| Price in Europe | €36,050 - €47,069 |
| Price in US | $35,595 - $37,990 |
| Price in Britain | £30,995 - £32,296 |
| Car type | Compact |
| Curb weight | 1380-1436 kg (3042-3166 lbs) |
| Introduced | 2017 |
| Origin country | Japan |
| Gas mileage | 29.4-6.6 l/100 km (8-36 mpg US / 10-43 mpg UK) |
| CO2 emissions | 178 - 239 g/km |
| Views | 103.8k |
| Submitted by | Inline 6 rules |
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 2.3 s |
| 0 - 60 kph | 3.1 s |
| 0 - 70 kph | 3.6 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 4.2 s |
| 0 - 90 kph | 4.8 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 5.5 s |
| 0 - 110 kph | 6.5 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 7.3 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 8.0 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 9.6 s |
| 0 - 150 kph | 10.5 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 11.6 s |
| 0 - 170 kph | 13.3 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 14.9 s |
| 0 - 190 kph | 17.4 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 18.5 s |
| 1000 m | 25.3 s @ 214.0 kph |
| 0 - 30 mph | 2.1 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 3.2 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 4.0 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 4.9 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 6.6 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 8.0 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 10.2 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 11.5 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 21.7 s |
| 1/8 mile | 9.2 s |
| 1/4 mile | 13.4 s @ 108.0 mph |
| 1/2 mile | 21.4 s |
| Top speed | 272 kph (169 mph) |
| 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 16.3 s |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.53 g (5 m/s²) |
| 18m slalom | 72.1 kph (44.8 mph) |
| 36m slalom | 139.0 kph (86.4 mph) |
| Lateral acceleration | 1.05 g (10 m/s²) |
| Engine type | Inline 4, turbo, DI, DOHC, 16 valves, VTEC, Dual-VTC |
| Displacement | 2.0 l (122 ci / 1996 cc) |
| Power | 320 ps (316 bhp / 235 kw) @ 6500 rpm |
| Tested power | 338 ps (333 bhp) |
| Torque | 400 Nm (295 lb-ft) @ 2500 rpm |
| Tested torque | 420 Nm (310 lbft) |
| Power / liter | 160 ps (158 hp) |
| Power / weight | 228 ps (225 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 285 Nm (210 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 29 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 40 ps |
| Transmission | 6 speed manual |
| Layout | front engine, front wheel drive |
| 50 kph - 0 | 8 m (27 ft) |
| 100 kph - 0 | 30 m (99 ft) |
| 130 kph - 0 | 58 m (191 ft) |
| 150 kph - 0 | 74 m (242 ft) |
| 190 kph - 0 | 132 m (433 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 131 m (428 ft) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 30 m (99 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 43 m (140 ft) |
| 100 mph - 0 | 88 m (290 ft) |
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 3.7 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (5) | 5.2 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 3.8 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 4.8 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 6.7 s |
| 80 - 150 kph (5) | 10.0 s |
| 80 - 150 kph (6) | 14.0 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (4) | 8.3 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (5) | 10.4 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (6) | 14.0 s |
| 60 - 160 kph | 8.3 s |
| 80 - 120 kph | 2.9 s |
| 100 - 140 kph | 3.7 s |
| 100 - 200 kph | 13.5 s |
| Noise @ idle | 43 dB |
| Noise @ 50 kph | 63 dB |
| Noise @ 80 kph | 70 dB |
| Noise @ 100 kph | 70 dB |
| Noise @ 130 kph | 73 dB |
| Noise @ 160 kph | 75 dB |
| Noise @ 70 mph | 73 dB |
IsaacFlat6 1d ago
Magny Cours GP : 2:01.51
https://youtu.be/zRHPd7pni50?si=oqRbVScTbw0nyXQI
Silverstone GP : 2:31.32
https://youtu.be/gdWflh96Vh0?si=-a3xL7sN9V3RJcyj
Spa-Francorchamps : 2:53.72
https://youtu.be/vVgBCx_Gq5s?si=_QYg17eqmek9j6t5
Hungaroring : 2:10.19
https://youtu.be/nCuPq6n2oGY?si=PYoPX_dERrr6sAOT
I believe that the "Type R Challenge" car that is stock and different from the car tested from Nordschleife.
IsaacFlat6 1d ago
Mendig AFB Circuit : 1:59.57
Continental SportContact 6 tires
https://youtu.be/SfBxXBf2nBk?si=_P1UnU773UpGrSwM
Add laptime, please.
jeremyclarkson1 1y ago
This car did better on the MT Figure 8 circuit, as it actually did 24.30 seconds, this was in 2018 best drivers car btw.
Source: https://www.motortrend.com/news/honda-civic-type-r-2018-best-drivers-car-contender/
srr4791 2y ago
Check out Performance Calculations of 2020 Honda Civic Type R
https://flattorque.wordpress.com/2020-honda-civic-type-r/
Costas.Ch 3y ago
So, after the development car that did the 7:45 we haven't some other hotlap laptime from a production car.
hostboy 3y ago
hostboy 3y ago
7:43.8 around the Green Hell track
https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/honda-civic-type-r-nurburgring/
Wibble 4y ago
Still need to add the Llandow time of 45.8.
Auto Express test:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dQ9mFuqdOZ0
Ray 5y ago
I know it’s old thread now. I have owned the golf r dsg tuned. Focus rs tuned on e85 and type r and the Honda Is the best car to drive out of all of them hands down. Yes it’s slightly slower in a straight line but I like to take It on a twisty mountain road and I decimates everything. It’s nicer to drive and more comfortable than the golf. Focus was a horrendous place to be.
w0o0dy2 5y ago
Laptime on Suzuka GO track 2:23.993
JustARandomGuu 6y ago
People in this post are retarded. Comparing 0-100km times with AWD cars.
THE CIVIC IS A FWD PLATFORM. COMPARE IT TO OTHER FWD PLATFORMS. If you actually wanna see which company did it better. As a consumer you can argue about what you should choose between a FWD hatchback and a RWD Sports car. But they ARE NOT the same thing.
So, Given the fact that the Civic Type R is a version of the FWD Platform Civic, that you can also take on a track, it is THE BEST example of such a car. PERIOD.
And I am ONLY considering its performance on track. If you count in other factors like reliability, services, interior space, comfort, seating position, aftermarket support, price, and cost of maintainance etc, the Civic DEATROYS ALL COMPETITION.
That's the sad truth you can't understand.
Eric 7y ago
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dQ9mFuqdOZ0
Auto express ran 45.8 with the fk8 at llandow, please add, this is a very fast time!
2007 350Z HR 7y ago
Odd thread. Lots of VR4 talk.
I own a 2007 350Z HR with FBO. My carc is by no means super fast
I have beaten a couple of stock Type Rs, I agree that they're overrated. From a dig I pulled hard on both of them.
As far as the VR4, I've lost to 2 bone stock VR4s, a 1996 and 1999. They're faster than people think and pretty untouchable from a dig. They're a bit faster than a stock Focus RS and a bit slower than the Golf R DSG.
