Umm in my opinion the 430 can did it better. The track now is faster and the performance of tires have avanced a lot. But the performance of clubsport S is excelent.
Ferrari F430 vs VW Golf GTI Clubsport S
Category | Golf GTI Clubsport S | Ferrari F430 |
---|---|---|
Engine layout | 2.0 l R4 | 4.3 l V8 |
Max power (ps / bhp) | 310 / 306 | 490 / 483 |
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 465 / 343 | |
Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1314 / 2897 | 1505 / 3318 |
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 236 / 233 | 326 / 321 |
Average price | €40,000 | €139,000 |
Lap Times
Track | Golf GTI Clubsport S | Ferrari F430 |
---|---|---|
Hockenheim Short | 1:12.60 | 1:12.70 |
Nürburgring Nordschleife | 7:49.21 | 7:55.00 |
Acceleration
Speed & distance | Golf GTI Clubsport S | Ferrari F430 |
---|---|---|
0 - 50 kph | 2.3 s | 1.8 s |
0 - 100 kph | 5.6 s | 3.8 s |
0 - 160 kph | 11.6 s | 8.3 s |
0 - 200 kph | 18.6 s | 12.2 s |
0 - 250 kph | 40.6 s | 20.9 s |
1000 m | 24.7 s | 21.5 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 13.0 s | 8.4 s |
0 - 60 mph | 5.8 s | 3.5 s |
0 - 100 mph | 12.8 s | 7.9 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 9.6 s @ 89.5 mph | 8.3 s @ 102.5 mph |
1/4 mile | 13.6 s | 11.7 s @ 122.8 mph |
General performance
Category | Golf GTI Clubsport S | Ferrari F430 |
---|---|---|
Top speed | 266 kph (165 mph) | 316 kph (196 mph) |
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 18.3 s @ 1549 ft | 11.9 s @ 830 ft |
Est. max acceleration | 0.55 g (5 m/s²) | 0.77 g (8 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 70.9 kph (44.1 mph) | 68.0 kph (42.3 mph) |
Fuel economy | 7.8 l/100 km (30 mpg US / 36 UK) | 18.4 l/100 km (13 mpg US / 15 UK) |
100 kph - 0 | 31 m (100 ft) | 34 m (111 ft) |
200 kph - 0 | 116 m (381 ft) | 134 m (441 ft) |
Summary
Category | Golf GTI Clubsport S | Ferrari F430 |
---|---|---|
Track Performance | 200 | 196 |
Straight line speed | 1145 | 1702 |
Total | 1345 | 1898 |
Verdict
F430 is the fastest by considerable margin.
This comparison has been viewed 441 times.
Acceleration graph
dumbfucks 7y ago @saxy
These hatchback poor-as-****-morons really have been brainwashed by the marketing gang lol, whatever brand it may be. Every time when you look deeper into how these FWD shitboxes set their records you find special made compounds, geometry settings that never see the retail cars, and god knows how many other modifications for a record run. This then gets compared to supercars that none of these peasants will ever be able to afford, with times that were set in a different age when Nordschleife wasn't even known to the public at large (thus useless for marketing), and with no intention of setting records lol. Then you look up trackday / journalist times or in case of Nordschlife BTG times and none of these FWD turds actually set these laptimes in the real world.
At least these poorjoe's have something to spend all their hard earned Mcdonalds money on and tell themselves they bought a dedicated track car to go shopping and drop of the kids lmfao. Uneducated dumb****s.
cosimo 7y ago
we never know how badly it was tuned, because they follow the footsteps of the father of all cheaters :)
saxy 7y ago
I thought you were better than this. /smh. A factory hardcore qualifying lap record beat again by another factory lap (vw improved their record on a second attempt) is not to be compared with a casual magazine test lap.
Plus, the Golf has much stickier tires and is lighter. The Golf was not cheating on engine power at all. Advertising the same 310hp as the Civic Type R, the type R did a suspicious 268kph? While the Golf Struggled to get passed 250. If anyone was cheating with more hp, it was Honda.
Fastedee 7y ago @saxy
I have no arguments about Honda as it beat cars at the Ring that were far faster and also better braking. No doubt a factory lap for the F430 would be faster but removing seats and using slicks or near slicks should not be Valid. A ZO6 or Viper is close enough to a McLaren or Ferrari in speed to win by barely slowing down in the corner. A Civic type R is so much slower than an early Murcielago -along with worse braking that it makes 7:50 a laugh and 7:43 a howl.