Image of Mercedes-Benz AMG GT R

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT R specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1554-1650 kg (3426-3638 lbs)
Dimensions 4.55 m (179 in) long, 1.94 m (76 in) wide, 1.29 m (51 in) high
Wheelbase 2.63 m (104 in)
Power / weight 364 ps (359 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 436 Nm (321 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2017
Origin country Germany
Average fuel consumption 16.1-14.5 l/100 km (15-16 mpg US / 18-19 mpg UK)
Price in Europe €165,410 - €195,430
Noise @ idle 53 dB
Noise @ 100 kph 71 dB
Noise @ 130 kph 73 dB
Views 13.6k
Submitted by hostboy

Performance

Top speed 318 kph (198 mph)
0 - 40 kph 1.3 s
0 - 50 kph 1.4 s
0 - 100 kph 3.2 s
0 - 130 kph 4.7 s
0 - 150 kph 6.1 s
0 - 160 kph 6.6 s
0 - 200 kph 9.8 s
0 - 40 mph 2.2 s
0 - 50 mph 2.9 s
0 - 70 mph 4.3 s
0 - 110 mph 8.6 s
0 - 130 mph 11.8 s
0 - 140 mph 13.8 s
0 - 150 mph 16.3 s
0 - 160 mph 19.3 s
0 - 170 mph 23.4 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.3 s @ 103.1 mph
1/4 mile 11.0 s
Est. 1/2 mile 17.7 s @ 150.4 mph
Est. 1 mile 29.0 s @ 170.3 mph
1000 m 19.9 s
60 - 100 kph (4) 2.4 s
60 - 100 kph (5) 3.1 s
80 - 120 kph (5) 3.0 s
80 - 120 kph (6) 3.8 s
80 - 120 kph (7) 5.1 s
80 - 120 kph 1.9 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 7.7 s
50 kph - 0 9 m (29 ft)
100 kph - 0 31 m (101 ft)
140 kph - 0 66 m (215 ft)
200 kph - 0 122 m (399 ft)
30 mph - 0 8 m (25 ft)
50 mph - 0 21 m (68 ft)
70 mph - 0 41 m (136 ft)
18m slalom 73.2 kph (45.5 mph)
36m slalom 146.0 kph (90.7 mph)
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT R acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type V8 Twin Turbo
Displacement 4.0 l (243 ci / 3982 cc)
Power 585 ps (577 bhp / 430 kw) @ 6250 rpm
Torque 700 Nm (516 lb-ft) @ 1750 rpm
Power / liter 147 ps (145 hp)
Efficiency 39 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 17 ps
Transmission 7-speed SPEEDSHIFT (dual-clutch)
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

Laptimes 8

AMG GT R rivals

User avatar



User avatar

DAVE  2m ago

0-300 km/h in 31.6 seconds


User avatar

cosimo  3m ago

it has over 585 bs german advertised numbers, and knowing amg and their press cars it's nothing new, which puts it in the cheaters list of 2017 with german uber cars with lower power than what you expect or try to bs yourself that it can deliver without too much power.

who knows if amg engineers tuned it down to make it look like it has less than 680hp on the dyno!

the weight is also doubtful with 2wd config with given bs power vs other lap times with less weight and higher power.


User avatar

saxy  3m ago

Engine measured to be 619PS... which isn't too over the top. The car isn't extremely light but the chassis is very well sorted.


User avatar

fakekillerfour  3m ago

Hockenheim Short in 1:06.4

3212b21a26d357b051d1ff123788dc31-png.404



User avatar

BR2+  3m ago

Get your mods arses moving


User avatar

FastestLaps  3m ago

I am on it, takes to time to add everything :D


User avatar

DeDe  3m ago

Still no care for the 2nd fastest ever laptime of Contidrom? :O



User avatar

Fastedee  4m ago

132.00 at Laguna


User avatar

BR2+  4m ago

Smh...


User avatar

hostboy  4m ago

This car has the same standing kilometer time as GenteMotori's Bugatti EB110 GT from the 1990s. But the Bugatti completed its 400m run in 11.4 seconds. The Bugatti is even less powerful and also heavier and has a manual transmission. If the AMG is underrated by power, then by this logic, the old Bugatti is far more underrated.


User avatar

Imarobot151534  5m ago

I dislike supercars and I hate 'road going' race cars, yet I'm in love with the amg gtr and it's not even out yet.
If I had the money for a super car, this would be it.
Any predictions on the lap time at laguna seca?


User avatar

BR2+  7m ago

Damn straight.


User avatar

saxy  7m ago

The current E63s has the same 4.0L engine with easily 600+hp. Can't see why this has any less.


User avatar

tøs  7m ago

It wasmt the same driver so its irrlevant the 7:13 by sport auto.. Horst van is shit vs crish and Christaian!!


User avatar

BR2+  7m ago

The top of the line E class from 2 years ago already makes as much power as a 675LT, There's Zero reason to believe this doesnt too


User avatar

Chanante  7m ago

If you see the speeds for me this car does 600ps may be but not near 675lt output power. 488 does 314/316 in the test and it not a german car.

HCbVn6f.jpg


User avatar

Good gamer  7m ago

No it wasn't a standing start .If it was standing start,I don't see why sport auto wouldn't mention it.


User avatar

BR2+  7m ago

Correct me if im wrong, But wasnt that 918 7:13 time done with a standing start with one lap? Or am i thinking of a different test?

Also, The GTS has impressive times because it has WAAAAY more power then advertised, Mercedes on average out of all German cars would top the list for more power then its competitors bhp numbers, This prolly has 675LT power figures..


User avatar

FastestLaps  7m ago

Regular AMG GT S had some impressive acceleration times for a two wheel drive. I wonder what this will do in magazine tests!


User avatar

sroser  7m ago

Hmmmm.... 300+hp less than a 918, same weight, RWD, 2s faster????????????????


User avatar

Ukspeed  7m ago

WHO was the driver? Awesome laptime!


User avatar

racingisinmyblood  7m ago

Wow. AMG GT R Laptime Nordschleife 7.10,92 min by Sport Auto, Driver Christian Gebhardt

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AtXzca-zSY&t=251s


User avatar

BR2+  9m ago

Ooooo, This is gonna be Fun~


User avatar

dddd  9m ago

It seems that most cars with turbo engines that are currently produced have more power than it is advertised...

Its a pity that Ferrari (seemingly) is not one of them : http://www.boostaddict.com/showthread.php?75833-Powerhaus-Performance-gets-another-74-whp-from-a-Ferrari-488-GTB-with-their-Stage-I-dyno-tuned-ECU-flash

http://www.europeanboost.com/content.php?7445-Ferrari-overrates-488-GTB-output-Stock-and-Fabspeed-tuned-dyno-results-plus-McLaren-650S-and-570S-output-comparison

528 WHP is a horrid number for a Ferrari 488... It SEEMS that this car is 50-60 hp down on power !

Have you guys seen more optimistic dyno test of 488 ?


User avatar

manone  9m ago

15% for rear wheel drive is just an approximate estimate. the rear differential losses alone (it is the place with greatest power loss) could be anything between 6 to 10%, giving a potential 4% lower figure from that estimate.

The old F10 M5... rwd. so 522/0.85 = 618.8hp.

522whp/0.85=614.1hp,
522whp/0.9=590hp.

claimed power is 553hp+5%=580hp
thus that particular m5 "could" between 10-35hp overpowered. that is illegal, but not a game changer in performances as you claimed. especially since we have to factor in variables such as dyno induced errors and kind of gasoline. We are definitely not talking about 15-20% power gain over claimed figures+tolerances, unlike the case for german press cars.
another sample with 91oct and akrapovic exaust system ran 519whp.


User avatar

saxy  9m ago

Firstly, the usually REAR wheel drive is 15% loss, and AWD is 20% loss. Automatics are always worst than Manuals. 10% are for FWD cars. Side note, Tesla electric motors half almost no loss at all, hence why 532hp can bring a 2 ton machine to the 1/4 mile in 11 seconds.

The non S version is rear wheel drive only.

And I'm not sure you have done your math right either. drive train loss of 15% does NOT mean you take the whp x 115%. It should be whp / 0.85 or whp/ 0.8. In this case, 636hp, or 676hp.

The old F10 M5... rwd. so 522/0.85 = 618.8hp.
claimed is like 555hp? how is that not overpowered?