Image of Mercedes-Benz CLK DTM

Mercedes-Benz CLK DTM specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1678 kg (3699 lbs)
Power / weight 347 ps (342 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 477 Nm (352 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2004
Origin country Germany
Views 42.5k

Performance

Top speed 320 kph (199 mph)
0 - 100 kph 3.9 s
0 - 200 kph 11.8 s
0 - 100 mph 7.9 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.8 s @ 98.8 mph
Est. 100 - 200 kph 7.9 s

More acceleration times

Mercedes-Benz CLK DTM acceleration graph
User avatar

User avatar

RRTeam  2y

To be honest, the M3 CSL is faster only because it was driven by pro and the CLK DTM by journalists from a magazine. I even ain't Mercedes fan but this one was a hell of a car.


User avatar

Fangio Man  4y

This thing looks so much better than the newer CLK 63 Black Series. Data is also impressive.


User avatar

Shaggy  4y

This makes my list of dream cars, this machine is just brutal!


User avatar

Mental  4y

The old-good CLK DTM... Mmmm... Even more badass than the Black Series... Just shame, there are neither CLK-class, nor DTM series with us anymore...


User avatar

Fangio Man  4y

"So now why buy an SLR?"

For the looks! :D


User avatar

Ferrari driver  5y

DTM=
Deutsche Tourenwagen Meisterschaft


User avatar

Seriously  7y

So now why buy an SLR?


User avatar

Lemming25  8y

Comon , there is no E92 CSL , maybe GTS...i was talking about the E46 CSL and about the nordschleife track...


User avatar

FastestLaps  8y

m3 csl? Comon. Last time I checked there was no E92 M3 CSL with 500 hp.


User avatar

Lemming25  8y

the bmw m3 csl eats this on track for less money ;)


User avatar

Anonymous  8y

The NSX-R did not have 280BHP... it was considerably more, despite what Honda claim.


User avatar

Anonymous  9y

And much less weight. Saying that a car is amazing just because it did something with less power is pointless.


User avatar

Douglas6250  9y

The NSX-R did this lap time with only 280BHP.


User avatar

Georg  9y

1:44.10 is the correct time in the 2007 magazine was a laptime sheet published of all sportscars Oschersleben laps... the other time wasfor the convertible


User avatar

A156  9y

And two Oschersleben times using the same reference! Anybody knows the real one?


User avatar

A156  9y

So why the 7:40 is still there? Somebody delete it please


User avatar

Georg  10y

@ Anonymous
The 7:56min is from the 3/2006 test which is quoted here as the referenz for the 7:40min, just klick my link which transfers you directly to > Autobild > online archive > 3/2006 test at the Ring with the CLK DTM AMG


User avatar

Ale-/////AMG  10y

7:56.50 155.594 km/h -- Mercedes CLK DTM AMG, 582 PS/1678kg, Klaus Ludwig (AutoBild 02/06)
this is the 7:56 lap time^^.


User avatar

Anonymous  10y

the CLK DTM can make this time the lap time 7:56 is another autobild test it's older than this time.Do you like BMW M?


User avatar

Georg  10y

The 7:40min time is wrong..during this Autobild test published in 3/2006 the CLK DTM AMG reached a 7:56.50min driven by Walter Röhrl Klaus Ludwig and other real race drivers.. the conditions on that test day was not perfect Walter Röhrl reached at that day only a 7:39min with the Carrera GT ..11s slower as his best time
http://www.autobild.de/artikel/supercars-treffen-superstars_54963.html


User avatar

Ale-/////AMG  10y

there is a Nurburgring track list in www.supercars.net it is very good ^^

Active users

FastestLaps, tyler, hmdqyg, saxy, fakekillerfour, BR2+, Flabernat, DeDe, lawrencefearon, Fastedee

Latest topics

2017 racing season starts tomorrow 40
15 hours ago by saxy

The new, "down-sized" Audi RS5 14
17 hours ago by BR2+

Data submission requests 148
1 day ago by fakekillerfour

Dodge Viper ACR goes "HAM" on 14 tracks, "spanks" Porsche 918 1
2 days ago by lawrencefearon

Shame on Ferrari, shame on McLaren 88
5 days ago by Fastedee

Aston Martin DB11 is much faster than S-Class coupe 20
5 days ago by Fastedee