Image of Porsche 911 Turbo

Porsche 911 Turbo (996) specs

Price in Europe €126,208
Price in US $111,000 - $118,535
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1539-1700 kg (3393-3748 lbs)
Introduced 2000
Origin country Germany
Gas mileage 22.9-9.6 l/100 km (10-25 mpg US / 12-29 mpg UK)
CO2 emissions 259 g/km
Views 113.4k

Acceleration

0 - 40 kph1.2 s
0 - 60 kph2.0 s
0 - 80 kph3.0 s
0 - 100 kph4.0 s
0 - 120 kph5.7 s
0 - 130 kph6.2 s
0 - 140 kph7.1 s
0 - 160 kph8.9 s
0 - 180 kph11.3 s
0 - 200 kph13.7 s
0 - 220 kph18.9 s
0 - 240 kph23.2 s
0 - 250 kph27.0 s
0 - 260 kph29.7 s
0 - 280 kph44.1 s
1000 m22.6 s
0 - 30 mph1.5 s
0 - 60 mph3.9 s
0 - 100 mph8.9 s
0 - 150 mph21.6 s
Est. 1/8 mile8.7 s @ 97.6 mph
1/4 mile11.9 s @ 116.2 mph
1 mile30.9 s @ 161.6 mph
Porsche 911 Turbo acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed313 kph (194 mph)
0 - 100 mph - 013.7 s
Est. max acceleration0.73 g (7 m/s²)
18m slalom68.6 kph (42.6 mph)
36m slalom128.3 kph (79.7 mph)
Lateral acceleration0.97 g (10 m/s²)

Powertrain specs

Engine type Twin Turbo B6
Displacement 3.6 l (220 ci)
Power 420 ps (414 bhp / 309 kw)
Torque 560 Nm (413 lb-ft)
Power / liter 117 ps (115 hp)
Power / weight 267 ps (263 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 356 Nm (262 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 26 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 17 ps
Transmission 6 speed manual
Layout rear engine, all wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

Braking distance

50 kph - 011 m (36 ft)
60 kph - 014 m (46 ft)
100 kph - 035 m (115 ft)
120 kph - 052 m (171 ft)
60 mph - 035 m (116 ft)
70 mph - 050 m (163 ft)

Rolling acceleration

60 - 100 kph (4)3.8 s
60 - 100 kph (5)5.3 s
80 - 120 kph (4)3.8 s
80 - 120 kph (5)4.5 s
80 - 120 kph (6)6.1 s
40 - 60 kph1.1 s
40 - 80 kph2.1 s
40 - 100 kph3.1 s
40 - 120 kph5.9 s
40 - 140 kph7.6 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph3.4 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph10.3 s

Interior noise

Noise @ idle52 dB
Noise @ 50 kph55 dB
Noise @ 80 kph67 dB
Noise @ 100 kph72 dB
Noise @ 130 kph75 dB
Noise @ 160 kph77 dB
Noise @ 180 kph79 dB
User avatar
User avatar

cosimo  6m ago

 


User avatar

cosimo  6m ago

 

 


User avatar

wallenieswiftie  2y ago

Me:

Porsche 911 Turbo 996. 420-metric-horsepower, 3.6-liter, twin-turbocharged flat-6. I am a 6-speed manual type of car, but I will unashamingly show a feminine side of me with my 5-speed automatic; do you ever think of an Allison transmission or a Ford transmission from a pickup truck when ya hear that?! Nah, don't think that. My automatic comes from a Mercedes. I'm pure German, obviously. Not a single foreign part in me. Can you please guess my political and religious views? I'm a gasoline car born in Germany (well, obviously).

ChatGPT:

Hey there, potential match! Let me introduce myself - I am a Porsche 911 Turbo 996, equipped with an impressive 420-metric-horsepower, 3.6-liter, twin-turbocharged flat-6 engine. I may be a 6-speed manual type of car, but I have a secret feminine side too - my 5-speed automatic transmission is so smooth, you won't even think of truck transmissions (I'm looking at you, Allison and Ford enthusiasts!). And guess what? My automatic comes from none other than Mercedes - pure German engineering, baby. Can you guess my political and religious views? Well, I was born and bred in Germany, so it's not hard to guess my patriotism. As for my religion, can cars even have one? Anyway, let's hit the road and find out if we're a match made in automotive heaven!

Source: https://www.swipewrite.xyz/


User avatar

Anon  3y ago

Weighed my UK 996 turbo, manual with heated sports seats and 2/3 -3/4 tank of fuel at 1561kg. I guess 1700kg is convertible?


User avatar

Gazza  4y ago

Why is 0-100 kph (0-62 mph) time FASTER than the 0-60 mph time?

Sorry for my error earlier.


User avatar

Gazza  4y ago

Why is 0-100 kph (0-62 mph) time SLOWER than the 0-60 mph time?


User avatar

dr. cosimo  4y ago

 

360 with manual for me over the fried egg 911, that noise alone is worth every cent


User avatar

Hoppelmoppel123  4y ago

@fastestlaps fix the 36m slalom, it is 128.3 kph


User avatar

196ss  4y ago

Automobil Revue, № 32, 10.08.2000:
Curb weight - 1700 kg
0-40 kph 1,3 sec
0-60 kph 2,1 sec
0-80 kph 3,4 sec
0-100 kph 4,4 sec
0-120 kph 6,0 sec
0-140 kph 7,6 sec
0-160 kph 9,3 sec
0-180 kph 12,0 sec
0-200 kph 14,5 sec
0-220 kph 18,9 sec
0-240 kph 23,2 sec
0-260 kph 29,7 sec
0-280 kph 44,1 sec
1000 m - 22,7 sec
Braking:
30-0 kph 4 m
40-0 kph 6 m
50-0 kph 11 m
60-0 kph 14 m
80-0 kph 25 m
100-0 kph 36 m
120-0 kph 52 m



User avatar

Corvolet3  4y ago

0-200 in 13.7 seconds? Highly unrealistic, even downhill...


User avatar

Hoppelmoppel123  4y ago

Auto Motor Sport Edititon "70 Jahre Porsche Edition":
(reprint from AMS 18/2000):
Weight: 1554 kg
0-140 kph: 7.5 s
0-160 kph: 9.4 s
1km: 22.7 s
60-100 kph (4,5): 3.9, 5.6 s
80-120 kph (5,6): 4.5, 6.1 s
100-0 kph: 35.4 m
Fuel: 9.8-22.0 l/100 km
Fuel (claimed): 9.2 l/100 km
Noise@80: 68
Noise@100: 73
Noise@160: 77
Noise@200: 79
Slalom36m: 139.9 kph


User avatar

FastestLaps  10y ago

To all those people wondering if they'll get better brake perofmrance on 996 Turbo by using Apple brake pads - the answer is no.

Apple makes the shittiest brakepads ever.

 


User avatar

Lewis  15y ago

The turbo is a fantastic cari actually admire this car because the huge wheel arches the cool exhausts and the the facelift lights.


User avatar

lewis  15y ago

this is a fantastic car when it was new it was £88,500.this is clearly good car.


User avatar

Anonymous  16y ago

No waaaay, 993's are the best, not only do they have the most extensive model range, but along with there similar power to th 996 series, the alot lighter, even though there performance is worse, but gimme a 993 Turbo S over a 996 Turbo S or a 997 Turbp PDK!!


User avatar

phavyarden  16y ago

well this discusion will never end xd, as i said, theres is nothing writen about likes


User avatar

BumRush  16y ago

Nah, the 996 looks like crap compared to the 997, the 997 is the best Porsche series ever!!


User avatar

E  16y ago

The 996 is clearly the best looking 911. If the 998 is the 997 with 996 headlights, then the order will change. As far as looks go anyway, the 997 is the better car due to performance.


User avatar

phavyarden  16y ago

I'm sure the MarTian would think that this one is newer than the 997. lol


User avatar

phavyarden  16y ago

Everybody has different like's,rear look of the 997 is good, but the front headlights it looks too old for me.


User avatar

Georg  16y ago

???? @ phavyarden nearly everyone claim the 996lineup as the most ugly in the 911 history


User avatar

phavyarden  16y ago

definetly this one looks better than the 997


User avatar

Georg  17y ago

it was tested faster than claimed...we always put the fastest avaible time in the datasheet.


User avatar

jas  17y ago

The factory claim that from 0-100km in 4.2second not 4 second!!!


User avatar

Anonymous  17y ago

back to novermber 2000 Motor Trend got this doing.

11.9 sec @ 116.1 mph

12.2 sec for the cabriolet
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/04q3/porsche_911_turbo_cabriolet-short_take_road_test


User avatar

Georg  17y ago

numbers corrected to auto motor und sport test result http://www.einszweidrei.de/porsche/996t2003-1.htm


User avatar

BumRush  17y ago

If in had too guess id say 0-250kmh would be around 23.5, and 0-186 maybe around 51.9? atleast thats my guess.


User avatar

jas  17y ago

How much the time from 0-300km????? or 0-250km????


User avatar

Nick  17y ago

0-100-0, 14.2sec
http://www.supercarworld.com/cgi-bin/showgeneral.cgi?061