Image of Ford GT

Ford GT (Mk II) specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1474 kg (3250 lbs)
Power / weight 445 ps (439 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 506 Nm (373 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2017
Origin country United States
Views 18.3k
Submitted by BR2+

Performance

Top speed 348 kph (216 mph)
0 - 30 mph 1.5 s
0 - 40 mph 2.0 s
0 - 50 mph 2.6 s
0 - 60 mph 3.2 s
0 - 70 mph 3.9 s
0 - 80 mph 4.7 s
0 - 90 mph 5.5 s
0 - 100 mph 6.6 s
0 - 110 mph 7.7 s
0 - 120 mph 9.3 s
0 - 130 mph 11.1 s
0 - 140 mph 13.0 s
0 - 150 mph 15.7 s
1/4 mile 11.1 s @ 130.0 mph
60 mph - 0 34 m (113 ft)

Powertrain

Engine type TwinTurbo EcoBoost V6
Displacement 3.5 l (214 ci)
Power 656 ps (647 bhp / 482 kw) @ 6250 rpm
Torque 746 Nm (550 lb-ft) @ 5900 rpm
Power / liter 187 ps (185 hp)
Transmission 7-Speed DCT
Layout middle engine, rear wheel drive

Laptimes 3

GT rivals

User avatar

User avatar

bench racer  2m ago

how many months has this been released now and there are still only 3 (obscure) lap times for it? lmao this car is a joke.


User avatar

tyler  3m ago

I would love for Carandriver or Motortrend to instrument test this car.


User avatar

GriN  3m ago

GT 2017 0-150mph - 15.7 s
911 TurboS Cabriolet - 14.9 s
Impressive performance for 500,000 usd price .Probably GT faster on the track but not twice. And it's not clear why the McLaren 570S has the same weight and only 560hp and runs 0-150 in just 13,9s

 

User avatar

Fastedee  3m ago

Altitude,aero ; and superior McLaren tranny and launch control.


User avatar

cosimo  5m ago

for track junkies, you get a special helmet from ford performance division

http://i.imgur.com/gGRzZjy.jpg

 

User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago

That's just what your Momma and Papa wear after you've had a spicy dinner Cos. My bambino is so gassy!! They say.


User avatar

Skyzz  4m ago @Fastedee

@Fastedee

Hahahaha


 

User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago

Every company has problems on occasion. If it's true pull em off the bloody road pronto.


User avatar

cosimo  5m ago

most probably they will hand over their tweaky version of this car in other tests and call it our stock cars can do better than the competition, but since they know they can sell the idiots out there an updated exterior design from its predecessor with cheap ford interior quality, why not charge them over 400k ? lol

i wonder what could happen if one of those ecus decide to fail ? 125 mph would come up in 12 s - 13 s ? lol


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago

According to the Road & Track tester this car was tested in hot weather at 4370 feet(1325 metres). You lose about .7 seconds in the quarter for every 4000 feet in an N/A car and .3 in a turbocharged car in my experience. Subtract another .1 for heat and this car does a 10.7 134 mph quarter and a 9.2-9.4 125 mph.


User avatar

dddd  5m ago

I would say that not every supercar has to be so heavily performance-obsessed like Mclaren. But by any standards new Ford GT shouldnt be slower than typical supercar like 488 GTB or 991.2 Turbo S.

More tests will show how fast is this car.


User avatar

FastestLaps  6m ago

Most interesting/anticipated supercar of 2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-MCdfqL61E

 

User avatar

saxy  6m ago

Lol nope


User avatar

FastestLaps  6m ago @saxy

I can only speak for myself - to me its the most intriguing supercar of 2017 for sure. It's a new player in Porsche, Ferrari and McLaren game.


User avatar

cosimo  6m ago @FastestLaps

jag boys with the xj couldn't deliver a v12 and went for v6t, ford did the same thing just being a bit more anal and using the climate change excuse to lay off some heat from democrats and obama party


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @cosimo

They designed the chassis around the engine to keep the car light and well balanced within Lemans regulations. The carbon footprint of a small run of supercars is negligible. Not to mention this V6 isn't very fuel efficient anyhow


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @cosimo

Fascinating. Usually Europeans mock climate change denying far right Republicans. Must be one of those Nigel Farage/Marine LaPen Europeans


User avatar

BR2+  6m ago

Yes and no


User avatar

FastestLaps  6m ago @Fastedee

I like how Jay Leno describes this car as "chassis car" rather than "engine car". That V6TT engine is utilitarian - it is there just to do the job of delivering 650 hp and do no more and no less. It is just a power generating appliance with compact dimensions for perfect weight distribution. It is not mechanical art like a V12.

Does that make it a shit supercar? I don't think so, it makes it "practical supercar" - like Jay said - it was designed to win Le Mans, rather than and impress with pornographic, shiny exhaust manifolds or the most amazing sound.

Either way, the "form follows function" exterior still came out very striking and visually pleasing.


User avatar

FastestLaps  6m ago @Fastedee

It's just a shame how FIA over-reacted with balance-of-performance for this year's Le Mans and rendered turbo cars (Ford GT and Ferrari 488) almost noncompetitive.


User avatar

cosimo  6m ago @FastestLaps

blame the french for every single lame regulation they come up with every 6 months

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/1d/68/19/1d6819a1c805f042cb8d568dd7ff7b93--special-interest-health-care.jpg


User avatar

cosimo  6m ago @Fastedee

kill every control unit installed on this car and you have this, back to square one with a degraded ecoboost tech out of a focus

http://st.motortrend.com/uploads/sites/5/2013/04/2005-Ford-GT-crash-front-side-view.jpg

there's nothing special about a v6 turbo, it should be sold under srt or chrysler brand and the laughing part is the sticker price with every douche drooling all over it, later on putting it up for sale on ebay or use it as a future investment.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @cosimo

Must be why they served the Griswolds frozen dinners in National Lampoon.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @cosimo

That's an old V8 GT- probably the victim of a lead foot. The V6 is nearly as powerful as a 488s twin turbo V8. Doesn't sound quite as good though but it wasn't made for that. I'm hoping the 488's successor has an air to water intercooler as they're more efficient. A few whinging Willies think you can't design an integrated dry sump without oil starvation in fast corners but Porsche has done a great job and surely Ferrari can do even better. Remember you get more flies with honey than vinegar...but you get the most with a dead Beaver!


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @FastestLaps

It's fast enough but I wonder how McLaren and Ferrari get such incredible high speed acceleration with similar power levels. I bet it will be killer on the track though.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @FastestLaps

True


User avatar

another1  2m ago @FastestLaps

488 won this year...nice try


User avatar

cosimo  6m ago

is this the finished product of devel sixteen ? a shocking downgrade from v16 to v6!

the interior is almost identical to its prototype version d-16 'throw up'

ford has a lot to learn when it comes to supercar handling around the track without cheating, like chevy and porch throwing in sticky rubbers just to attract as much consumers as possible

 

User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago

Ford are not cheaters.


User avatar

cosimo  6m ago @Fastedee

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/06/17/ford-gt-dominates-le-mans-qualifying-gets-bop-change/

this company is about on / off switch and still can't get their traction control system right on the mustang.

let's not even start about their production cars as being completely stock and ferrari / mclaren killers :)))


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @cosimo

I dunno. Look how much slower practice laps are in F1. Sandbagging is a bold claim mister lol.I mean a Williams or Toro Rosso Q2 lap can be faster than a Ferrari first practice lap.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago

Ferrari doesn't exactly put snow tires on their masterpieces either. The F12 needed stickier rubber and with the TDF it has it. McLaren also does better with Trofeos but that is just equipping the car for the job not cheating.


User avatar

cosimo  6m ago @Fastedee

we don't know what exactly ford does when they talk about 'adjustments' it could be a tweaked ecu, higher boost pressure, the type of cheating on turbo cars is unlimited and hard to trace without a dyno or a quick test comparing stock car to fords twerked out cars.

when you go the turbo route, it will put down jaw dropping numbers but you can print out on your spec sheet list it's a legit300 hp with sticky tires and claim to be the fastest around every track around the globe :))

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20YBMETp1Aw

corruption in the auto car business is like a line that has no end :)


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago @cosimo

488 is turbo and the legendary f40.


User avatar

cosimo  5m ago @Fastedee

their official hp numbers are higher than factory specs :)


User avatar

hostboy  6m ago

11.1/130 1/4 mile is a bad result just like 12.7/118 for the last GT tested in 2009 in a 0-300kph test. This should do 10.2/138 like the old one did 11.2/131.

 

User avatar

saxy  6m ago

10.2? What are you smoking? Haha


User avatar

BR2+  6m ago

Its not a bad result in anyway, This will do 10s no doubt, And even better in the hands of an independent who owns it, Magazine results arent the end all to be all, But saying its a bad result, Or slow is just retarded, 918s and P1 make ever car seem slower, But that shouldnt have a determent on how you people see ther cars, Or think how fast they "Should" so..The last one, That one was built for more acceleration then track times, A time when cars were just that, Cars and not computers that try and get the fastest laps.

This wont do a 10.2 in a magazine test, If a C7 ZO6 can pull off a 10.3@137 in the hands of an independant, Its certainly possible for this one, Maybe, But i dont expect this car to be seen at the local strips.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @saxy

The pipe of wisdom


User avatar

hostboy  6m ago

This may not be as fast as the Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat (it DOES BEAT the Challenger though) or the last Corvette ZR1 in a straight line, but at least it has track bits to beat them at them circuits.

 

User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago

Neck and neck with ZR1 and beats both Hellcats.


User avatar

hostboy  6m ago @Fastedee

This one does 0-150 in 15.7. The Hellcat 15.8-17.2 in C/D, ZR1 15.9 in Evo's testing.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @hostboy

The Hellcats needs slicks to go under 17 to 150.


User avatar

BR2+  6m ago @Fastedee

Then the time wouldn't be up here if that were the case...smh


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @BR2+

17 is posted as the best for the Challenger while there is no 0-150 for the Charger. FL must have deemed the 15.8 as invalid.Entertaining cars especially on the Grand Tour.


User avatar

BR2+  6m ago @Fastedee

The fact is, The Charger did do the 15.8 to 150mph, Wether its no her or not, And thes times are only the best of magazine times, Which doesnt show there tru potential.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @BR2+

It has worse power to weight than the GT and the aerodynamics of a brick. Still 17 is crazy fast for a car like this.


User avatar

BR2+  6m ago @Fastedee

And? If you can get the launch just fight it will have great times, A Charger actually has normal aerodynamics, It has a coefficient drag of Cd.34, Which is pretty much average, A Challengers is different, And 60bhp and 100lb ft more torque then the GT help too, But either way, You give a HellCat to a pro for a week who knows how to launch it And take it too a runway, You'll see it dip much lower.


User avatar

rhs1992  6m ago

Hell, even McLaren 540C did 0-100km/h in 3.0 and 0-200 in 9 flat!!
It is in newest Autozeitung issue.
570S can do 8.5 to 200km/h.
Z06 with its power can do 10.5-11.0 only. Viper even slower.

 

User avatar

hostboy  6m ago

Americans do suck at giving power ratings, coming from an American myself. The real C6ZR/C7Z power is between 580 and 620 hp but y'all gotta remember they're heavier than a 540C.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago

Also Americans have a hard time going under 10 to 125 mph. Even disregarding the Quattroroute test the 488 does 125 in 8.5-8.7 or so and a Turbo S well under 10 not to mention the 650s and 720s.The ZO6 and GT have excellent power to weight yet the Zo6 is mid tens and the GT might do 9.7-9.8 in some future test.0-120 in 9.3 and 130 in 11.1means 125 between 9.9--10.1. Americans excel at laptimes but Europeans at powertrains.


User avatar

777Balt  6m ago

2004 Ford GT: 1/4 mile 11.2 s @ 131.1 mph
2017 Ford GT: 1/4 mile 11.1 s @ 130.0 mph

lolwut? 14 years of progress and 0.1 faster 1/4 mile and slower trap speed by 1/1 mph.

I really hope Car and Driver pull better numbers for the sake of Ford but how much better can they get from now on? Not by enough I'm afraid.

 

User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago

2004 Ford Gt was nearly a second slower to 100. Theres no way it sped up to 131 in 11.2 and then slowed down again. A real quarter time would be 11.6-7 125-126 mph


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago

Also based on its Calabogie lap the New GT will handle way better than its predecessor. The 2004 GTs laptimes are hardly supercar level these days.


User avatar

saxy  6m ago @Fastedee

That's just numbers from different tests. It's like the instances when numbers show the car can get to 62mph quicker than it does to 60.


User avatar

777Balt  6m ago @Fastedee

I guess it makes sense, although the new GT probably has more advantage in lower speeds than higher due to downforce but still 0.8 seconds difference is just too high to recover from in this case and data backs up this.

2004 Ford GT does 100-150 mph in 9.5 seconds
2017 Ford GT does 100-150 mph in 9.1 seconds

So even after after 100 mph the new GT keeps accelerating faster.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @saxy

True to a degree but there are no magazines sourced for the old GT in mph except 0-60 0-100 and 0-150. 0-100 mph was estimated at 7 by Car & Driver but the fastest actually achieved was 7.4 vs 6.6. Slow Sports Auto at the other end of the Spectrum got 0-125 mph(200 kph) in 12. The modern GT must use up some of its speed for downforce. If it outlaps the McLarens and Ferraris then 6.6 vs 6.0 0-100 times won't matter but only if it outlaps the ACR and 720s.The old GT laps like a very fast modern grand touring car. The old GT quarter mile was anonymously entered and is not consistent with 7.4 and 16.9 to 100 and 150 mph. The 7 flat 0-100 still shows up when you do comparisons but not when you look at the old GT singly. That time was pending removal 2 years ago.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago

The old GT is seriously quick equalling a new ZO6 to 150 mph.


User avatar

saxy  6m ago @Fastedee

It also did 215mph


User avatar

BR2+  6m ago @Fastedee

The fastest time with the old one was done by motortrend when it was compared to the Enzo, Carrera GT, And SLR in a comparison test, The least most powerful car with the second highest weight and far less expensive was the most impressive, 0-60, 100 and 1/4 time range from the slowest of 4.3, 9.0s and 12.3@120 by C&D to the fastest by motortrend of 3.3s, 7.3s and 11.2@132, It's a powerful manual red car where the driver actually drives the car so tests will be all over the place given different skill levels.

I mean did you people expect this thing to be faster or as fast as a 650S in acceleration?....I didnt


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @BR2+

Nope just in laptimes.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @BR2+

Fortunately Car and driver doesn't haveva driver that poor these days and the GT is DCT.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago

Car and Driver will probably get slightly faster times.


User avatar

BR2+  6m ago

I dunno what you people are complaining bout, Those are fast as he'll times, I think P1s n 918 have got a lot of people's mind warped on how fast a car should be, 3.2s 0-60, 6.5s 0-100 is no where near slow, even for it's power, This car was made more for reading up a track then acceleration, Not too mention it's only 1 test so far.

However, I will say, The last GT did 11.2 at 132.5mph in the 1/4, But also a lot more cars today then 11 years ago produce a he'll if a lot more did force, But performance or not 450k is is absurd from a company that makes cars for your average everyday working man

 

User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago

True but they sold every one.


User avatar

saxy  6m ago

Like you said, it's no faster in a straight line even with more power more torque faster gearbox and better tires. Nobody is comparing the car to the P1s and 918s. You have the Ferrari 488 which has the similar power and more weight (if the Ford claimed weight is true) doing 10.4s runs. Both are mid engine layouts. The Porsche TS, R8, any Mclaren, and Lambo would do 10.6 runs.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @saxy

The acceleration numbers for the old GT are old anonymous and probably bogus. 0-100 in 7.5 sounds closer to what I remember. plus its bodywork was for speed not handling. The old GT gets beat by a DB11 and F type R on the track and absolutely monstered at Big Willow by them. Heck even contemporaries like the Gallardo and DBS beat it at most tracks.The new GT is slowed down for track speed like the ZL1 ILE and ACR.



User avatar

brz  6m ago

these figures do seem slow for a car which has 647hp and a 216mph top speed


User avatar

Hans Batter  6m ago

I'm waiting for the V8 version for sure...:)

No serious Ford GT V6? I would Never pay much money for a V6. V8 and V10 sound forever!


User avatar

DrDuke  6m ago

it's a track car not a dragster - go play with your car Top Trumps


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago

Some of its the rwd as well as a high rpm torque band.


User avatar

DrDuke  6m ago

guys it's so sad!


User avatar

saxy  6m ago

11.1s for the 1/4 mile at 130mph, while cars half its price are hitting the 1/4 mile at 10.4-10.6s.

Kind of disappointed for a half million dollar super car that claims to be faster than the 675lt


User avatar

david  6m ago

Wow, it's slow for 647-hp...
0-100 km/h: 3,7 s
0-160 km/h: 6,7 s
0-200 km/h: 10,8 s
Quarter mile: 11,4 s (209 km/h)
https://www.germancarforum.com/threads/ford-gt-2017.53741/page-7

 

User avatar

FastestLaps  6m ago

Those figures don't look too impressive. I am sure it can (and will) produce better numbers.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago

That's not the Road & Track numbers.


User avatar

Fastedee  6m ago @FastestLaps

It's still fast enough if it monsters the track. Otherwise just a gimmick


User avatar

DeDe  6m ago @Fastedee

Those are the R&T numbers in "European" language: in kph, without rollout. The numbers were taken from the acceleration graph I made based on their test data. Error is +-0.1 sec max. ;)

ford-gt-png.415417


User avatar

hostboy  6m ago

A Dodge Charger Hellcat can do a 1/4-mile in 11.3sec-ish (NHRA certified excluding rollout) at 215kph... so something is wrong with the Ford GT. Notice 0-96 in 3.5 and 0-200 in 10.8 for that GT, 0-96 in 3.7 and 0-200 in 9.9 or so for the Hellcat...


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago @DeDe

A car that does 120 mph in 9.3 and 130 in 11.1 does not do 125(200 kph) in 10.8. Factoring in a typical non linear slowdown .8 to 120-125 and 1.0 for 125-130 = 200 in exactly 10.1 or 9.2-9.4 with altitude adjustment. The 0-60 was standing start converting to a 3.5 0-100 kph.


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago @DeDe

A quarter mile is a quarter mile is a quarter mile so it's growth from 11.1-11.4 is not borne by any evidence.


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago @hostboy

Amusing for him to think a car that does 130-140 in 1.9 seconds takes a full 1.5 seconds to go 120-125 mph.


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago @DeDe

In fairness to you your numbers will probably be very close to SportAutos times but they have an atypical testing process with 2 people and a full tank of gas in the car.


User avatar

DeDe  5m ago @Fastedee

MY numbers are with the 0.3 s rollout-time. And so the real 0-120mph time is 9,6 and the 130mph time is 11,4. The graph was made with these numbers.
You can read the 0-200 kph time quite accuratly: 10,8 s.


User avatar

cosimo  5m ago @DeDe

fastedee is a certified technician that was approved by fasteslpas beavis & butthead to always provide us his own personal opinion about super fast cars that get tested on xbox forza game.

the ford is an uninteresting car that relies on thousands of ecus to keep it from going sideways or killing a pedestrian, wait till they start delivering them all and owners sending them back to get their trims glued back, the engine ? not sure how much boost it will handle, but it will blow up for sure under full throttle at the track.


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago @cosimo

Woo hoo


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago @DeDe

Interesting. So you add the rollout time which both Road & Track and FL don't. When they put 0-60 is 3.2 that's what they mean. When they got a 3.9 for the Vantage V12 s that's what they said it did. They didn't add the .4 rollout and say 4.3. Adding the rollout time would change every Road & Track based time for the worse on this site. The graph is fundamentally flawed and even at 9.6 and 11.4 the correct 200 time would be 10.4.


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago @cosimo

Say what you will about me but not those two titans of automotive thought. Bow to their wisdom.


User avatar

DeDe  5m ago @Fastedee

Yes, because outside of the US the real standing start 0-60mph time means STANDING start. From 0.00mph. Not a timing after the first 30 centimeters. :D


User avatar

cosimo  5m ago @DeDe

if this arguement continues, you know mr dump and his advisors will list you as a turrbowrist and the whole crew on fl will stand against you for mocking the murican lifestyle with 0 to 60 test which is considered world standard nowadays to set a new record, as they call it the fastest bla bla bla car in our hands did it in under 3 seconds with tons of potholes ahead lol

how many of original red muricans were slaughtered to takeover that land ? oh, it has nothing to do with turrborism it was just an indian vs cowboy game tadaaa!!


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago @cosimo

Ferrari is my favourite non British car but their test track goes downhill.


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago @cosimo

Mr Dump? There's hope for you yet lad.


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago @cosimo

Yes tge Natives
Fought them hard
They fought them well
Out on the plains they gave
Them Hell
But many came..too much
For Cree
When will we
Be set free.
Of course we made the Newfoundland natives extinct so we must hang our heads with our southern friends in the States.


User avatar

cosimo  5m ago @Fastedee

so being a terrorist and man slaughtering is fine as long as you're holding the flag with stars ? mmmm yea whatever lol

it's a new nation for natzis to immigrate there with a different swastika that looks like a goat with cyclops eyes


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago @cosimo

Your Trump criticism while spot on may be pokeing the bear.


User avatar

Fastedee  5m ago @DeDe

Look at the Autobild ZO6 test 0-100 3.2. Car and Driver 0-60 3.0. Only a .2 gap not .5. Car and Driver 0-130 mph11.9 Autobild 0- 200 km/hr 10.2. Gap of 1.7. The GT is nearly a second faster than the ZO6 to 130 but somehow .6 slower to 200 km\hr. This European alternative facts 0-60 is bogus and a shallow concealment of trollery.


User avatar

fakekillerfour  8m ago

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-ford-gt-supercar-first-drive-review
CarandDriver reported 2017 ford gt's curb weight at 3250 Ibs


User avatar

Freakz  8m ago

FORD vs FERRARI GTE (Spa-Francorchamps):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M37QesPcTTw

Good Fight!
Ferrari got 1-2
Ford got 3-4


User avatar

tyler  8m ago

Carandriver first drive review of the Ford GT

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-ford-gt-supercar-first-ride-review


User avatar

Fastedee  9m ago

Great skiing near Calabogie. Seriously if Ford was messing around they were smart enough to have the Speciale slower than the other two by a believable margin. It will be interesting to see how it matches the 488 and 720s.

 

User avatar

Somebody  9m ago

Speciale is not particularly FAST, its more of a FEEL car,


User avatar

Fastedee  9m ago

kanuk? Is that like a Yahnkei?

Photo of Ford GT Mk II

Photo of Ford GT Mk II

Photo of Ford GT Mk II

Photo of Ford GT Mk II

Photo of Ford GT Mk II

Photo of Ford GT Mk II

Photo of Ford GT Mk II

Photo of Ford GT Mk II

Photo of Ford GT Mk II

Timeline

Latest topics

Data submission requests 162
2 days ago by serpentx

Porsche 911 GT2 RS sets new Hockenheim record, beats Huracán Performante 12
3 days ago by cosimo

Alexander West takes his LaFerrari FXX K and P1 GTR to Silverstone GP 121
1 week ago by fatpussy

First official look at a near-production ready Aston Martin Valkyrie 33
2 weeks ago by Fastedee

Roll race - 918 vs LT vs 720S vs Chiron vs TDF 24
2 weeks ago by ///

Open letter to YouTube 10
2 weeks ago by FastestLaps

Active users

tyler, DeDe, fakekillerfour, Hayes, FastestLaps, QA51M, NIN, Chanante, honzakoubek, hostboy, Freakz, skizoman, Inline 6 rules, manone, Fastedee