMeenoBuffalo  2m ago @Tyrone1

I bet the 720S would have beat the P1 if it had Trofeo Rs.


User avatar

Tyrone1  2m ago @TheMeenoBuffalo

Neither have the trofeo, so its fair.
Power is power. I dont care how much the 720s REALLY has, it is down on both Horsepower and Torque, considerably.
The fact is that the P1 will walk the 720s on the straights. 720s compensates a little in the corners but its not enough on a proper race track.


User avatar

TheMeenoBuffalo  2m ago @Tyrone1

The P1 is not that much faster in the straights, quarter mile times and trap speeds are almost identical.


User avatar

marcoppi  3m ago

hi guys, a question for someone more clever than me ;-)
how is it possible for the 720s to be so close in chrono in almost all circuits to the lambo performante while on the nordschleife the 720 takes almost 20 seconds from the performante ?
isnt it too much ? is it a matter of pilot/driver ? maybe mclaren should perform an official test ?
time differences are so close even with the 918 in many tracks that 20 seconds seemed to me really too much in the nordschleife !
very best .. and thank for any reply
marco

 

User avatar

DeDe  3m ago

Huracán laptime is a factory time with factory driver; 720S was driven by a car journalist/ex-racing driver (Horst von Saurma). :)


User avatar

Tyrone1  3m ago

In addition to what DeDe said, you can probably knock off a good 5 seconds off that 720s' time to account for the German bias ;)


User avatar

Fastedee  3m ago @Tyrone1

German BIAS?????!!NEIN Nein Nein!!! Lmao


User avatar

marcoppi  3m ago @DeDe

thank you DeDe .. could be interesting an official test from the factory with a racing driver as happens for other factories .. even to compare with the new gt2rs great lap time


User avatar

Monolith29  3m ago @marcoppi

when they put the new mclaren on the ring it will smash the gt2's 6:47 time. im guessing 6:41, could be a lot better if they have christian in the drivers seat


User avatar

Chanante  3m ago @Monolith29

You can't compare a Factory professional driver with a magazine driver. And GT2 RS is really fast and more track focused, 720S is great and a straight line monster but the GT2 destroy this car in a this track, is is a Porsche territory and have the best set up for make a better times. 76 Km/h in a 18m slalom its awesome in a street car.


User avatar

Monolith29  2m ago @Chanante

sorry i was talking about the senna not the 720s, and the gt2 rs is one of my fav cars atm


User avatar

Freakz  3m ago

McLaren 720S 0-347 km/h:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0albv9fxSp0

 

User avatar

hostboy  3m ago

I didn't see 350, only 347


User avatar

Freakz  3m ago @hostboy

It seems so, I fixed it on my end.


User avatar

Tyrone1  3m ago

Erm, not that ive ever been in a 720s, but i have seen pictures and videos: that is NOT the 720s dashboard. Looks like a 570s. SOUNDS like a 570s too. And as far as i know the 570s does not do 300kph in 19s. Explain plz...


User avatar

Monolith29  3m ago

this is a 570s.... its obvious if you're familiar with mclaren interiors


User avatar

Freakz  3m ago @Tyrone1

It's actually a tuned 570S!


User avatar

hostboy  4m ago

Every time I get an Obama phone, I think of this..


User avatar

Freakz  4m ago

McLaren 720S vs Ferrari F12 (800 HP):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O94nHLuJoa8

 

User avatar

Fastedee  4m ago

No naturally aspirated front engined rwd production car will ever challenge 720s unless It's a hybrid. Can only imagine what 720 s successor will do to overhyped and overweight Tesla Roadster.


User avatar

lolnoobs  3m ago @Fastedee

tesla will murder this


User avatar

xxSoulRaipahxx  3m ago @lolnoobs

And why's that? All because it claims to do 0-60mph in 1.9s? Will it have sub-par reliability, though? I wouldn't think so.


User avatar

Monolith29  3m ago @Fastedee

this might challenge it http://fastestlaps.com/models/pagani-zonda-760-rs


User avatar

Monolith29  3m ago @lolnoobs

agreed, watch the dragtimes guy in the passenger seat of one that was running for a few hours already..... and you will understand its really not overhyped. but being elec elon could go for a more rimac'ish top speed or he will govern it at like 300kmh hoping for the former!


User avatar

Fastedee  3m ago @Monolith29

Zonda will but It's rear engined
.


User avatar

Monolith29  3m ago @Fastedee

ahh ya true, wasnt thinking lol


User avatar

hostboy  4m ago

If a European gets 2.6 0-62 mph on this thing, then it should really do 2.2 0-60 mph in an American test. I thought Euros don't use rollouts

 

User avatar

DeDe  4m ago

Rollout is a ridiculous US-testing methode. :D That 2,6 s is about 2,4 s 0-60mph without and yes, about 2,2 WITH rollout.


User avatar

Freakz  4m ago

McLaren 720S vs Porsche 918 Standstill Drag:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBQ5W0nOVWo

 

User avatar

n21t4  4m ago

Rematch will need to be done. Bad surface. 0-60mph in 5.1 seconds? I mean, a 2011 Challenger SRT8 392 with a manual transmission, 470bhp and a weight of over 4000lbs can do it in 4.5 seconds.


User avatar

Fastedee  4m ago @n21t4

Reminds me of this guy on youtube who took his V12 Vantage to some bumpy wet English road, floored it and got a 5.9 0-60. Only that car only does it in 4.2 anyhow. This is almost double the McLarens normal time. Even the Supercar Driver with a 10.9 quarter mile for the P1 aren't this bad.


User avatar

hostboy  4m ago

I think a 720S can hit 0-62 mph in 3.2 secs on a normal road, 2.8 on a race track.


User avatar

Eric Kovalsky  3w ago @hostboy

Actually on a normal road with launch control it is reliably in the 2.7-2.8 sec range, or 2.5-2.6 sec at a dragstrip with near ideal conditions. This is with 93 octane pump gas and the new Corsa tires.


User avatar

Tyrone1  4m ago

Grand tour test track 1 min 17.9 seconds.

 

User avatar

lafars  4m ago

fastest streetlegal car around the Eboladrome


User avatar

Tyrone1  4m ago @lafars

Unless you count the 650s on Trofeos xD
I was always curious as to how they got a 650s around that tight little track so fast. Now we have an answer!


User avatar

hostboy  4m ago

Test figures (AUTO BILD sportscars)
0-50 km/h: 2.0 s
0-100 km/h: 3.9 s
0-130 km/h: 5.1 s
0-160 km/h: 6.3 s
0-200 km/h: 8.1 s
0-300 km/h: 24.9 s
0-402.34 m: 11.00 s @ 240.0 km/h
https://imgur.com/a/gdNmb

 

User avatar

Fastedee  4m ago

Them Germans got drunk and did tire smoking starts. Who could resist with all that power? Lolol 0-300 6 seconds slower than their own time!


User avatar

Fastedee  4m ago

Hellcat did 220-300 in 11 but this did 240-300 in 13.9. wow


User avatar

Freakz  6m ago

McLaren 720S vs 800 Horsepower Dodge Viper ACR Extreme Roll Drag:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5vv5GgWxVI

 

User avatar

FastestLaps  5m ago

That wing on Viper did no favors. ACR probably the last car u would want for a fast highway drag races.

That said - McLaren flatplane twin turbo V8 is ace. It's like F40 of 21st century.



 

User avatar

knmkl  6m ago

Well it was done t 1000feet below sea lvl lmfao so no wonder it went fast.. thats easy an extra 30-50whp


User avatar

sroser  6m ago

720s runs 9.80 @ 147.46 MPH
Attached Images

attachment.php?attachmentid=156505&stc=1


User avatar

Campbell  7m ago

All supercars are on notice. Teslas coming for you. No excuses

New Roadster coming 2020

0-60 1.9 sec

0-100 4.2 sec

8.8

roadster

sec 1/4 mile

Top speed over 250 mph

620 miles on a single charge

Seats 4

AND... this is just the BASE model!

 

User avatar

sroser  7m ago

Sounds like a vacuum cleaner though.


User avatar

Monanysou  7m ago

-Do you really think Elon Musk is suddenly going to start living up to his promises on delivering on time? I hardly believe it.
-Also, we've seen his cars so far. Straight line fast, yes, but heavy, dull, boring and inert, accompanied by practical and ergonomical flaws that are to be expected from an unexperienced manufacturer as Tesla.
-2020 Roadster promises the same boring stuff. Straight line speed, fancy trendy design and nothing more. Well, not enough for me if you ask me, because the price will be huge, positive.
-By the time that car is ready, other manufacturers will already be ahead, overtaking his tech bubble made for taking fools money on stock market.


User avatar

lafars  7m ago

the 1.9 seconds 0-60 time smells like bullshit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAvIVGGhEis


User avatar

moegigo  7m ago

just straight line numbers. what is it for if it goes on save / overheating mode after 10min and top speed limitited to 220km/h like a ford fiesta ST and corner speed below a Ford Fiesta ST. Shouldnt I get straight a Ford Fiesta and save a lot of money?!


User avatar

Joe  7m ago @lafars

This video is bullshit. There are plenty of tuned cars that have broken 2.0 seconds on street tires. His math makes too many assumptions to really be taken seriously.


User avatar

Progresso  4m ago

your soup sucks


User avatar

Fastedee  4m ago

Sure and E Prix cars are as fast as F1 cars...from 1949! .....well almost as fast lololololol.!! !!


User avatar

Steve  4m ago @Monanysou

....say the car manufacturers.

;)


User avatar

Lcx  3m ago @sroser

Sounds like my mums hairdryer!!!


User avatar

Freakz  7m ago

Huracan Performante vs 720S Roll Drag:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nataVD3aqFc


User avatar

Freakz  7m ago

Vehicle Virgins Parker's Supercharged Huracan vs DragTimes 720S:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFcVBcv6P8Q



User avatar

sroser  7m ago

ZmzGUyy.jpg


User avatar

bob  7m ago

this just managed a 1:11.5 at angelesy coastal with Steve sutcliff at the wheel

 

User avatar

tyler  7m ago

Do you have link


User avatar

bob  7m ago @tyler

only a screen shot
I can't upload it here


User avatar

sroser  7m ago @bob

Page 064 of Evo Issue 242.


User avatar

dddd  7m ago

This car has such a tremendous straight line acceleration that it is insane...It also must have great drivetrain, gearbox, gear ratios and it has to put power down really good. Then when we combine it with 800 HP/1450 KGS it may have that kind of acceleration capabilities.

 

User avatar

cosimo  7m ago

there's always a catch, i'll let you figure this one out all by yourself :)


User avatar

dddd  7m ago

Despite that car is extremely expensive we can say that its a bargain when we talk about luxurious-high-end supercars. 488 GTB, Huracan and 991.2 Turbo S are not even close to 720S in terms of performance. On this levels that still matters.

 

User avatar

Chanante  7m ago

Funny with 800ps and les than 1450kg is easy to take the numbers. A Ultima GTR cost les than 100k punds and distroy this car but is not "special".


User avatar

cosimo  7m ago

how can it be expensive and a bargain at the same time ? it has its quirks and i hope you're not serious about the bargain part.

all it does is it will hurt the prices of those of who own 675, 650 and spider versions until the next 750 is out or p15 or whatever they will call it.

it's another flop from british engineering for those who want to show off their needle dicks just like porky 9-11 turbo.

i don't even have to open up the overheating part about mclaren cars and turbochargers lol

this is british engineering at its best

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlbR8eUZhfo


User avatar

Fastedee  7m ago @cosimo

British engineering is the best but imperfect. Italy has great engineers but their cars don't win all the time either.


User avatar

cosimo  7m ago @Fastedee

and it will remain imperfect for life :)

so if a car wins in a 1/4 mile and does accelerate couple of secs faster, does that mean it's an all time great super car ? e.g. bugatti veyron / chiron ?

the 720s will be dethroned once the successor is out and will be forgotten. hence 12c, 650s ,675 and soon enough the 720.

they still do not get it when it comes to designing a beautiful car mixed with power and passion. even billy and bobby can make tons of power out of a murican ohv v8 with or without a blower :)


User avatar

Cosmo use your brain  6m ago @cosimo

"and it will remain imperfect for life :)" this is not a piece of software ffs, you can't fix it with a downloadable update, all cars are imperfect for life, for example the LFA with it's tiny fuel tank, 4C with it's shit engine, use your brain. Keep in mind that you are talking about a super series cash grab, perfect as the economic boom in China for the last decades made for tons of materialistic billionaires. The super series cars are not here to stay, they are like iPhones with their yearly trivial upgrades. The ultimate series is where McLaren makes it's mark, I don't see the P1 getting forgotten any time soon, and I don't see how McLaren can make the P1 without the Mp4-12c to fund it's development.


User avatar

cosimo  6m ago @Cosmo use your brain

720 is history for the time being now that the track focused version is out but some might remember the 720 because it looks a bit sexier, but the good news is the senna mclaren will rape the the gt2 rs with the right driver behind the wheels of course :)

Photo of McLaren 720S

Photo of McLaren 720S

Photo of McLaren 720S

Photo of McLaren 720S

Photo of McLaren 720S

Photo of McLaren 720S

Photo of McLaren 720S

Photo of McLaren 720S

Photo of McLaren 720S

Photo of McLaren 720S

Photo of McLaren 720S

Photo of McLaren 720S

Timeline

User avatar
fakekillerfour 4h 

added laptime for Porsche 911 Carrera GTS (991 facelift), laptime for BMW M4 CS, laptime for BMW M4 CS, laptime for Porsche 911 Carrera GTS (991 facelift), laptime for Nissan GT-R (R35 570PS) and more

User avatar
Max812 5h 

Latest topics

Jaguar F-type r has Nürburgring lap time 24
2 weeks ago by BR2+

Which is faster - Le Mans LMP1 car or Formula 1 car? 87
3 weeks ago by Fastedee

Gents it’s time for round two! 21
1 month ago by Dolby89

488 Pista, Is it really worth it? (updated) 115
1 month ago by saxy

Nissan GT-R Nismo brings new Tsukuba lap record for "cars with doors" 10
2 months ago by sroser

McLaren P1 LM laps Nürburgring in 6:43.20 63
2 months ago by Monolith29

Active users

fakekillerfour, xxSoulRaipahxx, moegigo, saxy, Fastedee, Hans, FastestLaps, honzakoubek, BR2+, hostboy, omarkhaled, tyler, manone, Inline 6 rules