Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG S (W212 facelift) specs

Isn't this the same car?

https://fastestlaps.com/models/mercedes-benz-e63s-amg-s-4matic

0-60mph in 3.4s, according to a M/T twin test.

0-280: 27.4 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/15789489262/in/album-72157648881252308/

0-250: 19.7 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/15789489262/

0-130 km/h: 5.6 s
0-180: 9.9 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/10858070414/

0-100 kph: 3.6 s
0-120: 4.7 s
0-140: 6 s
0-160: 7.6 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/8876832430/

1/4 mile: 11,35 @ 126 mph
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPYzjKnwPkw

0-280 in 27,4 s
/watch?v=53Lnm0YrqMg

Motor trend says car weighed 2046kg according to link of BR2+ not 1840kg

0-60mph in 3.4s
1/4 mile in 11.6s @ 122mph

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1311_2014_mercedes_benz_e63_amg_s_vs_bmw_m5_competition_pack_comparison/specs.html

Well..Looks like this is pushing ALOT more power then claimed...676Bhp-631Bhp? Wow And I though Audi was one to talk.

M5 also, but we already new that...

Know im curious about all the Bmw/Mercedes/Audis TRUE power claims, "Could" explain a lot. But I "Really" wonder if that is the case? Just by there Trap speeds though, there not any faster then the other 500Bhp cars, but then again they are a lot heavier, and here DCTs could play apart..

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

@ZondaMan7.3 The Troll,Vimulator is Not a Reliable Source,It Shows a Very Unrealistic Result.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

@password

Soon i will upload my last race against C7 RS6. My name is Vitalik , i live in Moscow , the M5 is my car. I started to catch my firend Kostya , when i hit 180 kph. He was suprised that the M5 wasen't even the LCI version. Anyway , now Kostya has a stage 2 version of the E63 , producing around 700 + hp. When we did a race against the new RS6 , the RS6 pulled even harder in low speeds than the E63 S-Model , but it loses more power than the AMG in high speeds.They are both wonderful cars and damn expensive in Russia.

спасибо! - Виталик.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

I have just realised that those videos might have been planned. Still no proof, you might be racing a weaker sh!t driver.

Hahaha. Nice race M5 F10. Didn't you catch heart attach when he first pull away? at what speed you past him/her? Congrats, he/she should had serious pain when you past.

And if you have any further questions , then ask the driver , oh yeah , the driver was me myself.

What do you own? a Civic?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmXZmyPFiJI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QvNWFD_Qks

@E63 AMG , i think your being the joke right now.Watch the videos , see how your E63 S gets murdered.lol

@ M5 F10
Hahahahahahaahahaha.....your a joke. :D

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

Sure the Admins update data what they've want to update.

0-40 kph: 1,3 s
0-100 kph: 3,7 s
0-160 kph: 7,8 s
0-200 kph: 11,9 s
Hockenheimring Short: 1:13,5 min
Nordschleife: 7:55,2 min

http://www.germancarforum.com/community/threads/sport-auto-supertest-mercedes-benz-e63-amg-s.49461/#post-654892

@ Hans: What sedan isn't?

Nice, but still slower than Panamera Turbo S :)

Nordschleife: 7.55 min

Source: Sport Auto 09/2013

@Killuminati
I have done high 10's in this car without modifications.