Image of Nissan GT-R

Nissan GT-R (R35 570PS) specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1769-1818 kg (3900-4008 lbs)
Dimensions 4.71 m (185 in) long, 1.90 m (75 in) wide, 1.37 m (54 in) high
Wheelbase 2.78 m (109 in)
Power / weight 318 ps (314 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 353 Nm (261 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2017
Origin country Japan
Average fuel consumption 19.5-12.5 l/100 km (12-19 mpg US / 14-23 mpg UK)
Price in Europe €99,900 - €108,050
Noise @ idle 49 dB
Noise @ 100 kph 71 dB
Noise @ 130 kph 74 dB
Noise @ 160 kph 79 dB
Views 7.3k
Submitted by JiSiN

Performance

Top speed 320 kph (199 mph)
0 - 40 kph 1.1 s
0 - 50 kph 1.4 s
0 - 60 kph 1.6 s
0 - 80 kph 2.3 s
0 - 100 kph 3.2 s
0 - 120 kph 4.2 s
0 - 130 kph 4.8 s
0 - 140 kph 5.5 s
0 - 150 kph 6.2 s
0 - 160 kph 6.9 s
0 - 180 kph 8.7 s
0 - 200 kph 10.8 s
0 - 230 kph 15.4 s
0 - 250 kph 18.8 s
0 - 300 kph 37.5 s
0 - 30 mph 1.1 s
0 - 40 mph 1.6 s
0 - 50 mph 2.2 s
0 - 60 mph 2.9 s
0 - 70 mph 3.7 s
0 - 80 mph 4.8 s
0 - 90 mph 5.9 s
0 - 100 mph 6.9 s
0 - 110 mph 8.5 s
0 - 120 mph 9.9 s
0 - 130 mph 11.5 s
0 - 140 mph 14.0 s
0 - 150 mph 16.9 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.2 s @ 99.4 mph
1/4 mile 11.2 s
Est. 1/2 mile 17.8 s @ 148.5 mph
Est. 1 mile 29.2 s @ 170.9 mph
1000 m 20.5 s @ 254.4 kph
60 - 100 kph (4) 3.3 s
60 - 100 kph (5) 4.6 s
60 - 120 kph (5) 4.6 s
80 - 120 kph (4) 3.1 s
80 - 120 kph (5) 4.0 s
80 - 120 kph (6) 5.7 s
80 - 160 kph (4) 6.3 s
80 - 160 kph (5) 8.6 s
80 - 160 kph (6) 11.9 s
80 - 120 kph 2.1 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph 2.4 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 7.7 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph 26.6 s
100 kph - 0 33 m (109 ft)
140 kph - 0 66 m (215 ft)
200 kph - 0 128 m (420 ft)
60 mph - 0 31 m (103 ft)
18m slalom 70.1 kph (43.6 mph)
Lateral acceleration 0.98 g (10 m/s²)
Emissions 315 g/km
Nissan GT-R acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type V6 DOHC Twin Turbo
Displacement 3.8 l (232 ci)
Power 570 ps (562 bhp / 419 kw) @ 6800 rpm
Torque 633 Nm (467 lb-ft) @ 3300 rpm
Power / liter 150 ps (148 hp)
Efficiency 37 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 27 ps
Transmission 6-Speed DCT
Layout front engine, all wheel drive

Laptimes 10

GT-R rivals

User avatar

User avatar

FastestLaps  4m  

Barely faster than a Jaguar :D Amazing how a car can actually get slower later in its development :D



User avatar

Chanante  4m  

488 Have more torque in more range of RPM, it is meaning of more power in medium range and better response. In the other hand 488 may be have less aerodynamic charge but it is strange when the people and the magazines said that 675LT can do 0 to 300km/h in 22.5s.


User avatar

bob  4m  

i found some interesting data whilst trawling through that quattroroute test..
488 vs 675 lt 0-200
8.11 plays 7.78
a gap of 0.33 seconds
488 vs 675 lt 0-250
12.93 to 12.69
gap closes negligably to 0.24
by the standing kilometer, however, the 488 is only 0.07 seconds behind the 675 (18.66 against 18.59) yet is traveling through the speed trap 1.14 kms faster..
splitting hairs I know but maybe that lt makes some decent df/drag
or maybe the 488 is actually more powerful than we all think...


User avatar

BR2+  4m  

But 100kg of..Test equipment? And who weighs a car with test equipment in it?


User avatar

saxy  4m  

If you're going to say the cars weighed a lot because of test equipment, then why was the Porsche at 1620kg? Porsche's official unladen weight is 1600kg.



User avatar

Chanante  4m  

The weight of cuattroruote test is with heavy indtrument. 675lt have 100kg more than other test dame Ferrari or R8.


User avatar

dddd  4m  

Nice QT test. All cars performed very well. 488 weighs 1644 kgs ? Its crazy...They should go in CF monocoque...It seems that its a must nowadays...


User avatar

fakekillerfour  4m  

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/acura/nsx/2017/2017-acura-nsx-vs-nissan-gt-r/
motortrend weighed the 2017 nissan gt-r at 3936 Ibs 1785 kg.


User avatar

BR2+  4m  

1,892Kg/4,172Lbs?...Are you kidding me?

How in the hell did the GTR gain 200kg from last years model? Cars are supposed to loose weight in this day not gain a ton, I dont no what they did with this new GTR, But they need to stop.

And i dont no why every single car in that test is so damned heavy, There literally 100kg heavier then most tests.


User avatar

saxy  4m  

oh wow... I really didn't expect a Turbo S to weigh less than the 488, but then I didn't expect it to cost more either... GTR and R8 are really fat.
R8: 1771kg
488 gtb: 1644kg
675 lt: 1453kg
GTR: 1892kg
Turbo S:1620kg



User avatar

Chanante  4m  

Vairano in 1:15.725

http://i63.tinypic.com/2ugyzvp.jpg


User avatar

BR2+  5m  

You have to remember though, The track is Laguna Seca, its one of the tracks where a cars performance is usually y different then it is on other tracks, So it may lose to it hear, And will prolly wipe the floor with it on another. Not too mention Randy also took more laps in the 911, That alone is time to learn the car more and enabling him to get better. Although the car is more comfortable, But i kinda think that was stupid since nobody who buys a GTR buys it for comfort. On another note, Its pretty wild that when the GTR made its debute in America it statred at $79,800, Now it starts at $109,990, Thats a huge difference for whats essentially the same car. Id still pay it.


User avatar

saxy  5m  

So the original GTR costed way less, competed with the top end 911 turbo.

Now it's much more expensive and it may be slower than a C2S?


User avatar

BR2+  9m  

It's prolly not as slippery as it used to be, Question is how much aero equals how much toppled WI? Although it's prolly due to aggressivelyrics shorter gearing, But I no the 530bhp model has been clocked at 200mph, I've taken my stock R34 to 176mph verified years ago, So I find it interesting that the claim no difference in top speed thru the years,.


User avatar

saxy  9m  

well i think this GTR has more aero. And typically turbo engines don't have max power at max revs, leading to lower top speeds, but arriving there sooner


User avatar

BR2+  9m  

195Mph top speed was the same as the 2008 model with 480bhp......, Almost 100bhp more,Better gearing and aero, Yet no increase from 8 years ago?...



User avatar

BR2+  1y  

lol Truth

They should be atleast at the Morgan 4/14 already lol

But i ABSOLUTELY LOVE the heritage and how Morgan sticks to there roots! Mad respect



User avatar

lafars  1y  

I dont think a car models span should go past 10 years.

morgan 4/4, has been going since the 1930s


User avatar

BR2+  1y  

They have all looked the same since 2008, Just minor improvements on the exterior and interior, But a good jump in terms of performance and feel, which is great.

Couple things though.

1: Still can't believe it's list price has jumped over 30k!! Since it's introduction

2: The very first test from Motor trend back in 07 or 08 is still insane to this day.

3: For such a small car it hides it's weight unbelievably well in both exterior a day feel which is amazing, But GTRs have always been amazing at that, I should no.

4: Frickin love the orange interior


User avatar

Freakz  1y  

They could have done this car more justice; the improvements are not bad but could have done more. Still lets see what this car can do.


User avatar

saxy  1y  

They say, "our newest GTR is our best GTR yet." Better than the Nismo? =/
I really can barely tell anything apart from the other last 10 years of GTR.

catch up to the Huracan? In terms of track performance, the last Nismo was a good rival. But even that had no chance in straight line speed.


User avatar

BR2+  1y  

It wont, I dont see any huge changes with exceptions to the interior. But it is getting old, I dont think a car models span should go past 10 years.


User avatar

FastestLaps  1y  

Will it be enough to catch up to the surprisingly fast Huracan? Eeeemmm... no, I don't think so.

Unless they made real improvements in other areas as well.