This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.
SRT Viper specs
Price in Europe | €139,900 |
Price in US | $101,990 - $114,985 |
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 1500-1520 kg (3307-3351 lbs) |
Dimensions | 4.30 m (169 in) long, 1.87 m (74 in) wide, 1.21 m (48 in) high |
Wheelbase | 2.42 m (95 in) |
Introduced | 2013 |
Origin country | United States |
Gas mileage | 27.3-12.6 l/100 km (9-19 mpg US / 10-22 mpg UK) |
CO2 emissions | 337 g/km |
Views | 26.2k |
Submitted by | BR2+ |
Lap times
Acceleration
0 - 40 kph | 1.6 s |
0 - 50 kph | 2.0 s |
0 - 60 kph | 2.5 s |
0 - 80 kph | 3.3 s |
0 - 100 kph | 3.5 s |
0 - 120 kph | 5.3 s |
0 - 130 kph | 6.2 s |
0 - 140 kph | 6.4 s |
0 - 160 kph | 7.2 s |
0 - 180 kph | 9.6 s |
0 - 200 kph | 10.6 s |
0 - 30 mph | 1.5 s |
0 - 60 mph | 3.3 s |
0 - 100 mph | 7.2 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 8.2 s @ 103.8 mph |
1/4 mile | 11.4 s @ 129.7 mph |
General performance
Top speed | 332 kph (206 mph) |
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 11.7 s @ 827 ft |
Est. max acceleration | 0.80 g (8 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 72.7 kph (45.2 mph) |
Lateral acceleration | 1.09 g (11 m/s²) |
100 kph - 0 | 31 m (103 ft) |
200 kph - 0 | 132 m (432 ft) |
60 mph - 0 | 30 m (99 ft) |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | Naturally Aspirated V10 |
Displacement | 8.4 l (513 ci) |
Power | 649 ps (640 bhp / 477 kw) @ 6400 rpm |
Torque | 813 Nm (600 lb-ft) @ 5000 rpm |
Power / liter | 77 ps (76 hp) |
Power / weight | 430 ps (424 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 539 Nm (397 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 33 PS per l/100 km |
Power / €5000 | 23 ps |
Transmission | 6-Speed Manual |
Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
Rolling acceleration
80 - 120 kph (4) | 3.8 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 5.5 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 7.5 s |
80 - 160 kph (4) | 7.4 s |
80 - 160 kph (5) | 11.2 s |
80 - 160 kph (6) | 15.1 s |
Est. 100 - 140 kph | 2.6 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 8.1 s |
Viper competition
wallenieswiftie 4m ago
12.0 @ 134 mph with 2.3 60' time!
https://www.vwvortex.com/threads/drag-strip-tested-c7-z06-vs-viper-vs-hellcat-vs-zr1.7099860/
hostboy 3y ago
Dodge Viper SRT/GT/GTS acceleration stats! (+25% effort from 0 to 100 km/h / 62 mph)
0-60 MPH: 2.9 seconds
0-100 km/h: 3.0 seconds
0-100 MPH: 6.0 seconds
0-200 km/h: 9.4 seconds
0-150 MPH: 13.7 seconds
0-300 km/h: 22.5 seconds
0-200 MPH: 30.1 seconds
Lateral Acceleration: 1.07 G
Quarter (1/4) Mile: 10.5 seconds at 133 mph
Half (1/2) Mile: 16.4 seconds at 157 mph
Whole (1/1) Kilometer: 18.8 seconds at 175 mph
Whole (1/1) Mile: 26.5 seconds at 193 mph
Today is my last day estimating cars' performance.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mc-JJgfFrlYYFGuv3ohleC_rh7k8G3yp73DMb6UpCD8/edit?usp=sharing
0-200 km/h estimated in the form of (200/(100x1.609344))^1x6.0 and (200/(150*1.609344))^1x13.7
0-300 km/h estimated in the form of (300/(150x1.609344))^1x13.7 and (300/(200*1.609344))^1x30.1
Half mile time estimated in the form of 1320x1.6 = 2112 ft / 133 mph = 15.8 + .6 = 16.4, because 1320 / 133 = 9.9, +.6 = 10.5. 10.5/16.4 = more potential, and 10.4/16.5 = less potential.
Half mile trap speed estimated in the form of (16.4/13.7)^1x150 and (16.4/22.5)^1x(300/1.609344)
Kilometer time estimated in the form of 3.0+9.4+22.5/(3.0+9.4+22.5)x10; mile time pretty much the same way, but instead of 10, I multiplied by 22.
Kilometer trap speed estimated in the form of (18.8/13.7)^0.5x150 and (18.8/22.5)^0.5x(300/1.609344)
Mile trap speed estimated in the form of (26.5/22.5)^0.2x(300/1.609344) and (26.5/30.1)^0.2x200
uptownfunker 10y ago
Damn! This car is faster than all of its rivals - only aside from getting beat by a Mosler at the Hockenheim. Proud of Dodge and the US!
Inline 6 rules 11y ago
Power is 640HP/649PS!
0-100 km/h: 4 s
http://www.germancarforum.com/community/threads/autobild-sportscars-abt-r8-gtr-vs-mclaren-mp4-12c-vs-mercedes-sls-amg-black-series-vs-srt-viper.49427/
0-160 km/h: 8.1 s
0-200 km/h: 11.9 s
http://www.sportauto.de/einzeltests/srt-viper-im-test-voellig-durchgedreht-7520125.html?show=4
phavyarden 11y ago
GT-R is a completely different car.
Even if it's at the same price range. It's not a pure drivers car.
DCT, AWD, millions of aids.
Also, a pretty rought looking comparing to the Viper.
The real threat is the new Z06
Rest, i'm partly agree, it should be even quicker at the track maybe, and fronts doesn't look that brutal as before. Still it looks absolutly awesome.
The real threat is the new Z06
Piorun 11y ago
IMO other problem with it, its that You can always have something better, Viper has few good points in the bast that was hard to beat.
-not expensive
-man's car
-one of the fastest
-bargin sports car
Now...
-We have a lot of cheaper cars
-Now its not so brutal looking its europeized in design
-Cars are already too fast, we need controll over crazy speeds
-We have many fast and cheap cars, just GT-R its about better bargin
BR2+ 11y ago
@Apathy
still cannot believe they wont let you test drive a car, That is absurd, Specially if your gonna spend 50k on a car, I also agree on the Viper being batshit brutal and limiting its customer base, That is a very good point.
Ive laways thought the Viper was too "Common" through out all its years they should have built half, But i think the biggest problem, Is the price, $140,000...for a Viper? Are you kidding me?..Thats still a bargain, But Viper should NOT be THAT expensive, For the last(Excluding these nes Vipers) Have been in the $80,000 range for almost 20 years, Amazing, And it should have stayed that way, Hell look at the Vettes, Theres barely a price hike between the generations.
But theres alo Ralph Ghillies, Who hasnt done a good job with getting the Viper out there.
1: Lower the price, Not over 100k fully loaded, And give us Europeans the same American price.
2: Side exhaust, Yes there cool, But theres that burning your leg part, And there illegal in alot of places in Europe, Get rid of that and you get a broader audience.
3: I usually dont say this, But quality, To be honest this particular Viper seems of less quality then the previous one..Its rather weird because some are of excellent quality yet others are literally falling apart, Extremely strnge.
lamboboy 11y ago
I know, from the new five year chrysler plan that the viper will be refreshed next year. So i would think if they are updating the viper in the face of low sales and faster competition, then they will make sure it becomes competitive and starts selling properly. Otherwise whats the point of wasting money on improving it? So this leads me to believe that the 2016 model year DODGE Viper will kick ass once again!
saxy 11y ago
I know exactly why this isn't selling. If you want american muscle, a GT500 is less than 1/2 the price, but even more power, and has a much better heritage and name.
corvette on the other hand has rebranded itself to beat the best sports cars in Europe at their own game.
I think on one hand it's smart to make a 700+hp challenger, but on the other hand, makes the viper even harder to sell
Apathy 11y ago
There are a few reasons that I see for the poor sales.
1) Steep competition. The Viper has more competition than ever, and while being a bargain, there are several cars that aren't too far off.
2) Intimidation. The Viper has a reputation as being batshit crazy. This could steer away customers before they even think about getting behind the wheel. It automatically limits its customer base. It's unlikely that people who are just looking for the exotic look will risk limb and life just for strikingly good looks.
3) Dealerships! Even if I pulled up in a Ferrari F12 and walked into a dealership with 120k dollars in a suit case, there are Dodge dealerships that would not let me test drive the car. The Sales people are afraid to let customers behind the wheel.
The dealership thing really irks me. I was at a chain style dealership called Autonation about a month ago. Autonation is a little bit like CarMax, but they tend to focus on new cars. Anyway... the only car that I was considering over a C5 Z06 was a newer GT500. They happened to have a nicely priced 2011 GT500 for sale. I could not, for the life of me, convince anyone to let me test drive that car. Not the sales manager, not the general manager, nobody! Company policy they said. They didn't want to risk the car on the driving ability of a stranger. They even gave me the BS that their insurance wouldn't allow it when I pushed even harder. I couldn't believe it.
FastestLaps 11y ago
The stock market suggests we are in another period of crazy profits. Surely there have to be enough people willing to spend some of those $$$ for a toy like Viper :)
If they can't sell them now, they surely won't when the next crisis (correction) happens :)
Inline 6 rules 11y ago
The production of the Viper is halted again because of the even lower sales number. Between 14th April and 23rd June the Viper was out of production because of the many unsold one. In 23rd June Dodge restarted the production but now they stop it again.
If it goes like this there will be more days in 2014 when the production is halted than days when they actually produce Viper.
Piorun 12y ago
Todays world works in a diffrent way.
A bad opinion of few journalist from MotorTrend published on YT can totaly destroy sales, from potential 10.000/year to 1.500
And the biggest problem is C7.
If New Viper would come alive 3 years ago, and journalist would say that is cool car for real men, then is could sale in number of 20.000/year or more.
Viper just have very bad luck and all things combined desroys the sales.
Flabernat 12y ago
As is, the Viper isn't selling well. I think it's a mix of a high price-tag and some relatively bad press. If you could make a car that had the exotic looks of a Viper, but C7Stingray performance/price, I feel sales would soar...
Chevy is doing something right. There's a lot to be said for an affordable sports car. 11,600+ total sales in 2014 alone(as of April).
http://gmauthority.com/blog/2014/05/corvette-sales-were-up-260-percent-in-april/
BR2+ 12y ago
Im fine with more variations, But i dont want to see a V8 in one, No less then a N/a 8.0L V10, No less.
The Viper isnt the kind of car that should be 50k, If Dodge wanted, They could make that CopperHead Concept into production, Which they should have done long ago, 50k and a V8, And maybe even a whole Snake range, DiamondBack/CopperHead/Rattler/BushMaster lol/Mamba/ etc, All Dodge SRTs. But id rather see the Viper go then give it a V8, Thas like given a 911 Turbo a V12 or a Corvette a 3Cylinder.
Piorun 12y ago
this project failed so hard that its even difficult to finda place when anyone can start to improve sales.
IMO
Create at least 3 versions of Viper:
1-Cheap Viper for 50k made form other dodge components and with that V8
2-V10 Viper but improved in many areas like ride comfort, predictablity, control, engine sound etc
3-Hardcore Viper ACR with at least 800hp, and areo kit.
This car need a lot of work on.
SRT failed, but Fiat group have people from Ferrari, and Ferrari technology, i think they can make it better, beceause they are the best at it.
lamboboy 12y ago
I know i know the viper isnt a viper without a v10 but the idea of a rumbling v8 and less weight is kind of excitingā€¦ Ofcourse i would like it much better if the current v10 is further improved. Less weight more power and torque and more efficient. Integrated with modern technologies like the gm LT1 is. Is it possible to put the 8 speed auto from the Challenger into the viper? Not saying i want that but just wondering
BR2+ 12y ago
It should have never left the Full Dodge name to begin with, SHould have been either Dodge SRT Viper GTS, Or Dodge Viper SRT GTS. And the Viper price should come down, Not even the best top of the line Viper should even be close to $140,000+ Fully loaded. I know companys want to make a profit, But that can also lead to poor to slow sales, And the Viper, Like every American performance car is a Bargain, I still believe this is, But it SHOULD have been under $90,000 when introduced,