Ferrari F40 specs

Ferrari F40

Lap times:
20,600 meters: 9:07.99 (estimated 8:22.24 with driver mod)
20,832 meters: 9:14.11 (estimated 8:28.35 with driver mod)
232-meter rollout: 6.11 sec

Dragstrip times (launching at redline rpm):
0-100 km/h: 3.5 sec
0-160 km/h: 6.6 sec
0-200 km/h: 11.0 sec
Standing start, 0-400 meters: 11.06 sec @ 200 km/h
Short rollout, 0-400 meters: 10.71 sec
Long rollout, 0-400 meters: 10.33 sec

Acceleration times (launching from idle rpm):
0-100 km/h: 5.0 sec
0-160 km/h: 8.2 sec
0-200 km/h: 13.3 sec
0-240 km/h: 17.8 sec
0-300 km/h: 29.4 sec
Standing start, 0-400 meters: 13.03 sec @ 198 km/h
Standing start, 0-1000 meters: 21.78 sec @ 268 km/h

Homemade "Ferrari F40" mod in the Automation Tycoon Game

Fair to say it's pretty dramatic driving experience

Anyway it was said that Tipo USA F40 was rated to be around 515 hp. It seems that during the process to refine gasses engineers found some extra power. In my idea that was just partially true, because lots of EU F40s were enough powerful to be faster than US cars. I always tought that that happens because of the same process of engine production more than other choice and no matter the figure Ferrari power claimed.

The Robocop of cars.

Ferrari F40.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Top_Gear_test_track_Power_Lap_times

So the Top Gear lap was a "Did Not Start".
@FastestLaps can I add this time?

fake f40

Are there top speed figures achieved by the Ferrari F40 GTE in the BRP Global GT Series in 1995/1996?

с

Auto Pur 1/94
Ferrari F40 road test
0-100 kph 4.0s
0-200 kph 11.0s
Dyno test: 504 PS @ 7000 rpm

Ferrari F40

And no it isn't. The Mclaren F1 is. Bipartisan agreements over the years online and offline. OUR experience.

https://youtu.be/SwmEgJ9Q0nI?si=CULzdFt7TNBv_6vT

Damn, link doesn't embed. Anyway carwow races the Ferrari F40 vs the Bugatti EB110

It seems that Rosenbaum's F40 (Tipo USA) was able to run 3/4 of a mile with a terminal speed of 180 mph with an engine delivering up to 650 hp.

F40

Liberty Walk F40

Sylvester Stallone visiting the Ferrari factory in Maranello Italy 1990

@hoppelmoppel123
200M 7.505 secs
400M 11.293 secs at 203.60 km/h

Check out these in-house estimations

0-60 mph: 3.43 sec (pre-shift) or 3.91 sec (post-shift)
0-100 mph: 7.38 sec-> 60-100 = 3.47 sec

Street 1/4-mile: 11.62 sec @ 130.00 mph

Top speed: 194 mph (theoretical maximum velocity: 205 mph)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ERFzdIin1zS36ZjmkjahNwjwJAVxwoPCgNV2zJzn2Jo/edit?usp=sharing

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ERFzdIin1zS36ZjmkjahNwjwJAVxwoPCgNV2zJzn2Jo/edit?usp=sharing

Please add these F40 & F50 times at Tsukuba

ROMBO magazine 1/90

Match bike vs car
Yamaha FZR 1000 Ex Up vs Ferrari F40
Airport surface, 5 Cdeg, no wind

BIKE:
0-100 km/h 3s
0-200 km/h 8s
400 m 10.2 @ 220 km/h
1000 m 19.2 @ 258 km/h

CAR:
0-70 km/h 3s
0-160 km/h 8s
400 m 11.7 @ -
1000 m 20.2 @ 265 km/h

PS. Car driver, Nicola Larini, ex F1 & DTM driver.

@FastestLaps please remove the 19.9 1km time nonsense, while it's true that the F40 prototypes had roughly the same specs as the GTO Evoluzione (as pointed out by Thiago_Lins), those are far different from the regular customer-spec F40s which have slightly bigger wings and aren't straight piped

No '90s supercar besides the EB110 SS could even do low 20s, and even an F1 XP5 PROTOTYPE (which shouldn't even BE mentioned in the same breath as a customer production car) ran a barely better time at 19.6.

A customer F40 won't do any better than 20.9 to the first kilometer as pointed out by European mag tests. If an XJ220 can only manage 20.7, and an Enzo can only manage 20.1, and the EB110 SS can only do 19.8, then THE F40 ABSOLUTELY ISN'T DOING 19.9. It should be ONLY BARELY quicker than the F50.