Performance
| Max speed |
176.08 miles/h (284 km/h) |
| 0-100 km/h |
- |
| 0-160 km/h |
8.0 seconds |
| 0-200 km/h |
- |
| 0-300 km/h |
- |
| Quarter mile |
11.07 @ 129mph seconds |
| 0-100-0 mph |
- |
Engine
| Power |
441 kw (592 bhp / 600 ps) |
| Torque |
759 Nm (562 lb-ft) |
| Displacement |
8.4 liters |
| Engine type |
V-10, 2 valves per cylinder |
| Engine location |
Front |
General data
| Gearbox |
6 |
| Drive |
Rear Wheel Drive |
| Mass |
1536 kilograms (3379 lbs) |
| Weight distribution |
- |
| Year of introduction |
2008 |
| Home country |
United States |
Calculations
| Power to Weight ratio |
385.28 hp/tonne |
| Power per liter |
52.54 kw/liter |
Fastestlaps.com stats
| FL Rank |
Position - 1357/1356, 0 points |
| Page views |
59757 |
| Car submitted by |
unknown |
More Viper SRT-10 ACR photos  
Other cars by Dodge (20)
Viper SRT-10, Charger SRT-8, Viper GTS, Viper SRT-10 (600hp), Viper RT/10, Caliber SRT4, Challenger SRT-8, Viper ACR, Viper SRT-10 Roadster, Viper GT2, Charger R/T Daytona, Viper SRT-10 Roadster, Ram SRT-10, Charger R/T Daytona, Charger V6, Charger R/T, Viper RT/10, Charger Daytona, Neon SRT-4, Viper SRT-10 ACR 1:33 Edition (Revised gearing, shifter, wing),
|
The Americans have already produced the perfect car, the Saleen S7(Competition), after dominating European tracks with the most wins in the Saleen S7R. The aluminum OHV engine has the best power to weight ratio and is why Vette engines are found in everything from RX7s to M3s to 944s at the autocrosses.
You don't even know how much weight they took out and you don't know how the gear ratio is, but you are already talking about 5 seconds...
How about the other expert!!!
(Porsche, Nissan, Chevy), cars are developed on the Ring That's a dumb thing to say...
So you're saying that the Porsche beat the Viper because of experience? You are saying that the Porsche whas built based on the Nurburgring?
How about the porsche beat the Viper, because it has more PS and wais less?? The Power to Weight ratio is much higher!
Viper 385.28 hp/tonne
Porsche 446.35 hp/tonne
This better Laptimes, don't have anything to do with Experience in the Nurburgring. Just look at the numbers and the result of faster Laptimes is logical.
“when are they going to test the 2010 viper at the 'ring???? has everyone forgot about it???? ”
An all new Viper is on the way. Look for a new test then.
???????????
Normally (Porsche, Nissan, Chevy), cars are developed on the Ring and get to lap it repeatedly over weeks/months. The Viper ACR never did this. It was factory backed, but they only did four laps, it was more like a magazine test than anything. Just by the fact that they could have run into better track conditions just by coming back on a couple of other days, they could have easily brought their lap time down. (Not to mention even more practice with the car/track).
“Oh they can! Buy Radical.”
Agreed. But the Viper is cooler, lol.
“European cars cannot beat 100K American muscle like the ACR and ZR1 for a similar price.”Oh they can! Buy Radical.
On reliability, the ACR will last a while with certainty; if you want to sit in it during that time, well some people seem picky.
When the ACR beat the Nordschleife record, everybody whas saying OHHH a Euro car beater!! We realy showed them this time!! And what happened then whas that some european got pissed off and took some 3 - 6 year older models and beat that lap record.
And I also said, wait until they test the new cars. And there you have it, the GT2 RS...
You can drive a GT2 all day long, go to work in that car every day and the car just won't break. With the ACR?? I don't realy know.
It has alwais been the same with american and asian cars.
Take a look at the Feraris, maseratis, Zondas in the list. This are cars that are much older than the ACR. Just wait until the europeans put their newest models on the track. The result will be the same as with the Apolo. LOL!!!
One track is an oval, so it's no surprise that the Viper loses, and the other is small gap.