Performance

Max speed 250 kph (155 mph)
0 - 40 kph 1.8 s
0 - 50 kph 1.9 s
0 - 100 kph 4.3 s
0 - 130 kph 6.8 s
0 - 200 kph 14.2 s
0 - 250 kph 24.8 s
0 - 60 mph 4.0 s
0 - 100 mph 9.5 s
1000 m 22.7 s @ 245 kph
1/4 mile 12.4 s @ 114 mph

Engine

Power 386 kw (518 bhp / 525 ps) @ 6800 rpm
Torque 630 Nm (466 lb-ft) @ 5200 rpm
Displacement 6.2 liters (378 ci)
Engine type V8
Engine location front

General data

Gearbox 7 speed automatic
Drive rear wheel drive
Fuel capacity
Year of introduction 2009
Home country Germany

Dimensions

Curb weight 1765 kg (3883 lbs) +

Calculations

Power to Weight ratio 293 bhp/tonne
Power per liter 83 bhp/liter
1/8 mile (est) 8.2 s @ 92 mph

Fastestlaps.com stats

FL Rank Position - 410/1769, 0 points
Page views 41234
Car submitted by 427

More E63 AMG photos

Photo of Mercedes E63 AMG

2009 Mercedes E63 AMG

Photo of Mercedes E63 AMG

Mercedes E63 AMG racing rivals

Mercedes E 63 AMG, Mercedes CLS 63 AMG, Vauxhall VXR8 Supercharged, Audi RS6, Cadillac CTS-V

0 - 100 km/h
E 63 AMG (557 PS) 4.2 s
HSV F-Type GTS 4.2 s
Mercedes E63 AMG 4.3 s
BMW M5 (E60) 4.4 s
Mercedes C 63 AMG 4.4 s
0 - 200 km/h
Cadillac CTS-V 14.0 s
Alpina B3 Biturbo 14.0 s
Mercedes E63 AMG 14.2 s
Jaguar XFR 14.3 s
Alpina B5 14.5 s
1/4 mile
Mercedes E 55 AMG 12.4 s
Audi S7 Sportback 12.4 s
Mercedes E63 AMG 12.4 s @ 114 mph
BMW M3 CRT 12.4 s
Brabus E B63 S 12.4 s

Other cars by Mercedes (298)

SL 55 AMG, SLK 55 AMG, CLK DTM, SL65 AMG, CLS 55 AMG, C 55 AMG, SLK 55 AMG Black Series, CLK 63 AMG, SLK 350, SL 500, C 30 CDI AMG, 190E 2.5-16V Evo II, A 190, SL 55 AMG, SL 500, C 32 AMG, SLK 32 AMG, CLK 55 AMG, C 43 AMG, CL 65 AMG, E 55 AMG, C 230K Sports Coupe, CL 500, ... show more

Community comments (37)

  3 years ago
Did a 1:50.00 on Laguna Seca, with performance package. ESP on.
  3 years ago
Oh sorry haha, I didn't see that
  3 years ago, last edited 3 years ago
@Mike B
The car you've linked is the new E 63 AMG with 5,5 l twinturbo engine. This has the "old" 6.2 l n/a engine, so the torque is right.
The 1765 kg is also right, the Mercedes page says 1840 kg and it is mentioned that it includes the +75 kg.
  3 years ago
and Torque is 700Nm
  3 years ago
Weight is 1840kg, http://www.mercedes-amg.com/e63.html#/e63-specs

The AMG site doesn't mention weights with 68kg driver and 7kg of luggage
  4 years ago
0-50kph:1,9
0-100kph:4,3
0-200kph:14,2
0-250kph:24,8
1/4 mile:12,42
Resourc from:AutoBild Sportscar Jan.2011

Please update the data
  5 years ago
Typical for BMW fans like Babken to talk crap. Its funny how mercedes makes a car sets a lap time then a year later BMW makes a car and they say ˝our car is better˝. A YEAR LATER? Why dont they releas a car on the same day same year?
  5 years ago
Displacement should be 6.2l, not 6.3.

Press release first mentions 6.3-liter V8 engine and then later states 6208 cc. To comply with German law, Mercedes-Benz is required to round up the displacement figure to 6.3 when used for marketing purposes.

I think the site should put 6.2l for accuracy.
  5 years ago
I think a lot of you guys lost the plot.
Caddy is supercharged! That the only way they can keep up?
Look,M,RS,CTS-V,they all good,just I've driven them all extensively,at the limit,if find AMG's better.
Personal preferance.
  5 years ago
The next generation BMW M5 will turn both the e63 amg and cts-v to ashes.
  5 years ago
Considering the CTS's power advantage, that .1 second difference speaks a lot about the AMG's cornering. Also note the Mercedes won the figure 8 test. The next gen CTS-V is going to have to step up the game.
  5 years ago
Beating CTS-V by .1 second at Willow Springs is the least of E63's achievements.

It is obvious that CTS-V still gives the biggest bang per buck. But, strangely, I feel that the E63 actually holds more value per buck than the CTS-V. And that is an achievement worth mentioning. And, by the way, I still think the M156 is the best atmospheric V8 on planet.
  5 years ago
by .1s Wow, what an achievement...........................
  5 years ago
If cost is a big factor (at this price range, it shouldn't be), take the CTS-V. Otherwise, take the M-B E63.

Another magazine article...

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/09q4/2009_cadillac_cts-v_vs._2010_jaguar_xfr_2010_mercedes-benz_e63_amg_-comparison_tests/2010_mercedes-benz_e63_amg_page_4
  5 years ago
Beat the CTS-V in direct comparison (same conditions/same driver). Was faster on track and had almost identical acceleration figures.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/112_1003_2010_cadillac_ctsv_2010_mercedes_benz_e63_amg_comparison/results.html
  5 years ago
@Mr. Turbo............HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahahahahahahah LOL
  5 years ago
Many would becuse of many resons 1st > as long as it contain the name MB its better 2> German made 3> Better Quality .. those are enough
  5 years ago
Who would take this over a CTS-V? I would, nothing to do with the emblem just that the shiny trim in the Cadillac is just too much.
  5 years ago
@Pavyarden, E63AMG's time to 200km/h is surely above 13 sec, since it's quarter mile time is 12,7 sec and it gained 112,4 mph. It's unlikely that it will gain another 11,6 mph in less than 0,3 sec. Check 2.20:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GINMe7K_aL0&feature=sub
  5 years ago
According to Edmunds it weights 4341 pounds, so it shoul be corrected. Check 3.14: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GINMe7K_aL0&feature=sub
  5 years ago
Weight datum of this car is wrong. This E63 AMG weights 1840kg according to the official MB website:
http://www.mercedes-benz.de/content/germany/mpc/mpc_germany_website/de/home_mpc/passengercars/home/new_cars/models/e-class/w212/technical_data.html
  5 years ago
this time would be corrected in the next months, i'm sure that this car can hit the 200 km/h in less than 13 secs
  5 years ago
14.6 s to 200km/h ... emm soo slow !!
Pages:    12Next
7007 fastest lap times for 4507 cars from 299 manufacturers.
© Fastestlaps.com 2006-2014