Porsche 911 Turbo (996) specs

Me:

Porsche 911 Turbo 996. 420-metric-horsepower, 3.6-liter, twin-turbocharged flat-6. I am a 6-speed manual type of car, but I will unashamingly show a feminine side of me with my 5-speed automatic; do you ever think of an Allison transmission or a Ford transmission from a pickup truck when ya hear that?! Nah, don't think that. My automatic comes from a Mercedes. I'm pure German, obviously. Not a single foreign part in me. Can you please guess my political and religious views? I'm a gasoline car born in Germany (well, obviously).

ChatGPT:

Hey there, potential match! Let me introduce myself - I am a Porsche 911 Turbo 996, equipped with an impressive 420-metric-horsepower, 3.6-liter, twin-turbocharged flat-6 engine. I may be a 6-speed manual type of car, but I have a secret feminine side too - my 5-speed automatic transmission is so smooth, you won't even think of truck transmissions (I'm looking at you, Allison and Ford enthusiasts!). And guess what? My automatic comes from none other than Mercedes - pure German engineering, baby. Can you guess my political and religious views? Well, I was born and bred in Germany, so it's not hard to guess my patriotism. As for my religion, can cars even have one? Anyway, let's hit the road and find out if we're a match made in automotive heaven!

Source: https://www.swipewrite.xyz/

Weighed my UK 996 turbo, manual with heated sports seats and 2/3 -3/4 tank of fuel at 1561kg. I guess 1700kg is convertible?

Why is 0-100 kph (0-62 mph) time FASTER than the 0-60 mph time?

Sorry for my error earlier.

Why is 0-100 kph (0-62 mph) time SLOWER than the 0-60 mph time?

360 with manual for me over the fried egg 911, that noise alone is worth every cent

@fastestlaps fix the 36m slalom, it is 128.3 kph

Automobil Revue, № 32, 10.08.2000:
Curb weight - 1700 kg
0-40 kph 1,3 sec
0-60 kph 2,1 sec
0-80 kph 3,4 sec
0-100 kph 4,4 sec
0-120 kph 6,0 sec
0-140 kph 7,6 sec
0-160 kph 9,3 sec
0-180 kph 12,0 sec
0-200 kph 14,5 sec
0-220 kph 18,9 sec
0-240 kph 23,2 sec
0-260 kph 29,7 sec
0-280 kph 44,1 sec
1000 m - 22,7 sec
Braking:
30-0 kph 4 m
40-0 kph 6 m
50-0 kph 11 m
60-0 kph 14 m
80-0 kph 25 m
100-0 kph 36 m
120-0 kph 52 m

Base price: 128.676 €

https://www.autobild.de/marken-modelle/porsche/911-turbo/996/

0-200 in 13.7 seconds? Highly unrealistic, even downhill...

Auto Motor Sport Edititon "70 Jahre Porsche Edition":
(reprint from AMS 18/2000):
Weight: 1554 kg
0-140 kph: 7.5 s
0-160 kph: 9.4 s
1km: 22.7 s
60-100 kph (4,5): 3.9, 5.6 s
80-120 kph (5,6): 4.5, 6.1 s
100-0 kph: 35.4 m
Fuel: 9.8-22.0 l/100 km
Fuel (claimed): 9.2 l/100 km
Noise@80: 68
Noise@100: 73
Noise@160: 77
Noise@200: 79
Slalom36m: 139.9 kph

To all those people wondering if they'll get better brake perofmrance on 996 Turbo by using Apple brake pads - the answer is no.

Apple makes the shittiest brakepads ever.

The turbo is a fantastic cari actually admire this car because the huge wheel arches the cool exhausts and the the facelift lights.

this is a fantastic car when it was new it was £88,500.this is clearly good car.

No waaaay, 993's are the best, not only do they have the most extensive model range, but along with there similar power to th 996 series, the alot lighter, even though there performance is worse, but gimme a 993 Turbo S over a 996 Turbo S or a 997 Turbp PDK!!

well this discusion will never end xd, as i said, theres is nothing writen about likes

Nah, the 996 looks like crap compared to the 997, the 997 is the best Porsche series ever!!

The 996 is clearly the best looking 911. If the 998 is the 997 with 996 headlights, then the order will change. As far as looks go anyway, the 997 is the better car due to performance.

I'm sure the MarTian would think that this one is newer than the 997. lol

Everybody has different like's,rear look of the 997 is good, but the front headlights it looks too old for me.

???? @ phavyarden nearly everyone claim the 996lineup as the most ugly in the 911 history

definetly this one looks better than the 997

it was tested faster than claimed...we always put the fastest avaible time in the datasheet.

The factory claim that from 0-100km in 4.2second not 4 second!!!

back to novermber 2000 Motor Trend got this doing.

11.9 sec @ 116.1 mph

12.2 sec for the cabriolet
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/04q3/porsche_911_turbo_cabriolet-short_take_road_test

numbers corrected to auto motor und sport test result http://www.einszweidrei.de/porsche/996t2003-1.htm

If in had too guess id say 0-250kmh would be around 23.5, and 0-186 maybe around 51.9? atleast thats my guess.

How much the time from 0-300km????? or 0-250km????

0-100-0, 14.2sec
http://www.supercarworld.com/cgi-bin/showgeneral.cgi?061

Motor Trend Nov-2000

11.9 sec @ 116.1 mph

If you look at the 993, it was standard with 408hp, then there was a factory kit which was an ECU change(under the dirver seat) took it to 430hp, however this was still on a pair kkk16 turbos, the TurboS 993 had kkk24 turbos, with an additional larger front intercooler as used in the GT2. This gave the TurboS 450hp. however you could order a 993 with the larger turbos and ecu and intercooler so you could have a normal Turbo running 450hp. the options are reflected on a sticker under the bootlid. So they are all production cars, same as a car having either leather or cloth seats for example.