Image of Nissan Skyline GT-R

Nissan Skyline GT-R (R33) specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1601 kg (3530 lbs)
Power / weight 175 ps (173 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 234 Nm (173 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 1995
Origin country Japan
Views 56.8k

Performance

Top speed 180 kph (112 mph)
0 - 80 kph 4.3 s
0 - 100 kph 5.5 s
0 - 60 mph 5.3 s
0 - 100 mph 12.9 s
Est. 1/8 mile 9.0 s @ 82.0 mph
1/4 mile 12.9 s
1000 m 24.7 s

More acceleration times

Nissan Skyline GT-R acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type RB26DETT- Inline 6, Twincam, Twin turbo intercoolered
Displacement 2.6 l (159 ci)
Power 280 ps (276 bhp / 206 kw)
Torque 375 Nm (277 lb-ft)
Power / liter 108 ps (106 hp)
Transmission 5
Layout front engine, all wheel drive

Laptimes 4

Skyline GT-R rivals

User avatar

User avatar

Migalex  8m  

The 8:01 lap time in nordschleife belongs to the R33 V-spec not the standard R33. The full lap is watchable on Best Motoring R33 Special. It's clearly stated it's the V-spec at the end. Also, why is there no R33 V-spec page in fastest laps? There's only this made up V-spec II with wrong stats.


User avatar

uptownfunker  2y  

0-30 mph: 2.0 s (0-48 kph, which rounds to 0-50 kph)
0-40 mph: 2.7 s
0-50 mph: 4.3 s (0-80 kph)
0-60 mph: 5.3 s
0-70 mph: 6.6 s
0-80 mph: 9.1 s (0-129 kph, which rounds to 0-130 kph)
0-90 mph: 10.9 s
0-100 mph: 12.9 s
0-110 mph: 16.1 s (0-177 kph > 0-180 kph)

PDF: http://media.caranddriver.com/files/1995-nissan-gt-r-v-spec-archived-road-test-review-car-and-driver1995-nissan-skyline-gt-r-full-story.pdf


User avatar

BR2+  2y  

...Nope.


User avatar

Paxa  2y  

Gtr33 faster than gtr34 at ring


User avatar

BR2+  3y  

..I was actually referring to the test that fordfocus linked....sooo....yeah...


User avatar

Danzzz  3y  

@BR2+

300 bhp car from the mid 90's that lapped ring in under 8 minutes (also being the first ever production car to do it) and you say terrible times?

Not sure if serious.


User avatar

BR2+  3y  

Terrible times for the 33, But then again it want the top of the line V-Spec, Still a great car even today, I even considered getting one before i got my 34, But the 34 is more my type, Plus it looks and drives way better, You can get 33s for a good price over here.


User avatar

fordfocus  3y  

311 horsepower.

Read more: 995 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec

Ode to a Skyline: We test Nissan's wildest carâ€[quote]the Skyline GT-R V-Specâ€[quote]on its home turf, and get wing clipped, too.

DECEMBER 1995 BY DON SCHROEDER PHOTOGRAPHY BY JEFFREY DWORIN http://media.caranddriver.com/files/1995-nissan-gt-r-v-spec-archived-road-test-review-car-and-driver1995-nissan-skyline-gt-r-full-story.pdf


User avatar

r33skyliner  5y  

0 - 100miles for this flying turd is under 5s beat that corvette!


User avatar

Cabrera24MANDY  5y  

If you want to buy real estate, you would have to get the home loans. Furthermore, my mother commonly utilizes a bank loan, which supposes to be the most fast.


User avatar

Rick James Jr. V  7y  

lol@ fanboys submitting random YOUTUBE videos as \"proof\"

As if you can verify the car (s) aren\'t modified.


User avatar

Georg  7y  

@wads they will never learn it...


User avatar

Wads  7y  

0-60mph and 0-100kph are NOT the same thing......


User avatar

ThatDamnDrunk  7y  

Change that 5.5 second 0-60mph please... wanna know why those times wrong? Those were American and British magazines which means those cars were ALL used and possibly could have lost horses; plus many of the smarter automotive journalists cite their driving is not the best (i.e. Jeremy Clarkson) and to use a racecar driver instead (Though this shouldn't be hard at all...).



User avatar

stephen  8y  

man I love this car


User avatar

Enzo  8y  

http://www.nismo.com.au/

go to unique media, scroll to bottonm and read the magazine. Its from Unique Cars, a respected mag here in Australia. Gives weight...and 0-100km time. Please stop this stupid keyboard war and fix this.


User avatar

Anonymous  8y  

Well considering it did a 7:59 round the Ring for the 90's, thats not slow. and if 0-60mph is done in 5.0s, 0-100kmh (62mph) should be about 5.3s or so. but than again, i really couldnt care, and BR, dont you own a skline? u should know if you do, but again, couldnt care less bout this car, just stating a comment.


User avatar

GTR256  8y  

Wads, with all due respect if you could go through these sites and links we have posted and please ammend. I'm sure the purpose of this site was not to create keyboard wars but to share knowledge and passion we have about cars. Georg, unless you get rid of the attitude, your arrogant posts are not required here..find some place else. Go check out your audi's. You dont belong here mate.


User avatar

Mpower  8y  

Georg...nice post.

I am no fan of japcrap but if its incorrect then its gotta be corrected. If the car is capable of 0-30mph in 1.9 seconds, your saying it takes half a second to do 2mph? Mate, you clearly have no logic. Nor do you understand physics, and pardon the pun but you are a really arrogant 'prick'. It might have been the slowest to the 0-100 km/h out of the the R32-34 GTR's but it was easily one of the best around a track.


User avatar

Georg  8y  

should I post the 5.4s Evo Magazine tested the Skyline R33 GT-R in a group compare between R32, R33 and R34 ..... and yes that was the R33 GT-R V-spec they tested with 5.4s 0-60mph...and it was by far the slowest of all GT-R´s nearly a full second slower 0-60 than the R34 GT-R V-spec..

come up with real test numbers by car magazines not with internet claims were everyone can claim everything... and don´t claim my freinds car can do this and that..no one cares..


User avatar

GTR256  8y  

As posted by Georg himself..0-60 in 5 secs...it does not take half a second for it to do another 2 miles you fool. And its practically the same as the Vspec? if not faster


User avatar

Georg  8y  

http://www.autocar.co.uk/CarReviews/RoadTestsData/Nissan-Skyline-GT-R/200075/

a real road test by a car magazine and oh wonder claiming the same 1601kg weight that best motoring claimed ....


User avatar

Mpower  8y  

Thats great proof. Any GTR that does the quarter in less than 13.7 has a 0-62 time of under 5 seconds. Any one who owns a GTR knows that. Why...cause 13.7 for the 0-400m was widely accepted when it was released with the boost restrictor on. Launch it harder and the car does not bog down, giving you an even quicker take off. Its a sick car


User avatar

Georg  8y  

no 0-100km/h time no adding to the data..btw... here we have already better time for 1/4mile and nearly the same time 0-100mph so the 0-100km/h time sounds correct.. and stays...the weight is a japanese best motoring claim from one of their videos not from the fantasy numbers of a fanboy side..



User avatar

RadicalMerc  8y  

Oh btw thats a 0-60 time so 5.0 sounds bout right for 0-62


User avatar

RadicalMerc  8y  

Wadz, ay bud think you gotta adjust that. Even check wikipedia, speed and weight are incorrect here bro

http://www.jbskyline.net/R33/GTR/index2.php


User avatar

Wads  8y  

BR we don't have the time to verify every lap within a set time..... we have a tool that lists all new laps that (when we have time) we go through to check validity..... there are only 3 or 4 admins and 4000 lap times. Which new image?.... for my avatar or the R33?


User avatar

BumRush  8y  

Yes that is true, BUT, if wikipedia does not have some kind of proof some where, they will remove the time within 48hrs, but if proof is listed on the site somewhere that time will stay. n have you thought about putting a new image up Wads?