https://ruf-automobile.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/AMS-CTR2-03-1997.compressed.pdf
0-60 kph: 1.9 s
0-160 kph: 7.6 s
1000 m: 20.8 s
60-100 kph (5): 8.8 s
60-100 kph (6): 15.9 s
80-120 kph (5): 7.0 s
80-120 kph (6): 13.8 s
Noise @ 100 kph: 72 dB(A)
Noise @ 200 kph: 84 dB(A)
Fuel: 10.8 - 29.2 l/100 km
100-0 kph: 39.0 m
RUF CTR2 specs
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 1422 kg (3135 lbs) |
Introduced | 1997 |
Origin country | Germany |
Gas mileage | 29.2-10.8 l/100 km (8-22 mpg US / 10-26 mpg UK) |
CO2 emissions | 302 g/km |
Views | 27.6k |
Lap times
Performance
0 - 60 kph | 1.9 s |
0 - 100 kph | 3.6 s |
0 - 160 kph | 7.6 s |
0 - 200 kph | 11.5 s |
1000 m | 20.8 s |
60 - 100 kph (5) | 8.8 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 7.0 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 13.8 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 8.0 s |
Est. 0 - 60 mph | 3.4 s |
0 - 100 mph | 7.6 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 8.0 s @ 105.0 mph |
1/4 mile | 11.5 s @ 126.1 mph |
Top speed | 347 kph (216 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.86 g (8 m/s²) |
100 kph - 0 | 39 m (128 ft) |
Noise @ 100 kph | 72 dB |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | F6 |
Displacement | 3.6 l (220 ci) |
Power | 520 ps (513 bhp / 382 kw) |
Torque | 685 Nm (505 lb-ft) |
Power / liter | 144 ps (142 hp) |
Power / weight | 366 ps (361 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 482 Nm (355 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 26 PS per l/100 km |
Transmission | 6 speed stick shift |
Layout | rear engine, all wheel drive |
CTR2 competition
Hoppelmoppel123 5y ago
Inline 6 rules 9y ago
0-60 km/h: 1,9 s
1000 m: 20,8 s
http://ruf-automobile.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/AMS-CTR2-03-1997.compressed.pdf
Bezza 16y ago
Being a Ruf fan I was just reading through the bits on the CTR2 and laughed at the comments made by a few ignoramuses about the 8 mins 15 lap time. Well I have a copy of Autocar issue 17/24 Dec 97 which featured this very lap! The driver that day was one Stefan Roser, yes him who drifted the CTR1 around in Faszination. It took place on a cold November day and on the same day Caterham set the road car record for the original Superlight R at 8 mins 6.2 seconds. Stefan tried several times to match this time and managed 8 mins 15 eventually. I am not sure if it was a full lap or the bridge to gantry variety, but the track was closed, so I guess it could have been the former. Anyway you can hardly say it was a rubbish lap can you, when the greatest RUF driver of all time was at the helm!
Anyway that sets the record straight. The reason why CTR2 was 10 seconds slower than CTR1 is probably because a) the track was slower on the day of the CTR2 test and b) the CTR2 doesnt actually have a better power to weight ratio than old yellowbird. Plus the fact that track day times didnt really improve until 1999 with the arrival of the GT3 which kickstarted the whole Nurburgring craze.
Anonymous 17y ago
or it could have ben a damp or wet or cold track. and it might have ben a terrible driver. 8:15 for a 520bho RUF?!! c'mon, theres no way this cnt break 8mins,no way, there had to be somthing up with the driver,conditions, or maybe somthing was badly wrong with the car. o and this has 520bhp not ps, and 506lb ft of torque and weighs 3050.
siya 17y ago
the car should'nt be a 4wd and 1997 4wd technology must have been low thats why its lap time is so bad
Anonymous 17y ago
This Ring time is total shite, was it wet that day? how the hell can the YellowBird beat this by t=10 seconds? and its 10 years older. the conditions must not have ben good or the driver was total shit.
Anonymous 17y ago
How in the hell did this car do such a shitty ring time with all that power??? And its a frigin RUF??