Image of McLaren 765LT

McLaren 765LT specs

Price in US $363,500 - $429,190
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1339-1409 kg (2952-3106 lbs)
Introduced 2020
Origin country United Kingdom
Views 25.6k
Submitted by fakekillerfour

Acceleration

0 - 100 kph2.8 s
0 - 200 kph7.0 s
0 - 300 kph18.0 s
100 m4.6 s @ 147.1 kph
100 - 200 kph4.3 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph10.6 s
0 - 30 mph1.4 s
0 - 40 mph1.9 s
0 - 50 mph2.3 s
0 - 60 mph2.7 s
0 - 100 mph5.1 s
0 - 120 mph6.6 s
1/8 mile6.5 s @ 117.3 mph
1/4 mile9.9 s @ 146.2 mph
1/2 mile15.6 s @ 174.0 mph
McLaren 765LT acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed330 kph (205 mph)
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 09.1 s @ 636 ft
Est. max acceleration0.93 g (9 m/s²)
Lateral acceleration1.18 g (12 m/s²)
100 kph - 030 m (97 ft)
200 kph - 0108 m (354 ft)

Powertrain specs

Engine type V8 Twin Turbo
Displacement 4.0 l (244 ci)
Power 765 ps (755 bhp / 563 kw)
Torque 800 Nm (590 lb-ft)
Power / liter 191 ps (189 hp)
Power / weight 559 ps (552 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 585 Nm (431 lb-ft) / t
Transmission 7 speed dual clutch automatic
Layout middle engine, rear wheel drive
User avatar
User avatar

Fred  6d ago

so i own a 765LT and got the following results with GPS device (tires 50 degrees C, outside temperature 26 degrees C). 0-100: 2.52, 100-200: 3.89. I never tested 200-300. If you go faster than 300km/h it accelerates slower than my 720s because of downforce and the different gearing ratio. So bottom-line: 0-200 and even 0-300 nothing comes close in this price segment other than electric cars (Tesla Plaid) or Ferrari SF90)

 

User avatar

ChironSS  6d ago

So your 0-200km/h= 2.52+3.89= 6.41 seconds? The quickest I can recall was above that and on a prepared surface.

Please upload GPS slip, I'd Love to see it.


User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago

1) 3,051 lbs*
2) 855hp corrected for transmission losses

Equals> 1383.91 kilograms converted equals>

617.81hp/tonne!

Based on Dragtimes independent weighing and dyno testing. Any issues contact HIM.

In its class, NOTHING touches it. And you've got to ABOVE its class to push those numbers. And it beats cars there too! And I'm very sure it'll (one day soon) show it above 150MPH verified.

Criminally underated.


User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago

OK this has been bugging me last couple of days. No genuine 0-300 km/h times are published. I've hear things or more correctly read things of verifications but nothing.

So I've run some calculations on Brooks 15.62 seconds to 174.02MPH.

The difference between 174.02 and 186 is 6.65%.

Just because and to factor in correction I raised this to 9% as it can't be purely mathematical.

So X's that by 15.62 seconds and you get= 17.0258 seconds 0-300km/h.

That's theoretically possible. And the McLaren 720S is proof of concept.

 

User avatar

196ss  1w ago

Tuned 765LT from the video below had 1/2 mile at 15.26@178,18 mph and 186 mph in 17,7 seconds in the same run.
So 15,62@174,02 can not be consistent with 186 mph in 17,0 seconds. More like 18,5.


User avatar

Lambolover  1w ago @196ss

A downpipe alone won't make an 18-19 sec time to a 17 sec time


User avatar

196ss  1w ago @Lambolover

May be.
I'm just clarifying that 15.62@174 doesn't adds up with 0-186 in 17.0 seconds.

BTW, that 765 had optional audio and air conditioning, so additional power partially compensated by additional weight)


User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago @196ss

"18.5" seconds is McLaren 720S territory. And that's proven. Anyway I've seen slips for a McLaren 765LT across multiple speed ranges.

I already knew what it was capable of. Just have to tie a few loose ends up and with permission granted, I'll prove it. :)


User avatar

196ss  1w ago @ChironSS

You can try it from the other side.
174 mph is 280 km/h. The SF90 accelerates after 200 about as fast and 280-300 for the SF90 is 3.1 seconds (from the QR test).
It turns out 0-300 km/h - 15.6+3.1=18.7.


User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago @196ss

I've seen apparent verifications for 200-300km/h at under 10 seconds. In fact 9.62 seconds. And the McLaren 765LT also does 0-200km/h in under 7 seconds.

The 765LT actually has a superior power to weight ratio than the Ferrari SF90.

I think on the right day with the right driver 17.XX seconds is a forgone conclusion. In fact some of the owners think it's possible to go quicker.


User avatar

SpeedKing  1w ago @196ss

To answer the question as to what a 765LT can do from 0-300km/h this video will help. 100-200 4.16 sec 200-300 10.47sec and we know that the 765LT does 0-100 in 3.1/3.2 sec without roll-out so it should be able to do 17.7 sec 0-300km/h on the street.

 


User avatar

196ss  1w ago @ChironSS

So far the best tested 200-300 for SF90 is 10,17 seconds. Looking at specifications we can suppose, that 765LT potentially could be a few tenths faster, but that assumpsion still needs confirmation.
Could you give a source for the 9,62 number?


User avatar

ChironSS  6d ago @196ss

I will in due course, ofcourse reveal the source. Hopefully even upload the slip.


User avatar

ChironSS  6d ago @SpeedKing

I remember him and that video. I'll definitely watch it again but I know people were stating no evidence was shown. He's obviously using Dragy but especially for 200-300km/h he should have provided them. Probably why he turned his comments off!


User avatar

196ss  6d ago @ChironSS

In addition, we don't know if there was a slight downhill or a tailwind.
I hope we will see some 0-300 tests from magazines.


User avatar

ChironSS  6d ago @196ss

Exactly. I think we should leave this one for awhile. Otherwise you can get obsessed! LOL!


User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago

So, about that "racing". Er, the Mclaren was taken to GAPPLEBEES. Sobs!


User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago

An absolute BANGER of an episode, let's trust it goes the right way! Oo


User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago

 

 

User avatar

MurderedOutAMG  1w ago

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.


User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago @MurderedOutAMG

You realise Mclaren make hybrid cars yes? WTF.


User avatar

Freakz  3w ago

765LT vs 600LT vs 911 Turbo S (992) Drag Race:

 


User avatar

ChironSS  1m ago

Time stamp 10 minutes 52 seconds. VBox GPS recorded proof of 1/2 mile in 15.62 seconds at 174.02MPH.

Unbelievable...


User avatar

ChironSS  1m ago

 


User avatar

Lambolover  4m ago

 

765LT 1/4 mile and 1/2 mile runs at the recent Unlim500 event

 

User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago

For a minute I thought that black Audi was going to beat the McLaren 765LT. The Ferrari F8 TRASHED it!

Unforgettable. For the WRONG reasons!


User avatar

Lambolover  4m ago

 

0-100 km/h 2.94 secs
100-200 4.08 secs
1/4 mile 9.83 secs at 239.84 km/h
1/2 mile 15.26 secs at 286.76 km/h
21:00 for launch 21:36 for all of the results
Can you put these numbers as the new numbers?


User avatar

Freakz  5m ago

765LT vs P1 Drag and Roll Races:

 


User avatar

Lambolover  6m ago

765LT Laguna Seca 1:27.904

 


User avatar

Austin  6m ago

Why aren't the times updated based on the 9.3sec 1/4 drag times accomplished.


User avatar

Mcnuggets 765  7m ago

765lt 10.4 on prepped dragstrip ahahah
https://youtu.be/MDixEtM3sR8


User avatar

MSO7XX!  7m ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYd4ELtGOto&t=3s

Sebastian Vittel comments:

SPEC OF EACH CAR:
GT2 RS: 100% stock GT2 RS MR (manthey Racing) with 50% used Michelin sport cup 2 n2 (not R) non magnesium wheel and nurburgring setup.
Fuel tank full
BEST LAP of the day (TONS OF TRAFFIC!): 2MIN16.437

MCLAREN 765LT: 100% stock car, 50% used Pirelli Trofeo R, fuel tank?
BEST LAP of the day (TONS OF TRAFFIC!): 2min10.500

In perfect condition, same driver and both cars with new tires (cup2 R for the gt2 and Trofeo on the 765) we can expect an optimal laptime:
GT2: 2MIN11.5X
765LT: 2MIN08.9X
So absolutely no comparison, the Mclaren is on a different league!!

The mclaren 765lt after i seen the gebhardt sport auto test on Hockenheimring i were very disappointed of the result because i thought that the 765 should feel like 918syder/gt2rs, then Senna/765lt, but when you look at the laptime it is not close like gt2 rs/918 spyder, or even in that particular case where the gt2 is faster than 918!

But when i jumped into the car of Yann, WTF it is something completely crazy fast and that make clearly one new benchmark in the gt segment

Sport Auto is a shady magazine for sure as hell, if we're talking anything besides their boring domestic brands.


User avatar

Lambolover  8m ago

 


User avatar

Mcnuggets 765  8m ago

Just kidding i don't have an identity crisis, going to McDonald's now, anybody want a Mcflurry or Mcnuggets?


User avatar

Mcnuggets 765  8m ago

Looks like im having an Identity crisis. Ive just realised im full of bs


User avatar

Lol  8m ago

765lt does to the 720s what the 992 does to a huracan https://youtu.be/64q_JRdnHYI


User avatar

Ion  8m ago

765 on track is so slow ... Slower than a 2018 car likes GT2 RS and 488 pista


User avatar

Lambolover  8m ago

 

9.3 on stock tires


User avatar

Lambolover  8m ago

 

850hp GTR vs 765LT


User avatar

Sf90 or bust  8m ago

Mcnuggets fans are punching the air right now, sf90 is king of the street


User avatar

Mcnuggets 765  8m ago

Mcnuggets 765 slower on track than a gt2 rs.... embarrassing
https://youtu.be/nofi9FxpEPg


User avatar

Anonymous  8m ago

Post content redacted by Advanced BS Detector (ABSD)™


User avatar

McChicken 765lt  9m ago

Mcnuggets 765lt at almost 900hp is not that impressive, 9.8 quarter mile on the street, worse lap times than other cars....


User avatar

Lambolover  9m ago

Here you go boys
769 hp to the wheels

 


User avatar

Javeon hills  9m ago

So 765LT makes 747 whp STOCK
so its estimated 765LT has 11% drivetrain loss
so 747x1.11
765LT makes 829 hp

Photo of McLaren 765LT

Photo of McLaren 765LT

Photo of McLaren 765LT

Photo of McLaren 765LT

Photo of McLaren 765LT

Photo of McLaren 765LT

Photo of McLaren 765LT

Photo of McLaren 765LT

Photo of McLaren 765LT

Photo of McLaren 765LT