Image of Lotus 3-Eleven Race

Lotus 3-Eleven Race specs

Car type Open-wheeler
Curb weight 979 kg (2158 lbs)
Power / weight 476 ps (469 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 536 Nm (396 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2016
Origin country United Kingdom
Views 3.8k
Submitted by tyler

Performance

Top speed 290 kph (180 mph)
0 - 40 kph 1.5 s
0 - 100 kph 3.0 s
0 - 160 kph 5.9 s
0 - 200 kph 8.6 s
0 - 250 kph 15.3 s
0 - 60 mph 2.9 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.1 s @ 108.7 mph
Est. 100 - 200 kph 5.5 s
100 kph - 0 34 m (110 ft)
18m slalom 74.1 kph (46.0 mph)
Lotus 3-Eleven Race acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type 3.5 litre V6, 24 valve, supercharged
Displacement 3.5 l (214 ci)
Power 466 ps (460 bhp / 343 kw) @ 7000 rpm
Torque 525 Nm (387 lb-ft) @ 3500 rpm
Power / liter 133 ps (131 hp)
Transmission 6 speed sequential gearbox with paddle shift
Layout middle engine, rear wheel drive

Laptimes 2

Track Time
Goodwood Hill climb 1:11.51 w
Hockenheim Short 1:06.19

3-Eleven Race rivals

User avatar

User avatar

sroser  4m  

See the link. Power to weight ratio, 517hp/ton. This calculates to a weight of 890kg.

http://www.lotuscars.com/3-eleven


User avatar

FastestLaps  4m  

What's wrong with the specs?


User avatar

sroser  4m  

Specs are wrong.

http://www.lotuscars.com/3-eleven


User avatar

IknowYouknow  1y  

Radikal-like piece of shit


User avatar

saxy  1y  

that's ridiculous. of course this car has less load on the front axle, it's a much lighter car. If what your excuse is plausible, then turn in will be a nightmare and it'll be a gigantic understeering maniac.


User avatar

E63AMG  1y  

911s use massive carbon brakes, this car I believe had steels ?


User avatar

DeDe  1y  

True, but a 911 has wider front tyres and about 200 kgs more load on the front axle ;)


User avatar

BR2+  1y  

The one in the pic looks different then the one in the video?....Different options? Or race version?


User avatar

saxy  1y  

911s have small loads on their front axles. That doesn't seem to be a problem


User avatar

DeDe  1y  

@saxy It's not, the main reason for the relatively bad braking figures is the low load on the front axle (only 351 kilos).


User avatar

saxy  1y  

33.5m to brake from 100? That's pretty pathetic for a lightweight $100+k track car


User avatar

FastestLaps  1y  

0-40 km/h: 1,5 sec
0-100 km/h: 3,3 sec
0-160 km/h: 5,9 sec
0-200 km/h: 8,6 sec
0-250 km/h: 15,3 sec

Slalom: 74,1 km/h

braking 100 to 0 km/h (cold): 37,8 m
braking 100 to 0 km/h (warm): 33,5 m