Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 (Mk V) specs

One of my favorite Head 2 Head's, which would you go for? Me personally would take the Shelby!

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

HELL YEAH IT'S HERE!!
The new 2020 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 will make 760 horsepower and 625 LB-FT of torque from a 5.2 liter supercharged V8. It's goverened at 180 miles an hour, and all of this is according to Car & Driver, I'm not making this up. It's high on horsepower, but a little down on torque. Well, that's just the way superchargers work.

https://www.motortrend.com/cars/ford/shelby-gt500/2013/gunning-for-200-mph-in-the-2013-ford-shelby-gt500/
Could you change power and torque to 662bhp @ 6500rpm and 631lb-ft @ 4000rpm

Can't wait for 2020 version

The ring time wasn't for a stock version..

Oh great, they removed the half mile estimate.. :(

Power is 662HP, torque is 631lb-ft.
0-100 mph: 7,7 s
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/ford/shelby-gt500/2013/gunning-for-200-mph-in-the-2013-ford-shelby-gt500/
Please correct it!

0-180 mph: 30 s

I would immediately if i could.

0-80 kph: 2.8 s
0-100 mph: (which I'm still waiting for to be changed to) 7.7 s

http://m.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1205_gunning_for_200_mph_in_the_2013_ford_shelby_gt500/

BTW: This car is really awesome! I'd compare this to a ZL1 Camaro or even the new SRT Hellcat.

I kept requesting the admins to update the performance figures; the power and torque figures haven't been edited in four years, so I guess the original rating is true.

Please change:
0-100 mph: 7.9 > 7.7
Power: 650 hp > 662 hp
Torque: 602 lb-ft > 630 or 631 lb-ft

http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2012/04/27/2013-ford-mustang-shelby-gt500-to-pump-out-662-hp/
http://m.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1205_2013_ford_shelby_gt500_first_test/

0-300 kph: 31.0 s; impressive or not, it's a ponycar with musclecar additude!

Watch video: Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Top Speed on the Autobahn https://youtu.be/eryLjUNsHkA (start at 0:19) (done in 07/13)

..Hello people where have you been? Its obvious that Power is measured from the front area of the car when the wind hits it, Having the wind resistance measure how much force is hitting the car in turn measuring how much power it makes, Who ever herd of measuirng power from a car not moving? Thas like saying Japanese food isnt delicious..

The power is not measured at the rear wheels, it's measured at the flywheel, horsepower is lost through the drivetrain, only the majority of it actually gets to the wheels.

The new 5.0 gt makes 367 rwhp,not 390hp!

I don't see this thing hitting 136Mph, Not even in the 10s, 131Mph is THE highest I would guess, But only with the best results. Has the power and torque, But it also has the big weight and horrid gearing.

137 mp/h = F12's 1/4 mile trap speed achieved by Qt Magazine.

136mph would be quite high of a trap speed... higher than any F12 trap speed

11.23 @ 136 MPH STOCK (no kidding!!)

http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/overview.aspx?year=2014&make=Ford&model=Shelby%20GT500

It is known that the output of this car is overrated. With a terrible weight distribution and skinnier tires, it wouldn't be able to beat a ZL1 or a Z/28 at smaller tracks. Nordschleife, maybe, but definitely not the Top Gear Test Track or the Laguna Seca.

I wasn't sure If either the cars picked WERE one of the cars that actually did the lap, So I wasn't gonna bring uo there was a passenger in the car, I dunno, Maybe those cars could have been test cars, or they were getting shots of the car and track, don't know how accurate any of that is, thas why I said "Maybe"

Also I did recently just notice those differences, 9Good Eye) The front grille isn't of the 2014 Model, nor are the exhausts, SO why is there 2014 trim pieces on a 2012 Model?

Which further intrigues my curiosity, Either a modded 2012 Model was used in the lap, Or those cars shown WERENT the car that lapped in 7:39. I do think more evidence needs to be found, Very curious know, but also very skeptical.

The GT500 that ran the Ring time actually "May" not have been stock..

it also had the "advantage" of an extra passenger

why do they have the old gen rearlights?

instead of these

also, the pipes are totally different? is that even the current gen model?

...The GT500 that ran the Ring time actually "May" not have been stock..

http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ford-mustang-shelby-gt500-spy-shots/full/#photo-237361/

I dunno if either of these cars were there for testing or if one of them was the actual car, But it seems like, The interior may have something that isn't stock, dunno if its safety equipment or something else, Also on the red car theres Air Dams, Cant say about the tyres though, But those front ones look kinda suspect.

But I don't really know.

There not no, You cant get them from the Ford parts bin.

Aftermarket, Not stock, I "Think" there prolly DRs, Dunno what the difference is in grip compared to the MPSS it has on stock. But its a fun fact to know it would get a similar time.

are those tires actually an option from ford or purchased additionally?

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20130307005883/en/2013-Shelby-GT500-Super-Snake-Breaks-Mid-Tens%C2%A0in

NT555Rs, Still.

Because it was run on super tight slicks