With 0.3 second of rollout added to the 0-60 mph time, the 0-60 mph and 0-100 km/h times translate very easily well.
BMW X6 M specs
Price in Europe | €113,800 - €130,900 |
Car type | SUV/truck |
Curb weight | 2250-2373 kg (4960-5232 lbs) |
Introduced | 2009 |
Origin country | Germany |
Gas mileage | 26.6-13.9 l/100 km (9-17 mpg US / 11-20 mpg UK) |
CO2 emissions | 363 g/km |
Views | 73k |
Submitted by | gt |
Lap times
Acceleration
0 - 40 kph | 1.3 s |
0 - 50 kph | 1.6 s |
0 - 80 kph | 3.4 s |
0 - 100 kph | 4.5 s |
0 - 130 kph | 7.1 s |
0 - 160 kph | 10.3 s |
0 - 180 kph | 12.9 s |
0 - 200 kph | 16.3 s |
1000 m | 23.3 s |
0 - 60 mph | 4.0 s |
0 - 100 mph | 10.2 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 9.0 s @ 95.1 mph |
1/4 mile | 12.5 s @ 111.2 mph |
General performance
Top speed | 275 kph (171 mph) |
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 17.9 s @ 1512 ft |
Est. max acceleration | 0.67 g (7 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 62.9 kph (39.1 mph) |
100 kph - 0 | 36 m (119 ft) |
200 kph - 0 | 151 m (496 ft) |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | V8 twin turbo technology |
Displacement | 4.4 l (269 ci) |
Power | 555 ps (547 bhp / 408 kw) |
Torque | 680 Nm (502 lb-ft) |
Power / liter | 126 ps (124 hp) |
Power / weight | 239 ps (236 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 293 Nm (216 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 28 PS per l/100 km |
Power / €5000 | 22 ps |
Transmission | 6-speed M Sports Automatic transmission |
Layout | front engine, all wheel drive |
Rolling acceleration
60 - 100 kph (4) | 4.1 s |
80 - 120 kph (4) | 4.5 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 5.9 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 7.7 s |
80 - 160 kph (4) | 9.6 s |
80 - 160 kph (5) | 12.5 s |
80 - 160 kph (6) | 17.0 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 12.0 s |
X6 M competition
Fangio Man 12y ago
1.@Käsekuchen
LOL on your name. XD
"It is dangerous for other people on the street, nearly 3 tons- like a little train!!!"
Nearly 3 tons? More like 2 tons, rounded. ;)
Also, dangerous for other people? I do not think so...
Käsekuchen 12y ago
A car which nobody needs! If i want to be fast, i buy a Porsche 911. If i want to load much things i will buy a truck or a van. This car is only for people with inferiority complexes. It is dangerous for other people on the street, nearly 3 tons - like a little train!!!
hisgonish 14y ago
how is the new cayenne is faster than the x6m every on know that the x6m is faster
.youtube.com/watch?v=JMBxZExiONE
phavyarden 15y ago
i think they are equally fast,it\'s a difference between the test ( different magizines, track conditions, etc)
M=Power 15y ago
Since this is lighter, why is this slower than a X5 M?
Everything is pointless until you can afford it!
Anonim 16y ago
the time(1:46:80) for mireval is absolutely wrong and please delete it.
the corect one is 1:40:83
Kz guy 16y ago
Performance Suv as X5m, Ml63 and etc, are the best suited cars for countries with cold climate. we have cold winters (-20c) with a lot of snow, and we still want to buy 4wd high car like suv, but still want it to go fast, that why they are so popular in Russia and Kazakhstan. British people (top gear) saying that they are completly pointless, maybe for small and warm country like Britain. But for us they are obvious choice if u have money to afford them. Diesle will just freeze in this kinf of climate. And cars like m5 and etc, are real wheel drive, so no use at winter time. 911 r8 have all wheel drive but there are to low, so it wont be possible to park them in our countries cause we have pretty high road ''borders''
FastestLaps 17y ago
Racing rivals are nothing more than just a random selection of cars with similar power/weight ratio.
If you want to use comparison tool for BMW X6M to compare it with any other cars that are not provided in "racing rivals" section, you can always do it in "compare" section.
Anonymous 17y ago
Guys, could someone explain me what is guinding you in selection of rivals for cars here? Because neighter of cars mention under head "BMW X6 M racing rivals" is not its rival at all. RS4? NSX? 997 Carrera? SLK 55AMG? What else?! X6M is not the only case where racing rivals are not what is consider as racing rivals for given car at all. And it's a shame because this good tool provide easy way to compare cars' statistics, unfortunately often it includes cars which shouldn't be compared.
phavyarden 17y ago
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/09q3/2010_bmw_x6_m-short_take_road_test
1/4 mile 12,8
0-100 10.7
Babken 17y ago
Guys, Car and Driver says that X6 M lapped the Nurburgring faster than the E92 M3. Wow, I just wonder what miracles the next-generation M5 will perform.
Bravo, BMW! Keep going.
phavyarden 17y ago
1/4 mile 12,8
0-100 10.7
twin-turb0 17y ago
"gimme a focus rs" ha-ha-ha ! :D x6s the best.! maybe x5 M is the only thing better