@FastestLaps please merge into the main GT350 page (https://fastestlaps.com/models/ford-shelby-mustang-gt350), there is not enough difference to warrent 2 pages

Ford Shelby Mustang GT350R specs
Price in Europe | €54,000 |
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 1655-1683 kg (3649-3710 lbs) |
Introduced | 2016 |
Origin country | United States |
Gas mileage | 14.7-14.0 l/100 km (16-17 mpg US / 19-20 mpg UK) |
CO2 emissions | 300 - 350 g/km |
Views | 73.2k |
Submitted by | BR2+ |
Lap times
Acceleration (kph)
0 - 60 kph | 2.4 s |
0 - 100 kph | 4.5 s |
0 - 120 kph | 6.0 s |
0 - 130 kph | 6.9 s |
0 - 140 kph | 7.7 s |
0 - 150 kph | 8.4 s |
0 - 160 kph | 9.3 s |
0 - 180 kph | 11.6 s |
0 - 200 kph | 13.9 s |
0 - 220 kph | 18.8 s |
1000 m | 22.5 s @ 245.0 kph |
Acceleration (mph)
0 - 30 mph | 1.6 s |
0 - 40 mph | 2.3 s |
0 - 50 mph | 3.0 s |
0 - 60 mph | 3.9 s |
0 - 70 mph | 4.8 s |
0 - 80 mph | 5.9 s |
0 - 90 mph | 7.2 s |
0 - 100 mph | 8.5 s |
0 - 130 mph | 14.5 s |
0 - 150 mph | 21.2 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 8.9 s @ 97.6 mph |
1/4 mile | 12.1 s @ 119.6 mph |

General performance
Top speed | 282 kph (175 mph) |
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 15.7 s @ 1289 ft |
Est. max acceleration | 0.66 g (6 m/s²) |
Lateral acceleration | 1.10 g (11 m/s²) |
Noise @ 50 kph | 66 dB |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | Flat-Crank Naturally Aspirated V8 |
Displacement | 5.2 l (317 ci) |
Power | 533 ps (526 bhp / 392 kw) @ 7500 rpm |
Torque | 582 Nm (429 lb-ft) @ 4750 rpm |
Power / liter | 103 ps (101 hp) |
Power / weight | 320 ps (315 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 349 Nm (257 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 37 PS per l/100 km |
Power / €5000 | 49 ps |
Transmission | 6-Speed Manual |
Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
Braking distance
100 kph - 0 | 38 m (124 ft) |
200 kph - 0 | 131 m (429 ft) |
60 mph - 0 | 29 m (96 ft) |
70 mph - 0 | 45 m (146 ft) |
Rolling acceleration
80 - 150 kph (5) | 9.5 s |
80 - 150 kph (6) | 23.5 s |
70 - 90 kph | 5.9 s |
70 - 120 kph | 15.1 s |
70 - 140 kph | 21.9 s |
Est. 100 - 140 kph | 3.1 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 9.6 s |
Shelby Mustang GT350R competition


anonymoused 3w ago
Honestly I was never really even a fan of either the GT350 or the GT350R. While it was great on the track, it was never anything like the Camaro Z28 or the ZL1 1LE. It had a special flat-plane-crank engine, but that was pretty much the only thing setting this thing apart from the GT Performance Package Level 2. The tires on the PPL2 are on the same level as these ones. Straight-line performance figures are the same. The PPL2 should not be far off from the GT350R on most tracks, and that is literally an SS 1LE and RC F Track competitor we are talking about. There is far more aftermarket support for both the 5.0 Coyote and the 5.2 Predator than there is for the 5.2 Voodoo.

jeremyclarkson1 9m ago
It’s crazy how this car can match and sometimes beat a Ferrari 458 Italia on track, Ford really did wonders with this car

jeremyclarkson1 1y ago
This car did a 23.10 on the MT Figure 8 Circuit. It was in the comparison test with the Camaro ZL1.



hostboy 4y ago
I hate to break this to everyone but the 5.2 Voodoo is not a real flat plane engine. While the camshaft is technically "flat" based, the exhaust is manifold is "cross" based. It's more of an in-between engine.
The AMG GT Black and C8 Z06 engines on the other hand are true FPC engines.


fakekillerfour 7y ago
Could you add power and torque: 526bhp @ 7500rpm, 429lb-ft @ 4750rpm
https://www.motortrend.com/cars/ford/mustang/2016/2015-chevrolet-camaro-z28-vs-2016-ford-shelby-gt350r-mustang/


hostboy 7y ago
[2018 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350R] Motor Trend 7/2018 test results [published in "Ultimate Grand Tourers" page on this issue date]:
0-30 mph = 1.9 s
0-40 mph = 2.7 s
0-50 mph = 3.7 s
0-60 mph = 4.5 s
0-70 mph = 5.3 s
0-80 mph = 6.0 s
0-90 mph = 7.9 s
0-100 mph = 9.5 s
1/4-mile = 13.0 s / 123.0 mph
Figure-8 = 22.3 s / 1.14 g
Lateral acceleration = 0.96 g
Willow Springs = 82.75 s

Monolith29 8y ago
the gt350, gt350r and the new 18' stang gt are all underrated. the gt350r puts down 449 whp too 482 whp, the 449 i believe was motortrend or roadntrack while the 482 was done at hennessey's shop and dyno - they wanted to dyno it before they modded it as is the same with every hennessey






Inline 6 rules 9y ago
Power is 526 BHP, torque: 429lb-ft.
Weight: 3650 lb.
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/ford/mustang/2016/2015-chevrolet-camaro-z28-vs-2016-ford-shelby-gt350r-mustang/

BR2+ 9y ago
Nah the 500 is coming, And with huge power, A 5.0+L Sc V8, No official output number yet, Some say as high as 850bhp, I dont think it will be THAT much, But will have more then the HellCat, And some sources say it may even have a TT V6, But ill be damned if that happens and will go raid Ford myself.

karl 9y ago
Just assumption. Since in 5th gen they only build GT500 as their top model but no GT350.




JasonM 9y ago
2016 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350R vs. 2015 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 - Head 2 Head Ep. 71
As a reminder.
Cheers and enjoy ;)

JamesL 9y ago
@BR2+ We are talking about street legal car right? I still can't think of any practical mods for the Z28. Without major powertrain and suspension mods, I believe Z28 is as extreme as it is. Yes, you can further lighten the car by moding the interior and lighter chassis component, maybe a carbon fiber driveshaft as well. But hey, GT350 can also do the same, but with much more mods. Anyway, if you want to do track only, GT350 may be the better choice. The track part for Mustang is easier to find than Camaro. Back to tires, I doubt that you try the tires yourself. information on forum can be deceiving. Most people just can't drive to the limit to notice the difference in tires, and don't even talk about slip angle and characteristic of tires. One of my buddy was struggling with his lap time. He ran re71r for the few months and lap time can't improve, so he blamed the tires like most people did and got a new set of cup2. Guess what, he ain't get any faster And their is another friend, who used trofeo r for his c7, ruined it by not knowing how to drive it properly, understeer the crap out of the front tires. From my own experience and experience from real track people, trofeo r is just that much faster than cup2. At gingerman and grattan raceway, I see around 1.5 and 1 second improvement on trofeo r depend on cars. And I just found a test on youtube as well, should be referential even it's an ad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrLQpAt5Mes