Image of Mercedes-Benz CLK DTM

Mercedes-Benz CLK DTM specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1678 kg (3699 lbs)
Power / weight 347 ps (342 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 477 Nm (352 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2004
Origin country Germany
Views 43.7k

Performance

Top speed 320 kph (199 mph)
0 - 100 kph 3.9 s
0 - 200 kph 11.8 s
0 - 100 mph 7.9 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.8 s @ 98.8 mph
Est. 100 - 200 kph 7.9 s

More acceleration times

Mercedes-Benz CLK DTM acceleration graph
User avatar

User avatar

Kain  1m ago

the 355hp & 273lb-ft e46 csl - http://fastestlaps.com/models/bmw-m3-csl
it has no chance of beating the clk dtm on any track..
Power / weight 260 ps (256 bhp) / t <-- M3 CSL
Torque / weight 267 Nm (197 lb-ft) / t <-- M3 CSL
Power / weight 347 ps (342 bhp) / t <-- CLK DTM
Torque / weight 477 Nm (352 lb-ft) / t <-- CLK DTM


User avatar

RRTeam  2y ago

To be honest, the M3 CSL is faster only because it was driven by pro and the CLK DTM by journalists from a magazine. I even ain't Mercedes fan but this one was a hell of a car.


User avatar

Fangio Man  5y ago

This thing looks so much better than the newer CLK 63 Black Series. Data is also impressive.


User avatar

Shaggy  5y ago

This makes my list of dream cars, this machine is just brutal!


User avatar

Mental  5y ago

The old-good CLK DTM... Mmmm... Even more badass than the Black Series... Just shame, there are neither CLK-class, nor DTM series with us anymore...


User avatar

Fangio Man  5y ago

"So now why buy an SLR?"

For the looks! :D


User avatar

Ferrari driver  6y ago

DTM=
Deutsche Tourenwagen Meisterschaft


User avatar

Seriously  7y ago

So now why buy an SLR?


User avatar

Lemming25  8y ago

Comon , there is no E92 CSL , maybe GTS...i was talking about the E46 CSL and about the nordschleife track...


User avatar

FastestLaps  8y ago

m3 csl? Comon. Last time I checked there was no E92 M3 CSL with 500 hp.


User avatar

Lemming25  8y ago

the bmw m3 csl eats this on track for less money ;)


User avatar

Anonymous  9y ago

The NSX-R did not have 280BHP... it was considerably more, despite what Honda claim.


User avatar

Anonymous  9y ago

And much less weight. Saying that a car is amazing just because it did something with less power is pointless.


User avatar

Douglas6250  9y ago

The NSX-R did this lap time with only 280BHP.


User avatar

Georg  10y ago

1:44.10 is the correct time in the 2007 magazine was a laptime sheet published of all sportscars Oschersleben laps... the other time wasfor the convertible


User avatar

A156  10y ago

And two Oschersleben times using the same reference! Anybody knows the real one?


User avatar

A156  10y ago

So why the 7:40 is still there? Somebody delete it please


User avatar

Georg  11y ago

@ Anonymous
The 7:56min is from the 3/2006 test which is quoted here as the referenz for the 7:40min, just klick my link which transfers you directly to > Autobild > online archive > 3/2006 test at the Ring with the CLK DTM AMG


User avatar

Ale-/////AMG  11y ago

7:56.50 155.594 km/h -- Mercedes CLK DTM AMG, 582 PS/1678kg, Klaus Ludwig (AutoBild 02/06)
this is the 7:56 lap time^^.


User avatar

Anonymous  11y ago

the CLK DTM can make this time the lap time 7:56 is another autobild test it's older than this time.Do you like BMW M?


User avatar

Georg  11y ago

The 7:40min time is wrong..during this Autobild test published in 3/2006 the CLK DTM AMG reached a 7:56.50min driven by Walter Röhrl Klaus Ludwig and other real race drivers.. the conditions on that test day was not perfect Walter Röhrl reached at that day only a 7:39min with the Carrera GT ..11s slower as his best time
http://www.autobild.de/artikel/supercars-treffen-superstars_54963.html


User avatar

Ale-/////AMG  11y ago

there is a Nurburgring track list in www.supercars.net it is very good ^^