The CTS V is a M5 competitor, not fair.
Cadillac CTS-V vs Alfa Romeo Giulia QV
Category | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV | Cadillac CTS-V |
---|---|---|
Engine layout | 2.9 l V6 | 6.2 l V8 |
Max power (ps / bhp) | 510 / 503 | 649 / 640 |
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 601 / 443 | 855 / 631 |
Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1708 / 3765 | 1887 / 4160 |
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 299 / 295 | 344 / 339 |
Average price | €89,000 | €102,000 |
Lap Times
Acceleration (mph)
Speed & distance | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV | Cadillac CTS-V |
---|---|---|
0 - 40 mph | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
0 - 60 mph | 3.6 s | 3.5 s |
0 - 80 mph | 5.7 s | 5.6 s |
0 - 100 mph | 8.0 s | 7.3 s |
0 - 130 mph | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
0 - 150 mph | 19.9 s | 17.4 s |
Est. 0 - 170 mph | 27.5 s | 25.8 s |
1/4 mile | 11.7 s @ 123.1 mph | 11.6 s @ 126.1 mph |
Acceleration (kph)
Speed & distance | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV | Cadillac CTS-V |
---|---|---|
0 - 40 kph | 1.2 s | 1.5 s |
0 - 50 kph | 1.7 s | 1.7 s |
0 - 60 kph | 2.0 s | 2.6 s |
0 - 80 kph | 2.9 s | 3.4 s |
0 - 100 kph | 3.8 s | 3.7 s |
0 - 120 kph | 4.9 s | 5.6 s |
0 - 130 kph | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
0 - 140 kph | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
0 - 160 kph | 7.9 s | 7.3 s |
0 - 180 kph | 9.7 s | 10.5 s |
0 - 200 kph | 11.9 s | 10.9 s |
0 - 250 kph | 20.7 s | 18.2 s |
0 - 280 kph | 32.7 s | 29.0 s |
1000 m | 21.2 s @ 250.9 kph | 21.8 s @ 252.0 kph |
Rolling acceleration
Speed | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV | Cadillac CTS-V |
---|---|---|
60 - 100 kph (4) | 2.5 s | 2.1 s |
60 - 100 kph (5) | 3.3 s | 3.1 s |
80 - 120 kph (4) | 2.7 s | 2.4 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 3.3 s | 2.9 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 4.4 s | 4.0 s |
80 - 120 kph (7) | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
80 - 160 kph (4) | 5.7 s | 5.1 s |
80 - 160 kph (5) | 7.3 s | 6.6 s |
80 - 160 kph (6) | 9.9 s | 8.9 s |
80 - 160 kph (7) | 14.2 s | 12.2 s |
100 - 140 kph | 2.6 s | 2.3 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 8.5 s | 7.8 s |
Braking distance
Speed | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV | Cadillac CTS-V |
---|---|---|
100 kph - 0 | 31 m (101 ft) | 33 m (109 ft) |
200 kph - 0 | 126 m (415 ft) | 133 m (435 ft) |
60 mph - 0 | 30 m (99 ft) | 30 m (99 ft) |
70 mph - 0 | 42 m (138 ft) | 45 m (149 ft) |
General performance
Category | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV | Cadillac CTS-V |
---|---|---|
Top speed | 309 kph (192 mph) | 324 kph (201 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.74 g (7 m/s²) | 0.74 g (7 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 71.1 kph (44.2 mph) | 69.6 kph (43.2 mph) |
Fuel economy | 7.2 l/100 km (33 mpg US / 39 UK) | 11.8 l/100 km (20 mpg US / 24 UK) |
Lateral acceleration | 1.17 g (11 m/s²) | 0.98 g (10 m/s²) |
Summary
Category | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV | Cadillac CTS-V |
---|---|---|
Track Performance | 98 | 100 |
Straight line speed | 95 | 100 |
Overall | 97 | 100 |
Verdict
CTS-V is the fastest by a small margin.
This comparison has been viewed 4.3k times.
Acceleration graph




Marco Kröning 3y ago
I miss the time from 0-300 and 200-300.
The Alfa seeme to have the much better brakes, mybee this great breaking result comes also from the lightness...
Both are really nice cars and especially the CTS-V is a really unique car here in Germany much more than any BMW, Mercedes, Audi or Porsche. The Interieur in the Caddy is much more special than in the Alfa, but evem the Alfa is not bad. The exhaust sound is really amzing. The pre-owner of my CTS-V said the sound is much better than of his new McLaren 765LT :)


jeremyclarkson1 1y ago
I think the ATS V comes close and even beats the Giulia on a few tracks


jeremyclarkson1 1y ago @Corvolet3
Makes sense, however I am still impressed with the ATS V's performance on track especially
