Nissan GT-R (R35) specs

Two completely different GT-R’s?

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15151521/2009-nissan-gt-r-road-test/

2009 Nissan GT-R

VEHICLE TYPE
front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 2-door coupe

PRICE AS TESTED
$70,835 (base price: $70,475)

ENGINE TYPE
twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve V-6, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection
Displacement
232 in3, 3799 cm3
Power
480 hp @ 6400 rpm
Torque
430 lb-ft @ 3200 rpm

TRANSMISSION
6-speed dual-clutch automatic

CHASSIS
Suspension (F/R): control arms/multilink
Brakes (F/R): 15.0-in vented, cross-drilled disc/15.0-in vented, cross-drilled disc
Tires: Dunllop SP Sport 600 DSST, F: 255/40ZRF-20 97Y R: 285/35ZRF-20 100Y

DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 109.5 in
Length: 183.4 in
Width: 74.7 in
Height: 54.0 in
Passenger volume: 86 ft3
Trunk volume: 9 ft3
Curb weight: 3908 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.3 sec
100 mph: 7.8 sec
130 mph: 12.1 sec
Rolling start, 5–60 mph: 4.1 sec
Top gear, 30–50 mph: 3.1 sec
Top gear, 50–70 mph: 2.7 sec
1/4 mile: 11.5 sec @ 124 mph
Top speed (redline limited): 191 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 145 ft
Roadholding, 185-ft-dia skidpad: 0.99 g

C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 16 mpg

EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/city/highway: 18/16/21 mpg

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparison-test/a15150849/chevrolet-corvette-z06-vs-dodge-viper-srt10-acr-nissan-gt-r-porsche-911-gt2-comparison-tests/

2009 Nissan GT-R
480-hp twin-turbo V-6, 6-speed automatic, 3920 lb
Base/as-tested price: $70,475/$72,525

C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.1 sec (no rolling start 5-60)
100 mph: 10.2 sec
1/4 mile: 12.6 sec @ 111 mph
Braking, 70­-0 mph: 155 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.96 g
C/D observed fuel economy: 12 mpg

EDIT: Found a third one!

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparison-test/a15142828/2008-bmw-m3-vs-2009-nissan-gt-r-vs-2008-porsche-911-turbo-comparison-tests/

2009 Nissan GT-R
480-hp V-6, 6-speed automated-manual, 3900 lb
Base/as-tested price: $70,475/$70,475
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.6 sec (again, no rolling start 5-60)
140 mph: 19.3 sec
1/4 mile: 12.1 @ 115 mph
Braking, 70­–0 mph: 156 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.96 g
C/D observed fuel economy: 18 mpg

Design work for this car began in 2000. This car will be 24 years old when it is discontinued in October.

GTR35 is dead ☠️

https://www.motor1.com/news/723377/nissan-gt-r-dead/

➡️ Lap Time: 07.23.288

Post under review. Will be published by moderator shortly.

The car that broke my neck!

Nordschleife Short – 7:38, Horst von Saurma, “Sport Auto” 07/2009.

A car that made Porsche to say, "our drivers aren't talented as Nissan's" literally saying they couldn't catch up with it. Truly an engineering masterpiece. Mad respect

https://www.motortrend.com/features/mph-in-a-stock-nissan-gtr-2318/

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

Very interesting comparison! The GT-R is sure giving its German rivals a run for their money!

As for the SLS, you can tell it's just not meant for the race track, seeing how much it swings around on the track. LMAO. Love the car still.

0-100 km/h: 3.4 s
0-250: 25.4 s
Top speed: 314 km/h
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/9709615247/

lol, someone who says that the GTR is the most shitty car must have the most shitty taste or lack of.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cg_GAVA8VHQ#t=1m10s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NA_DMWKkfg#t=2m00s

...Ummm okay..

IMO still the fastest car in the world on twisty road, in all weather condition in hand of non pro driver for the possible the lowest price.

ive just seen this car on button moon with betty buck and captain large

What is the GTR lap around tsukuba japan track? not listed?

I have much respect for this car, but come on, your saying the interior doesn't matter.

Apologies for bursting your bubble, but it to a lot of people who work hard, day in and out to afford supercars, we expect a certain standard, a standard of excellence, attention to detail.

Fair enough your priority is speed and acceleration, instead of class and luxury, to each is own.

But please please don't INSULT supercar manufacturers who strive to provide the consumer (YOU) with an EXCELLENT product with comments like this.

Its still hard to belive what this car is able to do with those supercars.

And in exchange You got not so good interior, oh, beceause interior matters so much in drivers car? Right? No!!! You look on the road not on the interior.

As to exterior - well, good paint job can make wonders. this car need just some delicate tunning change to become handsome machine.
I call for grey-silver combinations, or some matte paint. also military green look sweet on such a weapon.

Still no.1 performance for money, even it eats tires, and is rough.

Obvious troll is obvious.

@ Donkey: TorqueStats is not a reliable source.

The Best Rivals For This Car : Porsche 997 GT2,Ferrari 430 Scuderia,Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4.

@hotpot
This is no stock GT-R in the video, maybe it have not kept AWD, too. With this power, 1300 hp, even an AWD car is very hard to drive. You can spin/lose control in each car, even if it has AWD. And GT-R has more power at the rear tires than at the front, that is another reason.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.