Ford GT (Mk II 656 PS) specs
Price in Europe | €530,000 |
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 1385-1533 kg (3053-3380 lbs) |
Introduced | 2017 |
Origin country | United States |
Views | 66.6k |
Submitted by | BR2+ |
Lap times
Acceleration (kph)
0 - 60 kph | 1.8 s |
0 - 100 kph | 3.3 s |
0 - 120 kph | 4.2 s |
0 - 130 kph | 4.7 s |
0 - 140 kph | 5.2 s |
0 - 150 kph | 5.8 s |
0 - 160 kph | 6.5 s |
0 - 180 kph | 7.9 s |
0 - 200 kph | 9.8 s |
0 - 220 kph | 11.8 s |
0 - 240 kph | 14.7 s |
0 - 250 kph | 16.0 s |
0 - 260 kph | 18.1 s |
1000 m | 19.8 s @ 268.7 kph |
100 - 140 kph | 1.9 s |
100 - 200 kph | 6.1 s |
Acceleration (mph)
0 - 30 mph | 1.3 s |
0 - 40 mph | 1.8 s |
0 - 50 mph | 2.4 s |
0 - 60 mph | 3.0 s |
0 - 70 mph | 3.7 s |
0 - 80 mph | 4.4 s |
0 - 90 mph | 5.2 s |
0 - 100 mph | 6.2 s |
0 - 110 mph | 7.2 s |
0 - 120 mph | 8.6 s |
0 - 130 mph | 10.1 s |
0 - 140 mph | 11.9 s |
0 - 150 mph | 14.5 s |
0 - 160 mph | 17.5 s |
0 - 170 mph | 21.4 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 7.7 s @ 109.4 mph |
1/4 mile | 10.8 s @ 134.0 mph |
1/2 mile | 17.2 s |
General performance
Top speed | 348 kph (216 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.86 g (8 m/s²) |
Lateral acceleration | 1.11 g (11 m/s²) |
60 mph - 0 | 29 m (95 ft) |
70 mph - 0 | 44 m (145 ft) |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | TwinTurbo EcoBoost V6 |
Displacement | 3.5 l (214 ci) |
Power | 656 ps (647 bhp / 482 kw) @ 6250 rpm |
Torque | 746 Nm (550 lb-ft) @ 5900 rpm |
Power / liter | 187 ps (185 hp) |
Power / weight | 443 ps (437 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 504 Nm (372 lb-ft) / t |
Power / €5000 | 6 ps |
Transmission | 7-Speed DCT |
Layout | middle engine, rear wheel drive |
GT competition
Aaron 10m ago
I don't think people understand how freaking insane this thing looks in person. Literally only a few cars come even remotely close. A Koenigsegg One:1? Ferrari SP3 Daytona? Pagani Huayra R? And I think that's it. This will be a very hot take but even the P1 and LaFerrari aren't that visually appealing compared with the GT. The Ford GT beats literally everything in it's price range when it comes to looks.
wallenieswiftie 1y ago
I hate to be the one to say this, but I do not believe that the second generation GT will appreciate in value in the same way that the first generation one did.
The first model was a supercharged V8 competing successfully against most hypercars of its day. Basically the Ferrari SF90 Stradale and Chevy Corvette E-Ray of its day combined.
The second model was matched or beaten by cars costing between 1/5 and 3/5 of its MSRP even though it had a twin-turbo V6.
TypeF173 2y ago
Motortrend, Ford GT "spanks" Lamborghini Aventador SVJ and THEN it tries it on with the Bugatti Chiron Pur Sport in a decider race showoff!
Except NO Bugatti race! They'd BETTER bloody time it AND SHOW IT!🤦
TypeF173 2y ago
Ford GT HOTLAPS at Laguna Seca PLUS apparently the McLaren Senna AND 765LT!🔥
🧐
hostboy 2y ago
Unlike the GT, its indirect successor will be a series-production super-GT
https://carbuzz.com/news/the-ford-thunderbird-may-return-as-a-corvette-fighting-sportscar
TypeF173 2y ago
A special announcement from John Hennessey, quote>"HPE DOES NOT PLAN TO OFFER ANY PERFORMANCE UPGRADES FOR THE NEW FORD GT AT THIS TIME. IT DOES NOT HAPPEN OFTEN BUT SOME CARS ARE NOT MEANT TO BE MODIFIED. IN OUR HUMBLE OPINION, THE NEW FORD GT IS ONE OF THESE CARS."
Hennessey website.
🤔
John it's the one bloody car that DID NEED some electronic "enhancements?"
😂
hostboy 2y ago
The Ford GT's acceleration is the exact reason why engine inertia is important. If this car had produced the same power and even the same torque out of a larger engine — say, a 5.0-liter V-8 — that peak torque would start very early in the range. The problem with the EcoBoost engine is that it can't handle that much power and torque without a huge turbocharger, and that's what decreases the engine inertia and makes the car unstable. There is no replacement for displacement even when it comes to supercharging and turbocharging.
The previous Ford GT had a 5.4L supercharged V-8 and that car is not only already equally as fast as this one, but it makes more than the advertised 550 hp (only underrated so that it wouldn't officially touch the established Hypercar Big 3 of the time — CGT, McF1, and Enzo).
Disclosure: Drag coefficient, frontal area, and curb weight figures are estimates of my own; not copied from manufacturers or independent tests.
2005 Ford GT
Drag coefficient: 0.338 Cd
Frontal area: 19.40 sq. ft. (x1.2 for mirrors and ground clearance)
Curb weight: 3492 lb (+165 lb for driver)
Top speed: 211.89 mph (verified @Nardo)
= 545 rwhp (rounded up)
2017 Ford GT
Drag coefficient: 0.310 Cd
Frontal area: 19.63 sq. ft. (x1.2 for mirrors and ground clearance)
Curb weight: 3313 lb (+165 lb for driver)
Top speed: 213.xx mph (verified @JBPG; rounded up to 214 mph regardless)
= 520 rwhp (rounded up)
Thiago_Lins 3y ago
Ford GT - Lap Velocitta - 0'57"507
Corvolet3 3y ago
Ford GT: is a track oriented supercar for 500k to up to a million
Also Ford GT: is outmatched by a Ferrari on most tracks for half the price ;)
Just buy an MC20 if you want a fast and actually pretty V6 supercar
TypeF173 3y ago
So the finest manufacturers in terms production portfolio from hatchbacks to hypercars are FORD and MERCEDES-BENZ. Leave your thoughts below>
TypeF173 3y ago
Also pulled the 60-186MPH or time off the Johnny Bohmer top speed Ford GT test. The display is a direct link to a GPS readout and the timings are off directly related YouTube counters. There could be variances.
60-186MPH= 22 seconds plus 3 seconds 0-60MPH= 0-300km/h= 25 seconds
0-200MPH worked out exactly the same way= 35 seconds
Etc.
TypeF173 3y ago
Finally managed to get the FULL figures from the Car and Driver test with results and full scans>
Instrumented Test numbers of the 2017 Ford GT
0-30mph: 1.3
0-40mph: 1.8
0-50mph: 2.4
0-60mph: 3.0
0-70mph: 3.7
0-80mph: 4.4
0-90mph: 5.2
0-100mph: 6.2
0-110mph: 7.2
0-120mph: 8.6
0-130mph: 10.1
0-140mph: 11.9
0-150mph: 14.5
0-160mph: 17.5
0-170mph: 21.4
skidpad: 1.11 g
70mph-0: 145 ft (only 1 ft better than a Shelby Mustang GT350R?)
1/4 mile: 10.8 @ 134 mph
topseed: 216 mph
Laptime @ Vir 2:43.00
weight: 3381 lb
Scans>
Thank You to the original collator!
aaayy 4y ago
I saw one of these in person a few months back. Absolutely stunning, one of the coolest looking and sexiest cars to come out in the past 5 years.
It’s the stance that’s cool too- this thing is insanely low, lower than any current road car I can think of. It’s also super wide, and the flying buttresses just make it look wider.