It's crazy what gaps the Camaro puts between its opponent on the track. It's almost like comparing a 488 GTB to a Huracan Performante.
Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 vs Ford Mustang Shelby GT500
| Category | Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 | Mustang Shelby GT500 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine layout | 6.2 l V8 | 5.8 l V8 |
| Max power (ps / bhp) | 588 / 580 | 659 / 650 |
| Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 751 / 554 | 855 / 631 |
| Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1838 / 4052 | 1750 / 3858 |
| Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 320 / 316 | 377 / 371 |
Lap Times
Acceleration
| Speed & distance | Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 | Mustang Shelby GT500 |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.6 s | 4.2 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 14.4 s | 12.3 s |
| 0 - 250 kph | 23.9 s | 18.9 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 9.8 s | 8.1 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 3.8 s | 3.5 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 8.7 s | 7.9 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 22.9 s | 17.6 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.8 s @ 96.9 mph | 8.4 s @ 101.9 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 11.9 s @ 116.0 mph | 11.6 s @ 126.1 mph |
General performance
| Category | Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 | Mustang Shelby GT500 |
|---|---|---|
| Top speed | 296 kph (184 mph) | 324 kph (201 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.67 g (7 m/s²) | 0.72 g (7 m/s²) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 30 m (100 ft) | 31 m (101 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 48 m (157 ft) | 47 m (155 ft) |
Summary
| Category | Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 | Mustang Shelby GT500 |
|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 897 | 862 |
| Straight line speed | 974 | 1297 |
| Total | 1871 | 2159 |
Verdict
Mustang Shelby GT500 is the fastest by a small margin.
This comparison has been viewed 6.1k times.
Acceleration graph
hostboy 3y ago @Richard C
I never said the ZL1 would beat the GT500 in straight-line performance after 60 mph. It simply has shorter gearing; it has a 3.73 rear end versus the GT500's 3.31 and also a 51% front weight distribution versus the GT500's 57%.
It's easier to handle 580 hp and 556 lb-ft on a 51:49 ratio than it is to handle 662 hp and 631 lb-ft on a 57:43 ratio.
The ZL1 hits 54 mph in first gear with a manual, while the GT500 does 66 in first gear.
Kilobit81 6y ago
The Mustang should win because it is 600lbs lighter than the Camaro not to mention it has 70 more h.p. and 46 more ft lbs of torque. But I would still not purchase another Ford product. Ford heavily relies on r.p.m.s and fuel pressure to achieve their jorse power and torque which is a bad thing for engine life and longetivity. Although I do believe Ford has made improvements in their engineering, their past reliability has completely put me off from ever trusting them.
V8Supercar1 11y ago
Are you kidding me? A car with a solid rear axle is quicker on the Nurburgring than a car with the latest in magnetic ride control?? Thats very interesting. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hiSgO7Jq3I&list=FLMX0InKsiuh5WnQ-tKmSCCg&index=1
Viking 12y ago
@Shaggy
I am kinda counting on the Napa Valley Bike Tours job to get my body fat percentage down a bit so I can compete again. I still have lots of muscle, but I probably need to lose about 10 or 15 lbs in order to get on stage again. Still, I really haven't changed much since 2006. Even when I am a bit out of shape, it is only maybe 10 or 15 lbs that I need to lose. The muscles tend to stay even when I don't lift weights. However when I try to lose fat it is important to do some weight training and make sure I eat enough protein in order to keep the muscles while getting more ripped.
Viking 12y ago
@Shaggy and BR2'
Yeah, I am a bit of a show off. That's me at a natural bodybuilding competition in Blacksburg Virginia in 2006. I didn't do that well, only fourth place in men's over 40, but it is a good picture nonetheless. I have done better in more recent competitions, including a first place trophy in men's over 50 at the 2010 INBF Natural USA in Rochester New York. But this is the best picture I can find of me on stage.
Viking 12y ago
Muscle cars like these are fun to drive (as long as you can afford the petrol). I am quite familiar with muscles. Vikings are sometimes kinda muscular like this: http://www.thenaturalmusclenetwork.com/ocb/Contests/2006/OCB2006BlacksburgVA/GaryAsmussen.jpg
Viking 12y ago
@reality check
My nephew owns a 2009 Shelby GT500, my dad owns a 1994 Mustang GT, and I used to own a 2011 Mustang GT. However, I like both the Camaro models, and the Mustang models. Both are fine muscle cars. The current Camaro has proven to be the better handling (when set up properly), but the Mustang has a better style (in my opinion). If you like real powerful muscle cars, both are fine examples in my humble opinion.
Mental 12y ago
@reality check
Ironically, I cannot choose the best. Camaro has a better suspension, more responsible handling, and has a more exciting exhaust note; while Shelby has more power, probably has a more beautiful exterior and interior. Each has its own advantage; but to sum up, and both appear to be excellent muscle cars. And whether I'm neither Ford's, nor GM's fan, I don't care what badge they carry, I love them for their muscles, and I love muscle cars. I simply consider them as brothers, because they both are muscle cars.
