@lafars
Yes, my mistake.
Cadillac CTS-V Coupe specs
Price in Europe | €83,710 |
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 1907-1945 kg (4204-4288 lbs) |
Dimensions | 4.79 m (189 in) long, 1.88 m (74 in) wide, 1.42 m (56 in) high |
Wheelbase | 2.88 m (113 in) |
Introduced | 2011 |
Origin country | United States |
Views | 26.6k |
Lap times
Performance
0 - 50 kph | 2.0 s |
0 - 100 kph | 4.4 s |
0 - 130 kph | 6.6 s |
0 - 200 kph | 13.5 s |
0 - 300 kph | 57.3 s |
Est. 1000 m | 23.5 s @ 248.0 kph |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 9.3 s |
Est. 200 - 300 kph | 43.4 s |
0 - 60 mph | 3.9 s |
0 - 100 mph | 8.9 s |
0 - 150 mph | 22.5 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 8.8 s @ 97.6 mph |
1/4 mile | 12.2 s @ 118.1 mph |
Est. 1/2 mile | 20.1 s @ 145.4 mph |
Est. 1 mile | 33.1 s @ 170.9 mph |
Top speed | 308 kph (191 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.67 g (7 m/s²) |
300 kph - 0 | 336 m (1102 ft) |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | 6.2L supercharged V-8 engine |
Displacement | 6.2 l (378 ci) |
Power | 564 ps (557 bhp / 415 kw) |
Torque | 747 Nm (551 lb-ft) |
Power / liter | 91 ps (90 hp) |
Power / weight | 293 ps (289 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 388 Nm (286 lb-ft) / t |
Power / €5000 | 34 ps |
Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
CTS-V Coupe competition
Fangio Man 12y ago
0-300-0: 8.1 seconds
300-0: 65.4 seconds
Elise racer 12y ago
@NIN: And the "CTS-VR" name can be used by Cadillac, too. Not just Hennessey.
Elise racer 12y ago
@NIN: Yeah they do! You see a car tested on a simulator like it was tested in real life!
Elise racer 12y ago
The acceleration times were claimed with a 3.42 final drive ratio. With a 3.0 rear axle it can go up to 280.5 mph!
Elise racer 12y ago
It produces 1,500 horsepower at 6,500 rpm and 1,450 lb-ft of torque at 3,500 rpm (with a redline of 7,000 rpm).
Elise racer 12y ago
Sorry, that was the wrong link! Some glitch converted that to 1200+ hp. Here's an updated link:
http://vimulator.com/#/v5/sim/37940
0-60 mph: 2.4 seconds
0-100 km/h: 3.1 seconds
0-100 mph: 5.4 seconds
0-200 km/h: 6.4 seconds
0-300 km/h: 12 seconds
0-200 mph: 13.4 seconds
0-250 mph: 23.1 seconds
1/4 mile: 9.8 @ 162.2 mph
Top speed: 259.75 mph
Elise racer 12y ago
Cadillac is going to make 30 Super CTS-VR1500s (20 with manuals and 10 with automatics). They will come equipped with a Twin Turbo LS9 engine!
0-60 mph: 2.4 sec
0-100 mph: 5.5 sec
0-200 mph: 15.8 sec
1/4 mile: 10 @ 156 mph
Top speed: 258.8 mph
Source: http://vimulator.com/#/v5/sim/37937
Mike B 13y ago
If my research doesn't fail me, the 4.4 to 100kph is made up (as well as the 0-200) and is based on the 3.9 with roll out of the Automatic equipped CTS-V, add 0.3s (I've only seen an account of it only shaving 0.2, so I go for the most common measure) you get 4.2 real 0-60mph then add 0.2 for the 60 to 62 transition and there you have it 4.4s to 100kph.
The actual fastest 0-100kph tested is 4.6 for the manual equipped car, so ~4.1 0-60mph with roll out which results being the fastest gotten on the US for the manual car too.
Viking 13y ago
@mena3agram the acceleration times are probably from two different magazine tests, one U.S. and one European. Usually it takes 2 or 3 tenths of a second more to reach 0-100 kph than 0-60 mph. The 0-60 mph is probably done with 1 foot of roll out which reduces acceleration time by 2 tenths of a second. So, the 5 tenths of a second difference; 0-60 mph versus 0-100 kph isn't unusual. Looks okay to me given the different testing procedure, and that 100 kph is just over 62 mph.
Sims 15y ago
the CTS-V coupe looks so good. Cadillac\'s are setting standards for other high end luxury companies to obtain
E 15y ago
I could have sworn that a little while ago, BumRush left a comment here.
Sure some people want cheap cars, I have no problem with manufacturers making them, but when they exclusively make them, and it shows, it becomes annoying. Really, $1,000,000 is kind of silly for a road legal car. Cars don\'t cost that much due to performance, they cost that much due to other factors like artificial costs (this brand must sell things for high prices, etc), low production runs, and all kinds of luxury stuff. Skip those things and you can have $1,000,000 performance for $300,000. Mosler is a good example.
E 15y ago
They difference is, the US applies it to everything. Ever the ZR1 and ACR made a big deal about being so cheap. In turn they got 6 speed transmissions with 5 gears, high curb weights, and incomplete aerodynamics (yes even the ACR, drag was excessive because of no undertray venturi).
It would be nice to see one of the US companies make versions of their cars that do away with a price target. It\'s not like they would need to build $1,000,000 cars anyway. For $200,000-$300,000 they could beat 97% of cars out there if they don\'t focus on silly things like exclusivity and ridiculous interiors.
Anonymous. 15y ago
Its not just American cars, its everycar, most people use that term for american cars, becasue the offer the most Bhp per dollar, and its true, but thats not exactly a bad thing, but like they say, you get what you pay for..
E 15y ago
Bang for the buck is a disease that American cars get. At least put a gross amount of resources into ONE car.
YoungSinatra 15y ago
No the CTS-V is not up to the standards of a Mercedes-Benz A.M.G. BUT IT\'S ABOUT HALF THE PRICE!! It\'s a tremendous amount of bang for the buck. It\'s going for around 65k. American dollars. And the quality of the Cadillac is VERY good today. You must take price into consideration and compare apples to apples not apples to oranges.