Image of Alfa Romeo Giulia QV

Alfa Romeo Giulia QV specs

Car type 4-door saloon
Curb weight 1672-1733 kg (3686-3821 lbs)
Power / weight 299 ps (295 bhp) / t
Introduced 2015
Origin country Italy
Average fuel consumption 15.1-9.8 l/100 km (16-24 mpg US / 19-29 mpg UK)
Price in Europe €71,800 - €90,800
Price in US $73,595 - $79,195
Noise @ idle 48 dB
Noise @ 160 kph 75 dB
Noise @ 70 mph 68 dB
Views 23.5k
Submitted by Murmur

Performance

Top speed 307 kph (191 mph)
0 - 40 kph 1.4 s
0 - 50 kph 1.7 s
0 - 60 kph 2.1 s
0 - 100 kph 3.8 s
0 - 130 kph 5.7 s
0 - 160 kph 7.9 s
0 - 200 kph 12.3 s
0 - 250 kph 22.7 s
0 - 280 kph 39.0 s
0 - 30 mph 1.6 s
0 - 60 mph 3.6 s
0 - 100 mph 8.1 s
0 - 130 mph 13.8 s
0 - 150 mph 19.9 s
0 - 160 mph 24.2 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.8 s @ 97.6 mph
1/4 mile 11.8 s
1000 m 21.6 s
60 - 100 kph (4) 2.5 s
60 - 100 kph (5) 3.3 s
80 - 120 kph (4) 3.9 s
80 - 120 kph (5) 3.4 s
80 - 120 kph (6) 4.4 s
80 - 120 kph (7) 6.6 s
80 - 120 kph (8) 12.4 s
80 - 160 kph (4) 8.1 s
80 - 160 kph (5) 9.6 s
80 - 160 kph (6) 12.5 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 8.5 s
100 kph - 0 31 m (102 ft)
130 kph - 0 61 m (201 ft)
140 kph - 0 70 m (228 ft)
200 kph - 0 126 m (415 ft)
70 mph - 0 44 m (143 ft)
18m slalom 70.6 kph (43.9 mph)
Lateral acceleration 1.00 g (10 m/s²)
Alfa Romeo Giulia QV acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type Twin Turbo V6
Displacement 2.9 l (177 ci)
Power 510 ps (503 bhp / 375 kw)
Power / liter 176 ps (173 hp)
Efficiency 41 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 31 ps
Transmission 8-speed automatic or 6 speed manual
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

Laptimes 8

Giulia QV rivals

User avatar

User avatar

Rafael Fonseca  4d  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0QVXvIUZwY
IL MANQUE LE TOUR A L'ANNEAU DU RHIN 2.0 KM EN 1,03,5 SECOND


User avatar

BR2+  1w  

....Died, like are you serious?...


User avatar

GTA  1w  

Curb weight according to wikipedia is 1524 kg.
The Quadrifoglio weighs 1,524 kilograms (3,360 pounds) (DIN) for a power-to-weight ratio of 3 kg/PS.[34] This is achieved thanks to the Quadrifoglio sharing the other models' composite and light alloy construction, as well as featuring a roof and engine bonnet made of carbon fibre.[22] It has a carbon fiber driveshaft and has optional carbon fiber seats and break-discs.
If a BMW M3 can weigh a Curb weight of 1,595 kg (3,516 lb) why is a Alfa Giulia Quadrifoglio so much havier? Because it is not. It is actually about the same.



User avatar

GTA  1w  

Tare Mass or Weight
This is the weight of an empty standard vehicle with all of its fluids (oils, coolants) but with only 10 litres of fuel in the tank. We assume 10 litres was chosen as an industry standard to allow otherwise empty vehicles to be driven to and from a weighbridge.
In Australia a Giulia Quadrifoglio weighs 1585 kg = tare weight.
http://www.alfaromeo.com.au/vehicles/Giulia_QV_SPEC.pdf
The Australian model is with an automatic gearbox and RHD.
I don't know about any gravity differences but i do think if a Giulia has this tare weight in Australia, it might weigh the same in Europe.
Curb weight is with a driver and full tank (58 liter) of fuel.
So Curb weight for automatic would be 1585 kg + 48 liter (35 kg) + 75 kg (driver) = 1695 kg.
Curb weight manual is 40 kg less, 1655 kg.


User avatar

saxy  3w  

What the manufacturer says is NOT more accurate than real people weighing a real car.
1690kg curb weight was based on a manual car, where did that extra 145kg come from?

Pretty sure your numbers are dry weight, which is meaningless


User avatar

GTA  3w  

Giulia Quadrifoglio engine has 600 Nm
weight is not 1672 kg
but 1595 kg for automatic
and 1555 kg for manual
both values without driver


User avatar

illeverpaul  1m  

time with 6 speed or 8?


User avatar

FastestLaps  1m  

have you added the grand tour eboladrone time for this car

Of course I have :)


User avatar

brz  1m  

have you added the grand tour eboladrone time for this car


User avatar

tyler  2m  

Also could you add 8-speed automatic with manual shifting mode to transmission.



User avatar

Prior  3m  

@NicoP: I guess someone in Auto Zeitung is languig. You may find better results at You Tube


User avatar

Prior  3m  

I believe you misuderstood the Silverstone lap time. It was aimed to show how easy it is for modern car to achieve records that supercars had set dozens of years back in past. Do you really belive that Giulia QV could perform at Silverstone as miserably as 1:44? As you see the board it would became the slowest car you've clasified on that track, slower even than Astra OPC. Prease delate that laptime and watch the video with more carefully


User avatar

NicoP  3m  

@BR2+
Who cares? Now it's here and the Stelvio lap time is yet to come ;-)

@rhs1992
yeah, of course, just if driven from a very fat drunk Irish man just after Saint Patrick's Day...


User avatar

rhs1992  3m  

Manual test on Auto Zeitung
1690kg(50kg more than M3 Competition with DCT)!!
0-100 4.7s
0-160 9.2s
0-200 14.1s
So slower on straight and 1.5s slower in track.
Also it consumes more fuel...


User avatar

BR2+  4m  

I would have added it ages ago..


User avatar

Renzone  4m  

Thanks FastestLaps, sorry if they are insistent but I have a great passion for cars and your website is fantastic for a fan, so I like to make my contribution :-)


User avatar

FastestLaps  4m  

Can you believe it? I have finally added the 7:32! :D


User avatar

Renzone  4m  

http://fastestlaps.com/models/chevrolet-camaro-zl1-mk-vi

I would like to point out the slight time difference of 23 km of the Nurburgring Giulia QV than the new Camaro ZL1, less than 3 seconds the difference with 140 hp less.
Without detracting from the Camaro as the car value, congratulations to Giulia QV and its excellent time.



User avatar

Renzone  4m  

New nurburgring time 7:32


User avatar

marchino  4m  

please update the new Nurburgring time and the transmission type (auto)


User avatar

Renzone  4m  

New nurburgring time 7:32 please


User avatar

Lorenzo Rossi  4m  

New Nurburgring time 7.32 please


User avatar

Ser  5m  

Well, nurburgring time needs to be refreshed, there's a new one of 7.32


User avatar

saxy  6m  

Not to mention the gts costs like nearly twice as much


User avatar

BR2+  6m  

....Your comparing a stripped out track car to this....Are you just plain stupid?.. Whats next a Bentley Bentayga to a Z/28?..


User avatar

Lescix  6m  

BMW M3 GTS at 7:28 is still comfortably ahead... well done though Mr. Alfa Romeo


User avatar

rhs1992  6m  

M3/M4 aren't too heavy! It is light car fort it's class! Look at facts and numbers. Also Corvette isn't cheaper than base M3/M4