Image of Porsche 911 GT3

Porsche 911 GT3 (991 facelift) specs

Price in Europe €152,416 - €177,900
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1413-1498 kg (3115-3303 lbs)
Introduced 2017
Origin country Germany
Gas mileage 35.7-10.7 l/100 km (7-22 mpg US / 8-26 mpg UK)
CO2 emissions 292 - 351 g/km
Insurance group 50 / 50
Views 64.7k
Submitted by fakekillerfour

Acceleration (kph)

0 - 40 kph1.2 s
0 - 50 kph1.3 s
0 - 80 kph2.5 s
0 - 100 kph3.3 s
0 - 120 kph4.5 s
0 - 130 kph4.9 s
0 - 140 kph5.7 s
0 - 150 kph6.2 s
0 - 160 kph6.9 s
0 - 180 kph8.9 s
0 - 200 kph10.6 s
0 - 250 kph17.9 s
0 - 300 kph37.1 s
1000 m20.4 s @ 260.7 kph

Acceleration (mph)

0 - 30 mph1.2 s
0 - 40 mph1.7 s
0 - 50 mph2.4 s
0 - 60 mph3.0 s
0 - 70 mph3.8 s
0 - 80 mph4.7 s
0 - 90 mph5.8 s
0 - 100 mph6.9 s
0 - 110 mph8.2 s
0 - 120 mph9.8 s
0 - 130 mph11.6 s
0 - 140 mph13.8 s
0 - 150 mph16.3 s
0 - 160 mph19.8 s
0 - 170 mph24.3 s
Est. 1/8 mile7.8 s @ 105.0 mph
1/4 mile11.1 s @ 127.0 mph
1/2 mile18.2 s
Est. 1 mile30.1 s @ 178.3 mph
Porsche 911 GT3  acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed320 kph (199 mph)
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 010.9 s @ 784 ft
Est. max acceleration0.89 g (9 m/s²)
18m slalom74.1 kph (46.0 mph)
36m slalom148.0 kph (92.0 mph)
Lateral acceleration1.11 g (11 m/s²)
Downforce @ 200 kph69 kg (152 lbs)
Downforce @ 300 kph155 kg (342 lbs)
Noise @ idle57 dB
Noise @ 50 kph68 dB
Noise @ 100 kph73 dB
Noise @ 130 kph77 dB

Powertrain specs

Engine type naturally aspirated flat-6
Displacement 4.0 l (244 ci)
Power 500 ps (493 bhp / 368 kw)
Torque 460 Nm (339 lb-ft)
Power / liter 125 ps (123 hp)
Power / weight 339 ps (334 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 311 Nm (230 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 27 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 16 ps
Transmission 7 speed PDK, 6 speed manual
Layout rear engine, rear wheel drive

Braking distance

50 kph - 08 m (28 ft)
100 kph - 031 m (101 ft)
130 kph - 052 m (169 ft)
150 kph - 069 m (225 ft)
200 kph - 0116 m (381 ft)
60 mph - 030 m (98 ft)
70 mph - 043 m (141 ft)

Rolling acceleration

60 - 100 kph (4)3.7 s
60 - 100 kph (5)4.9 s
80 - 120 kph (4)4.1 s
80 - 120 kph (5)4.6 s
80 - 120 kph (6)5.7 s
80 - 120 kph (7)7.3 s
80 - 160 kph (4)7.6 s
80 - 160 kph (5)10.5 s
80 - 160 kph (6)13.9 s
80 - 160 kph (7)17.0 s
60 - 100 kph1.7 s
80 - 120 kph2.0 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph2.3 s
100 - 200 kph8.2 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph26.0 s
User avatar
User avatar

jmm  11m ago

just been on track day at donington national in991.2 gt3 and managed a 1min 17.3 looks decent didnt know how to post it in donington track times??


User avatar

Pormike  3y ago

991.2 GT2 RS (with the wing removed) did 192 in the mile under the same conditions. My run is on the Facebook Texas Mile site. My GPS indicated 179 mpg, my Dragy indicated 177.4 mph at the mile.


User avatar

Pormike  3y ago

Very close. I did the Texas Mile in my 991.2 at 125 at the quarter, 152 at the half and 177.4 at the mile. Bone stock.


User avatar

Lovetodrive  3y ago

NCM Motorsports Park Grand Full Course: 2:11,14 min

Driver: Andy Pilgrim

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hBWM0p12Qko


User avatar

benedekpuskas  4y ago

Best modern 911, in my opinion.



User avatar

DrDuke  6y ago

Interesting comparison between 991.2 GT3, 911GT3 R and 911 RSR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHr76gwj2dg

Lap times Lausitzring 3.442km version:
GT3: 1:37.?
911R: 1:25.9 although in the ADAC GT Masters they lap around 1:22.148
911RSR: 1:24.568

Quite a gap between the GT3 and R considering same engine with same power output (between 11-15 seconds). Or in other words the R overtakes the GT3 every 8. lap.


User avatar

hostboy  6y ago

Performance is between a C7 Z06 650 and a C7 ZR1 755 with just 500 HP!!! Imagine what GT3 RS, LET ALONE GT2 RS WILL DO


User avatar

777Balt  6y ago

Manual 991.2 GT3 vs 2018 Turbo S PDK

 


User avatar

fakekillerfour  6y ago

CarandDriver instrumented test of Porsche 991.2 GT3 PDK
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2018-porsche-911-gt3-pdk-automatic-test-review


User avatar

Gt34me  7y ago

0-60 2.93
1/4 mile 10.89

Source: https://instagram.com/p/Be6iYWHFepg/



User avatar

DrDuke  7y ago

Remember kids if its a Porsche pre production car nobody doubt the laptime on the nos but if its a Honda then it's 100% cheated!


User avatar

DeDe  7y ago

Contidrom: 1:29.34 min.

550x800m



User avatar

fakekillerfour  7y ago

Porsche 991.2 GT3 7.18 min Nordschleife HOT LAP Supertest sport auto

 


User avatar

Fastedee  7y ago

I actually heard that every German car maker with the exception of BMW programmed their cars to eventually crash anyone not of Germanic or Scandanavian origin.Hillary thought of it and George Soros was tickled pink! The huge number of crashes are covered up by controlling the news. As well mind control by the Freemasons,Romani and Trilateral Commission in collusion with George Lucas is involved.


User avatar

cosimo  7y ago

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.


User avatar

Chanante  7y ago

Lol 10.8s in 0 to 200 is slow. It is only pass in this page.


User avatar

DeDe  7y ago

That is no real-time speed display in the Drivetribe video. The numbers are going crazy fast past 160, lol.


User avatar

saxy  7y ago

The facelift turbo page lists 130mph in 9.9s. 120mph in 8.1. Pretty sure 124mph should come on the lower side of difference.

 


User avatar

DeDe  7y ago

Fastest "base Turbo" did it in 9,7 s, also in AutoZeitung. Turbo S' best is 9,3... 10,8 is very good considering that the GT3 has 40 less HP than the Turbo, it's only RWD and has a worse Cw.


User avatar

saxy  7y ago

0-200 in 10.8? damn, considering the base turbo can do it in under 9s, that is a bit underwhelming. But there's no denying it's track-ability


User avatar

DeDe  7y ago

PDK-model as tested by AutoZeitung:
- 0-100 kph: 3,3 s
- 0-200 kph: 10,8 s
- 100-0 kph: 31,4 m
- 200-0 kph: 120,6 m
- Nordschleife: 7:24 min (HvS)

https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/albums/72157681556379903


User avatar

TRACKA  7y ago

1:34.96 ANGELSEY GP - WOW


User avatar

fakekillerfour  7y ago

 


User avatar

DrDuke  7y ago

Well the normal VW's got front engined but the successor of the beetle was the first porsche. Up to the 993 they were air cooled. Then the first water cooled engine came with the 996. Which wasnt as bullet proof as the air cooled ones. Same goes for all these engines based on the Metzger engine. Just do propper research before you get an used one.
The main problem of the rear engine car setup is rear tire wear. Just look at how the 911 cup cars are setup. They all use a very tires consuming setup to be fast in the first few laps because then the field is close and the chances to overtake someone is high. You could setup the car faster over a race distance but you cant do that because you loose too much in the first few rounds.
If these car reviews would change from a "qualification" to a "race" format eg. several hotlaps in one stint the 911 would be losing much more time on mid engine cars that it does now.
And the other big disadvantage is that the engine sits there where the diffusor has to be.
You can argue about style but not about physics.


User avatar

fakekillerfour  7y ago

991.2 GT3 0-250 km/h

 


User avatar

Fastedee  7y ago

The original beetle was air cooled and even more rear weight biased. They then became front engined.
The biggest argument is in the laptimes which rival those of far more evenly distributed cars like the AMG GTR and 458 Speciale. Not to mention their safe and predictable oversteer.
The ZO6 needs superior weight, distribution, power and the low lying nature of pushrod engines to achieve faster laptimes. The 488 requires incredible power with a mid engined layout. It's a miracle of engineering up there with bees flying with those small wings.
Mid engine cars have the advantage of having started out in F1 and Miuras rather than the equivalent of a 1960's Fiero.
While no track cars Bentleys handle very well for 4900-5500 lb cars with a huge engine in the absolute worst place imaginable-in the cars nose.


User avatar

DrDuke  7y ago

Porsche is in my opinion the most capable german brand. The 911 has evolved from the bug quite well. They put a lot of effort into this car. Mainly because the customer loves them (without logical reason). They tried it first with the transaxle cars - now with the midengine. Surely the driving experience is unique. Maybe its good for hill climbing or drag racing but for track midengine is the way to go. Perhaps I can like them a bit because they developed the gearbox of my Alfa 90 (same for 75). Altough its not a very fast gearbox. :)