Image of Tesla Model S P100D

Tesla Model S P100D specs

Car type 4-door saloon
Curb weight 2218-2219 kg (4890-4892 lbs)
Power / weight 311 ps (306 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 483 Nm (356 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2016
Origin country United States
Views 3.8k
Submitted by tyler

Performance

0 - 30 mph 0.9 s
0 - 40 mph 1.3 s
0 - 50 mph 1.7 s
0 - 60 mph 2.3 s
1/4 mile 10.5 s @ 125.0 mph
Lateral acceleration 0.89 g (9 m/s²)

Powertrain

Engine type dual three-phase four-pole motors
Power 689 ps (680 bhp / 507 kw)
Torque 1072 Nm (791 lb-ft)
Layout middle engine, all wheel drive

Laptimes 1

Track Time
Motortrend Figure-8 0:24.60

Model S P100D rivals

User avatar

User avatar

Rufus  1m ago

In MotorTrend head to head video with Audi RS7 Performance, the P100D cross the line at 125 mph in 10,5 sec.
So we can approximate a 0-200 km/h in 10,5 sec. Is that enough to update this page with that value?


User avatar

BR2+  3m ago

1:Acceleration times do matter before 100

2:The Tesla wasn't made to blaze laprimes, Anybody who owns one could care less.

3: If your gonna use times use the best, CTS-V 0-60 in 3.4, 0-100 7.2, Traps at 127mph,.

4: It's faster then any 4 door car in acceleration from a dog, Even from rolls depending on starting speed, the highest trap speed of this car is 126mph.

 

User avatar

All the names I wanted are taken  1m ago

Sorry to have to tell you this, but the RS6 Avant is faster AND cheaper. For the price of a bare P100D you can have an Avant with all the options. From 100 mph, once the advantage of instant torque is gone, the Avant is a lot faster. The tesla dies down after about 70 mph acceleration-wise. The RS6 clocked a laptime of 8:09:00 around the Nurburgring, while the only numbers I could find for the tesla were an 8:50:00 for a P90D (Its almost as if their performance-oriented car isn't very good in the performance departament and they are trying to hide it). And if you bought a performance-orientated car for £130,000 (it's a lot more with options), you really SHOULD care about its performance. (And also it's "couldn't care less" not "could care less"). And it's not only the Avant, most performance saloons/estates will beat the tesla. And while you might tell me that you save money on the electricity, that doesn't make up for the £50,000 difference between the two models (Stock car prices, no mods/options).


User avatar

hostboy  6m ago

It's still slower than the Cadillac CTS-V and the Dodge Charger Hellcat. Acceleration times don't matter before 100 mph. It trapped 125mph to the CTS-V's 122, BUT... the CTS-V reached 0-100 in 8sec and this did that in 6... 6 sec to 100 mph while taking 4 more sec to reach 122, while CTS-V taking 3.8 sec to go from 100-122 in M/T.

 

User avatar

Andrew2Evo  3m ago

Yes, true man, Tesla fanboys don´t admit that car it´s slower than
everybody around corners...

Timeline

Latest topics

Formula 1 still slower than Le Mans LMP1 prototypes 44
7 hours ago by DrDuke

Mercedes E63 AMG S beats Panamera Turbo, becomes the fastest 4-door car at Llandow 22
4 days ago by Kain

First official look at a near-production ready Aston Martin Valkyrie 28
4 days ago by sroser

Viper ACR returns to Nürburgring for one last chance at production car lap record 20
1 week ago by cosimo

2018 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 Spied: Our Best Look Yet at the Last Front-Engined Mega Vette 18
2 weeks ago by cosimo

The new Porsche 911 GT2 RS 48
2 weeks ago by EEV

Active users

saxy, fakekillerfour, DeDe, tyler, DrDuke, Chanante, BR2+, manone, moegigo, FastestLaps, Inline 6 rules, rhs1992