1523-3355 kg?? 🤔 I know the 370Z isn't exactly light but something really went wrong here.
Nissan 370Z specs
Price in Europe | €37,130 - €41,200 |
Price in US | $29,930 - $33,740 |
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 1522-1583 kg (3355-3490 lbs) |
Introduced | 2009 |
Origin country | Japan |
Gas mileage | 12.6-11.5 l/100 km (19-20 mpg US / 22-25 mpg UK) |
CO2 emissions | 278 g/km |
Views | 206.9k |
Lap times
Acceleration (kph)
0 - 50 kph | 2.2 s |
0 - 100 kph | 5.1 s |
0 - 130 kph | 8.8 s |
0 - 160 kph | 13.0 s |
0 - 180 kph | 16.6 s |
0 - 200 kph | 20.0 s |
1000 m | 25.3 s @ 208.0 kph |
60 - 100 kph (4) | 4.9 s |
60 - 100 kph (5) | 7.7 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 7.0 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 9.6 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 15.6 s |
Acceleration (mph)
0 - 30 mph | 1.8 s |
0 - 40 mph | 2.7 s |
0 - 50 mph | 3.6 s |
0 - 60 mph | 4.7 s |
0 - 70 mph | 6.2 s |
0 - 80 mph | 7.9 s |
0 - 90 mph | 9.6 s |
0 - 100 mph | 11.8 s |
0 - 110 mph | 15.2 s |
0 - 120 mph | 18.6 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 9.6 s @ 88.9 mph |
1/4 mile | 13.3 s @ 105.0 mph |
General performance
Top speed | 253 kph (157 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.58 g (6 m/s²) |
Lateral acceleration | 0.99 g (10 m/s²) |
100 kph - 0 | 33 m (110 ft) |
60 mph - 0 | 32 m (106 ft) |
70 mph - 0 | 48 m (157 ft) |
Noise @ idle | 49 dB |
Noise @ 50 mph | 73 dB |
Noise @ 70 mph | 77 dB |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | V6 |
Displacement | 3.7 l (226 ci) |
Power | 330 ps (326 bhp / 243 kw) |
Torque | 366 Nm (270 lb-ft) |
Power / liter | 89 ps (88 hp) |
Power / weight | 215 ps (212 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 238 Nm (176 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 27 PS per l/100 km |
Power / €5000 | 42 ps |
Transmission | 6-Speed Manual |
Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
370Z competition
Bugatti4Life the real one 2y ago
False alarm it wasn't a full lap I was tired and didn't realize there were several Erays.
Bugatti4Life the real one 2y ago
Here's a vid of it testing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIYwH11nRL4
Bugatti4Life the real one 2y ago
Just remember I'm technically a kid and I tend to be nicknamed idiot so I am probably wrong but I try.
Bugatti4Life the real one 2y ago
Also take it with a grain of salt it could have not have shown every part so it could be off but its the closest we got so far but I can send a vid of it doing some normal testing.
Bugatti4Life the real one 2y ago
The Interior is dated sadly also they should have kept the 370z steering which I heard is great via Throttle House. Also please ignore me if I get a tad rude I should be more mature. Anyways the 370z Nismo in red is a stunning car.
Justin Lusion 2y ago
Over the years, I have driven BMWs, Porsche, muscle cars, and other exotic vehicles. For the price, of a 370z in my opinion I don't think there is a better car out there that allows you to feel the raw driving experience. When I took possession of my 2009 370z 5 years ago I did add some bolt-ons but nothing crazy. It brought out the tone I wanted in a sports car. What shocked me the most was the smile that it brought to my face every time I got behind the wheel. The simplicity of it and the view of the long hood reminds me of what it feels like to drive a car that was meant to be driven and that the drive brings out the feel that you can't get with these new auto-shifting cars. Nissan's past will always be the affordable underrated car that people will miss out on.
hostboy 3y ago
The 370Z and G37 are okay cars with okay performance, but with a grown man behind the wheel they just don't look good. The Hyundai Genesis 3.8 (especially with R-Spec package) was the better bang-for-buck, NOW THAT is what a chick wants to see a dude driving.
With that being said, the modern Z-cars (Z33, Z34, RZ34) are cute little birthday presents for a girlfriend or a daughter. It's basically a two-seater Altima with a rear-wheel drivetrain setup and on steroids.
Hoppelmoppel123 5y ago
AutoBild (9/September 2017):
0-200 kph: 20.0 s
60-100 kph (4,5): 4.9, 7.7 s
80-120 kph (5,6): 7.5, 9.6 s
100-0 kph: 33.4 m
Frederick 9y ago
How come that the figure for 0 - 160 kph is 13 s, and 0 - 100 mile is 11.8 s? I thought 100 mile is 160 km ... well to be precise 100 mile is 160.934 km. So actually 0 - 160 kph should be less than 11.8 s !!!!
Frank 11y ago
Of-course they do better, I already timed an 8.44 s 1/8th & 12.84 s 1/4 with stock power. I beat every 5.0 Mustang I raced through launch, 0-60, 330', & 1/8th - even for my slow passes, it still won every 0-60. It also traps 107-108 mph. It demolished the R/T's, & I beat the 470 hp SRT's. The SS's have no chance against a 370Z Coupe auto. The Z has to race a 550 hp ZL1 through the 1/8th. The Z's races vs the pony V6's was a complete massacre. The 370Z is just as fast as a 911-997 C2 +/- because the 997 does 12.9-13.4 s. The Z does all of that with stock power. The 13.3's is what they got, & it is accurate, but prepped like the Mustang testers who re-tuned the Mustang V4 (15.0 s) Turbo's turbo - The Z does 12.8 s @ 108 mph with stock power - no tuning needed.
I don't know what planet you fell off of, but my Z does 12.8 s stock power; you can use your imagination for the new models with 350 hp.
Hector 13y ago
Recorded stock 4.4 s 06- mph. The 370Z's low 13 s 1/4 time translates to beating mid to high 420-612 hp 12 s cars because of handling. After launch the 370Z beats the EVO & like he said, the Z does better on mid to longer tracks versus the EVO. Handling is its main tool for curves, turns, entry & exit speeds. Its an RC car on rails. I recommend it.
Proph3CY 14y ago
@Apathy
Lol, I love when people compare modified cars to those from factory. FROM FACTORY, a low-13sec car is FAST, especially if it's a N/A 6cyl.
If you want to talk "bolt ons", a twin-turbo kit 370Z, properly tuned and fitted can easily run low 10's. It's a light weight car with a small engine - lot's of potential.
For a stock car, 13's is nothing to be shunned for, especially for a car worth under AU$50k.
Apathy 14y ago
@ Jap4
I mean no offence in what I said. I just don't consider cars that run low 13's (in the 1/4) to be fast.
I'm just used to quicker cars is all. Hell, my buddies SUV runs 11's. And I know a friend of a friend with a 9 second tbss.
Speed is relative, and to me, 13's isn't very quick. Most 90's LS stuff and even mod motor stuff is into the 12's with bolt ons. It's just my opinion.
Enjoy your Z34.
jap4 14y ago
Thanks jeff b, i worked so hard to buy it :)
Family on the way so iv got 7 months to enjoy it before i get a volvo haha
jap4 14y ago
Viking i like you, u give great info thats very interesting and u are kind to me.
Jeff b, why cant i boast, why cant i be excited by my car, im only 23 and its a bloody quick car in a straight line no matter who says otherwise :)
Viking 14y ago
@jap4 yeah the 370Z is quite quick, quicker than a 1995 Corvette that I used to own, but not quite as fast as the 2002 Corvette that replaced it (although it would be a very close race). My current 2011 Mustang GT is quicker still. Your 370Z has excellent handling, better than either of the those Corvettes. You will find it lots of fun to use the comparison feature of this site. There are still a few glitches, but most of the info is legitimate, and comes from magazine test sources. You will find that the 370Z lap times are superb. Long tracks and multiple laps do present a problem sometimes however, since the stock brakes, and engine tend to overheat.
jap4 14y ago
Thanks viking, iv only just found this site, its an interesting read.
Apathy why be like that? No its not the fastest car in the world but its pretty damn quick and beats most cars iv raced, and iv raced dozens. Good accelleration by 90s standards? Ur off ur head, its on par with the bmw z3m coupe, beats the honda s2k and keeps up with a carrera 4 - all from the y2000s. Yes a tvr has beaten it, but tvrs are mad