Image of Toyota GT86

Toyota GT86 specs

Price in Europe €28,900 - €52,011
Price in US $27,120
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1180-1258 kg (2601-2773 lbs)
Dimensions 4.24 m (167 in) long, 1.78 m (70 in) wide, 1.29 m (51 in) high
Wheelbase 2.57 m (101 in)
Introduced 2012
Origin country Japan
Gas mileage 12.6-8.1 l/100 km (19-29 mpg US / 22-35 mpg UK)
CO2 emissions 200 g/km
Views 190.1k
Submitted by Jeff B

Acceleration (kph)

0 - 40 kph1.9 s
0 - 50 kph2.2 s
0 - 60 kph3.5 s
0 - 70 kph4.2 s
0 - 80 kph5.1 s
0 - 90 kph6.3 s
0 - 100 kph6.9 s
0 - 110 kph8.7 s
0 - 120 kph9.9 s
0 - 130 kph11.6 s
0 - 140 kph13.5 s
0 - 150 kph15.3 s
0 - 160 kph17.8 s
0 - 180 kph23.6 s
0 - 200 kph30.7 s
1000 m27.5 s @ 191.0 kph

Acceleration (mph)

0 - 30 mph2.3 s
0 - 40 mph3.4 s
0 - 50 mph4.7 s
0 - 60 mph6.4 s
0 - 70 mph8.4 s
0 - 80 mph10.7 s
0 - 90 mph13.5 s
0 - 100 mph16.5 s
0 - 110 mph21.0 s
0 - 120 mph25.8 s
Est. 1/8 mile10.9 s @ 78.3 mph
1/4 mile14.9 s @ 93.2 mph
Est. 1/2 mile26.0 s @ 116.8 mph
Toyota GT86 acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed226 kph (140 mph)
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 028.7 s @ 2572 ft
Est. max acceleration0.42 g (4 m/s²)
18m slalom67.6 kph (42.0 mph)
Lateral acceleration0.91 g (9 m/s²)
100 kph - 034 m (113 ft)
200 kph - 0154 m (506 ft)

Powertrain specs

Engine type Flat-4 DOHC
Displacement 2.0 l (122 ci)
Power 200 ps (197 bhp / 147 kw) @ 7000 rpm
Torque 205 Nm (151 lb-ft) @ 6400 rpm
Power / liter 100 ps (99 hp)
Power / weight 161 ps (159 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 165 Nm (122 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 21 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 29 ps
Transmission 6-Speed Manual or Automatic
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

Rolling acceleration

60 - 100 kph (4)7.1 s
80 - 120 kph (4)7.7 s
80 - 120 kph (5)9.4 s
80 - 120 kph (6)13.2 s
80 - 160 kph (4)16.0 s
80 - 160 kph (5)20.1 s
100 - 140 kph (4)7.1 s
100 - 140 kph (5)9.4 s
100 - 140 kph (6)13.5 s
80 - 120 kph4.9 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph6.0 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph24.2 s
User avatar
User avatar

wallenieswiftie  3w ago

The GT86 is a modern American muscle car.


User avatar

Hoppelmoppel123  4y ago

AutoBild (4/April 2015)
60-100 kph (4): 7.3 s
Sachsenring: 1:45.39


User avatar

N54Turbo  6y ago

AUTO BILD SPORTSCARS | Nr. 1 · Januar 2019
Sachsenring 1:47,82


User avatar

GustavoFarias  9y ago

by the way, I play as HardKill that is the account of my brother on Steam, his name is Guilherme and mine is Gustavo :D


User avatar

GustavoFarias  9y ago

haha thanks by the congratulations! no problems with 4C time, this is a god competition and i like it, now i'm gonna try to beat your M3 E30 time and try to repeat 4C time :) feel free to do better times and make a respectiful and good dispute! bye, see you later.


User avatar

FastestLaps  9y ago

Thank God you didn't beat my e30 M3 time :D


User avatar

FastestLaps  9y ago

Hardkill, your laptime is here: https://fastestlaps.com/assetto-corsa


User avatar

Hardkill  9y ago

i did 8:24 in nurburgring, how to put my time on the ranking


User avatar

BR2+  9y ago

No excuse for underpowered.


User avatar

aaa  9y ago

funny that no one bash the original 86's even lower power figures


User avatar

dddd  9y ago

I think that this car is nice but as i said earlier it should have more powerful version.

2,0L 200hp N/A for a basic model and 2,0L N/A 240-250 hp for a top version.

R4 2,0L N/A engine with ~240-250 hp - it would be something realy special nowadays. It would fit that car perfectly imo.


User avatar

ProDriveP2  9y ago

Does anyone else see the simple genius of this car? It's the fastest 200hp pure sports coupe since the E30 M3. A turbo version would easily best the Supra RZ, unless Mazda grew some balls and made the MX-5 a coupe with the RX-8 motor.


User avatar

Flabernat  10y ago

True, right now there more desirable options at that price...
But if this were to get around 250hp/torque, better brakes, bigger wheels/tires(basically a WRX upgrade), it would give cars like the Cayman S and Alfa 4C some new competition. And it'd be a lot more affordable.
... I think there are many who see a lot more potential with this lightweight, sporty chassis.


User avatar

BR2+  10y ago

You could give this the 4Cs engine, It would still get killed in performance, But the other way round in sales, Its a hit, But theres something big thats missing from it, For the same price you could get a Renault Megane 265, Or Challenger R/T or new Mustang , But you would miss the certain things from those cars that only this one provides.


User avatar

Flabernat  10y ago

I just watched a review with the Alfa 4C. What a great little car. Then it got me thinking, that little 237hp 1.8L turbo-4 would be perfectly suited for a small lightweight car like the FR-S/BRZ. It might even give the Alfa a run for it's money! It would be more appealing, especially since Toyota/Subaru offer a manual with this car... Alfa 4C is DCT-only... meh


User avatar

lafars  10y ago

Everyday driver tested it against S2000 and RX-8 and said that it had a better chassis than both of them but needed the power of the S2000 in order to reach perfect


User avatar

Shaggy  10y ago

I think it should have at least 250, the Camry's V6 puts out 268.


User avatar

BR2+  10y ago

What would be enuff?

I think they should have gone with 270Bhp 250Lb ft and 235x245 tyres RE050, And maybe a bit of work on the interior as well. Maybe a drivers car, But i dont think the people who buy these really car, I think its more about style ant a nicely affordable price.


User avatar

Shaggy  10y ago

I hope so, 200 horsepower isn't enough for these cars.


User avatar

BR2+  10y ago

Supposedly each company is making a high performance version of these cars, Dunno how theyll be intwined though.


User avatar

Shaggy  10y ago

I would at least like to see this car with the Camry's V6 under its hood.


User avatar

GT86meMR2  10y ago

0-62kmph is around 6.7sec and quarter mile is 14.7 stock... just look on the ft86 forums seriously a gt86 with some bolt ons with around 190whp did a 13.9 1/4 mile time so yeah these stats for stock are definetly uncorrect...


User avatar

BR2+  11y ago

Screw it right in the whiskers.

Cars are getting better, But also getting worse, Technology is a double ended sword...


User avatar

phavyarden  11y ago

And the engine is N/a which is great, Im tired of these cars ruining there tradition and going Turbo'd or Super'd because of bullshite emmisions and economy and shite.

Can't be more agree !!
A shame that every brand is leaving behind bigger engines higher revs NA engines. New Civic Type R is also Turbocharged :/
screw Euro 5


User avatar

BR2+  11y ago

Its light enuff, How many Rwd cars in todays world besides Miatas and kit cas are 2700Lbs or under?... practically none.

The power on the other hand could have been better, 270Bhp and 240Lb Ft would have been perfect, Price prolly would be raised an extra 2-3k though, And its hard to find a new car that looks this good, Has the essentials, And is super fun with a good manual while maintaing a great price tag(well Great in the US anyway)

And the engine is N/a which is great, Im tired of these cars ruining there tradition and going Turbo'd or Super'd because of bullshite emmisions and economy and shite.


User avatar

Piorun  11y ago

I have 2 complains

1-This car is not that light like it should be. I mean, for a performance oriented small 2 door, 2 seater with small engine 1200 kg is 200kg too much.

2-Torque and power. Yes i love NA engine, i dont need 800 hp to have fun, but, God, its way underpowered and undertorqued...
At last they should give another engine option, it even could be 2.5 boxer from STI with it 300 hp, and i do not need more.


User avatar

dddd  11y ago

Yes it is a realy weird situation that this car has "only" 200 hp.

In my opinion it is a fantastic thing that this car has N/A engine that like high revs but it could have 240-250 hp and that would be something !

Or let it be...2,0 200 hp for basic version and 2,2L with 250-270 hp. It would be so great then. In its class it would something like 458 Italia in supercars segment. Mayby it wouldnt have the strongest torque kick but it would be nicer and more special than turbo hot hathces.


User avatar

Shaggy  11y ago

I agree, I think it should have at least 250 horsepower.


User avatar

Albert  11y ago

I don't know why Toyota don't put a 2.0 turbo on that car. It needs more power I mean 50-80hp. It's incredible that a hot hatch like focus ST can beat it on track with 5 doors and 1400kg.


User avatar

Rob  11y ago

7.4 might be the 0-60 time for the automatic, which is considerably slower than the manual, but gets better gas mileage.

6.2 is too fast, and Motor Trend has a sloping track that would explain that.