Image of Nissan GT-R

Nissan GT-R (R35 550 PS) specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1736 kg (3827 lbs)
Power / weight 317 ps (312 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 364 Nm (269 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2012
Origin country Japan
Average fuel consumption 14.9-13.9 l/100 km (16-17 mpg US / 19-20 mpg UK)
Noise @ 80 kph 73 dB
Noise @ 100 kph 69 dB
Noise @ 130 kph 73 dB
Noise @ 160 kph 79 dB
Noise @ 180 kph 80 dB
Views 256.8k
Submitted by phavyarden

Performance

Top speed 315 kph (196 mph)
0 - 40 kph 1.1 s
0 - 50 kph 1.3 s
0 - 60 kph 1.7 s
0 - 80 kph 2.3 s
0 - 100 kph 2.8 s
0 - 120 kph 4.2 s
0 - 130 kph 4.9 s
0 - 140 kph 5.5 s
0 - 160 kph 7.0 s
0 - 180 kph 8.6 s
0 - 200 kph 10.6 s
0 - 250 kph 18.1 s
0 - 300 kph 35.7 s
0 - 30 mph 1.0 s
0 - 40 mph 1.5 s
0 - 50 mph 2.0 s
0 - 60 mph 2.7 s
0 - 70 mph 3.5 s
0 - 80 mph 4.5 s
0 - 90 mph 5.6 s
0 - 100 mph 6.8 s
0 - 110 mph 8.7 s
0 - 120 mph 10.4 s
0 - 130 mph 12.5 s
0 - 140 mph 14.9 s
0 - 150 mph 17.8 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.2 s @ 99.4 mph
1/4 mile 10.8 s @ 124.3 mph
Est. 1/2 mile 17.8 s @ 149.1 mph
Est. 1 mile 29.0 s @ 172.1 mph
1000 m 20.4 s @ 258.0 kph
Est. 100 - 140 kph 2.5 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 7.8 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph 24.8 s
100 kph - 0 32 m (105 ft)
130 kph - 0 53 m (175 ft)
190 kph - 0 119 m (390 ft)
60 mph - 0 29 m (94 ft)
70 mph - 0 46 m (151 ft)
18m slalom 72.7 kph (45.2 mph)
Emissions 323 g/km
Lateral acceleration 1.04 g (10 m/s²)

More acceleration times

Nissan GT-R acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type V6
Displacement 3.8 l (232 ci)
Power 550 ps (542 bhp / 404 kw) @ 6400 rpm
Torque 632 Nm (466 lb-ft) @ 5800 rpm
Power / liter 145 ps (143 hp)
Efficiency 38 PS per l/100 km
Transmission 6-Speed DCT
Layout front engine, all wheel drive

Laptimes 33

GT-R rivals

User avatar

User avatar

BR2+  2y  

That proves absolutely nothing, Again.


User avatar

uptownfunker  2y  

0-300 km/h: 29 sec (start from 0:30)
0-200 mph = 0-322 km/h: 47 sec

Video: Nissan GT R Top Speed 0 to 206 mph or 0 to 333kph https://youtu.be/_NLaiKS6fIs


User avatar

saxy  2y  

LL, the reason why it lost is heat, causing the engine to lose a lot of power.

The higher the pressure is on a turbo engine, the more easily fuel is ignited before the pistons are ready to get the maximum power. The BMW is least affected because it has a 4.4L engine, and is tuned less aggressively.



User avatar

LL  2y  

I'm sure that GTR is a very fast car in its own right. And I'm also sure it's one of the most bang for buck performance cars out there. If I'm not wrong, the GTR was designed and built more for the track and taking on the corners than for the straights. Let's just appreciate the GTR for what it is and can offer. I have seen quite a few GTRs modded to high/crazy powers for drag/track and still running strong. However, there's always a faster car out there. Peace.


User avatar

LL  2y  

@Saxy I understand your point. To be honest, I was also quite shocked that the GTR lost to the Bentley. But, there are also other factors to consider in a drag race. On the other hand, it should be a different story on track. Having said that, I'm not an expert in this but I'm pretty sure the Nissan engineers should know what they were doing. Well, there's always room for improvement for any car model since nothing is perfect.


User avatar

BR2+  2y  

...No replacement for displacement?...God i hate that saying....


User avatar

saxy  2y  

that's ridiculous. nobody is saying the that the GTR isn't fast. It's just absurd how it got killed by the bentley which has a 4.0L engine, while the GTR has a 3.8L. but the GTR weighs a lot less and has more power.

yeah, heat is an issue for all TC cars, that's why you add bigger or smarter ways to cool, like how Mercedes did, or how Mclaren tested the P1 in Death Valley.


User avatar

LL  2y  

Every car has its strengths and weaknesses. Like what said, it all comes down to individual preference. As usual, haters will hate. But, that doesn't mean the car itself isn't good in real. To be fair, we should give the basic respect and credit to what the GTR has/had achieved so far, competing with the ''big boys''. The same goes to other performance cars out there, whether they're from Europe, US or Japan.


User avatar

LL  2y  

@Saxy Heat can be an issue for all TC cars if the cooling isn't done properly. And, there's no replacement for displacement. In the Top Gear Australia episode, the Bentley has more cylinders and displacement so it eventually overtook the GTR. But, the GTR was fastest off the line and fastest on the track. Having said that, all the three Top Gear hosts were still impressed with the 3 cars.


User avatar

saxy  2y  

Clearly in the top gear Aussie special, the GTR was struggling for power in the hot drag race. It got monstered by a much heavier and less powerful Bentley for God sakes


User avatar

nik  2y  

I spen 10 years in UAE. When the temperature is 35 outside gtr is ok for 3/4 laps, after the turbo is going down and the car is dead. After 5 laps Carrera S 400hp is overtaking. I am not speaking about 40 degrees.


User avatar

kit3651  3y  

FASTEST EVER SUPERCAR AT GOODWOOD FOS- GT-R NISMO 'TIME ATTACK'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtsW__9RI3I




User avatar

Mansell 4 ever  3y  

The figures indicate that this car would beat current production Ferrari and Porsches.


User avatar

Hamcee  4y  

i think it looks cool from the front but that rear is horrible


User avatar

BR2+  4y  

If anybody values there eyes, Reframe from looking...

2015-nissan-gt-r-nismo-front-leaked.jpg

2015-nissan-gt-r-nismo-rear-leaked.jpg


User avatar

MondayBlues  4y  

Not here I don't think? But head over to NAGTROC for all the low down... Supposed to be a big press launch...


User avatar

Viking  4y  

@MondayBlues groovy. Is there a car page for the Nismo GTR yet?


User avatar

MondayBlues  4y  

Nismo GTR 7:08.7... Great time, will wait and see what it can do on smaller tracks, before I pass judgement...


User avatar

Mental  4y  

"laferrari is already known to be the fastest serial hypercar."

Yeah? Luca di Montezemolo personally told you that? LOL

And in fact, such an event isn't that much impossible. If Someone Really wanted, it could actually happen despite any difficulties.

And if you are not willing to see such a fair car Competition, then you aren't even a car enthusiast.


User avatar

grigio  4y  

mental, your idea is total bullshit. do you even realize how much all that organization would cost? Any motor trend or car and driver dont have power to hold such a serious event. and the counted automakers wont even bother paying attention to the stats they already know about.

moreover, its just a waste of time. laferrari is already known to be the fastest serial hypercar.


User avatar

Fangio Man  4y  

0-250 kph: 18.1 seconds
0-300 kph: 35.7 seconds

Source: AutoBild sportscars Dec. 2013


User avatar

Huayra RS  4y  

Performance tests: Audi R8 V10 Plus vs Nissan GT-R Black Edition vs Porsche 911 Turbo S

AUTO NEWS, October 7, 2013 Author: Guram Intskirveli

The authoritative German automobile edition Auto, Motor und Sport carried out dynamic tests of the latest Audi R8 V10 Plus, Nissan GT-R Black Edition и Porsche 911 Turbo S.

3rd place: Audi R8 5.2 FSI V10 Plus S-tronic (295/380 points, 77,6 %)

Tyres: Pirelli P Zero
Weight: 1655 kg
0-100 km/h: 3,7 s
0-200 km/h: 11,7 s
0-280 km/h: 30,7 s
400 m: 11,6 s
18 m slalom: 67,0 km/h
110 m AMuS-evasive test: 145,6 km/h
Contidrom dry: 0:56,6 min
Contidrom wet: 1:25,88 min

**2nd place: Nissan GT-R Black Edition (308/380 points, 81,1 %)

Tyres: Dunlop SP Sport Maxx GT600
Weight: 1751 kg
0-100 km/h: 3,3 s
0-200 km/h: 11,6 s
0-280 km/h: 30,3 s
400 m: 11,4 s
18 m slalom: 69,4 km/h
110 m AMuS-evasive test: 149,4 km/h
Contidrom dry: 0:55,8 min
Contidrom wet: 1:30,66 min
**
1st place: Porsche 911 Turbo S (320/380 points, 84,2 %)

Tyres: Pirelli P Zero
Weight: 1587 kg
0-100 km/h: 2,9 s
0-200 km/h: 10,2 s
0-280 km/h: 24,6 s
400 m: 10,9 s
18 m slalom: 69,3 km/h
110 m AMuS-evasive test: 149,4 km/h
Contidrom dry: 0:54,6 min
Contidrom wet: 1:23,86 min
Huayra RS 2 minutes ago

http://www.dragtimes.ru/en/blogs/view/56


User avatar

altmtgmer  4y  

this was not even a real run it was a simulation...the zr1 beat the GTR and so did the R8


User avatar

M3 Driver  4y  

Im not saying its a supercar or what(cuz i think all supercars should be mid-engined), but its like mental. But i found the driving disconnected,and has a somewhat confused personality. Yes it has 4 seats, making it like a family car, but it also has transmission wirrs that sounds cool, but gets annoying after a while, as if it wants you to jam the throttle every time you get in. But when you DO find the opportunity to do so, it doesnt get me as excited as an M3 CSL i had 4 years ago (yes second hand). Having said that, there is one thing you will never get bored of in a GTR: the launch control. Its ABSOLUTELY mental. I believe it has one of the highest price to performance on the market these days, BUT i will recommend a base-spec M5, the Jaguar F-type or even the Subaru BRZ/Toyota GT-86 over it. Personally I believe the driving sensation will be more fun in the other cars.


User avatar

M3 Driver  4y  

When I said how this car is an amazing technical achievement on the Mk.1 post, i got a whole load of disagreements. Finally, i found someone on the internet that appreciates this car as well.


User avatar

Piorun  4y  

I respect this car a lot, this is a weapon.
Downsides? Missan didnt made luxury version of it with Infinity, with better interior, exterior and suspension.

Other than that cool stuff. Like father of Mitubishi EVO


User avatar

Shaggy  4y  

@ Karthick01: From a standing start, yes, from a rolling start, no.