Image of McLaren 675LT

McLaren 675LT specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1328 kg (2928 lbs)
Power / weight 508 ps (501 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 527 Nm (389 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2015
Origin country United Kingdom
Average fuel consumption 17.5-16.7 l/100 km (13-14 mpg US / 16-17 mpg UK)
Views 36k
Submitted by Thiago_Lins

Performance

Top speed 332 kph (206 mph)
0 - 40 kph 1.2 s
0 - 50 kph 1.4 s
0 - 60 kph 1.8 s
0 - 80 kph 2.4 s
0 - 100 kph 2.8 s
0 - 130 kph 3.9 s
0 - 140 kph 5.0 s
0 - 160 kph 5.2 s
0 - 180 kph 6.4 s
0 - 200 kph 7.6 s
0 - 230 kph 10.4 s
0 - 250 kph 12.2 s
0 - 300 kph 22.4 s
0 - 60 mph 3.0 s
0 - 100 mph 5.7 s
Est. 1/8 mile 6.9 s @ 114.3 mph
1/4 mile 10.3 s @ 142.0 mph
Est. 1/2 mile 16.3 s @ 163.4 mph
1000 m 18.6 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph 2.1 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 4.8 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph 15.5 s
100 kph - 0 31 m (101 ft)
200 kph - 0 115 m (378 ft)
300 kph - 0 270 m (885 ft)
60 mph - 0 29 m (94 ft)
18m slalom 73.6 kph (45.7 mph)
Emissions 275 g/km
Lateral acceleration 1.09 g (11 m/s²)
McLaren 675LT acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type V8 Twin Turbo
Displacement 3.8 l (232 ci / 3799 cc)
Power 675 ps (666 bhp / 496 kw) @ 7100 rpm
Torque 700 Nm (516 lb-ft) @ 5000 rpm
Power / liter 178 ps (175 hp)
Efficiency 39 PS per l/100 km
Transmission 7 speed SSG
Layout middle engine, rear wheel drive

Laptimes 26

675LT rivals

User avatar

User avatar

sroser  3m

1min 43sec at Philip Island GP circuit

Surely that's an amateur time, otherwise it'd be slower than a 997 GT2?


User avatar

sroser  3m

Standing Mile - 185.1mph

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3Oi0_C3qm0


User avatar

szmisa  4m

1min 43sec at Philip Island GP circuit


User avatar

saxy  5m

yeah when are we going to change the curb weight on this page


User avatar

FastestLaps  5m

But.... what about the tyres?


User avatar

sroser  5m

1:46 on Fuji Speedway (7:49).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaSGSe7jgPE


User avatar

sroser  5m

2:20 at Ascari. Some traffic, cistomer driver.

4:20-6:20
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kCd1JIEBis


User avatar

sroser  5m

2:38 on Spa, amateur driver. Reports managing 2:36 previously.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAGFkqVKVj4


User avatar

sroser  5m

So how come Cup 2s are 1.2s/minute faster than Cup+ and Trofeos are only 0.4s faster than Cup+ and faster than Corsa System and Trofeo Rs were only 0.9s/minute faster than Corsa Systems on Portimao (all same day tests). Shouldn't Cup 2s be as slow as Corsa Systems if Trofeo Rs are 1s/minute faster than them?

Why did Chevrolet fit Trofeo Rs on the Z28 and not even have them as an option tyre for the Z06 then? Everyone likes PR, so if they could have droped 1s/minute by going to Trofeo Rs as an option I'm sure they would have.

The 488 is slower than the LT because it's 200kg (or 15%) heavier. The obvious answer is the one staring you in the face.

Let's not forget you were one of the people who claimed the P1 couldn't lap the 'ring sub-7, and now the LT is faster than LP750-4 SV (6:59). Don't you and others look stupid.


User avatar

saxy  5m

Simple. Cuz cup2s are the better tire 99.99% of the time, on the ROAD at road legal speeds. Still don't get it

And don't Ferrari corvette and Porsche use michelins on their WEC cars?


User avatar

sroser  5m

Saxy - do the maths, these are all same day tests by respectable sources. Cup 2 1.2s/minute faster than Cup+.

http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Article/Michelin-Pilot-Sport-Cup-2-Launched.htm

Trofeo 0.4s/minute faster than Cup +. Sport Auto test.

http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Article/2012-Sport-Auto-Track-Day-Tyre-Test.htm

So Cup 2 is ~0.8s/minute faster than non-R Trofeo and the non-R Trofeo is still faster than Corsa Systems.

Now at Portimao the Trofeo R on the P1 was 0.9s/minute faster than the Corsa Systems.

So in summary:

Cup 2 > 0.8s/min > Trofeo > Corsa System
Trofeo R > 0.9s/min > Corsa System

Good luck find 1s between the Trofeo R and Cup 2 in there.

Now Harris ran 1:56 at portimao with the 918 first time out and 1:53.98 the second time, with the same tyres. Now if he'd used Trofeo Rs the second time and ran 1:53.98, the internet would have been full of idiots claiming it was proof that Trofeo Rs are 1s/minute faster than Cup 2s, which is exactly what they did after his different day tyre test.

Why did Chevrolet put Trofeo Rs on the Z28 and then have Cup 2s as the option tyre for Z06s?


User avatar

sroser  5m

Can we add the Portimao lap. 1:54.7 - see centre console at 4:09.@FastestLaps.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kCd1JIEBis


User avatar

saxy  5m

LOL. Another one of those... "the faster lap time MUST make a car better" attitude. Trofeo R's are definitely more aggressive than any Michelins, but they also have no grip when their cold, or if it's raining.

For the 99.99% of the time these cars aren't being pushed to the limit, the less aggressive tires are better... like in the REAL world driving.


User avatar

sroser  5m

Manone - that's continually repeated garbage. The Cup 2 is 2s faster than Cup+ on a 2 minute lap (1 & 2) and Sport Auto only found the Trofeos 0.5s faster than the Cup+ on a 57s lap (3). These are all same day tests unlike the Harris test. So Cup 2s and Trofeos are roughly the same.
1. http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Article/2012-Sport-Auto-Track-Day-Tyre-Test.htm
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkoaijiEKRg
3. http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Article/Michelin-Pilot-Sport-Cup-2-Launched.htm

Why doesn't Ferrari just use Trofeos instead of making excuses? They're not bound to Michelin like McLaren is to Pirelli.


User avatar

manone  5m

488 does not come with cup2 tires. it comes with supersports. and yes cup2 are not quite as fast as trofeos r.
there are no "inferior" or "superior" tires globally. each choice may be better than another in a specific department. ferrari choices have been well known for decades. not one has ever come with trofeos r.


User avatar

sroser  5m

manone - there's no evidence that Trofeos are that much better than Cup 2s, all people are going on is a different day test, where the Cup 2 time for a GT3 was 5s slower than a 458s, which is definitely atypical, as you can see.
http://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/i6dlmtfhn0a7

Why would an Italian manufacturer be using inferior tyres made in France instead of faster Italian tyres?


User avatar

manone  5m

the noticeable advantage over the 488 is basically due to the trofeos r tyres. it is interesting to still see some 2wd cars competitive at vairano, albeit at the cost of using trofeos r. that's a well known 4wd biased track, even because of the very slow speeds reachable.


User avatar

Chanante  5m

Vairano in 1:10.101

http://i68.tinypic.com/2ccp98n.jpg


User avatar

fakekillerfour  5m

laptime at le mans bugatti circuit: 1:44.04

https://youtu.be/MYS73wc2sMo



User avatar

sroser  6m

Just to note the stated curb weight is actually the dry weight. Curb weight is 1,328kg.


User avatar

dddd  6m

I dont know whether it was posted or not but here you guys have it :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYRpQ965bJA&feature=youtu.be

Nice movie. 675 LT is a monster.



User avatar

saxy  6m

you do know that FIA now recognizes race car training directly through gaming consoles, and by earning a game racing license from the FIA, certifies you to be equivalent to having a REAL racing license in over 22 countries.

LMAO! but actually I don't have a game console at home, but I did study newtonian physics in University, and every thing I said in the previous post is truth and common sense.

you should try that some time.


User avatar

cosimo  6m

The LT is properly fast around the race track. Sure the lack of electric motors makes it lose instant grunt but that's negligible on a race track. On track you want smooth delivery and not sudden.

The P1 gtr time seems impressive but when you factor the slicks it doesn't seem so great anymore. The radical with street legal tires in street legal trim posts just 2 seconds slower

says the boy with years of experience behind a monitor plugged into a gaming console

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVFd46qABi0


User avatar

saxy  6m

The LT is properly fast around the race track. Sure the lack of electric motors makes it lose instant grunt but that's negligible on a race track. On track you want smooth delivery and not sudden.

The P1 gtr time seems impressive but when you factor the slicks it doesn't seem so great anymore. The radical with street legal tires in street legal trim posts just 2 seconds slower


User avatar

bob  6m

https://youtu.be/5WCav_2jF2s
laptime at Anglesey Coastal 1:12.8
P1 GTR did a 1:08.7



User avatar

Freakz  8m

McLaren says 7.9 sec to 0-200, where are you getting 9.4 from?

http://cars.mclaren.com/675LT-Specification (scroll down)


User avatar

Sonatine  8m

McLaren says officially 9.4 seconds for 0-200 kph. How can it reach 7.6 seconds then? What a joke.

Photo of McLaren 675LT

Photo of McLaren 675LT

Photo of McLaren 675LT

Photo of McLaren 675LT

Photo of McLaren 675LT

Photo of McLaren 675LT

Active users

FastestLaps, hmdqyg, saxy, tyler, fakekillerfour, BR2+, Flabernat, DeDe, lawrencefearon, Fastedee

Latest topics

2017 racing season starts tomorrow 40
13 hours ago by saxy

The new, "down-sized" Audi RS5 14
15 hours ago by BR2+

Data submission requests 148
1 day ago by fakekillerfour

Dodge Viper ACR goes "HAM" on 14 tracks, "spanks" Porsche 918 1
2 days ago by lawrencefearon

Shame on Ferrari, shame on McLaren 88
5 days ago by Fastedee

Aston Martin DB11 is much faster than S-Class coupe 20
5 days ago by Fastedee