Image of Honda NSX

Honda NSX (Mk II) specs

Price in Europe €185,000 - €235,000
Price in US $159,495 - $164,695
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1737-1800 kg (3829-3968 lbs)
Dimensions 4.47 m (176 in) long, 1.94 m (76 in) wide, 1.21 m (48 in) high
Introduced 2016
Origin country Japan
Gas mileage 21.8-9.4 l/100 km (11-25 mpg US / 13-30 mpg UK)
CO2 emissions 235 - 249 g/km
Views 79.3k
Submitted by BR2+

Acceleration (kph)

0 - 40 kph1.1 s
0 - 50 kph1.4 s
0 - 60 kph1.7 s
0 - 70 kph2.0 s
0 - 80 kph2.4 s
0 - 90 kph2.8 s
0 - 100 kph3.1 s
0 - 120 kph4.3 s
0 - 130 kph4.7 s
0 - 140 kph5.5 s
0 - 150 kph6.0 s
0 - 160 kph6.7 s
0 - 180 kph8.4 s
0 - 200 kph10.4 s
0 - 220 kph11.5 s
0 - 250 kph20.1 s
0 - 280 kph30.3 s
1000 m20.2 s @ 259.5 kph

Acceleration (mph)

0 - 30 mph1.2 s
0 - 40 mph1.7 s
0 - 50 mph2.3 s
0 - 60 mph3.0 s
0 - 70 mph3.8 s
0 - 80 mph4.7 s
0 - 90 mph5.6 s
0 - 100 mph6.8 s
0 - 110 mph8.2 s
0 - 120 mph9.7 s
0 - 130 mph11.6 s
0 - 140 mph13.9 s
0 - 150 mph17.0 s
0 - 160 mph21.7 s
Est. 1/8 mile7.8 s @ 105.6 mph
1/4 mile11.0 s @ 127.8 mph
Honda NSX acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed311 kph (193 mph)
0 - 100 mph - 011.0 s
Est. max acceleration0.92 g (9 m/s²)
18m slalom72.6 kph (45.1 mph)
36m slalom140.0 kph (87.0 mph)
Lateral acceleration1.06 g (10 m/s²)

Powertrain specs

Engine type TwinTurbo V6
Displacement 3.5 l (214 ci)
Power 581 ps (573 bhp / 427 kw)
Torque 646 Nm (476 lb-ft)
Power / liter 166 ps (164 hp)
Power / weight 328 ps (324 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 365 Nm (269 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 46 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 14 ps
Transmission 9-Speed DCT
Layout middle engine, all wheel drive

Braking distance

100 kph - 031 m (101 ft)
120 kph - 053 m (175 ft)
130 kph - 054 m (176 ft)
180 kph - 0117 m (385 ft)
200 kph - 0124 m (405 ft)
30 mph - 09 m (30 ft)
50 mph - 023 m (76 ft)
60 mph - 029 m (95 ft)
70 mph - 041 m (134 ft)

Rolling acceleration

60 - 100 kph (4)2.9 s
60 - 100 kph (5)3.3 s
80 - 120 kph (4)2.8 s
80 - 120 kph (5)3.0 s
80 - 120 kph (6)3.5 s
80 - 120 kph (7)4.2 s
80 - 120 kph (8)5.0 s
80 - 160 kph (4)6.0 s
80 - 160 kph (5)7.0 s
80 - 160 kph (6)8.1 s
80 - 160 kph (7)9.7 s
80 - 160 kph (8)12.3 s
80 - 120 kph1.9 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph2.4 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph7.9 s

Interior noise

Noise @ idle49 dB
Noise @ 50 kph59 dB
Noise @ 100 kph64 dB
Noise @ 130 kph71 dB
Noise @ 160 kph75 dB
Noise @ 180 kph77 dB
User avatar
User avatar

Anonymous  1y ago

Post under review. Will be published by moderator shortly.


User avatar

midwestcardude  1y ago

probably should specify what year for these. There are really 3 different second generation cars with changes that improved laptimes over years.


User avatar

altimgamr  2y ago

awesome car just like ford gt and viper, but not as good as 911 or gtr. if it didn't have the accord / pilot engine it would easily be tuneable for some more power and i abso****ingloutely wish honda invested in a type r gt or type s zero version instead of wasting their damn tax dollars on a retarded ridgeline pos and whatever that quasi "passport" (puss whore)


User avatar

TypeF173  2y ago

 


User avatar

Casual Car Guy  2y ago

In my opinion the reason NSX failed because of it's performance, quality and price. In performance perspective it's great but not enough for a supercar. If you see the numbers 0-60 in 2.9 and 1/4 mile in 11 flat. Compared to the rivals It's okay to sit next to the GT-R and front of AMG GT C. But look at lap times, which is MK1 NSX born to do. MK2 is even slower than the AMG GT C around a typical racetrack. It's not a thumbs up for a $200K super car.

Interior is good enough but not like it's rivals. Using cheap plastics and look at that infotainment system. 15 year old GT-R has a better one than this. So it's clearly doesn't worth a $200K, which led it to sell only 2,908 units worldwide. If they removed the hybrid system which will reduce the weight, more powerful engine, better all wheel drive system will make it a beast. Hope the 3rd gen would be a car like the GT-R.


User avatar

196ss  2y ago

Imola - 1:58,25
Autosprint Hot Lap, Stagione 1 - Episodio 6
Driver - Riccardo Piergentili
Tyres - Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
Peak speed - 259 kph

https://autosprint.corrieredellosport.it/video/hot-lap/2019/12/27-2598780/hot_lap_di_riccardo_piergentili_honda_nsx/


User avatar

TypeF173  3y ago

 


User avatar

TypeF173  3y ago

Honda NSX got SPANKED! It was inevitable.

(Hint>remember who supplied Red Bull Racing with engines for that Formula One Car!)

;)


User avatar

TypeF173  3y ago

 


User avatar

Wiped  3y ago

Japanese rumor reports says, during Honda's testing at Nürburgring, they did an unofficial lap time of 7:22 seconds. it's the best they've got from the car's maximum capabilities. When they were in development they actually planned to beat the GT-R around the Nürburgring. But 7:22 is not enough for that right? So they continued attempting lap times but ended up with their's NSX on fire (hope you guys can remember back in 2014). So Honda didn't want to spend anymore money on the NSX, quit the Nürburgring and announced NSX gonna debut in 2015. And I feel so bad for Honda


User avatar

Casual Car Guy  3y ago

7:36? May be if Honda attempt a record it'll be somewhere in 7:20 - 7:25. But it's not enough. Almost 12 years ago GT-R did a 7:26. This thing is doesn't deserve the NSX name. They better discontinue this in 2022.



User avatar

Corvolet3  3y ago

Imagine staging a win so hard, you make German car magazines almost look reputable. JJust needs a Japanese announcer and you almost got yourself a Time Attack from the 90s ;)

 


User avatar

bmw fan boy  3y ago

this peace of shot does 0-60 in 3.0 same as a lamborghini urus and that is a fake lambo


User avatar

Hoppelmoppel123  4y ago

SportAuto 10/2016
0-60: 1.8
0-80: 2.5
0-120: 4.6
0-140: 5.9
0-180: 9.6
80-120 @ 4: 2.8
80-120 @ 5: 3.2
80-120 @ 6: 3.6
80-120 @ 7: 4.3
80-120 @ 8: 5.9
80-160 @ 4: 6
80-160 @ 5: 7
80-160 @ 6: 8.1
80-160 @ 7: 9.7
80-160 @ 8: 13.3


User avatar

Heatedsword7  4y ago

 


User avatar

benedekpuskas  4y ago

This car is way too underrated, Honda will probably stop producing it next year.


User avatar

benedekpuskas  4y ago

1/4 mile in 10.8 sec, please add

 


User avatar

benedekpuskas  4y ago

lol

4sdf1tsmhlzn.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

Cauf40f50  4y ago

Mini 918


User avatar

Cauf40f50  4y ago

Honda/ acura said that no nsx type r will be built


User avatar

XYZ987  4y ago

Europeans wanted them to be built in Japan,so not selling too well.



User avatar

Cauf40f50  4y ago

Carwow tested 10.8 1/4 mile and 0-60 sub 3 sec (2.9)
Video: https://youtu.be/b3lPbVTsXc8


User avatar

Cocobe  4y ago

Got behind the wheel of one of these the other day... it was surprisingly underwhelming for a car of that price.


User avatar

aaayy  4y ago

Images of 2010 V10 powered NSX


User avatar

aaayy  4y ago

Here’s a reminder that we almost had a V10 powered NSX.


User avatar

aaayy  5y ago

The NSX Type R. I think it'll have no motors (for weight savings), a blueprinted and reinforced engine (forged pistons, etc.), higher redline (7500-8500 RPM), bigger turbos, intercooler sprayers and a power output around 600-650 hp. Upgraded transmission shift-times, and maybe even rear wheel steering. I think they'll replace the trunklid, hood, doors, and roof with carbon fiber stripped-down units. I think they'' give it carbon fiber race seats, and remove the infotainment system and sound system. They should also add an active spoiler & splitter and underfloor aerodynamics.


User avatar

benedekpuskas  5y ago

On the picture its an Acura NSX


User avatar

Broly  5y ago

This page says exactly 3.0 seconds for 0-60 but, for anyone who cares, Mat Watson on Carwow said he consistently got **under **3 seconds. He doesnt specify exactly how fast but it is in the 2 second range. Just throwing it out there for anyone who cares.