Image of Nissan GT-R Nismo

Nissan GT-R Nismo (R35) specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1720 kg (3792 lbs)
Power / weight 349 ps (344 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 379 Nm (280 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2015
Origin country Japan
Views 84.9k


Top speed 315 kph (196 mph)
0 - 50 kph 1.4 s
0 - 100 kph 3.1 s
0 - 120 kph 4.1 s
0 - 140 kph 5.2 s
0 - 160 kph 6.6 s
0 - 180 kph 8.3 s
0 - 200 kph 10.2 s
0 - 250 kph 17.0 s
0 - 60 mph 2.9 s
0 - 100 mph 6.6 s
0 - 150 mph 15.8 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.2 s @ 104.4 mph
1/4 mile 11.0 s @ 128.0 mph
Est. 1/2 mile 17.9 s @ 144.8 mph
Est. 1 mile 29.4 s @ 165.9 mph
1000 m 20.1 s @ 260.0 kph
100 kph - 0 33 m (109 ft)
200 kph - 0 128 m (421 ft)
60 mph - 0 30 m (97 ft)
70 mph - 0 44 m (145 ft)
Lateral acceleration 1.08 g (11 m/s²)
Emissions 275 g/km

More acceleration times

Nissan GT-R Nismo acceleration graph
User avatar

User avatar

BR2+  10m  

Its quite stupid, Thas like going to mcdonalds and saying you can only have cheese in France.....

Not only that, But the outrageous price tag they add to it, I dunno if its some kind of conversion from yen, Although i doubt it given the low price, But 100k Usd is insane for just a few parst specially when the car cost 150k.

User avatar

NIN  10m  

@ Speed_Demon

The N-Attack parts were optional in Japan. All you had to do was check the right boxes at the dealership and pay.

In America, the parts are available only as after-market and must be ordered from and installed by Stillen.

User avatar

luckyluke  10m  

lol, I remember that too. And when someone used common sense, they all get angry. That was hilarious.

As far as I know the special "Nürburgring package" could only be brought in Japan for 100000 $ extra, which would make it a 250000 $ car (without any other options).

User avatar

Freakz  10m  

Haha I remember that, when people on "Worlds Greatest Drag Race" comment section were arguing that the gtr would loose if they used car x or car y and gtr fanboys answer was "OK then put the GTR Nismo, 0-60 in 2 sec bitches"! In the end all they got was a car that was 0.1 sec slower in the 1/4 mile, despite being NISMO.

User avatar

saxy  10m  

it's non-stock for an american, but would be legit for Japan. So there's no problem about that. the only problem is stupid Nissan loves to make gigantic claims. Oh cuz THIS car once did a lap that fast, all GTRs can too... at least that's what the fanboys say. When Nissan said the Nismo would do 0-60 in 2secs, every fanboy actually believed it. Anyone with the tiniest bit of common sense would know that's impossible.

User avatar

Speed_Demon  10m  

The time should be removed since it wasn't stock (didn't have stock parts or tune) Production Nismo will probably only run 7:14-7:16s

User avatar

Speed_demon  1y  

So does anybody know what a "Real Production Nismo" runs? US spec if possible.

User avatar

BR2+  1y  

Comes down to a few things, Like any other kind of test. Driver is the most important part in any car, Fallowed by conditions, And options.

User avatar

kennyg  1y  

I know what your going to say but forgive my ignorance as i am not condoning tuned cars but how does the gtr do a quarter mile in 10.8 sec with 545hp but a tuned gtr with 1000 hp only shaves a weak second off that time?

User avatar

NIN  1y  

@ 2Fast

The N-Attack parts were optional in Japan. In fact, the parts have found their way out of Japan...

User avatar

2Fast  1y  

The +250K N-attack Nismo was never made into production so its 7:08 nurburgring time for production cars should be null and void!

The regular/very low production 150K Nismo GTR is considerably slower that the N-attack as we can all see from its other track times.

The non-production/one-off prototype/250K N-attack Nismo should get a separate page from the regular production 150K Nismo.

User avatar

FastestLaps  2y  

Holy crap is the new Yamaha R1 awesome!

User avatar

kit365  2y  

gt-r is too fast !!

User avatar

kit365  2y  

NISSAN has won the Liqui-Moly Bathurst 12 Hour for 2015, stealing the show thanks to a remarkable finish that saw Japanese driver Katsumasa Chiyo charge from third to first in the last two laps to deliver the brand their first Bathurst win since 1992.

User avatar


0-60 2,9 s
1/4 11,0 s@126.6 mph

User avatar

kit365  2y

vs Corvette Z06

User avatar

NIN  2y  

1:19.07 at Streets Of Willow driven by Pobst for Motor Trend.

User avatar

art  2y  

Yea that's fine and all but the nismo is not the car that did the time. The nismo is a $150k car. The N attack is a $250k car. That's in an entirely different price ranges. More than a huracan base. The ststandard nismo was only a tenth quicker than a 911 turbo s around a track when motor trend tested it. And the turbo isn't even Porsches dedicated track car.But whatever.
u base.

User avatar

BR2+  2y  


But i agree the Niss is no longer the bargain it was, Its still a bargain, But back when it was introduced i think it was more impressive then it is today, Id still pay it, But why pay that when i can have THAT?...

But in this day and age, What SHOULD be faster, Doesnt apply like it used to, Thats been completely thrown out the window.

Nismo or ACR?....Not tuff in my opinion, GTR is still impressive, But i think its lost alot of its impressiveness back in 2011.

User avatar

MondayBlues  2y  

Actually I agree!

User avatar

phavyarden  2y  

I will make it simply, please no hard feelings.
Viper: old Technology, price bargain, viceral experience, not really light weight!! Good downforce.
GT-R also WAS a bargain, it has a lot more technology, way quicker gearbox, and it's heavier cause of it's AWD system, dimensions, etc.
Viper is quicker at probably any track. Period.
GT-R might be more comfortable for every day driving.

User avatar

MondayBlues  2y  

The Viper is not...

1) 1740KG.
2) A V6.
3) AWD.

It should be faster... The GTR needs more engineering to over come it's weight. So it needs to be tested more.

Considering the GTR's AWD system is possible one of if not thee best out there. Where as Dodge is using what nearly every other manufacture uses.

1) Light
2) RWD, less to engineer
3) Big sticky tires
4) Huge amounts of downforce

Now I'm not slagging this off, it works, enough said!

But the GTR is, for me, now becoming a joke. Still using those shitty brakes. Still an average looking interior, and constantly going the Ring to prove they can set a lap time? Onstead of...

1) Refining all the rattles and noises. With better quality components.
2) Fixing those damned brakes with CC ones.
3) Refresh that interior it's 7 years old now.
4) Enough Nurb testing.
5) Performance improvments that ACTUALLY improve the car, not just a 10/th or two over the last car!

User avatar

BR2+  2y  

Disagree somewhat on both parts.

I think alot of people dont relize, That effort and time it takes to get that kind of result, alot of people are ONLY taking into account that single laptime, That 7:08, Take a pro driver, WHo knows the track like the back of his arse, Knows the car inside and out, Day by day night by night, Lowest liquid loads, Maximum performance options, Best conditions, Hundreds upon hundreds of attempts, And Bam!, You get a 7:08, If every company did that, We would see ALOT of time shaven from every car.

The reason why non if the Nismo other track times dont look as good, Is the exact opposite of what i just listed in order to get the 7:08 time, The video proved it, May not be "Absolute" proof, But we cant prove them wrong.

Also, The Viper did that 7:12 in 5 laps, With non of what Nissan had, And that is seriously impresive, And given if they had that, You can expect alot more time to come ut of it. Same with every car.

User avatar

MondayBlues  2y  

I think I have to agree with art!

No way is the N-Attack 7:08 fast, unless they are not telling us something? But then again I don't believe the Viper is 7:12 capable...

But the Nismo GTR is a real disappointment! I was expecting at least 2 seconds faster over the Track Pack GTR, but it's bearly (in the US) proving it's just a tad bit faster than the TE GTR...

The Laguna Seca time is just total BS, Randy just cannot get to grips with the GTR on that track. Seems to me Randy in a car with huge sticky tires, can put in mega times and others without them can't...

Seems a lot of money for something that's just not walking the walk!

User avatar

art  2y  

They should really add "N attack" to its name when listing it under the nurburgring times. Lmao no way in hell a standard nismo could do that lap

I'm just going to be honest, I don't trust Nissan at all. Their lap times are always too good to believe. Gtrs are fast, yes. But not as fast as Nissan claims.
time time

User avatar

aaaa  2y  

as usual the gtr does not live up to the expectations created by the manufacturer. it's fast don't get me wrong, but it's not 7:08 nurburgring time fast.

User avatar

kit3651  2y  


User avatar

saxy  2y  

they didn't get a speciale, because like always, Ferrari don't like to give their cars out for detail tests with numbers. That's been true for the past few years. And especially if you don't allow them to pre-tune the car out for the specific tests you said you were going to do with it.

User avatar

CoolShirtGuy  2y  

In the 911Turbo S video, they tell you that Porsche wouldn't give them a GT3; the closest they could get was the Turbo S with the GT3's more aggressive tires(which I believe are now the same Dunlops as the GT-R)as a factory option. As for the 458, assuming it's available in the US, they may not have been able to get one due to sheer demand for the car; I believe every Speciale scheduled for production is already spoken for, so press cars may be in limited supply.

But, considering that this is Ferrari we're talking about, I wouldn't be at all surprised if they just refused to hand one over for testing because they're *******s like that. If you don't play by their rules, they won't play at all.


User avatar
sroser 9h 

added laptime for Porsche 911 GT3 RS (991)

User avatar
sroser 10h 

added laptime for McLaren 675LT

User avatar
fakekillerfour 10h 

added laptime for Porsche 911 Carrera S (991 facelift) and data for Porsche 911 Carrera S (991 facelift)

Active users

BR2+, FastestLaps, Chanante, saxy, tyler, sroser, fakekillerfour, Georg, NIN, gtrs, 777Balt, PAPPACLART, lafars, CMRDNOOB, britishbikes

Latest topics

Mercedes-AMG GT R 7:10.92 min Nordschleife HOT LAP sport auto World's Exclusive First Test 33
12 hours ago by sroser

Porsche 918 beats McLaren P1 and "the Ferrari" in Grand Tour opening 215
1 day ago by BR2+

VW improve front wheel drive Nürburgring record with "7:47" for the Golf Clubsport S 3
1 day ago by FastestLaps

Aston Martin DB11 beats Dodge Challenger Hellcat in a Grand Tour duel - here are the lap times 9
4 days ago by saxy

What I saw on YouTube today 56
5 days ago by tharne

LMP1 cars are welcome 8
6 days ago by Driveitlikeyoustoleit